Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 4637–4644 | Cite as

Effects of dietary inclusion level of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes on broiler chickens immunity response

  • Alireza SeidaviEmail author
  • Mohammad Dadashbeiki
  • Mohammad-Hossein Alimohammadi-Saraei
  • René van den Hoven
  • Rita Payan-Carreira
  • Vito Laudadio
  • Vincenzo TufarelliEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

The current study was conducted to analyse the effect of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes (Probio Enzyme, XVET GmbH, Germany) on the immune response and weight of central lymphoid organs and liver in broilers. A total of 270 male chickens were randomly divided into nine groups, with three replicates of 10 birds each. Treatment groups were fed for either 22 or 42 days with different levels of Probio Enzyme 250, 500, 750 and 1000 g/ton, whereas the control group fed a basal diet without Probio Enzyme. To analyse the effects of dietary supplementation on broilers humoral immune response, the antibodies titres for avian influenza (AI) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and to the sheep red blood cells (SRBC) challenge were assayed in birds from each experimental unit, along with the assessment of the weight of the main lymphoid organs and liver. The addition of the Probio Enzyme mixture did not significantly affect the titres of the antibodies against AI and NDV at day 42, despite the wide individual variation observed specially on the antibody titres at day 33. Treatments affected the production of IgG after the second challenge with SRBC (P = 0.003), which was transposed to the correspondent total Ig titres (P = 0.044). Conversely, a lower birds’ body weight (BW) was found in the majority of treated groups compared to control (P = 0.031). The spleen was the only lymphoid organ showing differences in the absolute and relative weight (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). No differences were found in thymus and Bursa of Fabricius weights. In conclusion, broilers treated with Probio Enzyme showed a satisfactory immune response compared with control, despite the wide variation found after the first vaccine challenge against AI. Moreover, the probiotic mixture dose and duration modulated differently the immune response and the spleen weight, unaffecting the central lymphoid organs weight.

Keywords

Probiotics Enzyme Immunity Antibody Broiler 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support by Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University is gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethic rules

The procedures have been approved by authors’ Institutional Ethics Committee, and care was taken to minimize the number of animals used.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Böhm J (2009) Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 88(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai SP, Wu AM, Ding XM, Lei Y, Bai J, Zhang KY, Chio JS (2013) Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 92(3):663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen WL, Liang JB, Jahromi MF, Abdullah N, Ho YW, Tufarelli V (2014) Enzyme treatment enhances release of prebiotic oligosaccharides from palm kernel expeller. Bioresources 10:196–209Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham CH (1971) Virologia Practica, 6th edn. Zaragoza, Acribia, p. 260Google Scholar
  5. Gaggìa F, Mattarelli P, Biavati B (2010) Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. Int J Food Microbiol 141:S15–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guarner F, Malagelada JR (2003) Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 361(9356):512–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Sanei B, Parvizi P, Gisavi H, Chambers JR, Sharif S (2005) Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12(12):1387–1392Google Scholar
  8. Jahromi MF, Altaher YW, Shokryazdan P, Ebrahimi R, Ebrahimi M, Idrus Z, Goh YM, Tufarelli V, Liang JB (2016) Dietary supplementation of a mixture of lactobacillus strains enhances performance of broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions. Int J Biometeorol 60:1099–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S (2000) Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with lactobacillus cultures. Poult Sci 79(6):886–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. John, J. L. (1994). The avian spleen: a neglected organ. Q Rev Biol 327–351Google Scholar
  11. Kabir SL, Rahman MM, Rahman MB, Rahman MM, Ahmed SU (2004) The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Int J Poult Sci 3(5):361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kabir SM (2009) The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. Int J Mol Sci 10(8):3531–3546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khaksefidi A, Ghoorchi T (2006) Effect of probiotic on performance and immunocompetence in broiler chicks. J Poult Sci 43(3):296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee KW, Lee SH, Lillehoj HS, Li GX, Jang SI, Babu US, Park MS, Kim DK, Lillehoj EP, Neumann AP, Rehberger TG, Siragusa GR (2010) Effects of direct-fed microbials on growth performance, gut morphometry, and immune characteristics in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 89(2):203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macpherson AJ, Harris NL (2004) Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4(6):478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Midilli M, Alp M, Kocabağli N, Muğlalı ÖH, Turan N, Yılmaz H, Çakır S (2008) Effects of dietary probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on growth performance and serum IgG concentration of broilers. S Afr J Anim Sci 38:21–27Google Scholar
  17. Naseem S, Rahman SU, Shafee M, Sheikh AA, Khan A (2012) Immunomodulatory and growth-promoting effect of a probiotic supplemented in the feed of broiler chicks vaccinated against infectious bursal disease. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 14(2):109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pourhossein Z, Qotbi AAA, Seidavi AR, Laudadio V, Centoducati G, Tufarelli V (2015) Effect of different levels of dietary sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peel extract on humoral immune system responses in broiler chickens. Anim Sci J 86(1):105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rezaei S, Jahromi MF, Liang JB, Zulkifli I, Farjam AS, Laudadio V, Tufarelli V (2015) Effect of oligosaccharides extract from palm kernel expeller on growth performance, gut microbiota and immune response in broiler chickens. Poul Sci 94:2414–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sadeghi AA, Shawrang P, Shakorzadeh S (2015) Immune response of salmonella challenged broiler chickens fed diets containing Gallipro®, a Bacillus subtilis probiotic. Probiotics and antimicrobial. Proteins 7(1):24–30Google Scholar
  21. SPSS (1997) SPSS Base 7.5 for windows. SPSS, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Stringfellow K, Caldwell D, Lee J, Mohnl M, Beltran R, Schatzmayr G, Fitz-Coy S, Broussard C, Farnell M (2011) Evaluation of probiotic administration on the immune response of coccidiosis-vaccinated broilers. Poult Sci 90(8):1652–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Talebi A, Amirzadeh B, Mokhtari B, Gahri H (2008) Effects of a multi-strain probiotic (PrimaLac) on performance and antibody responses to Newcastle disease virus and infectious bursal disease virus vaccination in broiler chickens. Avian Pathology 37(5):509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang Y, Gu Q (2010) Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers. Res Vet Sci 89(2):163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Y, Iji PA, Choct M (2009) Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World’s Poul Sci J 65(01):97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhan X, Zeng X, Zhou L, Cao G, Chen A, Yang C (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 7:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alireza Seidavi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammad Dadashbeiki
    • 2
  • Mohammad-Hossein Alimohammadi-Saraei
    • 1
  • René van den Hoven
    • 3
  • Rita Payan-Carreira
    • 4
    • 5
  • Vito Laudadio
    • 6
  • Vincenzo Tufarelli
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Animal Science, Rasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityRashtIran
  2. 2.Department of Veterinary Science, Rasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityRashtIran
  3. 3.Institute of Animal NutritionVeterinary University of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Department of ZootechnicsUniversidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  5. 5.Animal and Veterinary Research Centre - CECAVVila RealPortugal
  6. 6.Department of DETO, Section of Veterinary Science and Animal ProductionUniversity of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’ValenzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations