Effects of dietary inclusion level of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes on broiler chickens immunity response
- 510 Downloads
The current study was conducted to analyse the effect of a mixture of probiotic cultures and enzymes (Probio Enzyme, XVET GmbH, Germany) on the immune response and weight of central lymphoid organs and liver in broilers. A total of 270 male chickens were randomly divided into nine groups, with three replicates of 10 birds each. Treatment groups were fed for either 22 or 42 days with different levels of Probio Enzyme 250, 500, 750 and 1000 g/ton, whereas the control group fed a basal diet without Probio Enzyme. To analyse the effects of dietary supplementation on broilers humoral immune response, the antibodies titres for avian influenza (AI) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) and to the sheep red blood cells (SRBC) challenge were assayed in birds from each experimental unit, along with the assessment of the weight of the main lymphoid organs and liver. The addition of the Probio Enzyme mixture did not significantly affect the titres of the antibodies against AI and NDV at day 42, despite the wide individual variation observed specially on the antibody titres at day 33. Treatments affected the production of IgG after the second challenge with SRBC (P = 0.003), which was transposed to the correspondent total Ig titres (P = 0.044). Conversely, a lower birds’ body weight (BW) was found in the majority of treated groups compared to control (P = 0.031). The spleen was the only lymphoid organ showing differences in the absolute and relative weight (P = 0.003 and P = 0.001, respectively). No differences were found in thymus and Bursa of Fabricius weights. In conclusion, broilers treated with Probio Enzyme showed a satisfactory immune response compared with control, despite the wide variation found after the first vaccine challenge against AI. Moreover, the probiotic mixture dose and duration modulated differently the immune response and the spleen weight, unaffecting the central lymphoid organs weight.
KeywordsProbiotics Enzyme Immunity Antibody Broiler
Financial support by Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University is gratefully acknowledged.
Compliance with ethical standards
The procedures have been approved by authors’ Institutional Ethics Committee, and care was taken to minimize the number of animals used.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Chen WL, Liang JB, Jahromi MF, Abdullah N, Ho YW, Tufarelli V (2014) Enzyme treatment enhances release of prebiotic oligosaccharides from palm kernel expeller. Bioresources 10:196–209Google Scholar
- Cunningham CH (1971) Virologia Practica, 6th edn. Zaragoza, Acribia, p. 260Google Scholar
- Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Sanei B, Parvizi P, Gisavi H, Chambers JR, Sharif S (2005) Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12(12):1387–1392Google Scholar
- Jahromi MF, Altaher YW, Shokryazdan P, Ebrahimi R, Ebrahimi M, Idrus Z, Goh YM, Tufarelli V, Liang JB (2016) Dietary supplementation of a mixture of lactobacillus strains enhances performance of broiler chickens raised under heat stress conditions. Int J Biometeorol 60:1099–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- John, J. L. (1994). The avian spleen: a neglected organ. Q Rev Biol 327–351Google Scholar
- Midilli M, Alp M, Kocabağli N, Muğlalı ÖH, Turan N, Yılmaz H, Çakır S (2008) Effects of dietary probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on growth performance and serum IgG concentration of broilers. S Afr J Anim Sci 38:21–27Google Scholar
- Sadeghi AA, Shawrang P, Shakorzadeh S (2015) Immune response of salmonella challenged broiler chickens fed diets containing Gallipro®, a Bacillus subtilis probiotic. Probiotics and antimicrobial. Proteins 7(1):24–30Google Scholar
- SPSS (1997) SPSS Base 7.5 for windows. SPSS, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhan X, Zeng X, Zhou L, Cao G, Chen A, Yang C (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune response, intestinal barrier function, and digestive enzyme activity in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 7:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar