Microplastics affect assimilation efficiency in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum
An important issue in assessing microplastics is whether this newly emerging type of pollution affects freshwater invertebrates. This study was designed to examine the interactions between the amphipod Gammarus fossarum and two types of microplastics. To determine the ingestion and egestion of polyamide (PA) fibres (500 × 20 μm), amphipods were exposed to four concentrations (100, 540, 2680, 13,380 PA fibres cm−2 base area of glass beakers) and four exposure times (0.5, 2, 8, 32 h) as well as four post-exposure times (1, 2, 4, 16 h). We demonstrate a positive correlation between concentration and ingestion of PA fibres. Fibres were found in the gut after 0.5 h of exposure. Egestion was rapid and the digestive tract was empty 16 h after exposure ended. To investigate whether polystyrene (PS) beads (1.6 μm) can be taken up in the epithelial cells of the gut and the midgut glands, four concentrations (500, 2500, 12,500, 60,000 PS beads mL−1) were tested. Cryosections exhibited fluorescent PS beads only within the gut lumen. In a 28-day feeding experiment with both, fibres and beads, we studied the amphipod’s feeding rate, assimilation efficiency and wet weight change. The exposure to PA fibres (2680 PA fibres cm−2 base area of glass beakers) significantly reduced the assimilation efficiency of the animals. While both tested polymer types are ingested and egested, PA fibres can impair the health and ecological functions of freshwater amphipods under continuous exposure.
KeywordsMicroplastics Ingestion Limnology Amphipod Gammarus fossarum Assimilation Freshwater toxicology Feeding
- Au SY, Bruce TF, Bridges WC, Klaine SJ (2015) Responses of Hyalella azteca to acute and chronic microplastic exposures. Environ Toxicol Chem 9999:1–9. doi: 10.1002/etc.3093
- Browne MA, Underwood AJ, Chapman MG, et al (2015) Linking effects of anthropogenic debris to ecological impacts. Proc Biol Sci 282:20142929. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2929Google Scholar
- Chapman JW (2007) Amphipoda. In: Carlton JT (ed) The light and Smith manual: intertidal invertebrates from Central California to Oregon, 4th edn. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 545–618Google Scholar
- GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/UNIDO/WMO/IAEA/UN/UNEP/UNDP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) (2015) Sources, fate & effects of microplastics in the marine environment—a global assessment. In: Kershaw P (ed) Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 90. London, pp 1–96Google Scholar
- Haley CJ (1997) Comparisons of secondary production, life history, and mouthpart functional morphology between two populations of the amphipod Gammarus minus. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Maltby L (1994) Stress, shredders and streams: using Gammarus energetics to assess water quality. In: Sutcliffe DW (ed) Water quality and stress indicators in marine and freshwater ecosystems: linking levels of organisation (individuals, populations, communities). Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria, pp. 98–110Google Scholar
- PlasticsEurope (2015) Plastics - the facts 2014/2015: an analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. http://www.plasticseurope.org/Document/plastics-the-facts-20142015.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/.
- Rasch B, Friese M, Hofmann W, Naumann E (2006) Varianzanalyse mit Messwiederholung. In: Quantitative Methoden Band 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–141Google Scholar
- Storch V, Burkhardt P (1984) Influence of nutritional stress on the hepatopancreas of Talitrus saltator (Peracarida, Amphipoda). Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 38:65–73Google Scholar
- Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, et al (2004) Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science (80- ) 304:838. doi:10.1126/science.1094559
- UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) UNEP yearbook emerging issues in our global environment 2011. United Nations Environment Programme, NairobiGoogle Scholar