Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 20, pp 21008–21019 | Cite as

Critical nutrient thresholds needed to control eutrophication and synergistic interactions between phosphorus and different nitrogen sources

  • Qinghui Zeng
  • Lihuan Qin
  • Linlin Bao
  • Yayong Li
  • Xuyong LiEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Eutrophication is one of the greatest threats to global freshwater ecosystems. The phytoplankton responses to nutrient inputs vary in different water bodies, so it is particularly important to determine the nutrient thresholds and synergistic interactions between nutrients in different freshwater ecosystems. Field sampling and bioassay experiments were conducted to determine the thresholds of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N) in Miyun Reservoir. A separate nutrient addition bioassay was designed to assess the synergistic interactions between these nutrients. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations were used to estimate phytoplankton biomass. The results showed the following: (1) nutrient threshold bioassay indicated that eutrophication thresholds of SRP, NO3-N, and NH4-N should be targeted at below 0.04 mg P L−1, 0.5 mg N L−1, and 0.3 mg N L−1, respectively, to limit the growth of phytoplankton. (2) The stimulatory effect of “NH4-N plus P” on phytoplankton biomass was greater than “NO3-N plus P” at the same N concentration, and “NH4-N plus NO3-N” did not show such associated stimulatory effect as “NH4-N plus P” or “NO3-N plus P”. (3) The average concentrations of total phosphorus (TP), NO3-N, and NH4-N in Miyun Reservior were 0.017 mg P L−1, 0.620 mg N L−1, and 0.143 mg N L−1, respectively. The reservoir-wide average Chl a is below 20 μg L−1 on an annual basis. (4) Ammonium was an important factor for the growth of phytoplankton and inputs of both NH4-N and NO3-N should be reduced to control bloom formation. Our findings imply that although P load reduction is important, appropriate reductions of all forms of N in watershed is recommended in the nutrient management strategy for Miyun Reservoir.

Keywords

Nutrient threshold Synergistic interaction Multiple nutrient limitations Ammonium Eutrophication Bioassays 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment in China (2014ZX07203010), the Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZZD-EW-10-02) and Comprehensive Demonstration Construction of Key Technology of Ecological Security in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration (2016YFC0503007).

Supplementary material

11356_2016_7321_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1059 kb)

References

  1. Ahlgren I, Sörensson F, Waara T, Vrede K (1994) Nitrogen budgets in relation to microbial transformations in lakes. Ambio 23Google Scholar
  2. Baldia S, Evangelista A, Aralar E, Santiago A (2007) Nitrogen and phosphorus utilization in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa isolated from Laguna de Bay, Philippines. J Appl Phycol 19:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloesch J, Stadelmann P, Bührer H (1977) Primary production, mineralization, and sedimentation in the euphotic zone of two Swiss lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:511–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boers PC (1991) The influence of pH on phosphate release from lake sediments. Water Res 25:309–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaffin JD, Bridgeman TB (2014) Organic and inorganic nitrogen utilization by nitrogen-stressed cyanobacteria during bloom conditions. J Appl Phycol 26:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaffin JD, Bridgeman TB, Bade DL, Mobilian CN (2014) Summer phytoplankton nutrient limitation in Maumee Bay of Lake Erie during high-flow and low-flow years. J Great Lakes Res 40:524–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Vries PJ, Klapwijk SP (1987) Bioassays using Stigeoclonium tenue Kütz. and Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Bréb. as testorganisms; a comparative study. Hydrobiologia 153:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dokulil MT, Teubner K (2000) Cyanobacterial dominance in lakes. Hydrobiologia 438:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domingues RB, Barbosa AB, Sommer U, Galvão HM (2011) Ammonium, nitrate and phytoplankton interactions in a freshwater tidal estuarine zone: potential effects of cultural eutrophication. Aquat Sci 73:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donald DB, Bogard MJ, Finlay K, Bunting L, Leavitt PR (2013) Phytoplankton-specific response to enrichment of phosphorus-rich surface waters with ammonium, nitrate, and urea. PLoS One 8:e53277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donald DB, Bogard MJ, Finlay K, Leavitt PR (2011) Comparative effects of urea, ammonium, and nitrate on phytoplankton abundance, community composition, and toxicity in hypereutrophic freshwaters. Limnol Oceanogr 56:2161–2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Droop M (1974) The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 54:825–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elser JJ et al (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao G, Gao X, Qin B (2000) Experimental study on the PO4 3−-P threshold of the alkaline phosphatase activity in Taihu lake. J Lake Sci 12:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao G, Zhu G, Qin B, Chen J, Wang K (2006) Alkaline phosphatase activity and the phosphorus mineralization rate of Lake Taihu. Sci China Series D 49:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner WS, Chandler JF, Laird GA (1989) Organic nitrogen mineralization and substrate limitation of bacteria in Lake Michigan. Limnol Oceanogr 34:478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner WS, Lavrentyev PJ, Cavaletto JF, McCarthy MJ, Eadie BJ, Johengen TH, Cotner JB (2004) Distribution and dynamics of nitrogen and microbial plankton in southern Lake Michigan during spring transition 1999–2000. J Geophys Res Oceans 1978–2012:109Google Scholar
  18. Groffman PM et al (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gu B, Alexander V (1993) Dissolved nitrogen uptake by a cyanobacterial bloom (Anabaena flos-aquae) in a subarctic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:422–430Google Scholar
  20. Halemejko GZ, Chrost RJ (1984) The role of phosphatases in phosphorus mineralization during decomposition of lake phytoplankton blooms. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Stuttgart 101:489–502Google Scholar
  21. Harpole WS et al (2011) Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities. Ecol Lett 14:852–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Healey F (1980) Slope of the Monod equation as an indicator of advantage in nutrient competition. Microb Ecol 5:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hecky R, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:796–822Google Scholar
  24. Holdren GC, Armstrong DE (1980) Factors affecting phosphorus release from intact lake sediment cores. Environ Sci Technol 14:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu H, Wei Y (2006) Freshwater Algae in China—system, classification and ecology. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Huang X, Chen W, Cai Q (2000) Survey, observation and analysis of lake ecosystem. China Standards Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Kagami M, Hirose Y, Ogura H (2013) Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Inba, Japan. Limnology 14:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim C, Nishimura Y, Nagata T (2006) Role of dissolved organic matter in hypolimnetic mineralization of carbon and nitrogen in a large, monomictic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 51:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolzau S, Wiedner C, Rücker J, Köhler J, Köhler A, Dolman AM (2014) Seasonal patterns of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation in four German lakes and the predictability of limitation status from ambient nutrient concentrations. PLoS One 9:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis WM Jr, Wurtsbaugh WA, Paerl HW (2011) Rationale for control of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus to reduce eutrophication of inland waters. Environ Sci Technol 45:10300–10305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis WM, Wurtsbaugh WA (2008) Control of lacustrine phytoplankton by nutrients: erosion of the phosphorus paradigm. Int Rev Hydrobiol 93:446–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller S, Mitrovic SM (2015) Phytoplankton co-limitation by nitrogen and phosphorus in a shallow reservoir: progressing from the phosphorus limitation paradigm. Hydrobiologia 744:255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma J et al (2015a) Green algal over cyanobacterial dominance promoted with nitrogen and phosphorus additions in a mesocosm study at Lake Taihu, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:5041–5049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma J, Qin B, Wu P, Zhou J, Niu C, Deng J, Niu H (2015b) Controlling cyanobacterial blooms by managing nutrient ratio and limitation in a large hyper-eutrophic lake: Lake Taihu, China. J Environ Sci 27:80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monod J (1950) Theory and applications of continuous culture technique. Ann Inst Pasteur Paris 79:390–410Google Scholar
  36. North R, Guildford S, Smith R, Havens S, Twiss M (2007) Evidence for phosphorus, nitrogen, and iron colimitation of phytoplankton communities in Lake Erie. Limnol Oceanogr 52:315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. North RL et al (2015) Evidence for internal phosphorus loading in a large prairie reservoir (Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan). J Great Lakes Res 41:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ohashi Y et al (2011) Regulation of nitrate assimilation in cyanobacteria. J Exp Bot 62:1411–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pápista É, Ács É, Böddi B (2002) Chlorophyll-a determination with ethanol—a critical test. Hydrobiologia 485:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paerl HW (2009) Controlling eutrophication along the freshwater–marine continuum: dual nutrient (N and P) reductions are essential. Estuar Coasts 32:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paerl HW, Fulton RS, Moisander PH, Dyble J (2001) Harmful freshwater algal blooms, with an emphasis on cyanobacteria. Sci World J 1:76–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paerl HW, Gardner WS, McCarthy MJ, Peierls BL, Wilhelm SW (2014) Algal blooms: noteworthy nitrogen. Science 346:175–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paerl HW, Xu H, Hall NS, Rossignol KL, Joyner AR, Zhu G, Qin B (2015) Nutrient limitation dynamics examined on a multi-annual scale in Lake Taihu, China: implications for controlling eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. J Freshw Ecol 30:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paerl HW, Xu H, McCarthy MJ, Zhu G, Qin B, Li Y, Gardner WS (2011) Controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a hyper-eutrophic lake (Lake Taihu, China): the need for a dual nutrient (N & P) management strategy. Water Res 45:1973–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reynolds CS (2006) The ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhee G-Y (1978) Effects of N: P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake. Limnol Oceanogr 23:10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schindler DW et al (2008) Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:11254–11258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott JT, McCarthy MJ (2010) Nitrogen fixation may not balance the nitrogen pool in lakes over timescales relevant to eutrophication management. Limnol Oceanogr 55:1265–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith S (1984) Phosphorus versus nitrogen limitation in the marine environment. Limnol Oceanogr 29:1149–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith VH (2003) Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a global problem. Environ Sci Pollut Res 10:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Takamura N, Iwakuma T, Yasuno M (1987) Uptake of 13C and 15N (ammonium, nitrate and urea) by Microcystis in Lake Kasumigaura. J Plankton Res 9:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner RE, Rabalais NN (2013) Nitrogen and phosphorus phytoplankton growth limitation in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Microb Ecol 68:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. von Liebig JF, Gregory W (1842) Animal chemistry; or, Organic chemistry in its application to physiology and pathology. London, Taylor and WaltonGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang X et al (2006) Probability and threshold values for recognizing eutrophication in Lake Songhua. Acta Ecol Sin 26:3989–3997 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Wang Z, Hong J, Du G (2008) Use of satellite imagery to assess the trophic state of Miyun Reservoir, Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 155:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu H, Paerl HW, Qin B, Zhu G, Gao G (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus inputs control phytoplankton growth in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Limnol Oceanogr 55:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu H, Paerl HW, Qin B, Zhu G, Hall NS, Wu Y (2014) Determining critical nutrient thresholds needed to control harmful cyanobacterial blooms in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. Environ Sci Technol 49:1051–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu S, Wang Y, Huang B, Wei Z-B, Miao A-J, Yang L-Y (2015) Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of phytoplankton growth in different areas of Lake Taihu, China. J Freshw Ecol 30:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang L, Wang X, Wang Z, Jia D, Wu Z, Wu J (2009) Dynamic AGP modeling analysis of phosphorus threshold in eutrophication waters. Ecol Environ Sci 18:1625–1630 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  61. Zeng Q, Qin L, Li X (2015) The potential impact of an inter-basin water transfer project on nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) and chlorophyll a of the receiving water system. Sci Total Environ 536:675–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qinghui Zeng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lihuan Qin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Linlin Bao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yayong Li
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xuyong Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.College of Environment and PlanningHenan UniversityHenanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations