Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 20, pp 20835–20852

Impact of aging on leaching characteristics of recycled concrete aggregate

Research Article
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

The focus of this study was to evaluate the effects of stockpiling (aging) on leaching of elements in recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) that may contribute to tufaceous constituent formation. Speciation and leaching controlling mechanisms of these elements were identified via geochemical modeling. The effects of stockpiling were simulated by comparing freshly produced RCA with RCA aged as part of this study for 1 year both in the laboratory and in the field. Leachate samples were generated following batch water leach test (WLT) and US Geological Survey leach test (USGSLT) methods. USGSLTs were conducted both on the laboratory and field samples while WLT was only conducted on laboratory samples. During the laboratory aging, it is observed that the carbonate content of RCA, measured as calcite equivalent, increased 20 % (i.e., from ∼100 to 120 mg/g) within a year time frame. The leachate extracted from RCA showed minor changes in pH and more significant decreases in electrical conductivity (i.e., ∼300 to 100 μS/cm). A comparison between laboratory and field samples revealed that the RCA aged much slower in the field than in the laboratory within a year. Comparisons between two leach extraction methods on the laboratory conditions showed that the total leached concentrations (TLCs) of most of the constituents from USGSLT were appreciably lower than the ones measured via WLT method. The results of geochemical modeling analyses showed that Al, Si, Fe, Ca, Mg, and Cu exist in their oxidized forms as Al3+, Fe3+, Si4+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Cu2+ and results revealed that these elements are primarily controlled by the solubility of gibbsite, hematite, silica gel, calcite, magnesite, and tenorite solid phases, respectively. One of the significant findings of the study was to identify the changes in leaching behavior of Ca, Si, Mg, Al, Fe, and Cu due to carbonation.

Keywords

Recycled concrete aggregate Aging Carbonation Batch tests Mineral solubility Speciation 

References

  1. Abbas A, Fathifazl G, Fournier B, et al. (2009) Quantification of the residual mortar content in recycled concrete aggregates by image analysis. Mater Charact 60:716–728. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2009.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbarnezhad A, Ong KCG, Zhang MH, Tam CT (2013) Acid treatment technique for determining the mortar content of recycled concrete aggregates. J Test Eval 41:20120026. doi:10.1520/JTE20120026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison JD, Brown DS, Kevin J, et al (1991) MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, a geochemical assessment model for environmental systems: Version 3.0 user’s manual. Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency Athens, GAGoogle Scholar
  4. Apul DS, Gardner KH, Eighmy TT, et al. (2005) Simultaneous application of dissolution/precipitation and surface complexation/surface precipitation modeling to contaminant leaching. Environ Sci Technol 39:5736–5741. doi:10.1021/es0486521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM C127 (2012) Test method for density, relative density (Specific Gravity), and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM C128 (2012) Test method for density, relative density (Specific Gravity), and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM C702 (2011) Standard practice for reducing samples of aggregate to testing size. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM D3665 (2012) Standard practice for random sampling of construction materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM D3987 (2012) Standard test method for shake extraction of solid waste with water. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  10. ASTM D422 (2007) Test methods for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  11. ASTM D4318 (2010) Test method for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  12. ASTM D4373 (2014) Standard test method for rapid determination of carbonate content of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  13. ASTM D559 (2003) Test methods for wetting and drying compacted soil-cement mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  14. Astrup T, Dijkstra JJ, Comans RNJ, et al. (2006) Geochemical modeling of leaching from MSWI air-pollution-control residues. Environ Sci Technol 40:3551–3557. doi:10.1021/es052250r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Babushkin VI, Matveyev GM, Mchedlov-Petrossyan OP (1985) Thermodynamics of silicates. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bish DL, Post JE (1993) Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full-pattern fitting method. Am Mineral 78:932–940Google Scholar
  17. Brookins DG (1988) Eh-pH diagrams for geochemistry. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  18. Cetin B, Aydilek AH, Li L (2013) Trace metal leaching from embankment soils amended with high-carbon fly ash. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen J, Bradshaw S, Benson CH, et al (2012) pH-Dependent leaching of trace elements from recycled concrete aggregate. In: Proc., GeoCongress 2012. pp 3729–3738Google Scholar
  20. Chen J, Tinjum J, Edil T (2013) Leaching of alkaline substances and heavy metals from recycled concrete aggregate used as unbound base course. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2349:81–90. doi:10.3141/2349-10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen Q, Zhang L, Ke Y, et al. (2009) Influence of carbonation on the acid neutralization capacity of cements and cement-solidified/stabilized electroplating sludge. Chemosphere 74:758–764. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cornelis G, Johnson CA, Gerven TV, Vandecasteele C (2008) Leaching mechanisms of oxyanionic metalloid and metal species in alkaline solid wastes: a review. Appl Geochem 23:955–976. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson EA, Trumbore SE (1995) Gas diffusivity and production of CO2 in deep soils of the eastern Amazon. Tellus B 47:550–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dijkstra JJ, Meeussen JCL, Comans RNJ (2004) Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils: an experimental and modeling study. Environ Sci Technol 38:4390–4395. doi:10.1021/es049885v CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drever JI (1997) The geochemistry of natural waters: surface and groundwater environments. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  26. Edil TB, Tinjum JM, Benson CH (2012) Recycled unbound materials. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  27. Engelsen CJ, van der Sloot HA, Wibetoe G, et al. (2009) Release of major elements from recycled concrete aggregates and geochemical modelling. Cem Concr Res 39:446–459. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Engelsen CJ, Wibetoe G, van der Sloot HA, et al. (2012) Field site leaching from recycled concrete aggregates applied as sub-base material in road construction. Sci Total Environ 427–428:86–97. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fruchter JS, Rai D, Zachara JM (1990) Identification of solubility-controlling solid phases in a large fly ash field lysimeter. Environ Sci Technol 24:1173–1179. doi:10.1021/es00078a004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gitari WM, Fatoba OO, Petrik LF, Vadapalli VRK (2009) Leaching characteristics of selected South African fly ashes: effect of pH on the release of major and trace species. J Environ Sci Health Part A 44:206–220. doi:10.1080/10934520802539897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hageman PL (2007) U.S. Geological Survey field leach test for assessing water reactivity and leaching potential of mine wastes, soils, and other geologic and environmental materials.Google Scholar
  32. Hampson CJ, Bailey JE (1982) On the structure of some precipitated calcium alumino-sulphate hydrates. J Mater Sci 17:3341–3346. doi:10.1007/BF01203504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huijgen WJJ, Comans RNJ (2006) Carbonation of steel slag for CO2 sequestration: leaching of products and reaction mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 40:2790–2796. doi:10.1021/es052534b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. de Juan MS, Gutiérrez PA (2009) Study on the influence of attached mortar content on the properties of recycled concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 23:872–877. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kitamura H, Sawada T, Shimaoka T, Takahashi F (2015) Geochemically structural characteristics of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash particles and mineralogical surface conversions by chelate treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5229-5
  36. Komonweeraket K, Cetin B, Aydilek AH, et al. (2015) Effects of pH on the leaching mechanisms of elements from fly ash mixed soils. Fuel 140:788–802. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kosson DS, van der Sloot HA, Sanchez F, Garrabrants AC (2002) An integrated framework for evaluating leaching in waste management and utilization of secondary materials. Environ Eng Sci 19:159–204. doi:10.1089/109287502760079188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuo S-S, Mahgoub H, Nazef A (2002) Investigation of recycled concrete made with limestone aggregate for a base course in flexible pavement. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1787:99–108. doi:10.3141/1787-11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kurdowski W (2014) Cement and concrete chemistry. Springer Science & BusinessGoogle Scholar
  40. Lagoeiro LE (1998) Transformation of magnetite to hematite and its influence on the dissolution of iron oxide minerals. J Metamorph Geol 16:415–423. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00144.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Langmuir D (1997) Aqueous environmental geochemistry. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  42. Lawrence CD (1981) Durability of concrete: molecular transport processes and test methods. Cement and Concrete Association, [Slough, Eng.]Google Scholar
  43. Li X (2008) Recycling and reuse of waste concrete in China: part I. Material behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:36–44. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindsay WL (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. WileyGoogle Scholar
  45. Majumdar AJ, Stucke MS (1981) Microstructure of glass fibre reinforced supersulphated cement. Cem Concr Res 11:781–788. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(81)90037-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millington RJ, Shearer RC (1971) Diffusion in aggregated porous media. Soil Sci 111:372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. NADP (2012) National Atmospheric Deposition Program Annual Maps. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/ntn/annualmapsByYear.aspx#2012. Accessed 3 Nov 2013
  48. Perkins RB, Palmer CD (1999) Solubility of ettringite (Ca6[Al(OH)6]2(SO4)3 • 26H2O) at 5–75 °C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1969–1980. doi:10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00078-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Poon C-S, Qiao XC, Chan D (2006) The cause and influence of self-cementing properties of fine recycled concrete aggregates on the properties of unbound sub-base. Waste Manag 26:1166–1172. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raudsepp M, Pani E (2003) Application of Rietveld analysis to environmental mineralogy. In: Environmental aspects of mine wastes. Mineralogical Association of Canada, Québec, Canada, pp 165–180Google Scholar
  51. Roy DM (1986) Mechanisms of cement paste degradation due to chemical and physical factors. In: 8th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement. Rio de Janeiro, pp 362–380Google Scholar
  52. Sadecki RW, Busacker GP, Moxness KL, et al (1996) An investigation of water quality in runoff from stockpiles of salvaged concrete and bituminous pavingGoogle Scholar
  53. Santana GP, Fabris JD, Goulart AT, Santana DP (2001) Magnetite and its transformation to hematite in a soil derived from steatite. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 25:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scrivener KL, Füllmann T, Gallucci E, et al. (2004) Quantitative study of Portland cement hydration by X-ray diffraction/Rietveld analysis and independent methods. Cem Concr Res 34:1541–1547. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van der Sloot HA (2000) Comparison of the characteristic leaching behavior of cements using standard (EN 196-1) cement mortar and an assessment of their long-term environmental behavior in construction products during service life and recycling. Cem Concr Res 30:1079–1096. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00287-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental Soil Chemistry. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Steffes R (1999) Laboratory study of the leachate from crushed Portland cement concrete base material. Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  58. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Suzuki K, Nishikawa T, Ito S (1985) Formation and carbonation of C-S-H in water. Cem Concr Res 15:213–224. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(85)90032-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor HF (1997) Cement chemistry. Thomas TelfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Weather Underground (2013) CENTREweather Weather | Personal Weather Station: KVACENTR1 by Wunderground.com. http://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KVACENTR1#history. Accessed 3 Nov 2013
  62. Weather Underground (2015) CENTREweather Weather | Personal Weather Station: KVACENTR1 by Wunderground.com | Weather Underground. http://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=KVACENTR1#history/s20131213/e20141214/myear. Accessed 28 Jan 2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure EngineeringGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations