Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 19, pp 19580–19589 | Cite as

High-VOC biochar—effectiveness of post-treatment measures and potential health risks related to handling and storage

  • Wolfram Buss
  • Ondřej MašekEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Biochar can contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs), formed and introduced during the pyrolysis process. In some pyrolysis units or under specific conditions during production, pyrolysis vapours can deposit on biochar in significant amounts resulting in high-VOC biochar. In this study, it was tested to which extent VOCs are released from such high-VOC biochars when openly stored, which post-treatment measures are most effective in reducing phytotoxic potential and whether the VOC emissions could exceed human health-related threshold values. It was shown that the initial VOC release of high-VOC biochars can exceed occupational exposure limit values and even after 2 months, the biochars still emitted VOCs exceeding air quality guideline values. Consequently, these specific high-VOC biochars pose health risks when handled or stored openly. Simple open-air storage turned out to be insufficient for VOC removal. Low temperature treatment, on the other hand, removed VOCs from the high-VOC biochars effectively and alleviated any human health risks and phytotoxic effects. In addition to the high-VOC biochars, a low-VOC biochar was tested which did not emit any VOCs and was even able to sorb VOCs from the VOC-rich biochar to a certain extent. Thermal treatment and blending with low-VOC biochar are methods which could be used in practise to treat high-VOC biochar, reducing VOC emissions. This study revealed significant new findings on the topic of VOCs in biochar which highlights the need to include VOCs in the list of priority contaminants in biochar.

Keywords

Biochar VOC Post-treatment Human health Phytotoxicity PAH 

Abbreviations

VOC

Volatile organic compound

PAH

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

GC biochar

Gas contaminated biochar

LC biochar

Liquid contaminated biochar

NC biochar

Non-contaminated biochar

LMW

Low-molecular weight

Supplementary material

11356_2016_7112_MOESM1_ESM.docx (464 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 464 kb)

References

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ökologischer Forschungsintitute (2013) AGÖF Guidance Values for Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air. Springe-EldagsenGoogle Scholar
  2. Ausschuss zur Gesundheitlichen Bewertung von Bauprodukten (2012) Health-related evaluation procedure for volatile organic compounds emissions (VOC and SVOC) from building products. 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. Aussschuss für Gefahrstoffe (2006) TRGS 900, Technische Regeln für Gefahrstoffe. Bundesarbeitsblatt 1:41–55Google Scholar
  4. Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Buss W, et al. (2013) Hydrochar and biochar effects on germination of spring barley. J Agron Crop Sci 199:360–373. doi: 10.1111/jac.12024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown R, del Campo B, Boateng AA, et al. (2015) Chapter 3: fundamentals of biochar production. Biochar Environ. Manag. Sci. Technol. Implementation, Second Ed. Earthscan Ltd., London., pp 39–61Google Scholar
  6. Bucheli TD, Hilber I, Schmidt HP (2015) Chapter 21: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated aromatic compounds in biochar. Biochar Environ. Manag. Sci. Technol. Implementation, Second Ed. Earthscan Ltd., London., pp 595–624Google Scholar
  7. Busch D, Kammann C, Grünhage L, Müller C (2012) Simple biotoxicity tests for evaluation of carbonaceous soil additives: establishment and reproducibility of four test procedures. J Environ Qual 41:1023–1032. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss W, Mašek O (2014) Mobile organic compounds in biochar—a potential source of contamination – phytotoxic effects on cress seed (Lepidium sativum) germination. J Environ Manag 137:111–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss W, Graham MC, MacKinnon G, Mašek O (2016a) Strategies for producing biochars with minimum PAH contamination. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 119:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss W, Graham MC, Shepherd GJ, Mašek O (2016b) Suitability of marginal biomass-derived biochars for soil amendment. Sci Total Environ 547:314–322. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buss W, Mašek O, Graham M, Wüst D (2015) Inherent organic compounds in biochar–their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J Environ Manag 156:150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiang Y, Chiang P, Chang PE (2001) Effects of surface characterisitics of activated carbons on VOC adsorption. J Environ Sci 54–62.Google Scholar
  13. Deenik JL, McClellan T, Uehara G, et al. (2010) Charcoal volatile matter content influences plant growth and soil nitrogen transformations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1259–1270. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Directive 2004/42/CE of the European parliament and of the council (2004) On the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain paints and varnishes and vehicle refinishing products and amending directive 1999/13/EC. Off J Eur Union L143:87–96Google Scholar
  15. Domene X, Enders A, Hanley K, Lehmann J (2015) Ecotoxicological characterization of biochars: role of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Sci Total Environ 512-513:552–561. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elad Y, Cytryn E, Harel YM, et al. (2011) The biochar effect: plant resistance to biotic stresses. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:335–349Google Scholar
  17. EU Commission Directive 2000/39/EC (2000) Establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work. Off J Eur Communities L142:47–50. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_285/l_28520031101en00330037.pdfGoogle Scholar
  18. EU Commission Directive 2006/15/EC (2006) Establishing a second list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC and amending directives 91/322/EEC and 2000/39/EC. Off J Eur Union L 38:36–39Google Scholar
  19. EU Commission Directive 2009/161/EU (2009) Establishing a third list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC and amending Commission Directive 2000/39/EC. Off J Eur Union L338:87–89Google Scholar
  20. EU Commission Directive 91/322/ECC (1991) On establishing indicative limit values by implementing Council Directive 80/1107/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to chemical, physical and biological agents at work. Off J Eur Communities L 177:22. doi:2004R0726 - v.7 of 05.06.2013Google Scholar
  21. European Union Joint Research Centre (2013) Report No 29: harmonisation framework for health based evaluation of indoor emissions from construction products in the European Union using the EU-LCI concept.Google Scholar
  22. Gell K, van Groenigen J, Cayuela ML (2011) Residues of bioenergy production chains as soil amendments: immediate and temporal phytotoxicity. J Hazard Mater 186:2017–2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hale SE, Lehmann J, Rutherford D, et al. (2012) Quantifying the total and bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dioxins in biochars. Environ Sci Technol 46:2830–2838. doi: 10.1021/es203984k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hilber I, Blum F, Hale S, et al. (2012) Total and bioavailable PAH concentrations in biochar – a future soil improver. Geophycial Reseach Abstr. EGU Gen. Assem. 2012. p 1Google Scholar
  25. Jones DL, Quilliam RS (2014) Metal contaminated biochar and wood ash negatively affect plant growth and soil quality after land application. J Hazard Mater 276:362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeley SC, Pizzorno M (1986) Charred wood stimulated germination of two fire-following herbs of the California chaparral and the role of hemicellulose. Am J Bot 73:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kołtowski M, Oleszczuk P (2015) Toxicity of biochars after polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal by thermal treatment. Ecol Eng 75:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwapinski W, Byrne CMP, Kryachko E, et al. (2010) Biochar from biomass and waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization 1:177–189. doi: 10.1007/s12649-010-9024-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Chapter 1: Biochar for environmental managment: an introduction. Biochar Environ. Manag. Sci. Technol. Implementation, Second Ed. Earthscan Ltd., London., pp 1–13Google Scholar
  30. Li J, Li Z, Liu B, et al. (2008) Effect of relative humidity on adsorption of formaldehyde on modified activated carbons. Chin J Chem Eng 16:871–875. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60008-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oleszczuk P, Jośko I, Kuśmierz M (2013) Biochar properties regarding to contaminants content and ecotoxicological assessment. J Hazard Mater 260:375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajkovich S, Enders A, Hanley K, et al. (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biol Fertil Soils 48:271–284. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0624-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodríguez-Mirasol J, Bedia J, Cordero T, Rodríguez JJ (2005) Influence of water vapor on the adsorption of VOCs on lignin-based activated carbons. Sep Sci Technol (Philadelphia, PA, U S) 40:3113–3135. doi: 10.1080/01496390500385277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogovska N, Laird D, Cruse RM, et al. (2012) Germination tests for assessing biochar quality. J Environ Qual 41:1014–1022. doi: 10.2134/jeq2011.0103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith CR, Buzan EM, Lee JW (2013) Potential impact of biochar water-extractable substances on environmental sustainability. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:118–126. doi: 10.1021/sc300063f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sohi SP, Krull E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and Ffunction in soil. Adv. Agron. Vol. 105, 1st ed. Elsevier Inc., pp 47–82Google Scholar
  37. Spokas KA, Novak JM, Stewart CE, et al. (2011) Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere 85:869–882. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. US Department of Health and Human Services (2007) NIOSH Pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  39. Youmans HL (1972) Measurement of pH of distilled water. J Chem Educ 49:429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UK Biochar Research Centre, School of GeosciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations