Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 18, pp 18596–18608 | Cite as

Phytotoxic effects of irrigation water depending on the presence of organic and inorganic pollutants

  • Sonja Gvozdenac
  • Vojislava BursićEmail author
  • Gorica Vuković
  • Simonida Đurić
  • Carlos Gonçalves
  • Dušica Jovičić
  • Snežana Tanasković
Research Article
  • 408 Downloads

Abstract

Irrigation is one of the most important uses of surface waters in the agricultural region of Vojvodina province (Serbia). The aim of the study was to assess the quality of water from Stara Tisa meander, based on the levels of pollution with metals, volatile compounds (VOC), pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and pathogenic bacteria, on sunflower, cabbage, cucumber, maize, barley, buckwheat, sorghum, radish, beans, and white mustard. Microbiological analysis was carried out using the dilution method and phytotoxicity assay according to ISTA filter paper method (germination energy (GE), germination (G), root and shoot length, fresh and dry weight). The sample was slightly contaminated with domestic, industrial, and agricultural xenobiotics and had low levels of nitrogen substances, metals, and organic micropollutants. Pesticides, metolachlor, tebuconazole, propiconazole, imidacloprid, and thiametoxam were detected at levels exceeding the maximum admissible concentrations (MACs), i.e., the sum value for neonicotinoids. The number of saprophytic (2.27 × 106 CFU mL−1) and coliform bacteria (5.33 × 102 CFU mL−1) was very high. The total number of sulphite reducing clostridia (10 cells mL−1) and Escherichia coli (5 cells mL−1) was very low. The GE and G of all tested plants, except sunflower, were not influenced by the total chemism of water sample. However, it inhibited root lengths of sunflower, cucumber, maize, and barley and stimulated shoot lengths of all species except maize and white mustard. These results indicate that it can be used for irrigation of cabbage and radish from the chemical point of view, but the microbiological traits should be considered prior to consumption since they are consumed raw. The overall results suggest that water from Stara Tisa should be purified before using for agricultural purposes.

Keywords

Phytotoxicity Irrigation water Metals Pesticides Pathogenic bacteria Plants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is a part of project III43005, financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. The authors would also like to thank Prof. Dr. Dušanka Inđić for the support.

References

  1. Ait AN, Bernal MP, Ater M (2002) Tolerance and bioaccumulation of copper in Phragmites australis and Zea mays. Plant Soil 239:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Harbi M, Al-Ruwaih FM, Alsulaili A (2013) Statistical and analytical evaluation of groundwater quality in Al-Rawdhatain field. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33(3):895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. An YJ (2004) Soil ecotoxicity assessment using cadmium sensitive plants. Environ Pollut 127:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eaton AD (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington, D. C., USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Antić N, Radišić M, Radović T, Vasiljević T, Grujić S, Petković A, Dimkić M, Laušević M (2015) Pesticide residues in the Danube River basin in Serbia—a survey in 2009–2011, CLEAN–Soil, Air. Water 43(2):197–204Google Scholar
  6. Angelopoulos K, Paraskeva CA, Emmanouil C (2010) Phytotoxicity of olive mill wastewater fractions and their potential use as a selective herbicide In: Protection2010. www.srcosmos.gr/srcosmos/showpub.aspx?aa = 14674
  7. Ankley GT, Benoit DA, Hoke RA, Leonard EN, West CW, Phipps GL, Mattson VR, Anderson LA (1993) Development and evaluation of test methods for benthic invertebrates and sediments: effects of flow rate and feeding on water quality and exposure conditions. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25(1):12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2005) Abiotic stresses plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. New York Food Products Press 725Google Scholar
  9. Ashraf MA, Maah MJ, Yusoff I, Mehmood K (2010) Effects of polluted water irrigation on environment and health of people in Jamber, District Kasur, Pakistan. Int J Basic Appl Sci IJBAS-IJENS 10(03):31–48Google Scholar
  10. Bakopoulou S, Emmanouil C, Kungolos A (2011) Assessment of wastewater effluent quality in Thessaly region, Greece, for determining its irrigation reuse potential. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74(2):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beckers L, Hiligsmann S, Hamilton CH, Masset J, Thonart P (2010) Fermentative hydrogen production by Clostridium butyricum CWBI1009 and Citrobacter freundii CWBI952 in pure and mixed cultures. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 14(S2):541–548Google Scholar
  12. Bursić V, Gvozdenac S, Vuković G, Cara M, Pucarević M, Lazić S, Vuković S, Zeremski T, Inđić D (2013) Comparative study of pesticide residue levels in water from irrigation canal with LC–MS/MS and biological methods, 3rd International Conference of Ecosystems, May 31st - June 5th 2013. Tirana, Albania, Proceeding book, 870–874Google Scholar
  13. Careghini A, Mastorgio A, Romele L, Saponaro S, Sezenna E (2015) Bisphenol a and nonylphenol transfer to vegetables cultivated on contaminated soil, 14th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, 3–5th September 2015, Rhodes, Greece, Proceedings, 94–101Google Scholar
  14. Casa RD, Annibale F, Pieruccetti SR, Stazi G, Giovannozzi Sermanni B, Cascio L (2003) Reduction of the phenolic components in olive-mill waste water by an enzymatic treatment and its impact on durum wheat (Tricum durum Desf.) germinability. Chemosphere 50:959–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chagnon M, Kreutzweiser D, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Van der Sluijs JP (2015) Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chigor VN, Sibanda T, Okoh AI (2013) Studies on the bacteriological qualities of the Buffalo River and three source water dams along its course in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:4125–4136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Commission Implementing Decision 495/2015/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2015. Official Journal of the European Communities L78/40, 24nd March 2015Google Scholar
  18. D’Aquino L, Concetta de Pinto M, Nardi L, Morgana M, Tommasi F (2009) Effect of some light rare earth elements on seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidant metabolism in Triticum durum. Chemosphere 75:900–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008. Official Journal of the European Communities L348/84, 24nd December 2008Google Scholar
  20. Doyle MP, Erickson MC (2008) The problems with fresh produce: an overview. J Appl Microbiol 105:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EFSA (2014) Panel on biological hazards (BIOHAZ): scientific opinion on the risk posed by pathogens in food of non-animal origin. Part 2 (Salmonella and Norovirus in leafy greens eaten raw as salads). EFSA J 12(3):3600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emmanuel J, Joshua G, Shams B (2012) Comparative study of four wetlands of Punjab using macroinvertebrates as bioindicators. J Anim Plant Sci 22(4):908–914Google Scholar
  23. FAO (1985) Ayers RS, Westcot DW Water Quality for Agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage, Paper No. 29, Rev. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. (URL: http://www.fao.org/DOCReP/003/T0234e/T0234E00.htm#TOC)
  24. Ghafoor A, Rauf A, Arif M, Muzaffar W (1994) Chemical composition of effluents from different industries of the Faisalabad city. Pak J Agric Sci 31:367–370Google Scholar
  25. Gerba CP (2009) The role of water and water testing in produce safety. In: Fan X, Niemira BA, Doona CJ, Feeherty FE, Gravani RB, editors. Microbial Safety of Fresh Produce. Wiley; Indianapolis, IN, USA. pp129–142Google Scholar
  26. Gil MI, Selma MV, Suslow T, Jacxsens L, Uyttendaele M, Allende A (2015) Pre- and post-harvest preventive measures and intervention strategies to control microbial food safety hazards of fresh leafy vegetables. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:453–468. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.657808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gong P, Wilke BM, Strozzi E, Fleischmann S (2001) Evaluation and refinement of a continuous seed germination and early seedling growth test for the use in the ecotoxicological assessment of soils. Chemosphere 44:491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gvozdenac S, Inđić D (2012) Biological potential of maize and cucumber in quality assessment of water and sediment. International Conference on BioScience: Biotenology and Biodiversity- Step in the Future the Forth Joint UNS-PSU Conference, 18–20 June 2012, Novi Sad, Serbia, Book of the proceedings, 331–341Google Scholar
  29. Gvozdenac S, Inđić D, Vuković S, Bursić V (2013) Cu and Cd tolerance of barley and white mustard: Potential indicators of water contamination with these heavy metals. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 45(2):118–126Google Scholar
  30. Gvozdenac S, Inđić D, Vuković S, Bursić V, Tričković J (2014) Assessment of environmental pollution of water from irrigation canal (Aleksandrovački canal, Serbia) using phyto-indicators. J Anim Plant Sci 24(2):614–619Google Scholar
  31. Gvozdenac S, Inđić D, Vuković S, Grahovac M, Vrhovac M, Bošković Ž, Marković N (2011) Germination, root and shoot length as indicators of water quality. Acta Agric Serbica 16:33–41Google Scholar
  32. International Seed Testing Association (2011) International rules for seed testing. ISTA, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Europe Report Series ILSI (2008) Considering water quality for use in the food industry. ILSI Europe Environment and Health Task Force, International Life Sciences Institute, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang W, Liu D (2010) Pb-induced cellular defense system in the root meristematic cells of Allium sativum L. BioMed Central Plant Biol 10:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-40 Google Scholar
  35. Leitgib L, Kalman J, Gruiz K (2007) Comparison of bioassays by testing whole soil and their water extract from contaminated sites. Chemosphere 66:428–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu X, Zhang S, Shan X, Zhu Y (2005) Toxicity of arsenat and arsenit on germination, seedling growth and amylolytic activity of wheat. Chemosphere 61:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahmood S (2006) Waste water irrigation: issues and constraints for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Ital J Agron 3:12–15Google Scholar
  38. Meudec A, Poupart N, Dussauze J, Deslandes E (2007) Relationship between heavy fuel oil phytotoxicity and polycyclic aromatic hydro-carbon contamination in Salicornia fragilis. Sci Total Environ 381(1–3):146–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mussarat M, AU B, FU K (2007) Concentration of metals in sewage and canal water used for irrigation in Peshawar. Sarhad J Agric 23:335–338Google Scholar
  40. Olaimat AN, Holley RA (2012) Factors influencing the microbial safety of fresh produce: a review. Food Microbiol 32:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orlofsky E, Bernsteinb N, Sacksc M, Vonshaka A, Benamia M, Kundud A, Makid M, Smithe W, Wuertzd S, Shapirof K, Gillor O (2016) Comparable levels of microbial contamination in soil and on tomato crops after drip irrigation with treated wastewater or potable water. Agric Ecosyst Environ 215:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pachepsky Y, Shelton DR, McLain JET, Patel J, Mandrell RE (2011) Irrigation waters as a source of pathogenic microorganisms in produce: a review. Adv Agron 113:73–138Google Scholar
  43. Park S, Szonyi B, Gautam R, Kendra N, Anciso J, Ivanek R (2012) Risk factors for microbial contamination in fruits and vegetables at the preharvest level: a systematic review. J Food Prot 75:2055–2081. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prica M, Dalmacija B, Dalmacija M, Agbaba J, Krčmar D, Tricković J, Karlovic E (2010) Changes in metal availability during sediment oxidation and the correlation with immobilization potential. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73(6):1370–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rončević S, Spasojević J, Maletić S, Molnar Jazić J, Kragulj Isakovski M, Agbaba J, Grgić M, Dalmacija B (2016) Assessment of the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of sediment spiked with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(4):3239–3246. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5566-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schulz R, Liess M (1999) A field study of the effects of agricultural derived insecticide input on stream macroinvertebrate dynamics. Aquat Toxicol 46:15–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schultz E, Vaajasaari K, Joutti A, Ahtiaienen J (2001) Toxicity of industrial wastes and waste leaching test eluates containing organic compounds. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 52:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Semwal A, Akolkar P (2011) Suitability of irrigation water quality of canals in NCR Delhi. Int J Basic Appl Chem Sci 1(1):60–69Google Scholar
  49. Steele M, Odumeru J (2004) Irrigation water as source of foodborne pathogens on fruits and vegetables. J Food Prot 67:2839–2849Google Scholar
  50. Trolldenier G (1996) Plate count technique. In Methods in soil biology. Ed. Franz Schinner, Ellen Kandeler, Richard Ohlinger, Rosa Margesin. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heildeberg. 20–26Google Scholar
  51. Uicong CAO, Wang J, Xuelin Z (2007) Ecotoxicity of cadmium to maize and soybean seedling in black soil. Chin Geogr Sci 17(3):270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Uyttendaele M, Jaykus LA, Amoah P, Chiodini A, Cunliffe D, Jacxsens L, Holvoet K, Korsten L, Lau M, McClure P (2015) Microbial hazards in irrigation water: standards, norms, and testing to manage use of water in fresh produce primary production. Compr Rev Food Sci 14:336–356. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van der Sluijs JP, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bijleveld van Lexmond MFIJ, Bonmatin JM, Chagnon M, Downs CA, Furlan L, Gibbons DW, Giorio C, Girolami V, Goulson D, Kreutzweiser DP, Krupke C, Liess M, Long E, McField M, Mineau P, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, Pisa L, Settele J, Simon-Delso N, Stark JD, Tapparo A, Van Dyck H, Van Praagh J, Whitehorn PR, Wiemers M (2015) Conclusions of the worldwide integrated assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(1):148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warriner K, Namvar A (2010) The tricks learnt by human enteric pathogens from phytopathogens to persist within the plant environment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wong MH, Bradshaw AD (1982) A comparison of the toxicity of heavy metals, using root elongation of rye grass Lolium perenne. New Phytol 91(2):255–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03310.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Tao Y, Sun G, Wang L (2014) Effects of di-n-butyl phthalate on the physiology and ultrastructure of cucumber seedling roots. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(10):6662–6670CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonja Gvozdenac
    • 1
  • Vojislava Bursić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gorica Vuković
    • 2
  • Simonida Đurić
    • 1
  • Carlos Gonçalves
    • 1
  • Dušica Jovičić
    • 4
  • Snežana Tanasković
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Institute of Public HealthBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Faculty of AgronomyUniversity of KragujevacČačakSerbia
  4. 4.Insitute for Field and Vegetable CropsNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations