Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 18, pp 18129–18136 | Cite as

Surfactant enhanced pyrene degradation in the rhizosphere of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea)

  • Sardar Alam CheemaEmail author
  • Muhammad Imran Khan
  • Xianjin Tang
  • Chaofeng ShenEmail author
  • Muhammad Farooq
  • Yingxu Chen
Research Article

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of two non ionic surfactants (Tween 80 and Triton X-100), a biosurfactant (Lecithin), and randomly methylated-β-cyclodextrins (RAMEB) on the remediation of pyrene from soil planted with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Soils with pyrene concentration of about 243 mg kg−1 was grown with tall fescue and were individually amended with 0, 200, 600, 1000, and 1500 mg kg−1 of Tween 80, Triton X-100, biosurfactant, and RAMEB. The results show that all surfactants significantly increased plant biomass compared to unamended soil. Dehydrogenase activity was also stimulated as a result of surfactant addition. Only 3.9 and 3.2 % of pyrene was decreased in the uncovered and covered abiotic sterile control, suggesting that microbial degradation was the main removal mechanism of pyrene from soil. In the planted treatment receiving no surfactant, the remediation of pyrene was 45 % which is significantly higher than that of corresponding unplanted control soil, suggesting that the cultivation of tall fescue alone could enhance the overall remediation of pyrene in soil. All surfactants had significantly higher rates of pyrene remediation compared to the unamended planted soil. Generally, RAMEB displayed the highest remediation rates, i.e., 64.4–79.1 % followed by the Triton X-100, i.e., 60.1–74.8 %. The positive impact of surfactants on pyrene remediation could possibly be because of their capacities to increase its bioavailability in soil. The evidence from this study suggests that the addition of surfactants could enhance phytoremediation of PAHs polluted soil.

Keywords

Surfactants Pyrene Phytoremediation Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Tall fescue 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA06A203) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR12D01001).

References

  1. Aprill W, Sims RC (1990) Evaluation of the use of prairie grasses for stimulating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment in soil. Chemosphere 20:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bharali P, Das S, Konwar BK, Thakur AJ (2011) Crude biosurfactant from thermophilic Alcaligenes faecalis: feasibility in petro-spill bioremediation. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:682–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1991) The rhizosphere, plant roots—the hidden half. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheema SA, Khan MI, Tang X, Zhang C, Shen C, Malik Z, Ali S, Yang J, Shen K, Chen X, Chen Y (2009) Enhancement of phenanthrene and pyrene degradation in rhizosphere of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). J Hazard Mater 166:1226–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheema SA, Khan MI, Shen C, Tang X, Farooq M, Chena L, Zhang C, Chen YX (2010) Degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in spiked soils by single and combined plants cultivation. J Hazard Mater 177:384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng KY, Wong JWC (2006a) Combined effect of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 and DOM on the behavior of PAHs in soil–water system. Chemosphere 62:1907–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng KY, Wong JWC (2006b) Effect of synthetic surfactants on the solubilization and distribution of PAHs in water/soil–water systems. Environ Technol 27:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng KY, Lai KM, Wong JWC (2008) Effects of pig manure compost and nonionic-surfactant Tween 80 on phenanthrene and pyrene removal from soil vegetated with Agropyron elongatum. Chemosphere 73:791–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curl EA, Truelove B (1986) The rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fan S, Li P, Gong Z, Ren W, He N (2008) Promotion of pyrene degradation in rhizosphere of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Chemosphere 71:1593–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frederick KA, Babish JG (1982) Evaluation of mutagenicity and other adverse effects of occupational exposure to sodium azide. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2:308–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao YZ, Ling WT, Wong MH (2006) Plant-accelerated dissipation of phenanthrene and pyrene from water in the presence of a nonionic-surfactant. Chemosphere 63:1560–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao YZ, Ling WT, Zhu LZ, Zhao BW, Zheng QS (2007) Surfactant-enhanced phytoremediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic contaminants: potential and assessment. Pedosphere 17(4):409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gianfresa M.A., Rao A., Piotrowska G., Palumbo C., Colombo (2005) Soilenzymeactivities as affected by anthropogenic alterations: intensive agriculture practices and organic pollution. Sci. Total Environ. 341:265–279Google Scholar
  15. Goldman R, Enewold L, Pellizzari E, Beach JB, Bowman ED, Krishnan SS, Shields PG (2001) Smoking increase carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in human lung tissue. Cancer Res 61:6367–6371Google Scholar
  16. Grimberg SJ, Stringfellow WT, Aitken MD (1996) Quantifying the biodegradation of phenanthrene by Pseudomonas stutzeri P16 in the presence of a nonionic surfactant. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(7):2387–2392Google Scholar
  17. Huang XD, El-Alawi Y, Penrose DM, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2004) A multi-process phytoremediation system for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 130:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan MI, Cheema SA, Shen CF, Zhang CK, Tang XJ, Zaffar M (2011) Assessment of pyrene bioavailability in soil by mild hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin extraction. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 60:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan MI, Cheema SA, Shen CF, Zhang CK, Tang XJ, Shi J, Chen X, Park J, Chen YX (2012) Assessment of phenanthrene bioavailability in aged and unaged soils by mild extraction. Environ Monit Assess 184:549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan MI, Cheema SA, Tang XJ, Hashmi MZ, Shen CF, Park J (2013) A battery of bioassays for the evaluation of phenanthrene biotoxicity in soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim IS, Park J, Kim K (2001) Enhanced biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using nonionic surfactants in soil slurry. Appl Geochem 16:1419–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee SH, Lee WS, Lee CH, Kim JG (2008) Degradation of phenanthrene and pyrene in rhizosphere of grasses and legumes. J Hazard Mater 153:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leigh MB, Fletcher JS, Fu X, Schmitz FJ (2002) Root turnover: an important substrate of microbial substrates in rhizosphere remediation of recalcitrant contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 36:1579–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li JL, Bai RB (2005) Effect of a commercial alcohol ethoxylate surfactant (C11-15E7) on biodegradation of phenanthrene in a saline water medium by Neptunomonas naphthovorans. Biodegradation 16:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liste HH, Alexander M (2000) Plant-promoted pyrene degradation in soil. Chemosphere 40:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liste HH, Prutz I (2006) Plant performance, dioxygenase expressing rhizosphere bacteria, and biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Chemosphere 62:1411–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu F, Wang C, Liu X, Liang X, Wang Q (2013) Effects of alkyl polyglucoside (APG) on phytoremediation of PAH-contaminated soil by an aquatic plant in the Yangtze estuarine wetland. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1633–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohamed T, Juan AO, Inmaculada GR (2002) Production of xyloglucanolytic enzymes by Trichoderma viride, Paecilomyces farinosus, Wardomyces inflatus, and Pleurotus ostreatus. Mycologia 94:404–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohanty S, Mukherji S (2013) Surfactant aided biodegradation of NAPLs by Burkholderia multivorans: Comparison between Triton X-100 and rhamnolipid JBR-515 Colloids and Surfaces B. Biointerfaces 102:644–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ni H, Zhou W, Zhu L (2014) Enhancing plant-microbe associated bioremediation of phenanthrene and pyrene contaminated soil by SDBS-Tween 80 mixed surfactants. J Environ Sci 26(5):1071–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rovira AD, Harris JR (1961) Plant root excretions in relation to the rhizosphere effect: the exudation of B-group vitamins. Plant Soil 14:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. S’anchez-Camazano M, Rodri’aguez-Cruz S, S’anchez-marti’an MJ (2003) Evaluation of component characteristics of soil-surfactant-herbicide system that affect enhanced desorption of linuron and atrazine preadsorbed by soils. Environ Sci Technol 37:2758–2766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabljic A (2001) QSAR models for estimating properties of persistent organic pollutants required in evaluation of their environmental fate and risk. Chemosphere 43:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schippers C, Geer K, Muller T, Scheper T (2000) Microbial degradation of phenanthrene by addition of a sophorolipid mixture. J Biotechnol 83:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shim H, Chauhan S, Ryoo D, Bowers K, Thomas SM, Canada KA, Burken JG, Wood TK (2000) Rhizosphere competitiveness of trichloroethylene-degrading poplar-colonizing recombinant bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4673–4678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin KH, Kim KW, Ahn Y (2006) Use of biosurfactant to remediate phenanthrene-contaminated soil by the combined solubilization-biodegradation process. J Hazard Mater 137:1831–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tang WC, White JC, Alexander M (1998) Utilization of sorbed compounds by microorganisms specifically isolated for that purpose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 49:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viisimaa MO, Karpenko V, Novikov TM, Goi A (2013) Influence of biosurfactant on combined chemical–biological treatment of PCB-contaminated soil. Chem Eng J 220:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang HY, Fan BQ, Li CH, Liu S, Li M (2011) Effects of rhamnolipid on the cellulose and xylanase in hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 102:6515–6521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang J, Yin R, Lin X, Liu W, Chen R, Li X (2010) Interactive effect of biosurfactant and microorganisms to enhance phytoremediataion for removal of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. J Health Sci 56:257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao BW, Zhu LZ, Li W, Chen BL (2005) Solubilization and biodegradation of phenanthrene in mixed anionic-nonionic surfactant solutions. Chemosphere 58:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu H, Aitken MD (2010) Surfactant-enhanced desorption and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 44(19):7260–7265CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sardar Alam Cheema
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Muhammad Imran Khan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Xianjin Tang
    • 1
  • Chaofeng Shen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Muhammad Farooq
    • 2
  • Yingxu Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Environmental Science and TechnologyZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Institute of Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations