Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 13, pp 13554–13559 | Cite as

Copper accumulation by stickleback nests containing spiggin

Short Research and Discussion Article

Abstract

The three-spined stickleback is a ubiquitous fish of marine, brackish and freshwater ecosystems across the Northern hemisphere that presents intermediate sensitivity to copper. Male sticklebacks display a range of elaborate reproductive behaviours that include nest construction. To build the nests, each male binds nesting material together using an endogenous glycoprotein nesting glue, known as ‘spiggin’. Spiggin is a cysteine-rich protein and, therefore, potentially binds heavy metals present in the environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the capacity of stickleback nests to accumulate copper from environmental sources. Newly built nests, constructed by male fish from polyester threads in laboratory aquaria, were immersed in copper solutions ranging in concentration from 21.1–626.6 μg Cu L−1. Bundles of polyester threads from aquaria without male fish were also immersed in the same copper solutions. After immersion, nests presented higher amounts of copper than the thread bundles, indicating a higher capacity of nests to bind this metal. A significant, positive correlation between the concentration of copper in the exposure solution and in the exposed nests was identified, but there was no such relationship for thread bundles. Since both spiggin synthesis and male courtship behaviour are under the control of circulating androgens, we predicted that males with high courtship scores would produce and secrete high levels of the spiggin protein. In the present study, nests built by high courtship score males accumulated more copper than those built by low courtship score males. Considering the potential of spiggin to bind metals, the positive relationship between fish courtship and spiggin secretion seems to explain the higher amount of copper on the nests from the fish showing high behaviour scores. Further work is now needed to determine the consequences of the copper binding potential of spiggin in stickleback nests for the health and survival of developing embryos.

Keywords

Aquatic Contamination Copper Reproductive Behaviour Spiggin Stickleback 

References

  1. ABS/ASAB (2012) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 83:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber I (2013) The evolutionary ecology of nest construction: insight from recent fish studies. Avian Biol Res 6:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber I, Nairn D, Huntingford FA (2001) Nests as ornaments: revealing construction by male sticklebacks. Behav Ecology 12:390–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell AM (2001) Effects of an endocrine disrupter on courtship and aggressive behaviour of male three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 62:775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg B (1994) Androgens in teleost fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol 109C:219–245Google Scholar
  6. Borg B, Mayer I (1995) Androgens and behaviour in the threespined stickleback. Behaviour 132:1025–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark RB (2001) Marine Pollution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobbett C, Goldsbrough P (2002) Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53:159–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EPS (1990) Biological test method: acute lethality test using threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Environ, Prot. Serv., Environment Canada, Regulations, Codes, Protocols, OtawaGoogle Scholar
  10. Gravenmier JJ, Johnston DW, Santore RC, Arnold WR (2005) Acute toxicity of copper to the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Environ Toxicol 20:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grosell M, Nielsen C, Bianchini A (2002) Sodium turnover rate determines sensitivity to acute copper and silver exposure in freshwater animals. Comp Biochem Physiol 133C:287–303Google Scholar
  12. Grosell M, McDonald M, Wood CM, Walsh PJ (2004) Effects of prolonged copper exposure in the marine gulf toadfish (Opsanus beta). I. Hydromineral balance and plasma nitrogenous waste products. Aquat Toxicol 68:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansell M (2000) Bird nests and construction behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoar WS (1962) Hormones and the reproductive behaviour of the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Anim Behav 10:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jakobsson S, Borg B, Haux C, Hyllner SJ (1999) An 11-ketosterone induced kidney-secreted protein: the nest building glue from male three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Fish Physiol Biochem 20:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jezierska B, ŁEugowska K, Witeska M (2008) The effects of heavy metals on embryonic development of fish (a review). Fish Physiol Biochem 35:625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kagi JHR (1993) Evolution, structure and chemical activity of class I metallothioneins overview. In: Suzuki KT, Imura N, Kimura M (eds) Metallothionein III, vol III. Birkha¨user Verlag, Basel, pp 29–55Google Scholar
  18. Landner L, Lindestrom L (1999) Copper in society and the environment: an account of the facts on fluxes, amounts and effects of copper in Sweden. Swedish Environmental Research Group, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  19. Lion LW, Altmann RS, Leckie JO (1982) Trace-metal adsorption characteristics of estuarine particulate matter” evaluation of contributions of iron/manganese oxide and organic surface coatings. Environ Sci Tech 16:660–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macnab V, Scott AP, Katsiadaki I, Barber I (2011) Variation in the reproductive potential of Schistocephalus infected male sticklebacks is associated with 11-ketotestosterone titre. Horm Behav 60:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD (2011) Fish sexual development test (FSDT), test guideline no TG234, guidelines for testing chemicals. OECD, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rowland WJ (1989) The ethological basis of mate choice in male threespine sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 38:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rushbrook BJ, Barber I (2006) Nesting, courtship and kidney hypertrophy in Schistocephalus-infected male three-spined stickleback from an upland lake. J Fish Biol 69:870–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sanchez W, Goin C, Brion F, Olsson PE, Goksøyr A, Porcher JM (2008) A new ELISA for the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) spiggin, using antibodies against synthetic peptide. Comp Biochem Physiol 147©:129–137Google Scholar
  25. Sargent RC (1982) Territory quality, male quality, courtship intrusions, and female nest-choice in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim Behav 30:364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seear PJ, Rosato E, Goodall-Copestake WP, Barber I (2015) The molecular evolution of spiggin nesting glue in sticklebacks. Mol Ecol 24:4474–4488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stouthart XJHX, Haans JLM, Lock AC, Wendelaar Bonga SE (1996) Effects of water pH on copper toxicity to early life stages of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Environ Toxicol Chem 15:376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svecevicius G, Vosyliene MZ (1996) Acute toxicity of copper to common freshwater fishes of Lithuania. Ekologija 2:17–21Google Scholar
  29. Urich K (1994) Extracellular structural and secretory proteins. In: Urich K (ed) Comparative animal biochemistry. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. USEPA (2007) Aquatic life ambient freshwater quality criteria—copper. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Iersel JJA (1953) An analysis of the parental behaviour of the male three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour 3:1–159Google Scholar
  32. Viarengo A, Burlando B, Dondero F, Marro A, Fabbri R (1999) Metallothionein as a tool in biomonitoring programmes. Biomarkers 4:455–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood CM, Farrell AP, Brauner CJ (2012) Fish physiology: homeostasis and toxicology of essential metals. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Wootton RJ (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Wootton RJ (1984) A functional biology of sticklebacks. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CaliforniaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiao R, Bai J, Lu Q, Zhao Q, Gao Z, Wen X, Liu X (2015) Fractionation, transfer, and ecological risks of heavy metals in riparian and ditch wetlands across a 100-year chronosequence of reclamation in an estuary of China. Sci Total Environ 517:66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. L. L. Pinho
    • 1
  • C. M. G. Martins
    • 2
  • I. Barber
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratório de Microcontaminantes Orgânicos e Ecotoxicologia Aquática, Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG)Rio GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, FURGRio GrandeBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and BehaviourUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations