Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 9079–9088 | Cite as

Monitoring and assessment of heavy metal contamination in a constructed wetland in Shaoguan (Guangdong Province, China): bioaccumulation of Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in aquatic and terrestrial components

  • H. M. Leung
  • N. S. Duzgoren-Aydin
  • C. K. Au
  • S. Krupanidhi
  • K. Y. Fung
  • K. C. Cheung
  • Y. K. Wong
  • X. L. Peng
  • Z. H. YeEmail author
  • K. K. L. YungEmail author
  • M. T. K. TsuiEmail author
Eco-aquaculture, sustainable development and public health

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the current status of heavy metal concentrations in constructed wetland, Shaoguan (Guangdong, China). Sediments, three wetland plants (Typha latifolia, Phragmites australis, and Cyperus malaccensis), and six freshwater fish species [Carassius auratus (Goldfish), Cirrhinus molitorella (Mud carp), Ctenopharyngodon idellus (Grass carp), Cyprinus carpio (Wild common carp), Nicholsicypris normalis (Mandarin fish), Sarcocheilichthys kiangsiensis (Minnows)] in a constructed wetland in Shaoguan were collected and analyzed for their heavy metal compositions. Levels of Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd in sediments exceeded approximately 532, 285, 11, and 66 times of the Dutch Intervention value. From the current study, the concentrations of Pb and Zn in three plants were generally high, especially in root tissues. For fish, concentrations of all studied metals in whole body of N. mormalis were the highest among all the fishes investigated (Pb 113.4 mg/kg, dw; Zn 183.1 mg/kg, dw; Cu 19.41 mg/kg, dw; 0.846 mg/kg, dw). Heavy metal accumulation in different ecological compartments was analyzed by principle component analysis (PCA), and there is one majority of grouped heavy metals concentration as similar in composition of ecological compartment, with the Cd concentration quite dissimilar. In relation to future prospect, phytoremediation technology for enhanced heavy metal accumulation by constructed wetland is still in early stage and needs more attention in gene manipulation area.

Keywords

Heavy metals Wetland Typha latifolia Shaoguan Phytofiltration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Ms. Wendy Wong (HKBU) for field sampling at Shaoguan

References

  1. Alam MGM, Tanaka A, Allinson G, Laurenson LJB, Stagnitti F, Snow ET (2002) A comparison of trace element concentrations in cultured and wild carp (Cyprinus carpio) of Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 53:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcega-Cabrera F, Norena-Barroso E, Oceguera-Vargas I (2014) Lead from hunting activities and its potential environmental threat to wildlife in a protected wetland in Yucatan, Mexico. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 100:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brix H, Schierup HH (1989) Use of aquatic macrophytes in water-pollution control. Ambio 18:100–107Google Scholar
  4. Burger J, Gochfeld M (2005) Heavy metals in commercial fish in New Jersey. Environ Res 99:403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canbek M, Demir TA, Uyanoglu M, Bayramoglu G, Emiroglu O, Arslan N, Koyuncu O (2007) Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and some Cyprinidae species from the Porsuk River, Turkey. J Appl Biol Sci 1:91–95Google Scholar
  6. Charlet L, Chapron Y, Faller P, Kirscha R, Stoned A, Baveyee PC (2012) Neurodegenerative diseases and exposure to the environmental metals Mn, Pb, and Hg. Coord Chem Rev 256:2147–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen GZ, Ma MJ, Lan CY, Zeng SS, Li SH (1990) Investigations on a cattail plant purification pond ecosystem. Chin J Ecol 9:11–15Google Scholar
  8. Cheung KC, Leung HM, Wong MH (2008) Metal concentrations of common freshwater and marine fish from the Pearl River Delta, South China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. China National Standards Management Department (2001) Safety qualification for agricultural product for non-environmental pollution aquatic products. GB 18406.4-2001. Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  10. DeBusk WF (1999) Wastewater treatment wetlands: contaminant removal processes. Soil and Water Science Department. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhir B, Sharmila P, Saradhi PP (2009) Potential of aquatic macrophytes for removing contaminants from the environment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:754–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher SW (1995) Mechanisms of bioaccumulation in aquatic systems. In: Ware GW (ed) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 142. Springer, New York, pp 87–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleming EJ, Cetinić I, Chan CS, King DW, Emerson D (2014) Ecological succession among iron-oxidizing bacteria. ISME J 8:804–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lake JL, Mckinney R, Lake CA, Osterman FA, Heltshe J (1995) Comparisons of patterns of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in water, sediment and indigenous organisms from New Bedford Harbour, Massachusetts. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29:207–220Google Scholar
  15. Lan C, Chen G, Li L, Wong MH (1992) Purification of wastewater from a Pb/Zn mine using hydrophytes. In: Cooper PF, Findlater BC (eds) In constructed wetlands in water pollutuion control. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 419–428Google Scholar
  16. Leung HM, Leung AOW, Wang HS, Ma KK, Liang Y, Ho KC, Cheung KC, Tohidi F, Yung KKL (2014) Assessment of heavy metals/metalloid (As, Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, Cu, Mn) concentrations in edible fish species tissue in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China. Mar Pollut Bull 78:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li JH, Dong F, Lu Y, Yan QY, Shim HJ (2014) Mechanisms controlling arsenic uptake in rice grown in mining impacted regions in South China. PLOS One 9, Article Number: e108300Google Scholar
  18. Netherlands Ministry of Housing (1994) Dutch intervention values for soil remediation (Report HQ 94-021). Environmental Quality Objectives in the Netherlands, Ministry of Housing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  19. Olaniran AO, Balgobind A, Pillay B (2013) Bioavailability of heavy metals in soil: impact on microbial biodegradation of organic compounds and possible improvement strategies. Int J Mol Sci 14:10197–10228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pezeshki SR, DeLaune RD (2012) Soil Oxidation-Reduction in wetlands and its impact on plant functioning. Biol (Basel) 1:196–221Google Scholar
  21. Quintin A, Fraiser L (2010) Comparison of international risk-based screening levels. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, Water and Energy: Vol. 15, Article 24Google Scholar
  22. Rai PK (2009) Heavy metals in water, sediments and wetland plants in an aquatic ecosystem of tropical industrial region, India. Environ Monit Assess 158:433–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Say PJ, Harding JPC, Whitton BA (1981) Aquatic mosses as monitors of heavy metal contamination in the River Etherow, Great Britain. Environ Pollut B Chem Phys 2:295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. USEPA (2000) Guidance for assessing chemical contaminant data for use in fish advisories, third edition, risk assessment and fish consumption limits, vol. 2, 2000Google Scholar
  25. Wang WX, Fisher NS (1999) Assimilation efficiencies of chemical contaminants in aquatic invertebrates: a synthesis. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2034–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ward TJ (1987) Temporal variation of metals in the seagrass Posidonia australis and its potential as a sentinel accumulator near a lead smelter. Mar Biol 95:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Welsh RPF, Denny P (1980) the uptake of lead and copper by submerged aquatic macrophytes in two English lakes. J Ecol 68:443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong et al. (2003) The water quality of influent and effluent of constucted wetland in constructed wetland. In: Environmental Pollution and Ecological Restoration Chapter 8, 236. The Science Publication [in Chinese]Google Scholar
  29. Wu QT, Chen L, Wang GS (1999) Differences on Cd uptake and accumulation among rice cultivars and its mechanism. Acta Ecol Sin 19:104–107 [in Chinese] Google Scholar
  30. Yilmaz F (2006) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in water, sediment, aquatic plants and tissues of Cyprinus carpio from Kizilirmak, Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull 15:360–369Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Leung
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • N. S. Duzgoren-Aydin
    • 4
  • C. K. Au
    • 2
  • S. Krupanidhi
    • 5
  • K. Y. Fung
    • 1
  • K. C. Cheung
    • 6
  • Y. K. Wong
    • 7
  • X. L. Peng
    • 8
  • Z. H. Ye
    • 9
    • 10
    Email author
  • K. K. L. Yung
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. T. K. Tsui
    • 11
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of HistoryHong Kong Shue Yan UniversityHong KongChina
  3. 3.Upper Iowa UniversityFayetteUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geoscience & GeographyNew Jersey City UniversityJersey CityUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiotechnologyVignan’s University (VFSTRU)VadlamudiIndia
  6. 6.Institute of Vocational Education, Hong Kong Vocational Training CouncilHong KongChina
  7. 7.School of Science and TechnologyThe Open University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  8. 8.Division of Science and TechnologyUnited International College, Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist UniversityZhuhaiChina
  9. 9.State Key Lab of BiocontrolSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  10. 10.School of Life ScienceSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  11. 11.Department of BiologyUniversity of North CarolinaGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations