Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 12435–12443 | Cite as

Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions in Nigeria

  • Hamisu Sadi AliEmail author
  • Siong Hook Law
  • Talha Ibrahim Zannah
Research Article

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions in Nigeria based on autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) approach for the period of 1971–2011. The result shows that variables were cointegrated as null hypothesis was rejected at 1 % level of significance. The coefficients of long-run result reveal that urbanization does not have any significant impact on CO 2 emissions in Nigeria, economic growth, and energy consumption has a positive and significant impact on CO 2 emissions. However, trade openness has negative and significant impact on CO 2 emissions. Consumption of energy is among the main determinant of CO 2 emissions which is directly linked to the level of income. Despite the high level of urbanization in the country, consumption of energy still remains low due to lower income of the majority populace and this might be among the reasons why urbanization does not influence emissions of CO 2 in the country. Initiating more open economy policies will be welcoming in the Nigerian economy as the openness leads to the reduction of pollutants from the environment particularly CO 2 emissions which is the major gases that deteriorate physical environment.

Keywords

CO2 emissions Urbanization Energy consumption Autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) Economic growth Nigeria 

References

  1. Acaravcı A, Erdogan S, Akalın G (2015) The electricity consumption, real income, trade openness and FDI: the empirical evidence from Turkey. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(4):1050–1057Google Scholar
  2. Akpan GE, Akpan UF (2012) Electricity consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Nigeria. Int J Energy Econ Policy 2(4):292–306Google Scholar
  3. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Lean HH (2015a) The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards 79(1):621–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-mulali U, Tang CF & Ozturk I (2015) Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–10Google Scholar
  6. Balibey M (2015) Relationships among CO2 emissions, economic growth and foreign direct investment and the EKC hypothesis in Turkey. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(4):1042–1049Google Scholar
  7. Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S, Ozturk I (2015) The role of renewable energy consumption and trade: environmental Kuznets curve analysis for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Afr Dev Rev 27(3):288–300Google Scholar
  8. Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G (2008) Urbanization and the wealth of nations. Science 319(5864):772–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole MA, Neumayer E (2004) Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Popul Dev Rev 2(1):5–21Google Scholar
  10. Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impact of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300Google Scholar
  11. Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(1):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farhani S, & Ozturk I (2015) Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14Google Scholar
  14. Farhani S, Shahbaz M, Arouri M (2013) Panel analysis of CO2 emissions, GDP, energy consumption, trade openness and urbanization for MENA countries. MPRA Paper No. 4925Google Scholar
  15. Glaeser E (2011) Cities, productivity, and quality of life. Science 333:592–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hossain MS (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39:6991–6999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hossain S (2012) An econometric analysis for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Econ 2012(3):92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report. IPCC, GenevaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with application to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y (2009) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy 34(11):1846–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martinez-Zarzoso I, Maruotti A (2011) The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol Econ 70:1344–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37:1979–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Bureau of Statistics—NBS (2012) Annual abstract of statistics. NBS Press, AbujaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ozturk I (2015) Measuring the impact of energy consumption and air quality indicators on climate change: evidence from the panel of UNFCC classified countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(20):15459–15468Google Scholar
  26. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:3220–3225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2013) The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ 36:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pesaran MH (1997) The role of economic theory in modelling the long run. Econ J 178–191Google Scholar
  29. Pesaran MH, Pesaran B (1997) Working with microfit 4.0: interactive econometric analysis; [Windows version]. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Pesaran HM, Shin Y (1999) Autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In: Storm S (ed) Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: the Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ponce de Leon Barido D, Marshall JD (2014) Relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions depends on income level and policy. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3632–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70(2):434–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S & Dhakal S (2012) Impacts of urbanization on national residential energy use and CO2 emissions: evidence from low-, middle- and high-income countries (No. 2-5). Hiroshima University, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC)Google Scholar
  35. Sadorsky P (2013) Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries? Energy Econ 37:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sadorsky P (2014) The effect of urbanization and industrialization on energy use in emerging economies: implications for sustainable development. Am J Econ Sociol 73(2):392–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014) Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Indic 45:622–631Google Scholar
  38. Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart Jr. CT, Lee JH (1986) Urban concentration and sectoral income distribution. J Developing Areas 357–368Google Scholar
  40. United Nations (2014): http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/world- urbanization-prospects-2014.html
  41. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014).World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. (available at http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf)
  42. York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and IMPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46(3):351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang C, Lin Y (2012) Panel estimation for urbanization, energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 49:488–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao Y, Wang S (2015) The relationship between urbanization, economic growth and energy consumption in China: an econometric perspective analysis. Sustainability 7(5):5609–5627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamisu Sadi Ali
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siong Hook Law
    • 1
  • Talha Ibrahim Zannah
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsFaculty of Economics and Management Universiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Land Management, Faculty of AgricultureUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural Technology, Ramat PolytechnicMaiduguriNigeria

Personalised recommendations