Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 10799–10807 | Cite as

Mutagenicity assessment of aerosols in emissions from domestic combustion processes

  • Nuno Canha
  • Isabel Lopes
  • Estela Domingos Vicente
  • Ana M. Vicente
  • Benjamin A. Musa Bandowe
  • Susana Marta Almeida
  • Célia A. Alves
Research Article

Abstract

Domestic biofuel combustion is one of the major sources of regional and local air pollution, mainly regarding particulate matter and organic compounds, during winter periods. Mutagenic and carcinogenic activity potentials of the ambient particulate matter have been associated with the fraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and their oxygenated (OPAH) and nitrogenated (NPAH) derivatives. This study aimed at assessing the mutagenicity potential of the fraction of this polycyclic aromatic compound in particles (PM10) from domestic combustion by using the Ames assays with Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100. Seven biofuels, including four types of pellets and three agro-fuels (olive pit, almond shell and shell of pine nuts), were tested in an automatic pellet stove, and two types of wood (Pinus pinaster, maritime pine, and Eucalyptus globulus, eucalypt) were burned in a traditional wood stove. For this latter appliance, two combustion phases—devolatilisation and flaming/smouldering—were characterised separately. A direct-acting mutagenic effect for the devolatilisation phase of pine combustion and for both phases of eucalypt combustion was found. Almond shell revealed a weak direct-acting mutagenic effect, while one type of pellets, made of recycled wastes, and pine (devolatilisation) presented a cytotoxic effect towards strain TA100. Compared to the manually fired appliance, the automatic pellet stove promoted lower polyaromatic mutagenic emissions. For this device, only two of the studied biofuels presented a weak mutagenic or cytotoxic potential.

Keywords

Mutagenicity Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon PM10 Residential wood burning Ames assay Domestic combustion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the AIRUSE-Testing and development of air quality mitigation measures in Southern Europe, LIFE 11 ENV/ES/000584. Ana Vicente acknowledges the Postdoc grant SFRH/BPD/88988/2012 from the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT; Portugal) and the financing programme POPH/FSE. N. Canha would like also to thank the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT; Portugal) for affording him a Postdoc grant (SFRH/BPD/102944/2014). The FCT support is gratefully acknowledged by the researchers from C2TN/IST (through the UID/Multi/04349/2013 project) and by the CESAM members (through the CESAM’s strategic programme UID/AMB/50017/2013).

Supplementary material

11356_2016_6292_MOESM1_ESM.doc (78 kb)
Table S1 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted in domestic combustion in a pellet stove and wood stove to S. typhymurium TA98. (DOC 78 kb)
11356_2016_6292_MOESM2_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Table S2 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted in domestic combustion in a pellet stove and wood stove to S. typhymurium TA100. (DOC 51 kb)
11356_2016_6292_MOESM3_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Table S3 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted in domestic combustion in a pellet stove and wood stove to S. typhymurium TA98 with metabolic activation with Mix S9. (DOC 60 kb)
11356_2016_6292_MOESM4_ESM.doc (51 kb)
Table S4 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted in domestic combustion in a pellet stove and wood stove to S. typhymurium TA100 with metabolic activation with Mix S9. (DOC 51 kb)
11356_2016_6292_MOESM5_ESM.doc (71 kb)
Table S5 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted by combustion of pine wood (devolatisation), and almond shell in different concentrations to S. typhymurium TA98. (DOC 71 kb)
11356_2016_6292_MOESM6_ESM.doc (56 kb)
Table S6 Mutagenicity of PAC extracts of particles emitted by combustion of pellets type IV in different concentrations to S. typhymurium TA100. (DOC 55 kb)

References

  1. Alves C, Gonçalves C, Fernandes AP, Tarelho L, Pio C (2011a) Fireplace and woodstove fine particle emissions from combustion of western Mediterranean wood types. Atmos Res 101:692–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves CA, Vicente A, Monteiro C, Gonçalves C, Evtyugina M, Pio C (2011b) Emission of trace gases and organic components in smoke particles from a wildfire in a mixed e evergreen forest in Portugal. Sci Total Environ 409:1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves C, Nunes T, Vicente A, Gonçalves C, Evtyugina M, Marques T, Pio C, Bate-Epey F (2014) Speciation of organic compounds in aerosols from urban background sites in the winter season. Atmos Res 150:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandowe BAM, Wilcke W (2010) Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their oxygen-containing derivatives and metabolites in soils. J Environ Qual 39(4):1349–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandowe BAM, Meusel H, Huang R-J, Ho K, Cao J, Hoffmann T, Wilcke W (2014) PM2.5-bound oxygenated PAHs, nitro-PAHs and parent-PAHs from the atmosphere of a Chinese megacity: seasonal variation, sources and cancer risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 473–474:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barale R, Giromini L, Ry SD, Barnini B, Bulleri M, Barrai I, Valerio F, Pala M, He J (1994) Chemical and mutagenic patterns of airborne particulate matter collected in 17 Italian towns. Environ Health Perspect 102:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleeker EAJ, Wiegman S, de Voogt P, Kraak M, Leslie HA, de Haas E, Admiraal W (2002) Toxicity of azaarenes. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 173:39–83Google Scholar
  8. Bølling AK, Pagels J, Yttri KE, Barregard L, Sallsten G, Schwarze PE, Boman C (2009) Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvo AI, Tarelho LAC, Alves CA, Duarte M, Nunes T (2014) Characterization of operating conditions of two residential wood combustion appliances. Fuel Process Technol 126:222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvo AI, Martins V, Nunes T, Duarte M, Hillamo R, Teinilä K, Pont V, Castro A, Fraile R, Tarelho L, Alves C (2015) Residential wood combustion in two domestic devices: relationship of different parameters throughout the combustion cycle. Atmos Environ 116:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canha N, Freitas MC, Almeida-Silva M, Almeida SM, Dung HM, Dionísio I, Cardoso J, Pio CA, Caseiro A, Verburg TG, Wolterbeek HT (2012) Burn wood influence on outdoor air quality in a small village: Foros de Arrão, Portugal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 291:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canha N, Almeida SM, Freitas MC, Wolterbeek HT, Cardoso J, Pio CA, Caseiro A (2014) Impact of wood burning on indoor PM2.5 in a primary school in rural Portugal. Atmos Environ 94:663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Claxton LD, Woodall GM Jr (2007) A review of the mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity of ambient air. Mutat Res 636:36–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Claxton LD, Matthews PP, Warren SH (2004) The genotoxicity of ambient outdoor air, a review: Salmonella mutagenicity. Mutat Res 567:347–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasius M, Ketzel M, Wåhlin P, Jensen B, Mønster J, Berkowicz R, Palmgren F (2006) Impact of wood combustion on particle levels in a residential area in Denmark. Atmos Environ 40:7115–7124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonçalves C, Alves C, Pio C (2012) Inventory of fine particulate organic compound emissions from residential wood combustion in Portugal. Atmos Environ 50:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonçalves C, Alves A, Fernandes AP, Monteiro C, Tarelho L, Evtyugina M, Pio C (2011) Organic compounds in PM2.5 emitted from fireplace and woodstove combustion of typical Portuguese wood species. Atmos Environ 45:4533–4545Google Scholar
  18. ICNF (2013) IFN6 - Áreas dos usos do solo e das espécies florestais de Portugal continental. Resultados preliminares. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas, Lisboa, p. 32. Available at: http://www.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/ifn/resource/ficheiros/ifn/ifn6-res-prelimv1-1
  19. International Agency for Research on Cancer - IARC (2006) Press Release n° 172 - Indoor emissions from household coal combustion carcinogenic: women in low- or medium-resource countries most exposed. Available at http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2006/pr172.html
  20. International Standards ISO Guide 5725-2 (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 2: basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.Google Scholar
  21. Kamal A, Cincinelli A, Martellini T, Malik RN (2015) A review of PAH exposure from the combustion of biomass fuel and their less surveyed effect on the blood parameters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4076–4098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E, Brown RJC (2013) A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int 60:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maron DM, Ames BN (1983) Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 113:173–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mortelmans K, Zeiger E (2000) The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res 455:29–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherji S, Swain AK, Venkataraman C (2002) Comparative mutagenicity assessment of aerosols in emissions from biofuel combustion. Atmos Environ 36:5627–5635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ, Smith KR (2007) Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol 19:67–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oanh NTK, Nghiem LH, Phyu YL (2002) Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, toxicity, and mutagenicity from domestic cooking using sawdust briquettes, wood, and kerosene. Environ Sci Technol 36:833–839Google Scholar
  28. OECD (1997) Test Guideline 471. Bacteria reverse mutation. In: OCED Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  29. Proforbiomed (2012) Promotion of residual forestry biomass in the mediterranean basin—situation report on forest biomass use in Mediterranean region. Work package leader: Slovenian Forestry Institute, Ljubljana, Project- MED number (1S-MED 10-009)Google Scholar
  30. Singla V, Pachauri T, Satsangi A, Km K, Lakhani A (2012) Characterization and mutagenicity assessment of PM2.5 and PM10 PAH at Agra, India. Polycycl Aromat Compd 32:199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tissari J (2008) Fine particle emissions from residential wood combustion. PhD Thesis, Kupio University Publications C, Natural and Environmental Sciences, Finland.Google Scholar
  32. Vicente ED, Duarte MA, Calvo AI, Nunes TF, Tarelho L, Alves CA (2015a) Emission of carbon monoxide, total hydrocarbons and particulate matter during wood combustion in a stove operating under distinct conditions. Fuel Process Technol 131:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vicente ED, Vicente AM, Bandowe BAM, Alves CA (2015b) Particulate phase emission of parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their derivatives (alkyl-PAHs, oxygenated-PAHs, azaarenes and nitrated-PAHs) from manually and automatically fired combustion appliances. Air Qual Atmos Health. (in press) Doi:  10.1007/s11869-015-0364-1
  34. Vicente ED, Duarte MA, Tarelho LAC, Nunes TFV, Amato F, Querol X, Colombi C, Gianelli V, Alves CA (2015c) Particulate and gaseous emissions from the combustion of different biofuels in a pellet stove. Atmos Environ 120: 15–27.Google Scholar
  35. Vu B, Alves CA, Gonçalves C, Pio C, Gonçalves F, Pereira R (2012) Mutagenicity assessment of aerosols in emissions from wood combustion in Portugal. Environ Pollut 166:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zelikoff JT, Chen LC, Cohen MD, Schlesinger RB (2002) The toxicology of inhaled woodsmoke. J Toxicol Environ Health B 5:269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaBobadela LRSPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Environment and Planning, CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine StudiesUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Biology and CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine StudiesUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  4. 4.Institute of GeographyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations