Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 11120–11125 | Cite as

Environmental benefits and concerns on safety: communicating latest results on nanotechnology safety research—the project DaNa2.0

  • D. KühnelEmail author
  • C. Marquardt
  • K. Nau
  • H. F. Krug
  • F. Paul
  • C. Steinbach
Open Access
Recent Advances in Chemistry and the Environment


The use of nanotechnology and advanced materials promises to revolutionise many areas of technology and improve our daily life. In that respect, many positive effects on the environment are expected, either directly, by developing new technologies for remediation, filtering techniques or energy generation, or indirectly, by e.g. saving resources due to lower consumption of raw materials, or lower energy and fuel consumption due to reduced weight of vehicles. However, such beneficial effects of new technologies are often confronted by concerns regarding the safety of novel substances or materials. During the past 10 years, great effort has been put into research on potential hazards of nanomaterials towards environmental organisms. As the methodology for reliable assessment of nanomaterials was immature, many studies reporting contradictory results have been published, hindering both risk assessment for nanomaterials, as well as the knowledge communication to all involved stakeholders. Thus, DaNa2.0 serves as a platform to implement trusted knowledge on nanomaterials for an objective discussion.


Nanomaterials Nanoobjects Nano ecotoxicity Science communication Knowledge base Knowledge dissemination Environmental impact 


Assessing the impact of new technologies or newly developed substances on humans and our environment is a challenge, even more so, when the applied test methods—both toxicological and analytical—are found to be partly inadequate and need amendments as it is in the case of nanotechnology (Krug 2014; Potthoff et al. 2015; Warheit and Donner 2015). This is illustrated by numerous publications in the field of nano-ecotoxicology, which although they have been investigating the impact of a number of nanomaterials on several organisms, almost never allow for explicit statements on potential hazards. This fact not only hampers the knowledge communication to all non-scientists (e.g. consumers), but it also complicates the transfer of the obtained results for other scientists.

Hence, reliable and understandable information on nanomaterials and nanotechnology is often missed. To bridge this gap, a web-based knowledge base ( has been developed. In an interdisciplinary approach, scientists of the DaNa2.0 expert team provide a knowledge base for more transparency wrapping up the results of current research on nanomaterials regarding their influence on humans and the environment in an understandable way. The selection of nanomaterials for inclusion into the knowledge base is driven by market-relevance as well as by applications. This is demonstrated on several nanomaterials applied for environmental purposes, some of which are elucidated in more detail in this article.

Powered by the need to provide clear information on risk and benefits of nanotechnology, the presentation of complex scientific data via the DaNa webpage addresses not only the scientific community but is just as much intended for the broader public, e.g. consumers, journalists, students or scientists from other research areas than nanotechnology. The collected knowledge integrated into the DaNa database could also contribute to the prioritisation of further research needs.

Examples for applications of nanoproducts in an environmental context

Water remediation (ground, surface and waste water)

In many areas with high industrial activity, ground and surface water is contaminated with organic pollutants such as perchloroethylene (PCE) and solvents such as benzene. The clean-up of those waters is laborious and cost-intensive, as conventional treatment methods rely on removing the contaminated water from the environment, destroying the pollutants, and then leading back the cleaned water to the environment. Nanomaterials open up the opportunity to directly introduce the clean-up agent into the contaminated water where the pollutants are then degraded on the spot (in situ) in a short time period. This is mainly due to the large specific surface area of the nanomaterials, which renders them very reactive. Some nanomaterials are very effective catalysts with a large potential to degrade pollutants, making the technology more cost effective than the conventional pump-and-treat methods. Current examples for environmental applications are iron-based nanomaterials such as zero-valent iron nanoparticles (Köber et al. 2014) or the nanocomposite Carbo-Iron® (Mackenzie et al. 2012). However, as an intentional release of nanomaterials into the environment takes place with the nanomaterials remaining in the environment after usage, concern on adverse effects on organisms was expressed. In consequence, potential adverse effects on biota need to be assessed in parallel to the development of novel remediation techniques (e.g. Weil et al. 2015).

Another area of applications for nanomaterials is the clean-up of contaminated industrial wastewater, which is not suitable for conventional treatment in wastewater treatment plants (Hildebrand et al. 2009; Hildebrand et al. 2008). Here, however, the clean-up technique is designed to separate the nanomaterials from the purified water before releasing it into the environment, hence significantly reducing the concern for detrimental effects on the environment.

Zeolite nanomaterials in fertiliser and in water treatment

Zeolites are a class of highly porous material with channels and pores of nanometre diameters. These channels and pores are intended to store plant nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium and release them gradually. The benefit is that the fertiliser is used more efficiently because the slow release prevents run-off of nutrients during rain events, thereby decreasing over-fertilisation. However, to date, the application of nutrient-loaded zeolite fertiliser is constrained by high costs for zeolite purchase and loading (Liu and Lal 2015). Furthermore, zeolites are also applied for water cleaning purposes due to their high capacity to selectively adsorb ions, specifically metal cations such as Cu, Cr and Cd. In terms of environmental impact, zeolites are not of major concern as they are considered to be insoluble and their main constituents, aluminium and silicon, are considered non-toxic (Fruijtier-Pölloth 2009). In addition, naturally occurring zeolites were shown to reduce the bioavailability of toxic cadmium for fish (Ghiasi 2011).


Pesticides or plant protection products are intended to protect crops from damage caused by insects, microorganisms or vermin such as nematods. The application of nanomaterials in this sector is also based on a number of expected benefits, including increased efficacy of the pesticide, while at the same time reducing the amounts of active ingredients. Likewise, the durability is increased, as some formulations allow a controlled gradual release of the pesticide, reducing the untargeted release into the environment and preventing detrimental effects on non-target species. Nanopesticides can contain a number of pristine engineered nanoparticles, such as metals, metal oxides, and nanoclays. Several formulation types have been suggested, such as emulsions and nanocapsules (Kah et al. 2013; Kah and Hofmann 2014; Kookana et al. 2014). For this type of application, benefits and risks have to be weighted carefully, but to date little research has been performed in the field of environmental fate and impact of nanopesticides.

As these examples demonstrate, there are many promising applications for nanomaterials in the environmental sector, which hold several advantages compared to conventional techniques or substances. At the same time, the necessity of an extensive assessment of the safety of novel technologies is evident. However, currently, the research into the risks of nanotechnology is lacking appropriate instruments to assess adverse effects towards humans and the environment in a reliable manner (Jemec et al. 2016; Kühnel and Nickel 2014). For this reason, the DaNa2.0 project aims at providing reliable information on nanomaterials suitable for a broad audience (Krug et al. 2014; Marquardt et al. 2013; Steinbach et al. 2012).

The DaNa2.0 knowledge base

The DaNa2.0 (Data and Knowledge on nanomaterials – Processing of socially relevant scientific facts) project team is evaluating research findings from the field of human and environmental nanotoxicology and presenting them together with material properties and applications for interested laymen and stakeholders. The core section of the DaNa2.0 web platform ( is a knowledge database, which provides a wealth of facts and data for engineered nanomaterials with regard to actual applications and their respective effects on humans and the environment (Fig. 1). The content within the knowledge base is derived from scientific literature and from various reports by an international and interdisciplinary expert team making use of a structured, criteria-based evaluation of the published literature (Kühnel et al. 2014; Marquardt et al. 2013).
Fig. 1

Overview on groups of nanomaterials contained in the DaNa2.0 knowledge base and examples with environmental relevance

Currently, information on 25 market-relevant nanomaterials is provided, covering information on the material, more than 100 applications, as well as the toxicological aspects of the materials. The most important and user-friendly feature is the linkage of a specific nanomaterial to its applications or products. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the visitor of the web platform can first select an application of interest, and in combination with a certain nanomaterial used for this application is then guided to brief and more in-depth background information on the respective nanomaterials and related safety aspects.
Fig. 2

Access to information on nanomaterial safety according to application. By choosing ‘fertiliser’ in the application column, the material column highlights ‘zeolite’. Upon choosing zeolite, the information column provides access to in-brief information on material properties, exposure of man and environment, as well as uptake and behaviour (not available in this example). From there, more in-depth information is accessible. Moreover, the application column highlights now additional uses of this nanomaterial. (, Dec. 2015)

This allows to access information in a graded way, according to background and interest of the recipients on specific issues. To achieve this, the content of the articles within the knowledge base is presented in four graded levels of complexity (Table 1).
Table 1

Graded levels of complexity realised in the DaNa2.0 knowledge base to address different backgrounds of our visitors

Level of complexity


Anticipated recipient

One pager

Short and basic summary, covering the most striking information for each nanomaterial

Interested citizens/consumers (public-oriented)

Short summary

Subdivided into sections with regard to material information, exposure, uptake and behaviour of a specific nanomaterial

Interested citizens/consumers (public-oriented)

Detailed article

In-depth information for each section and nanomaterial

Journalists, stakeholders, scientists from other fields, regulators

Original references

List of the literature used to compile the detailed articles

Scientists from related fields, regulators

Additional features of the DaNa2.0 web platform and the DaNa2.0 team

The DaNa2.0 knowledge base is encircled by various sections on the web platform, which provide further information about nanomaterials. This can be either more general, overarching information, such as in the basics section providing fundamental introductions into nanotechnology and safety issues. The cross-cutting section deals with overarching issues with significance to ENMs in general, for example on nanomaterials used in paints or toner as well as the relevance of nanoparticles for the human immune system. On the other hand, exploratory information is provided in the glossary and the FAQ section. The sections on research projects related to nanomaterials give an insight into the scientific landscape with a focus on Germany.

Based on the principles for careful scientific practice, the DaNa2.0 project team has also compiled a Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) template to fill in, as well-designed SOPs should be the basis for future research on the safety of engineered nanomaterials. Also, SOPs developed within research projects related to nanotechnology are published on the website, for example those describing the preparation of Carbo-Iron® and zeolite suspensions for ecotoxicological testing. By this, reliable SOPs are made available to researchers worldwide to foster harmonisation in nanomaterial testing.

In addition to this, the scientists behind the DaNa2.0 web platform like to interact with people interested in ‘nano’ directly. The main aim of the teams’ dissemination activities is to provide the general public with sound and up-to-date information related to nanotechnology. Hence, we are actively participating in various dialogue processes such as citizen dialogues, discussions, fairs and conferences, and are in contact with other European information platforms and provide the opportunity to directly address questions to our experts via E-mail or twitter (@nano_info). These activities are appreciated worldwide which is reflected in the number of visitors on our website. These numbers as well as page views increase constantly since the launch of the website in 2009, reaching more than 100,000 visitors in 2015 (Fig. 3), viewing for more than 200,000 pages. Due to the international networking of the DaNa2.0 team, the page is used by visitors from all continents, with most visitors coming from Europe.
Fig. 3

Access statistics for the DaNa2.0 website. In the upper panel, the number of visitors and the respective page view for the years 2014 and 2015 are depicted. The lower panel shows the distribution of visitors according to countries of origin


Nanotechnology holds many promising applications for the environmental sector, but some of them are associated to concerns on detrimental effects towards the environment and environmental organisms. To provide reliable and unbiased information to several groups of recipients, the DaNa2.0 team set up the website On this platform, latest research results related to nanotechnology and nanosafety are communicated in a structured and understandable way.



We thank the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) for funding the DaNa2.0 project (Data and knowledge on nanomaterials – Evaluation of socially relevant scientific facts), grant no. 03X0131 (Aug. 2013 – July 2017). We acknowledge the support by the Swiss government, namely the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment.


  1. Fruijtier-Pölloth C (2009) The safety of synthetic zeolites used in detergents. Arch Toxicol 83:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghiasi F (2011) Influence of Iranian natural zeolite on accumulation of cadmium in Cyprinus carpio tisues following exposure to low concentration of cadmium. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 6:636–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hildebrand H, Mackenzie K, Kopinke FD (2008) Novel nano-catalysts for wastewater treatment. Glob Nest J 10:47–53Google Scholar
  4. Hildebrand H, Kühnel D, Potthoff A, Mackenzie K, Springer A, Schirmer K (2009) Evaluating the cytotoxicity of palladium/magnetite nano-catalysts intended for wastewater treatment. Environ Pollut 158:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jemec A, Kahru A, Potthoff A, Drobne D, Heinlaan M, Böhme S, Geppert M, Novak S, Schirmer K, Rekulapally R, Singh S, Aruoja V, Sihtmäe M, Juganson K, Käkinen A, Kühnel D (2016) An interlaboratory comparison of nanosilver characterisation and hazard identification: harmonising techniques for high quality data. Environ Int 87:20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kah M, Hofmann T (2014) Nanopesticide research: current trends and future priorities. Environ Int 63:224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kah M, Beulke S, Tiede K, Hofmann T (2013) Nanopesticides: state of knowledge, environmental fate, and exposure modeling. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 43:1823–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Köber R, Hollert H, Hornbruch G, Jekel M, Kamptner A, Klaas N, Maes H, Mangold KM, Martac E, Matheis A, Paar H, Schäffer A, Schell H, Schiwy A, Schmidt KR, Strutz TJ, Thümmler S, Tiehm A, Braun J (2014) Nanoscale zero-valent iron flakes for groundwater treatment. Environ Earth Sci 72:3339–3352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kookana RS, Boxall ABA, Reeves PT, Ashauer R, Beulke S, Chaudhry Q, Cornelis G, Fernandes TF, Gan J, Kah M, Lynch I, Ranville J, Sinclair C, Spurgeon D, Tiede K, Van den Brink PJ (2014) Nanopesticides: guiding principles for regulatory evaluation of environmental risks. J Agric Food Chem 62:4227–4240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krug HF (2014) Nanosafety research—are we on the right track? Angew Chem Int Ed 53:12304–12319Google Scholar
  11. Krug HF, Wick P, Hirsch C, Kühnel D, Marquardt C, Nau K, Mathes B, Steinbach C (2014) Im Gleichgewicht? Risikoforschung zu Nanomaterialien. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 49:6–18Google Scholar
  12. Kühnel D, Nickel C (2014) The OECD expert meeting on ecotoxicology and environmental fate—towards the development of improved OECD guidelines for the testing of nanomaterials. Sci Total Environ 472:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kühnel D, Marquardt C, Nau K, Krug H, Mathes B, Steinbach C (2014) Environmental impacts of nanomaterials: providing comprehensive information on exposure, transport and ecotoxicity - the project DaNa2.0. Environ Sci Eur 26:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu R, Lal R (2015) Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci Total Environ 514:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mackenzie K, Bleyl S, Georgi A, Kopinke FD (2012) Carbo-Iron—An Fe/AC composite—as alternative to nano-iron for groundwater treatment. Water Res 46:3817–3826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marquardt C, Kühnel D, Richter V, Krug HF, Mathes B, Steinbach C, Nau K (2013) Latest research results on the effects of nanomaterials on humans and the environment: DaNa-Knowledge base nanomaterials. J Phys Conf Ser 429:012060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Potthoff A, Weil M, Meißner T, Kühnel D (2015) Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16:065006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steinbach C, Mathes B, Krug HF, Wick P, Kühnel D, Nau K (2012) Die Sicherheit von Nanomaterialien in der Diskussion: DaNa, eine Internet-Wissensplattform für Interessierte. Deutsche Apotheker Zeitschrift (DAZ) 152:90–92Google Scholar
  19. Warheit DB, Donner EM (2015) How meaningful are risk determinations in the absence of a complete dataset? Making the case for publishing standardized test guideline and ‘no effect’ studies for evaluating the safety of nanoparticulates versus spurious ‘high effect’ results from single investigative studies. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16:034603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Weil M, Meißner T, Busch W, Springer A, Kühnel D, Schulz R, Duis K (2015) The oxidized state of the nanocomposite Carbo-Iron® causes no adverse effects on growth, survival and differential gene expression in zebrafish. Sci Total Environ 530–531:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Kühnel
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Marquardt
    • 2
  • K. Nau
    • 2
  • H. F. Krug
    • 3
  • F. Paul
    • 4
  • C. Steinbach
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Bioanalytical EcotoxicologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Applied Computer Sciences (IAI)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Eggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany
  3. 3.International Research Cooperations, Empa - Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologySt. GallenSwitzerland
  4. 4.Society for Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology (DECHEMA)Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations