Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 2595–2602 | Cite as

Contributions of a compost-biochar mixture to the metal sorption capacity of a mine tailing

  • R. Forján
  • V. Asensio
  • A. Rodríguez- Vila
  • E. F. Covelo
Research Article


One technique applied to restore degraded or contaminated soils is to use amendments made of different types of waste materials, which in turn may contain metals such as Cu, Pb and Zn. For this reason, it is important to determine the capacity of the soil to retain these materials, and to compare the sorption capacity between an amended soil and another unamended soil. The aim of this study was to determine the mobility and availability of these metals in the soil after applying the amendment, and how it affected the soil’s sorption capacity. Sorption isotherms were compared with the empirical models of Langmuir and Freundlich to estimate the sorption capacity. The overall capacity of the soils to sorb Cu, Pb or Zn was evaluated as the slope Kr. The amendments used in this study were a mixture made of compost and biochar in different proportions (20, 40, 60, 100 %), which were applied to the mine tailing from a settling pond from a copper mine. The mine tailing that were amended with the mixture of compost and biochar had a higher sorption capacity than the mine tailing from the unamended pond, and their sorption isotherms had a greater affinity towards Cu, Pb and Zn than the mine tailing that was studied. Therefore, the results obtained show that adding a mixture of compost and biochar favours the retention of Cu, Pb and Zn in mine tailing.


Compost Mine tailing Mine Metal Soil remediation Biochar Sorption 


  1. Akala VA, Lal R (2001) Soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in reclaimed minesoils in Ohio. J Environ Qual 30:2098–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti G, Cristini A, Loi A, Melis P, Pilo G (1997) Copper and lead sorption by different fractions of two Sardinian soils. In: Prost R (Ed.) Contaminated soils: third int. conf. on the biogeochemistry of trace-elements. [CD-ROM] data/ communic/111 PDF. INRA Editions, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  3. Asensio V, Vega FA, Sing BR, Covelo F (2013) Effects of tree vegetation and waste amendments on the fractionation of Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in polluted mine soils. Sci Total Environ 443:446–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beesley L, Marmiroli M (2011) The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environ Pollut 159:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles JC, Harris E, Robinson B, Sizmur T (2010a) A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159:3269–3282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beesley L, Moreno-Jiménez E, Gomez-Eyles J (2010b) Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environ Pollut 6:2282–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown S, Henry C, Chaney R, Compton H, De Volde P (2003) Using municipal biosolids in combination with other residuals to restore metal-contaminated mining areas. Plant Soil 249:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buol SW, Sanchez PA, Cate RB, Granger MA (1975) Soil fertility capability classification. In: Bornemizza E, Alvarado A (eds) Soil Manag. in Trop. Amer. NCS University, Raleigh, pp 126–146Google Scholar
  9. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2007) Heavy metal sorption and desorption capacity of soils containing endogenous contaminants. J Hazard Mater 143:419–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covelo EF, Vega FA, Andrade ML (2008) Sorption and desorption of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn by a Fibric Histosol and its organo-mineral fraction. J Hazard Mater 159:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Decisión del Consejo de la Comunidad Europea (2001) Decisión del Consejo 573/2001Google Scholar
  12. Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83:1262–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freundlich H (1926) Colloid and capillary chemistry. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadepalle V, Ouki SK, Van Herwijnen R, Hutchings T (2007) Immobilization of heavy metals in soil using natural and waste materials for vegetation establishment on contaminated sites. J Soil Contam 16:233–251Google Scholar
  15. Giles CH, Smith D, Huitson A (1974) A general treatment and classification of the solute adsorption isotherm: I. Theoretical. J Colloid Interface Sci 47:755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomes PC, Fontes MPF, da Silva DG, Mendonça ES, Netto AR (2001) Selectivity sequence and competitive adsorption of heavy metals by Brazilian soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1115–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harter RD, Naidu R (2001) An assessment of environmental and solution parameter impact on trace-metal sorption by soils. Soil Sci Soc 65:597–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Houba VJG, Temminghoff EJM, Gaikhorst GA, Van Vark W (2000) Soil analysis procedures using 0,01M calcium chloride as extractation reagent. Soil Sci Plant Anal 31:1299–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Illera V, Walter I, Souza P, Cala V (2000) Short-term effects of biosolid and municipal solid waste applications on heavy metals distribution in a degraded soil under a semi-arid environment. Sci Total Environ 255:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, EEUU Google Scholar
  21. Kiikkilä O, Pennanen T, Perkiömäki J, Derome J, Fritze H (2002) Organic material as a copper immobilising agent: a microcosm study on remediation. Basic Appl Ecol 3:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez CE, Bazilevskaya KA, Lanzirotti A (2007) Zinc coordination to multiple ligand atoms in organic-rich surface soils. Environ Sci Technol 40:5688–5695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McBride MB, Suavé S, Hendershot W (1997) Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils. Eur J Soil Sci 48:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Natal-da-Luz T, Ojeda G, Costa M, Pratas J, Lanno RP, Van Gestel CAM, Sousa JS (2012) Short-term changes of metal availability in soil. Part I: comparing sludge-amended with metal-spiked soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 63:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paradelo R, Villada A, Barral MT (2011) Reduction of the short-term availability of copper, lead and zinc in a contaminated soil amended with municipal solid waste compost. J Hazard Mater 188:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T (2011) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348:439–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pérez-Esteban J, Escolástico C, Masaguer A, Moliner A (2012) Effects of sheep and horse manure and pine bark amendments on metal distribution and chemical properties of contaminated mine soils. Eur J Soil Sci 63:733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Porta J (1986) Técnicas y experimentos en Edafología. Collegi Oficial D’Enginyers Agronoms de Catalunya, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  30. Romeo S, Francini A, Ariani A, SebastianI L (2014) Phytoremediation of Zn: identify the diverging resistance, uptake and biomass production behaviours of poplar clones under high zinc stress. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1813. doi: 10.1007/s11270-013-1813-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Santibañez C, Ginocchioa R, Varnero MT (2007) Evaluation of nitrate leaching from mine tailings amended with biosolids under Mediterranean type climate conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 39:1333–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2005) Limiting factors for reforestation of mine spoils from Galicia (Spain). Land Degrad Dev 16:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2008) A versatile parameter for comparing the capacities of soils for sorption and retention of heavy metals dumped individually or together: results for cadmium, copper and lead in twenty soil horizons. J Colloid Interface Sci 327:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade ML (2009) Degradation of fuel oil in salt marsh soils affected by the Prestige oil spill. J Hazard Mater 169:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weng L, Temminghoff EJM, Van Riemsdijk WH (2001) Contribution of individual sorbents to the control of heavy metal activity in sandy. Soil Environ Sci Technol 35:4436–4443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xia H, Cai X (2002) Ecological restoration technologies for mined lands. Chin J Appl Ecol 13:1471--1477Google Scholar
  37. Zanuzzi A, Arocena JM, van Mourik JM, Faz A (2009) Amendments with organic and industrial wastes stimulate soil formation in mine tailings as revealed by micromorphology. Geoderma 154:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Forján
    • 1
  • V. Asensio
    • 2
  • A. Rodríguez- Vila
    • 1
  • E. F. Covelo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of VigoVigoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Plant Nutrition, CENAUniversity of São Paulo (CENA-USP)PiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations