Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 24, pp 19706–19715 | Cite as

The occurrence of UV filters in natural and drinking water in São Paulo State (Brazil)

  • Claudia Pereira da Silva
  • Elissandro Soares Emídio
  • Mary Rosa Rodrigues de MarchiEmail author
Research Article


Ultraviolet (UV) filters are widely used in the formulation of personal care products (PCPs) to prevent damage to the skin, lips, and hair caused by excessive UV radiation. Therefore, large amounts of these substances are released daily into the aquatic environment through either recreational activities or the release of domestic sewage. The concern regarding the presence of such substances in the environment and the exposure of aquatic organisms is based on their potential for bioaccumulation and their potential as endocrine disruptors. Although there are several reports regarding the occurrence and fate of UV filters in the aquatic environment, these compounds are still overlooked in tropical areas. In this study, we investigated the occurrence of the organic UV filters benzophenone-3 (BP-3), ethylhexyl salicylate (ES), ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate (EHMC), and octocrylene (OC) in six water treatment plants in various cities in Southeast Brazil over a period of 6 months to 1 year. All of the UV filters studied were detected at some time during the sampling period; however, only EHMC and BP-3 were found in quantifiable concentrations, ranging from 55 to 101 and 18 to 115 ng L−1, respectively. Seasonal variation of BP-3 was most clearly noticed in the water treatment plant in Araraquara, São Paulo, where sampling was performed for 12 months. BP-3 was not quantifiable in winter but was quantifiable in summer. The levels of BP-3 were in the same range in raw, treated and chlorinated water, indicating that the compound was not removed by the water treatment process.


UV filters Endocrine disruptors Brazil River water Drinking water Occurrence 



The authors are grateful for doctoral student fellowships from CAPES (Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) and CNPq (Brazilian National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development) for C. P. da Silva and E. S. Emídio, respectively. Research support was provided by the Foundation for Science, Technology and Education Support. In addition, the authors are grateful to the Alizete dos Santos for the construction of the maps.


  1. ABIHPEC—Brazilian Association of Personal Cosmetics, Toiletry and Fragrance.< Accessed in Jan 2015 (in Portuguese)
  2. Basaglia G, Pasti L, Pietrogrande MC (2011) Multi-residual GC-MS determination of personal care products in waters using solid-phase microextraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 399:2257–2265. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4609-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brausch JM, Rand GM (2011) A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82:1518–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerqueira MBR, Guilherme JR, Caldas SS, Martins ML, Zanella R, Primel EG (2014) Evaluation of the QuEChERS method for the extraction of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from drinking-water treatment sludge with determination by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. Chemosphere 107:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CETESB—Company of Environmental Sanitation Technology. Report Quality of surface water in the state of São Paulo in 2012. Accessed in July. 2014 (in Portuguese)
  6. Cuderman P, Heath E (2007) Determination of UV filters and antimicrobial agents in environmental water samples. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1343–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0927-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Díaz-Cruz MS, Barcelo D (2009) Chemical analysis and ecotoxicological effects of organic UV-absorbing compounds in aquatic ecosystems. Trends Anal Chem 28:708–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Díaz-Cruz MS, Gago-Ferrero P, Llorca M, Barceló D (2012) Analysis of UV filters in tap water and other clean waters in Spain. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:2325–2333. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5560-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fent K, Kunz PY, Gomez E (2008) UV filters in the aquatic environment induce hormonal effects and affect fertility and reproduction in fish. Chimia 62:368–375. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2008.368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fent K, Zenker A, Rapp M (2010) Widespread occurrence of estrogenic UV filters in aquatic ecosystems in Switzerland. Environ Pollut 158:1817–1824. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gago-Ferrero P, Mastroianni N, Díaz-Cruz MS, Barceló D (2013) Fully automated determination of nine ultraviolet filters and transformation products in natural waters and wastewaters by on-line solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1294:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.04.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jurado A, Gago-Ferrero P, Vàzquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Pujades E, Díaz-Cruz MS, Barceló D (2014) Urban ground water contamination by residues of UV filters. J Hazard Mater 271:141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kameda Y, Kimura K, Miyazaki M (2011) Occurrence and profiles of organic sun-blocking agents in surface waters and sediments in Japanese rivers and lakes. Environ Pollut 159:1570–1576. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim S, Choi K (2014) Occurrences, toxicities, and ecological risks of benzophenone-3, a common component of organic sunscreen products: a mini-review. Environ Int 70:143–157. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kunz PY, Fent K (2006) Multiple hormonal activities of UV filters and comparison of in vivo and in vitro estrogenic activity of ethyl-4-aminobenzoate in fish. Aquat Toxicol 79:305–324. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Y-S, Ying G-G, Shareef A, Kookana RS (2011) Simultaneous determination of benzotriazoles and ultraviolet filters in ground water, effluent and biosolid samples using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:5328–5335. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Magi E, Di Carro M, Scapolla C, Nguyen KTN (2012) Stir bar sorptive extraction and LC MS/MS for trace analysis of UV filters in different water matrices. Chromatographia 75:973–982. doi: 10.1007/s10337-012-2202-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manová E, Goetz NV, Hauri U, Bogdal C, Hungerbühler K (2013) Organic UV filters in personal care products in Switzerland: a survey of occurrence and concentrations. Int J Hyg Environ Health 216:508–514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Negreira N, Canosa P, Rodríguez I, Ramil M, Rubí E, Cela R (2008) Study of some UV filters stability in chlorinated water and identification of halogenated by-products by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1178:206–214. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Negreira N, Rodríguez I, Ramil M, Rubí E, Cela R (2009) Sensitive determination of salicylate and benzophenone type UV filters in water samples using solid-phase microextraction, derivatization and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 638:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ozáez I, Martínez-Guitarte JL, Morcillo G (2013) Effects of in vivo exposure to UV filters (4-MBC, OMC, BP-3, 4-HB, OC, OD-PABA) on endocrine signaling genes in the insect Chironomus riparius. Sci Total Environ 456–457:120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson SD (2009) Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem 81:4645–4677. doi: 10.1021/ac9008012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodil R, Moeder M (2008) Development of a method for the determination of UV filters in water samples using stir bar sorptive extraction and thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1179:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schlumpf M, Schmid P, Durrer S, Conscience M, Maerkel K, Henseler M, Gruetter M, Herzog I, Reolon S, Ceccatelli R, Faass O, Stutz E, Jarry H, Wuttke W, Lichtensteiger W (2004) Endocrine activity and developmental toxicity of cosmetic UV filters-an update. Toxicology 205:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silva CP, Emídio ES, Marchi MRR (2013) UV filters in water samples: experimental design on the SPE optimization followed by GC-MS/MS analysis. J Braz Chem Soc 24:1433–1441. doi: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva CP, Emídio ES, Marchi MRR (2015) Method validation using weighted linear regression models for quantification of UV filters in water samples. Talanta 131:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SNIS—Sistema Nacional de Informações em Saneamento. Accessed in July. 2014 (in Portuguese)
  28. Wu J-W, Chen H-C, Ding W-H (2013) Ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction plussimultaneous silylation for rapid determination of salicylate andbenzophenone-type ultraviolet filters in aqueous samples. J Chromatogr A 1303:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang H, Lee HK (2012) Simultaneous determination of ultraviolet filters in aqueous samples by plunger-in-needle solid-phase microextraction with graphene-based sol-gel coating as sorbent coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 742:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Y, Lee HK (2013) Determination of ultraviolet filters in environmental water samples by temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A 1271:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Analytical Chemistry Department, Chemistry InstituteSão Paulo State University—UNESPAraraquaraBrazil

Personalised recommendations