Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 24, pp 19632–19647 | Cite as

Pesticide authorization in the EU—environment unprotected?

  • Sebastian Stehle
  • Ralf Schulz
Research Article

Abstract

Pesticides constitute an integral part of high-intensity European agriculture. Prior to their authorization, a highly elaborated environmental risk assessment is mandatory according to EU pesticide legislation, i.e., Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009. However, no field data-based evaluation of the risk assessment outcome, i.e., the regulatory acceptable concentrations (RACs), and therefore of the overall protectiveness of EU pesticide regulations exists. We conducted here a comprehensive meta-analysis using peer-reviewed literature on agricultural insecticide concentrations in EU surface waters and evaluated associated risks using the RACs derived from official European pesticide registration documents. As a result, 44.7 % of the 1566 cases of measured insecticide concentrations (MICs) in EU surface waters exceeded their respective RACs. It follows that current EU pesticide regulations do not protect the aquatic environment and that insecticides threaten aquatic biodiversity. RAC exceedances were significantly higher for insecticides authorized using conservative tier-I RACs and for more recently developed insecticide classes, i.e., pyrethroids. In addition, we identified higher risks, e.g., for smaller surface waters that are specifically considered in the regulatory risk assessment schemes. We illustrate the shortcomings of the EU regulatory risk assessment using two case studies that contextualize the respective risk assessment outcomes to field exposure. Overall, our meta-analysis challenges the field relevance and protectiveness of the regulatory environmental risk assessment conducted for pesticide authorization in the EU and indicates that critical revisions of related pesticide regulations and effective mitigation measures are urgently needed to substantially reduce the environmental risks arising from agricultural insecticide use.

Keywords

Pesticide Surface water Europe Risk assessment Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009 Regulatory acceptable concentration Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Walter H. Schreiber and Ralf B. Schäfer for their statistical advice and Jörg Rapp and Caroline Nägele for their support with Fig. S1. We are grateful to Jörn Wogram and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. We thank David Imo, Niklas Keck, Bonny Krell, and Koffi Tassou for translating the foreign-language studies. This study was funded by the German Society for the Advancement of Sciences (DFG SCHU 2271/6-1).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11356_2015_5148_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.8 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 4.81 mb)

References

  1. Akerblom N, Arbjörk C, Hedlund M, Goedkoop W (2008) Deltamethrin toxicity to the midge Chironomus riparius Meigen—effects of exposure scenario and sediment quality. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 70:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balderacchi M, Trevisan M (2010) Comments on pesticide risk assessment by the revision of Directive EU 91/414. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:523–528Google Scholar
  3. BBA (2001) German Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL) database of pesticide risk assessment endpointsGoogle Scholar
  4. Beketov MA, Kefford BJ, Schäfer RB, Liess M (2013) Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates. PNAS 110:11039–11043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belden JB, Lydy MJ (2006) Joint toxicity of chlorpyrifos and esfenvalerate to fathead minnows and midge larvae. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:623–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berenzen N, Kumke T, Schulz HK, Schulz R (2005) Macroinvertebrate community structure in agricultural streams: impact of runoff-related pesticide contamination. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bereswill R, Streloke M, Schulz R (2013) Current-use pesticides in stream water and suspended particles following runoff: exposure, effects, and mitigation requirements. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1254–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cedergreen N, Christensen AM, Kamper A, Kudsk P, Mathiassen SK, Streibig JC, Sørensen H (2008) Review of independent action compared to concentration addition as reference models for mixtures of compounds with different molecular target sites. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1621–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chagnon M, Kreutzweise D, Mitchell EAD, Morrissey CA, Noome DA, van der Sluijs JP (2015) Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crane M, Giddings JM (2004) Risk around the world—“ecologically acceptable concentrations” when assessing the environmental risks of pesticides under European Directive 91/414/EEC. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:733–747Google Scholar
  11. Crommentuijn T, Sijm D, de Bruijn J, van Leeuwen K, Van de Plassche E (2000) Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for some organic substances and pesticides. J Environ Manag 58:297–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cross P, Edward-Jones G (2011) Variation in pesticide hazard from arable crop production in Great Britain from 1992 to 2008: an extended time-series analysis. Crop Prot 30:1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies BR, Biggs J, Williams PJ, Lee JT, Thompson S (2008) A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia 597:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deneer JW (2000) Toxicity of mixtures of pesticides in aquatic systems. Pest Manag Sci 56:516–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denholm I, Devine GJ, Williamson MS (2002) Insecticide resistance on the move. Science 297:2222–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denton DL, Wheelock CE, Murray SA, Deanovic LA, Hammock BD, Hinton DE (2003) Joint acute toxicity of esfenvalerate and diazinon to larval fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 22:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devine GJ, Furlong MJ (2007) Insecticide use: contexts and ecological consequences. Agricul Human Val 24:281–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DG SANCO (2002) Guidance document on aquatic ecotoxicology in the context of the Directive 91/414/EEC. European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Sanco/3268/2001 rev.4 (final)Google Scholar
  19. DG SANCO (2014) EU pesticides database. http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides/public/index.cfm2011. Accessed 08 March 2014
  20. ECPA (2006) Proposal for a regulation concerning the placing on the market of plant protection products—impact of the criteria for ‘non-approval’ and ‘candidates for substitution’. ECPA evaluation, PP/06/EJ/15809, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. EFSA (2008) Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance imidacloprid. EFSA Sci Report 148:1–120Google Scholar
  22. EFSA (2010) Scientific opinion on the development of specific protection goal options for environmental risk assessment of pesticides, in particular in relation to the revision of the guidance documents on aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology (SANCO/3268/2001 and SANCO/10329/2002). EFSA J 8:1821 (55 pp) Google Scholar
  23. EFSA (2011) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance bifenthrin. EFSA J 9:2159 (101 pp) Google Scholar
  24. EFSA (2013) Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters. EFSA J 11:3290 (186 pp) Google Scholar
  25. EFSA (2014) Pesticides publications. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/pesticides/pesticidesscdocs.htm. Accessed 12 March 2014
  26. European Commission (1991) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Off J Eur Union L230:1–32Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Comm L327:1–72Google Scholar
  28. European Commission (2009a) Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European parliament and the council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Off J Eur Union L309:1–50Google Scholar
  29. European Commission (2009b) Directive 2009/128/EC of the European parliament and the council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for community action to achieve sustainable use of pesticides. Off J Eur Union L309:71–86Google Scholar
  30. European Commission (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of the European parliament and the council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Union L226:1–17Google Scholar
  31. European Commission (2014) Member states factsheets—European Union. DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives UnitGoogle Scholar
  32. European Environment Agency (2012) European waters—assessment of status and pressures. EEA Report No 8/2012, Office for Publications of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  33. Eurostat (2013) Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics 2013 edition. European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  34. FOCUS (2001) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2Google Scholar
  35. Forbes VE, Cold A (2005) Effects of the pyrethroid esfenvalerate on life-cycle traits and population dynamics of Chironomus riparius—importance of exposure scenario. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goulson D (2013) An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J Appl Ecol 50:977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hallmann CA, Foppen RPB, van Turnhout CAM, de Kroon H, Jongejans E (2014) Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 511:341–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jeschke P, Nauen R (2008) Neonicotinoids—from zero to hero in insecticide chemistry. Pest Manag Sci 64:1084–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A (2010) Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59:2897–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kattwinkel M, Kühne J-V, Foit K, Liess N (2011) Climate change, agricultural insecticide exposure, and risk for freshwater communities. Ecol Appl 21:2068–2081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knäbel A, Stehle S, Schäfer RB, Schulz R (2012) Regulatory FOCUS surface water models fail to predict insecticide concentrations in the field. Environ Sci Technol 46:8397–8404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knäbel A, Meyer K, Rapp J, Schulz R (2014) Fungicide field concentrations exceed FOCUS surface water predictions: urgent need of model improvement. Environ Sci Technol 48:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kortenkamp A, Backhaus T, Faust M (2009) State of the art on mixture toxicity. Final report, study contract number 070307/2007/485103/ETU/D.1, European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  44. Lamberth C, Jeanmart S, Luksch T, Plant A (2013) Current challenges and trends in the discovery of agrochemicals. Science 341:742–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luttik R, Hart A, Roelofs W, Craig P, Mineau P (2011) Variation in the level of protection afforded to birds and crustaceans exposed to different pesticides under standard risk assessment procedures. Integr Environ Assess Manag 7:459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Malaj E, von der Ohe PC, Grote M, Kühne R, Mondy CP, Usseglio-Polatera P, Brack W, Schäfer RB (2014) Organic chemicals jeopardize the health of freshwater ecosystems on the continental scale. PNAS 111:9549–9554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maltby L, Brock TCM, Van den Brink PJ (2009) Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime. Environ Sci Technol 43:7556–7563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mohr S, Berghahn R, Schmiediche R, Hübner V, Loth S, Feibicke M, Mailahn W, Wogram J (2012) Macroinvertebrate community response to repeated short-term pulses of the insecticide imidacloprid. Aqua Toxicol 110–111:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moschet C, Wittmer I, Simovic J, Junghans M, Piazzoli A, Singer H, Stamm C, Leu C, Hollender J (2014) How a complete pesticide screening changes the assessment of surface water quality. Environ Sci Technol 48:5423–5432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newman MC, McCloskey JT (1996) Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data. Ecotoxicology 5:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, Van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A et al (2012) Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Total Environ 415:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pe`er G, Dicks LV, Visconti P, Arlettaz R, Baldi A et al (2014) EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. Science 344:1090–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peters K, Bundschuh M, Schäfer RB (2013) Review on the effects of toxicants on freshwater ecosystem functions. Environ Poll 180:324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pigott TD (2009) Handling missing data. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2nd edn. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 399–416Google Scholar
  55. PPDB (2013) The Pesticide Properties Database (PPDB) developed by the Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU), University of Hertfordshire, funded by UK national sources and the EU-funded Footprint project (FP6-SSP-022704). http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/index.htm. Accessed 15 December 2013
  56. Reichenberger S, Bach M, Skitschak A, Frede H-G (2007) Mitigation strategies to reduce pesticide inputs into ground- and surface water and their effectiveness; a review. Sci Total Environ 384:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanchez-Bayo F (2014) The trouble with neonicotinoids. Science 346:806–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schäfer RB, von der Ohe PC, Kühne R, Schüürmann G, Liess M (2011) Occurrence and toxicity of 331 organic pollutants in large rivers of north Germany over a decade (1994 to 2004). Environ Sci Technol 45:6167–6174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schäfer RB, von der Ohe PC, Rasmussen J, Kefford BJ, Beketov MA, Schulz R, Liess M (2012) Thresholds for the effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities and leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 46:5134–5142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schulz R (2004) Field studies on exposure, effects and risk mitigation of aquatic nonpoint-source insecticide pollution—a review. J Environ Qual 33:419–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulz R, Liess M (2000) Toxicity of fenvalerate to caddis fly larvae: chronic effects of 1- vs 10-h pulse-exposure with constant doses. Chemosphere 41:1511–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solomon KR, Giddings JM, Maund SJ (2001) Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analysis of laboratory aquatic toxicity data. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Spurlock F, Lee M (2008) Synthetic pyrethroid use patterns, properties, and environmental effects. In: Gan J, Spurlock F, Hendley P, Weston D (eds) Synthetic pyrethroids: occurrence and behavior in aquatic environments. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Starner K, Goh KS (2012) Detections of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid in surface waters of three agricultural regions of California, USA, 2010–2011. Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 88:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steen RJCA, Leonards PEG, Brinkman UAT, Barcelo D, Tronczynski J, Albanis TA, Cofino WP (1999) Ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals in European estuaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1574–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stehle S, Schulz R (2015) Agricultural insecticides threaten surface waters at the global scale. PNAS 112:5750–5755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stehle S, Elsaesser D, Gregoire C, Imfeld G, Niehaus E, Passeport E, Payraudeau S, Schäfer RB, Tournebize J, Schulz R (2011) Pesticide risk mitigation by vegetated treatment systems: a meta-analysis. J Environ Qual 40:1068–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stehle S, Knäbel A, Schulz R (2013) Probabilistic risk assessment of insecticide concentrations in agricultural surface waters: a critical appraisal. Environ Monit Assess 185:6295–6310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tennekes HA, Sanchez-Bayo F (2011) Time-dependent toxicity of neonicotinoids and other toxicants: implications for a new approach to risk assessment. J Environ Anal Toxicol S4:001. doi: 10.4172/2161-0525.S4-001 Google Scholar
  70. US EPA (2012) Pesticide reregistration status. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/status.htm. Accessed 12 December 2012
  71. US EPA (2014) ECOTOXicology database system. Version 4.0. http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/. Accessed 03 February 2013
  72. Van Dijk TC, van Staalduinen MA, van der Sluijs JP (2013) Macro-invertebrate decline in surface water polluted with imidacloprid. PLoS One 8, e62374 (10 pp) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Von der Ohe PC, Dublio V, Slobodnik J, De Deckere E, Kühne R et al (2011) A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. Sci Total Environ 409:2064–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yu SJ (2008) The toxicology and biochemistry of insecticides. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  75. Zubrod JP, Englert D, Feckler A, Koksharova N et al (2015) Does the current fungicide risk assessment provide sufficient protection for key drivers in aquatic ecosystem functioning? Environ Sci Technol 49:1173–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Environmental SciencesUniversity Koblenz-LandauLandauGermany

Personalised recommendations