Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 21, pp 16881–16888 | Cite as

Removal, redistribution, and potential risks of soil Cd, Pb, and Zn after washing with various extractants

  • Chunle Chen
  • Yanhui Chen
  • Tuanhui Xie
  • Ming Kuang Wang
  • Guo WangEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

The effectiveness of four different washing extractants—HCl, FeCl3, citric acid, and EDTA—in removing Cd, Pb, and Zn from polluted soil was studied. The removal of these metals, their redistribution between fractions, and the potential risks posed by them, in soils washed with the tested extractants, were examined. Although all the rounds of washing removed Cd, Pb, and Zn from soil, the first round removed more metals than subsequent rounds. Each of the four extractants had different effects on the removal of the metals. At the end of the first round of washing, HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 were the most effective in removing Zn, Pb, and Cd, respectively. Both the single round and five successive rounds of washing with various extractants resulted in significant increases in Pb in the exchangeable/acid extractable fraction. Washing with HCl, EDTA, and FeCl3 significantly reduced potential risks (calculated as the Potential Risk Index, PRI) posed by Cd in washed soil. The first round of washing, using all extractants, increased the risks posed by Pb and Zn. However, five successive rounds of washing with FeCl3 and EDTA reduced the risk posed by Pb, and washing with citric acid and FeCl3 increased the risks posed by Zn. EDTA and HCl were better for reducing Zn risks, and successive washing with EDTA and FeCl3 were more effective in reducing Pb risks than the other extractants. Finally, five successive rounds of washing, with all the extractants, effectively reduced the potential risks posed by Cd. Among the four reagents, EDTA was advised to be the alternative of the washing reagent by significantly reducing the PRI values of Cd, Pb, and Zn.

Keywords

Bioavailability Feasibility Heavy metals Remediation Soil pollution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the China Environment Protection Foundation, “Project, 2007-661.”

References

  1. Barona A, Aranguiz I, Elias A (2001) Metal association in soils before and after EDTA extractive decontamination: implications for the effectiveness of further clean up procedures. Environ Pollut 113:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourg ACM, Loch JPG (1995) Mobilization of heavy metals as affected by pH and by redox conditions. In: Salomons W, Stigliani WM (eds) Biogeodynamics of pollutants in soils and sediment. Springer, Berlin, pp 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dermont G, Bergeron M, Mercier G, Richer-Laflèche M (2008) Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications. J Hazard Mater 152:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di-Palma L, Mecozzi R (2007) Heavy metal mobilization from harbour sediments using EDTA and citric acid as chelating agents. J Hazard Mater 147:768–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehsan S, Prasher SO, Marshall WD (2006) A washing procedure to mobilize mixed contaminants from soil: II. Heavy metals. J Environ Qual 35:2084–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finžgar N, Leštan D (2006) Heap leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soil using ozone/UV treatment of EDTA extractants. Chemosphere 63:1736–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finžgar N, Leštan D (2007) Multi-step leaching of Pb and Zn contaminated soils with EDTA. Chemosphere 66:824–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GAQQF (General Administration of Quality and Quarantine of Fujian Province) (2008) Standard for heavy-metal pollution classification for agricultural soils in Fujian Province. DB35/T 859–2008. Fuzhou, Fujian, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo X, Wei Z, Penn CJ, Xu T, Wu Q (2013) Effect of soil washing and liming on bioavailability of heavy metals in acid contaminated soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gusiatin ZM, Klimiuk E (2012) Metal (Cu, Cd and Zn) removal and stabilization during multiple soil washing by saponin. Chemosphere 86:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jean L, Bordas F, Bollinger JC (2007) Chromium and nickel mobilization from a contaminated soil using chelants. Environ Pollut 147:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C (2008) Stabilization of as, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments-a review. Waste Manag 28:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li YJ, Hu PJ, Zhao J, Dong CX (2014) Remediation of cadmium- and lead- contaminated agriculture soil by composite washing with chloride and citric acid. Environ Sci Pollut Res. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3720-z Google Scholar
  14. Liu YG, Wang XH, Zeng GM (2006) Redistribution of Pb, Zn and Cu fractions in tailing soils treated with different extractants. Pedosphere 16(3):312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Makino T, Sugahara K, Sakurai Y, Takano H, Kamiya T, Sasaki K, Itou T, Sekiya N (2006) Remediation of cadmium contamination in paddy soils by washing with chemicals: selection of washing chemicals. Environ Pollut 144:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Makino T, Takano H, Kamiya T, Itou T, Sekiya N, Inahara M, Sakurai Y (2008) Restoration of cadmium-contaminated paddy soils by washing with ferric chloride: Cd extraction mechanism and bench-scale verification. Chemosphere 70:1035–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon DH, Lee JR, Wazne M, Park JH (2012) Assessment of soil washing for Zn contaminated soils using various washing solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 18:822–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geol 260:193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagai T, Horio T, Yokoyama A, Kamiya T, Takano H, Makino T (2012) Ecological risk assessment of on-site soil washing with iron(III) chloride in cadmium-contaminated paddy field. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 80:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oh S, Bade R, Lee H, Choi J, Won Sik Shin WS (2015) Risk assessment of metal(loid)-contaminated soils before and after soil washing. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4075-6 Google Scholar
  21. Pérez-Esteban J, Escolástico C, Moliner A, Masaguer A (2013) Chemical speciation and mobilization of copper and zinc in naturally contaminated mine soils with citric and tartaric acids. Chemosphere 90:276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rauret G, López-Sánchez JF, Sahuquillo A, Barahona E, Lachica M, Ure AM, Davidson CM, Gomez A, Lück D, Bacon J, Yli-Halla M, Muntau H, Quevauviller PH (2000) Application of a modified BCR sequential extraction (three-step) procedure for the determination of extractable trace metal contents in a sewage sludge amended soil reference material (CRM 483), complemented by a three-year stability study of acetic acid and EDTA extractable metal content. J Environ Monit 2:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reed BE, Carriere PC, Moore R (1996) Flushing of a Pb (II) contaminated soil using HCl, EDTA, and CaCl2. J Environ Eng 122(1):48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SSSC (Soil Science Society of China) (1999) Analysis methods for soil and agricultural chemistry. China Science and Technology Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. Stumm W, Sulzberger B (1992) The cycling of iron in natural environments: considerations based on laboratory studies of heterogeneous redox processes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56:3233–3257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tampouris S, Papassiopi N, Paspaliaris I (2001) Removal of contaminant metals from fine grained soils, using agglomeration, chloride solutions and pile leaching techniques. J Hazard Mater B84:297–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tsang DCW, Hartley NR (2014) Metal distribution and spectroscopic analysis after soil washing with chelating agents and humic substances. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:3987–3995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Udovic M, Lestan D (2009) Pb, Zn and Cd mobility, availability and fractionation in aged soil remediated by EDTA leaching. Chemosphere 74:1363–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Udovic M, Lestan D (2012) EDTA and HCl leaching of calcareous and acidic soils polluted with potentially toxic metals: remediation efficiency and soil impact. Chemosphere 88:718–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Voglar D, Lestan D (2014) Chelant soil-washing technology for metal contaminated soil. Environ Technol 35(9–12):1389–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang H, Huang H, Tan FF, Wang H, Qiu RL (2010) Influence of EDTA washing on the species and mobility of heavy metals residual in soils. J Hazard Mater 173:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunle Chen
    • 1
  • Yanhui Chen
    • 1
  • Tuanhui Xie
    • 1
  • Ming Kuang Wang
    • 1
  • Guo Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Resource and Environmental ScienceFujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations