Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 9563–9569 | Cite as

The environmental factors impact on the conservation of an historic marine quay—a baseline study

  • A. C. Antunes
  • J. Coroado
  • D. Boaventura
  • F. Rocha
Short Research and Discussion Article
  • 181 Downloads

Abstract

Changes effected by environmental factors on the biological colonization of an historic marine limestone quay were considered, as a baseline study for the monitoring and test plan definition. Environmental factors play a fundamental role in the deterioration of stone monuments, particularly those located in a marine environment. This eighteenth century quay, situated at the Royal Square of the Portuguese capital, is subject to tidal movement, marine aerosol, high levels of pollution and vibration and is partly submerged in polluted water. Part of the quay was dismantled in 1997 and returned to the river water in 2008; since then, progressive (re)colonization by biological organisms has occurred. By means of periodic photographic registry, from 2010 to 2014, the main alterations and deposits on its surfaces were registered. The present paper discusses and presents a vulnerability assessment and monitoring plan for monuments in a marine environment with a view to establishing a preventive conservation plan.

Keywords

Limestone quay Architectural heritage Environmental pollutants Marine environment Biological colonization Monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial support provided by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology-POPH funding programme, PEst-OE/CTE/UI4035/2014 (UI Geobiotec), and PEst-OE/MAR/UI0199/2014 (Centre of Oceanography) and to SIMTEJO for the results of the River Tagus microbiological analyses presented as Fig. 7. The authors are also grateful to Christine Blaeuer (Conservation Science Consulting Sarl) for the review of the manuscript.

References

  1. Adamo P, Vingiani S, Violante P (2002) Lichen-rock interactions and bioformation of minerals. Dev Soil Sci 28:377–391. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2481(02)80032-0 Google Scholar
  2. Antunes AC (2002) O Cais das Colunas em Lisboa, nota histórica e estado de conservação. Ed. Forum Unesco (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  3. Antunes AC (2010) Preliminar diagnosis of Cais das Colunas, Lisbon, Portugal. State of conservation of the historical limestone quay. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Marine Environment Damage to Coastal and Historical Structures. Mechanisms of Degradation, Durability, Diagnostics, Maintenance and Rehabilitation (MEDACHS’ 10), 533–540Google Scholar
  4. Antunes AC (2014) O cais da Praça do Comércio e as suas colunas. rossio. estudos de Lisboa 3:128–143 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Boaventura D, Matthew A, Santina PD, Smith ND, Ré P, Fonseca PC, Hawkins SJ (2002a) The effects of grazing on the distribution and composition of low-shore algal communities on the central coast of Portugal and on the southern coast of Britain. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 267:185–206. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00372-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boaventura D, Ré P, Fonseca PC, Hawkins SJ (2002b) Intertidal rocky shore communities of the Portuguese coast: analysis of distribution patterns. Mar Ecol 23:69–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton J (2007) Submerged ruins. In: Ashurst J (ed) Conservation of ruins, Butterworth conservation series. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 212–234Google Scholar
  8. Bolton J (2009) An assessment of the vulnerability of coastal stone monuments in Ireland. Ph.D. Thesis, Ireland, Dublin Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke K (2001) Informed conservation: understanding historic buildings and their landscapes for conservation. English Heritage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Coombes MA, Naylor LA, Vilesa HA, Thompson RC (2013) Bioprotection and disturbance: seaweed, microclimatic stability and conditions for mechanical weathering in the intertidal zone. Geomorphology 202:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corvo F, Reyes J, Valdes C, Villaseñor F, Cuesta O, Aguilar D, Quintana P (2010) Influence of air pollution and humidity on limestone materials degradation in historical buildings located in cities under tropical coastal climates. Water Air Soil Pollut 205:359–375. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0081-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzner B. (2004) Documentation and evaluation of stone damage on monuments. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone. Stockholm: ICOMOS. 2:677–690Google Scholar
  13. Herrera LK, Videla HA (2004) The importance of atmospheric effects on biodeterioration of cultural heritage constructional materials. Int Biodeter Biodegr 54:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera LK, Videla HA (2009) Surface analysis and materials characterization for the study of biodeterioration and weathering effects on cultural property. Int Biodeter Biodegr 63:813–822. doi: 10.1080/15583050802149995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerr JS (2013) The seventh edition conservation plan. A guide to the preparation of conservation plans for places of European cultural significance. ICOMOS, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Koestler RJ, Brimblecombe P, Camuffo D, Ginell WS, Graedel TE, Leavengood P, Petushkova J, Steiger M, Urzi C, Vergès-Belmin V, Warscheid T (1994) How do external environmental factors accelerate change? Durability and change—the science, responsibility and cost of sustaining cultural heritage. Wiley, New York, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  17. Miller A, Dionísio A, Macedo MF (2006) Primary bioreceptivity: a comparative study of different Portuguese lithotypes. Int Biodeter Biodegr 57:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2006.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller AZ, Sanmartín P, Pereira-Pardo L, Dionísio A, Saiz-Jimenez C, Macedo MF, Prieto B (2012) Bioreceptivity of building stones: a review. Sci Total Environ 426:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saiz-Jimenez C (1997) Biodeterioration vs biodegradation: the role of microorganisms in the removal of pollutants deposited on historic buildings. Int Biodeter Biodegr 40:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saiz-Jimenez C (2001) The biodeterioration of building materials. In: Stoecker J II (ed) A practical manual on microbiologically influenced corrosion, vol 2. NACE, Houston, pp 4.1–4.20Google Scholar
  21. Saldanha L (1995) Submarine atlantic fauna. Publicações Europa-América, PortugueseGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefanis NA, Theoulakis P, Pilinis C (2009) Dry deposition effect of marine aerosol to the building stone of the medieval city of Rhodes, Greece. Build Environ 44:260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Urosevic M, Sebastián E, Cardell C (2013) An experimental study on the influence of surface finishing on the weathering of a building low-porous limestone in coastal environments. Eng Geol 154:131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Balen K (2012) Preventive Conservation in the International context of the PRECOMOS network. II Encuentro Precomos, Seminario-Taller de Tecnologias y restauracion de Obras en Tierra, Proyecto VlirCPM, Universidad de Cuenca, 33–53Google Scholar
  25. VDI – Verein deutscher Ingenieure (1989) Examination and treatment of materials damaged by immissions, particularly those in historico-cultural objects. Düsseldorf, guideline 3798, part 1Google Scholar
  26. VDI – Verein deutscher Ingenieure (1997) Examination and treatment of materials damaged by emmissions, particularly those in objects of cultural and historical value. Documentation instructions. Düsseldorf, guideline 3798, part 2Google Scholar
  27. VDI – Verein deutscher Ingenieure (1998) Examination and treatment of materials damaged by air pollution, in particular in objects of cultural and historical value. Graphic documentation. Düsseldorf, guideline 3798, part 3Google Scholar
  28. Warscheid T, Oelting M, Krumbein WE (1991) Physico-chemical aspects of biodeterioration processes on rocks with special regard to organic pollutants. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 28:37–48. doi: 10.1016/0265-3036(91)90032-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zendri E, Biscontin G, Kosmidis P (2001) Effects of condensed water on limestone surfaces in a marine environment. J Cult Herit 4:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Antunes
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Coroado
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. Boaventura
    • 4
    • 5
  • F. Rocha
    • 1
  1. 1.GeoBioTec - University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.ARTIS - IHA/FL/University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Polytechnic Institute of TomarTomarPortugal
  4. 4.Escola Superior de Educação João de DeusLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Centro de Oceanografia, MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Laboratório Marítimo da GuiaFaculdade de Ciências da Universidade de LisboaCascaisPortugal

Personalised recommendations