Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 16, pp 12182–12189 | Cite as

Sorption of sulfisoxazole onto soil—an insight into different influencing factors

  • Joanna Maszkowska
  • Anna Białk-BielińskaEmail author
  • Katarzyna Mioduszewska
  • Marta Wagil
  • Jolanta Kumirska
  • Piotr Stepnowski
Research Article

Abstract

Although sulfonamides (SAs) are among the most commonly used veterinary drugs and their presence in the environment is well documented, knowledge of their fate and behavior in the soil environment is still limited, especially for sulfisoxazole (SSX) which is characterized by the lowest (among other SAs) pK a value associated with acid-base equilibrium of sulfonamide group. Thus, this work was focused on determining the sorption potential of SSX onto natural soils differing in physicochemical properties. All the results were modeled using linear, Freundlich, Langmuir, Dubinin–Radushkevich, and Temkin sorption isotherms. The established sorption coefficients (K d ) for SSX were quite low (from 0.27 to 0.95 L kg−1), which indicated that this substance is highly mobile and has the potential to run off into surface waters and/or infiltrate ground water. The sorption data of SSX is well fitted to the Freundlich isotherm model (R 2 > 0.968). Moreover, we assessed the sorption mechanism of these compounds in the edaphic environment with respect to organic matter (OM) content, pH, and ionic strength. To clarify the current state of knowledge, these factors were examined much more thoroughly than in previous investigations concerning other SAs. The wide range of ionic strength examined showed positive correlation of this factor and sorption of SAs. The results also yielded new insight into dependency of sorption of SAs on organic matter content in soil.

Keywords

Sulfisoxazole Sulfonamides Natural soils Sorption potential Adsorption isotherms Ionic strength 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support was provided by the Polish National Science Centre under grant DEC-2011/03/B/NZ8/03010.

Supplementary material

11356_2015_4445_MOESM1_ESM.docx (101 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 101 kb)

References

  1. Anskjær GG, Krogh KA, Halling-Sørensen B (2014) Dialysis experiments for assessing the pH-dependent sorption of sulfonamides to soil clay fractions. Chemosphere 95:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babić S, Horvat AJM, Mutavdžić Pavlović D, Kaštelan-Macan M (2007) Determination of pKa values of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Trends Anal Chem 26:1043–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran W, Adamek E, Ziemiańska J, Sobczak A (2011) Effects of the presence of sulfonamides in the environment and their influence on human health. J Hazard Mater 196:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Białk-Bielińska A, Maszkowska J, Mrozik W, Bielawska A, Kołodziejska M, Palavinskas R, Stepnowski P, Kumirska J (2012a) Sulfadimethoxine and sulfaguanidine: their sorption potential on natural soils. Chemosphere 86:1059–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Białk-Bielińska A, Stolte S, Matzke M, Fabiańska A, Maszkowska J, Kołodziejska M, Liberek B, Stepnowski P, Kumirska J (2012b) Hydrolysis of sulphonamides in aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 221–222:264–274Google Scholar
  6. Białk-Bielińska A, Maszkowska J, Puckowski A, Stepnowski P (2014) Exposure and hazard identification of sulphonamides in the terrestrial environment. In: Soil pollution, ISBN 980-953-307-1137-6, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. doi: 10.5772/57265
  7. Clausen L, Fabricius IL (2001) Atrazine, isoproturon, mecoprop, 2,4-D, and bentazone adsorption onto iron oxides. J Environ Qual 30:858–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dada AO, Olalekan AP, Olatunya AM, Dada O (2012) Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin—Radushkevich isotherms studies of equilibrium sorption of Zn 2+ onto phosphoric acid modified rice husk. J Appl Chem 3:38–45Google Scholar
  9. De Jonge H, de Jonge LW (1999) Influence of pH and solution composition on the sorption of glyphosate and prochloraz to a sandy loam soil. Chemosphere 39:753–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delle-Site A (2001) Factors affecting sorption of organic compounds in natural sorbent/water systems and sorption coefficients for selected pollutants. A review. J Phys Chem Ref Data 30:187–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deo RP, Halden RU (2013) Pharmaceuticals in the built and natural water environment of the United States. Water 5:1346–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doretto KM, Rath S (2013) Sorption of sulfadiazine on Brazilian soils. Chemosphere 90:2027–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueroa-Diva R, Vasudevan D, MacKay AA (2010) Trends in soil sorption coefficients within common antimicrobial families. Chemosphere 79:786–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gao Y, Li Y, Zhang L, Huang H, Hu J, Shah SM, Su X (2012) Adsorption and removal of tetracycline antibiotics from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 368:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Galán MJ, Silvia Díaz-Cruz M, Barceló D (2009) Combining chemical analysis and ecotoxicity to determine environmental exposure and to assess risk from sulfonamides. Trends Anal Chem 28:804–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillman GP, Sumpter EA (1986) Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Aust J Soil Res 24:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyland KC, Dickenson ERV, Drewes JE, Higgins CP (2012) Sorption of ionized and neutral emerging trace organic compounds onto activated sludge from different wastewater treatment configurations. Water Res 46:1958–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain M, Garg VK, Kadirvelu K (2009) Chromium (VI) removal from aqueous system using Helianthus annuus (sunflower) stem waste. J Hazard Mater 162:365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson CA, Westall JC (1990) Effect of pH and KCI concentration on the octanol-water distribution of methylanilines. Environ Sci Technol 24:1869–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kah M, Brown CD (2006) Adsorption of ionisable pesticides in soils. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 188:149–217Google Scholar
  21. Kurwadkar ST, Adams CD, Meyer MT, Kolpin DW (2011) Comparative mobility of sulfonamides and bromide tracer in three soils. J Environ Manag 92:1874–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leal RMP, Alleoni LRF, Tornisielo VL, Regitano JB (2013) Sorption of fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides in 13 Brazilian soils. Chemosphere 92:979–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee L, Rao P, Nkedi-Kizza P, Delfino J (1990) Influence of solvent and sorbent characteristics on distribution of pentachlorophenol in octanol-water and soil-water systems. Environ Sci Technol 24:654–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacKay AA, Vasudevan D (2012) Polyfunctional ionogenic compound sorption: challenges and new approaches to advance predictive models. Environ Sci Technol 46(17):9209–9223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maszkowska J, Kołodziesjska M, Białk-Bielińska A, Mrozik W, Kumirska J, Stepnowski P, Palavinskas P, Krüger O, Kalbe U (2013) Column and batch tests of sulfonamide leaching from different types of soil. J Hazard Mater 260:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD (2000) Adsorption-desorption using a batch equilibrium method. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals 106. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, pp 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Regitano JB, Bischoff M, Lee LS, Reichert JM, Turco RF (1997) Retention of imazaquin in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sassman SA, Lee LS (2005) Sorption of three tetracyclines by several soils: assessing the role of pH and cation exchange. Environ Sci Technol 39:7452–7459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Srinivasan P, Sarmah AK, Manley-Harris M (2013) Co-contaminants and factors affecting the sorption behaviour of two sulfonamides in pasture soils. Environ Pollut 180C:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sukul P, Spiteller M (2006) Sulfonamides in the environment as veterinary drugs. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 187:67–101Google Scholar
  31. Sukul P, Lamshöft M, Zühlke S, Spiteller M (2008) Sorption and desorption of sulfadiazine in soil and soil-manure systems. Chemosphere 73:1344–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ter Laak TL, Gebbink WG, Tolls J (2006) The effect of pH and ionic strength on the sorption of sulfachloropyridazine, tylosin, and oxytetracycline to soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:904–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thiele-Bruhn S, Seibicke T, Schulten H-R, Leinweber P (2004) Sorption of sulfonamide pharmaceutical antibiotics on whole soils and particle-size fractions. J Environ Qual 33:1331–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeng T, Ziegelgruber KL, Chin Y-P, Arnold WA (2011) Pesticide processing potential in prairie pothole porewaters. Environ Sci Technol 45:6814–6822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeng T, Chin Y-P, Arnold WA (2012) Potential for abiotic reduction of pesticides in prairie pothole porewaters. Environ Sci Technol 46:3177–3187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang H, Weber EJ (2013) Identifying indicators of reactivity for chemical reductants in sediments. Environ Sci Technol 47:6959–6968Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Maszkowska
    • 1
  • Anna Białk-Bielińska
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katarzyna Mioduszewska
    • 1
  • Marta Wagil
    • 1
  • Jolanta Kumirska
    • 1
  • Piotr Stepnowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Analysis, Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of GdańskGdańskPoland

Personalised recommendations