Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 18, pp 14007–14017 | Cite as

Differential responses of C3 and CAM native Brazilian plant species to a SO2- and SPMFe-contaminated Restinga

  • Luzimar Campos da SilvaEmail author
  • Talita Oliveira de Araújo
  • Carlos Alberto Martinez
  • Francisco de Almeida Lobo
  • Aristéa Alves Azevedo
  • Marco Antonio Oliva
Research Article

Abstract

Aiming to evaluate responses in terms of growth rates, physiological parameters, and degree of sensitivity to SO2 and SPMFe in Eugenia uniflora L. (Myrtaceae, a C3 species) and Clusia hilariana Schlecht (Clusiaceae, a CAM species); saplings were exposed to emissions from a pelletizing factory for 7 months. The species were distributed along a transect (200, 500, 800, 1400, and 1700 m away from the emission source), and analyses were performed after 71, 118, and 211 days of exposure to the pollutants. E. uniflora received higher superficial deposition of particulate iron. The highest total iron foliar contents were observed 200 m away from the emission source in both plant species, while the highest total sulfur foliar contents were observed 200 m away in C. hilariana and 800 m away in E. uniflora. E. uniflora presented decreased values of height growth rate, number of necrotic leaves, chlorophyll analysis (SPAD index) and transpiration, in relation to the distances from the emission source. C. hilariana showed decreased values of height growth rate, number of leaves, number of necrotic leaves, total ionic permeability, stomatal conductance, transpiration, net CO2 assimilation, and total dry matter, in relation to distances from the emission source. In relation to the days of exposure, both species presented increased number of necrotic leaves and foliar phytotoxicity index, and decreased values in the chlorophyll analysis. The two native plant species, both of which occur in the Brazilian Restinga, showed damage when exposed to emissions from an iron ore pelletizing factory. C. hilariana was considered the most sensitive species due to the decreased values in a higher number of variables after exposition.

Keywords

Eugenia uniflora Clusia hilariana Native plants Pollution Sensitive species Symptomatology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank for the research productivity scholarships granted to L.C. Silva (309170/2012-5) and A.A. Azevedo (312190/2013-1) and the agreement firmed between the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV) and SAMARCO Mining Company.

References

  1. Alves ES, Tresmondi F, Longui EL (2008) Leaf anatomy of Eugenia uniflora L. (Myrtaceae) in urban and rural environments, São Paulo State, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 22:241–248 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  2. Araujo DSD, Maciel NC (1998) Restingas of Rio de Janeiro state: biodiversity and preservation. Bol FBCN 25:27–51 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  3. Arndt U, Schlutler C (1985) Effect-based determination of the immission load in specific forest decline areas in Baden-Württemberg by the use of bio-indicators (active monitoring with indicator plants). Statuskoll. z. Arbeit des PEF, Karlsruhe 5.bis 7.3, pp. 17-41 (in German)Google Scholar
  4. Assis AM, Pereira OJ, Thomaz LD (2004) Phytosociology of a restinga forest in the “Paulo César Vinha” State Park, Setiba, Guarapari (Espírito Santo). Rev Bras Bot 27:349–361 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Becana M, Moran JF, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I (1998) Iron-dependent oxygen free radical generation in plants subjected to environmental stress: toxicity and antioxidant protection. Plant Soil 201:137–147Google Scholar
  6. Bustamante M, Oliva MA, Sant’Anna R, Lopes NF (1993) Fluorine sensitivity on soybean plants. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 5:151–157 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  7. Chung CY, Chung PL, Liao SW (2011) Carbon fixation efficiency of plants influenced by sulfur dioxide. Environ Monit Assess 173:701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CONAMA (1990) Resolução no 003, de 28 de junho de 1990. Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, 22 ago. 1990, Seção 1, p. 15937–15939. Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/index.cfm. Accessed 1 July 2014
  9. Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ (1997) Molecular genetics of crassulacean metabolism. Plant Physiol 113:667–676Google Scholar
  10. De Temmerman L, Bell JNB, Garrec JP, Klumpp A, Krause GHM, Tonneijck AEG (2004) Biomonitoring of air pollutants with plants—considerations for the future. In: Klumpp A, Ansel W, Klumpp G (eds) Urban air pollution, bioindication and environmental awareness. Cuvillier Verlag, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobermann A, Fairhurst T (2000) Rice: nutrient disorders & nutrient management. Potash & Phosphate Institute, Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada, and International Rice Research Institute, Singapore and Los Baños, pp. 1-4Google Scholar
  12. Dzierżanowski K, Popek R, Gawrońska H, Sæbø A, Gawroński SW (2011) Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species. Int J Phytoremediation 13:1037–1046Google Scholar
  13. Franco AC (1989) The genus Clusia as example of studies on plant responses to stress in tropical environments. In: Scarano FR, Franco AC (eds) Ecophysiological strategies of xerophytic and amphibious plants in the neotropics, vol IV. Series Oecologia Brasiliensis., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 65–85Google Scholar
  14. Freire MSB (1990) Floristic survey on Natal Sandy Dunes State Park. Acta Bot Bras 4:41–59 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  15. Grantz DA, Garner JHB, Johnson DW (2003) Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environ Int 29:213–239Google Scholar
  16. Hänsch R, Mendel RR (2005) Sulfite oxidation in plant peroxisomes. Photosynth Res 86:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haworth M, Elliott-Kingston C, Gallagher A, Fitzgerald A, McElwain JC (2012) Sulphur dioxide fumigation effects on stomatal density and index of non-resistant plants: implications for the stomatal palaeo-[CO2] proxy method. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 182:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Instituto Brasileiro de Mineração–IBRAM (2011) Information and analysis of the Brazilian mineral economy. IBRAM, Brasília (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  19. Jeong J, Guerinot ML (2009) Homing in on iron homeostasis in plants. Trends Plant Sci 14:280–285Google Scholar
  20. Jouraeva VA, Johnson DL, Hassett JP, Nowak DJ (2002) Differences in accumulation of PAHs and metals on the leaves of Tilia × euchlora and Pyrus calleryana. Environ Pollut 120:331–338Google Scholar
  21. Jucoski GO, Cambraia J, Ribeiro C, Oliveira JA, de Paula SO, Oliva MA (2013) Impact of iron toxicity on oxidative metabolism in young Eugenia uniflora L. plants. Acta Physiol Plant 35:1645–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Karuppanapandian T, Moon JC, Kim C, Manoharan K, Kim W (2011) Reactive oxygen species in plants: their generation, signal transduction, and scavenging mechanisms. Aust J Crop Sci 5:709–725Google Scholar
  23. Kaupp H, Blumenstock M, McLachlan MS (2000) Retention and mobility of atmospheric particle-associated organic pollutant PCDD/Fs and PAHs on maize leaves. New Phytol 148:473–480Google Scholar
  24. Klumpp A, Domingos M, Moraes RM, Lima JS (1998) Effects of complex air pollution on tree species of the Atlantic Rain Forest near Cubatão, Brazil. Chemosphere 36:989–994Google Scholar
  25. Köppen W (1918) Klassifikation der Klimate nach Temperatur, Niederschlag und Jahreslauf. Petermanns Mitt 64:193–203Google Scholar
  26. Kuki KN, Oliva MA, Pereira EG (2008) Iron ore industry emissions as a potential ecological risk factor for tropical coastal vegetation. Environ Manag 42:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuki KN, Oliva MA, Costa AC (2009) The simulated effects of iron dust and acidity during the early stages of establishment of two coastal plant species. Water Air Soil Pollut 196:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology, 3rd edn. Springer, Germany, p 506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liebig M, Scarano FR, Mattos EA, Zaluar HLT, Lüttge U (2001) Ecophysiological and floristic implications of sex expression in the dioecious neotropical CAM tree Clusia hilariana Schltdl. Trees 15:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lopes SA, Oliva MA, Martinez CA (2002) Impact of sulfur dioxide emissions and iron particulate matter deposition on Restinga plant species (Anchieta city, Espírito Santo state, Brazil): ecophysiological evaluation. In: Espíndola ELG, Paschoal CMR, Rocha O, Bohrer MBC, Oliveira Neto AL (eds) Ecotoxicology—perspectives for the XXI century. RiMa Artes e Textos, São Carlos, pp 53–71 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  31. Maclean DC, Schneider RE, Hansen KS, Troiano JJ (1989) Effects of simulated acid rain on uptake, accumulation, and retention of fluoride in forage crops. Water Air Soil Pollut 43:191–198Google Scholar
  32. Manninen S, Huttunen S (2000) Response of needle sulphur and nitrogen concentrations of Scots pine versus Norway spruce to SO2 and NO2. Environ Pollut 107:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press, California, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Momen B, Anderson PD, Houpi JLJ, Helms JA (2002) Growth of ponderosa pine seedlings as affected by air pollution. Atmos Environ 36:1875–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neves LJ, Donato AM (1989) Contributions to the study on Eugenia uniflora L. (Myrtaceae). Bradea 5:275–284 (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  36. Neves NR, Oliva MA, da Cruz CD, Costa AC, Ribas RF, Pereira EG (2009) Photosynthesis and oxidative stress in the restinga plant species Eugenia uniflora L. exposed to simulated acid rain and iron ore dust deposition: potential use in environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 407:3740–3745Google Scholar
  37. Pereira EG, Oliva MA, Kuki KN, Cambraia J (2009) Photosynthetic changes and oxidative stress caused by iron ore dust deposition in the tropical CAM tree Clusia hilariana. Trees 23:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira EG, Oliva MA, Rosado-Souza L, Mendes GC, Colares DS, Stopato CH, Almeida AM (2013) Iron excess affects rice photosynthesis through stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. Plant Sci 201–202:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prusty BAK, Mishra PC, Azzez PA (2005) Dust accumulation and leaf pigment content in vegetation near the national high way at Sambalpur, Orissa, India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Queiroz RS (1998) Evaluation of the Samarco Mining Company environmental monitoring network of sulfur dioxide and particulate matter. Report, 22p (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  41. Rennenberg H, Herschbach C (1996) Responses of plants to atmospheric sulphur. In: Yunus M, Iqbal M (eds) Plant response to air pollution. John Wiley, Chincester, pp 285–293Google Scholar
  42. Rennenberg H, Herschbach C, Polle A (1996) Consequences of air pollution on shoot-root interactions. J Plant Physiol 148:269–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Alves MAS, Van Sluys M (2003) Biodiversity in the largest forest remnants in the state of Rio de Janeiro and in the Restingas of the Atlantic Rain Forest. Editora RiMa, São Carlos (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  44. Rocha DI, Silva LC, Pereira EG, Sant’Anna-Santos BF, Gontijo ER, Oliva MA (2014) Early detection of injuries in leaves of Clusia hilariana Schletlendal (Clusiaceae) caused by particulate deposition of iron. Revista Árvore 38:423–432Google Scholar
  45. Scarano FR (2002) Structure, function and floristic relationships of plant communities in stressful habitats marginal to the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Ann Bot London 90:517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider SZ (1985) ‘Leaf anatomy of Clusia hilariana Schlechtendal and Clusia spiritu-sanctensis G. Mariz et Weinberg (Guttiferae) occurring in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil’, M.S. Thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 162 pp (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  47. Silva LC, Oliva MA, Azevedo AA, Araújo JM, Aguiar RM (2005) Micromorphological and anatomical alterations caused by simulated acid rain in restinga plants: Eugenia uniflora and Clusia hilariana. Water Air Soil Pollut 168:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silva LC, Oliva MA, Azevedo AA, Araújo JM (2006) Responses of restinga plant species to pollution from an iron pelletization factory. Water Air Soil Pollut 175:241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sinha S, Saxena R (2006) Effect of iron on lipid peroxidation, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and bacoside—a content in medicinal plant Bacopa monnieri L. Chemosphere 62:1340–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spiro TG, Stigliani MW (2002) Chemistry of the environment. Prentice Hall of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  51. Swanepoel JW, Kruger GHJ, Van Heerden PDR (2007) Effects of sulphur dioxide on photosynthesis in the succulent Augea capensis Thunb. J Arid Environ 70:208–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tarhanen S, Metsärinne S, Holopainen T, Oksanen J (1999) Membrane permeability response of lichen Bryoria fuscescens to wet deposited heavy metals and acid rain. Environ Pollut 104:121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang X, Zhou P, Zhang W, Zhang W, Wang Y (2013) Selection of landscape tree species of tolerant to sulfur dioxide pollution in subtropical China. Open Journal of Forestry 3:104–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luzimar Campos da Silva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Talita Oliveira de Araújo
    • 1
  • Carlos Alberto Martinez
    • 2
  • Francisco de Almeida Lobo
    • 3
  • Aristéa Alves Azevedo
    • 1
  • Marco Antonio Oliva
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biologia VegetalUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Solos e Engenharia RuralUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoCuiabáBrazil

Personalised recommendations