Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 15, pp 11236–11254 | Cite as

Vermistabilization of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L) waste produced from sugar factory using earthworm Eisenia fetida: Genotoxic assessment by Allium cepa test

  • Sartaj Ahmad Bhat
  • Jaswinder Singh
  • Adarsh Pal VigEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

In the present study, sugar beet mud (SBM) and pulp (SBP) produced as a waste by-products of the sugar industry were mixed with cattle dung (CD) at different ratios on dry weight basis for vermicomposting with Eisenia fetida. Minimum mortality and highest population of worms were observed in 20:80 (SBM20) mixture of SBM and 10:90 (SBP10) ratios. However, increased percentages of wastes significantly affected the growth and fecundity of worms. Nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, sodium, increased from initial feed mixture to final products (i.e., vermicompost), while organic carbon (OC), C:N ratio and electrical conductivity (EC) declined in all the products of vermicomposting. Although there was an increase in the contents of all the heavy metals except copper, chromium, and iron in SBM, the contents were less than the international standards for compost which indicates that the vermicompost can be used in the fields without any ill effects on the soil. Allium cepa root chromosomal aberration assay was used to evaluate the genotoxicity of pre- and post-vermicomposted SBM to understand the effect of vermicomposting on the reduction of toxicity. Genotoxicity analysis of post-vermicomposted samples of SBM revealed 18–75 % decline in the aberration frequencies. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was recorded to identify the changes in texture in the control and vermicomposted samples. The vermicomposted mixtures in the presence of earthworms confirm more numerous surface irregularities that prove to be good manure.

Keywords

Vermicomposting Sugar beet waste Eisenia fetida Genotoxicity Scanning electron microscopy Allium cepa root chromosomal aberration assay 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Sartaj Ahmad Bhat is thankful to the UGC, New Delhi for the financial assistance in the form of UGC-BSR Fellowship and Department of Botanical and Environmental Sciences for necessary laboratory facilities.

Ethical statement

1. The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

2. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full),

3. A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time.

4. No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support our conclusions

5. Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities.

6. Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

Compliance with ethical standards

Eisenia fetida was used as an experimental animal in this study which was conducted in accordance with national and institutional guidelines for the protection of human and animal welfare.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abdel-Migid HM, Azab YA, Ibrahim WM (2007) Use of plant genotoxicity bioassay for the evaluation of efficiency of algal biofilters in bioremediation of toxic industrial effluent. Ecotox Environ Saf 66:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aira M, Monroy F, Dominguez J, Mato S (2002) How earthworm density affects microbial biomass and activity in pig manure. Europ J soil Biol 38:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aira M, Monroy F, Dominguez J (2007) Earthworms strongly modify microbial biomass and activity triggering enzymatic activities during vermicomposting independently of the application rates of pig slurry. Sci Total Enviro 385:252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander M (1983) In introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi, 467 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. AOAC., 2000. In: Horwitz, W. (Ed.), Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  6. Arillo A, Melodia F (1991) Reducation of hexavalent chromium by the earthworm E. fetida (Savigny). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:391–394Google Scholar
  7. Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2000) Influence of earthworm processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Bioresour Technol 75:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benitez E, Nogales R, Elvira C, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (1999) Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabilization of sewage sludge composting with Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 67:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2013) Vermiremediation of dyeing sludge from textile mill with the help of exotic earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:5975–5982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2014) Genotoxic assessment and optimization of pressmud with the help of exotic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:8112–8123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2015) Potential utilization of bagasse as feed material for earthworm Eisenia fetida and production of vermicompost. Springerplus 4:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carita R, Marin-Morales MA (2008) Induction of chromosome aberrations in the Allium cepa test system caused by the exposure of seeds to industrial effluents contaminated with azo dyes. Chemosphere 72:722–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chauhan A, Joshi PC (2010) Composting of some dangerous and toxic weeds using Eisenia fetida. J Am Sci 6(3):1–6Google Scholar
  14. Delgado M, Bigeriego M, Walter I, Calbo R (1995) Use of California red worm in sewage sludge transformation. Turrialba 45:33–41Google Scholar
  15. Deolalikar AV, Mitra A, Bhattacharyee S, Chakraborty S (2005) Effect of vermicomposting process on metal content of paper mill solid waste. J Environ Sci Engg 47:81–84Google Scholar
  16. Dinand E, Chanzy H, Vignon M (1996) Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose 3:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dronnet VM, Renard CMGC, Axelos MAV, Thibault JF (1997) Binding of divalent metal cations by sugar-beet pulp. Carbohyd Polym 34:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards CA, Dominguez J, Neuhauser EF (1998) Growth and reproduction of Perionyx excavatus (Perr.) (Megascolecidae) as factors in organic waste management. Bio Fertil Soils 27:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fatima RA, Ahmad M (2006) Genotoxicity of industrial waste waters obtained from two different pollution sources in northern India: a comparison of three plant bioassay. Mutat Res 609:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fayolle LH, Michaud DC, Stawiecki J (1997) Influence of temperature and food source on the life cycle of the earthworm Dendrobaena veneta (Oligochaeta). Soil Biol Biochem 29:747–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrari B, Radetski CM, Veber AM, Ferard JF (1999) Ecotoxicological assessment of solid waste: a combined liquid and solid phase testing approach using a battery of bioassays and biomarkers. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1195–1202Google Scholar
  22. Fischer E, Koszorus L (1992) Sublethal, accumulation capacities and elimination rates of As, Hg and Se in the manure worms Eisenia fetida. Pedobiologia 36:172–178Google Scholar
  23. Fiskesjo G (1988) The Allium test-an alternative in environmental studies: the relative toxicity of metal ions. Mutat Res 197:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flack FM, Hartenstein R (1984) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida on microorganisms and cellulose. Soil Biol Biochem 16:491–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fracchia L, Dohrmann AB, Martinotti MG, Tebbe CC (2006) Bacterial diversity in a finished compost and vermicompost: differences revealed by cultivation-independent analyses of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:942–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gajalakshmi S, Ramasamy EV, Abbasi SA (2005) Composting–vermicomposting of leaf litter ensuing from the trees of mango (Mangifera indica). Bioresour Technol 96:1057–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaur AC, Singh G (1995) Recycling of rural and urban waste through conventional and vermicomposting. In: Tondon HLS (ed) Recycling of crop, animal, human and industrial waste in agriculture. Fertilizer Development and Consultation Organization, New Delhi, pp 31–49Google Scholar
  28. Gerente C, Couespel du Mesnil P, Andres Y, Thibault JF, Le Cloirec P (2000) Removal of metal ions from aqueous solution on low cost natural polysaccharides-sorption mechanism approach. React Funct Polym 46:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghosh M, Chattopadhyay GN, Baral K (1999) Transformation of phosphorus during vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol 69:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant WF (1982) Chromosome aberration assays in Allium. A report of U.S. Environmental protection agency gene- Tox program. Mutat Res 99:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grover IS, Kaur S (1999) Genotoxicity of wastewater samples from sewage and industrial effluent detected by the Allium root anaphase aberration and micronucleus assays. Mutat Res 426:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hait S, Tare V (2011) Optimizing vermistabilization of waste activated sludge using vermicompost as bulking material. Waste Manage 31:502–5011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hayawin ZN, Khalil HPSA, Jawaid M, Ibrahim MH, Astimar AA (2010) Exploring chemical analysis of vermicompost of various oil palm fibre wastes. Environmentalist 30:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Honarvar M, Samavat S, Davoodi MH, Karimi KH (2011) Possibility of producing compost and vermicompost from sugar beet waste in the sugar factory. J Food Technol Nutria 8:46–53Google Scholar
  35. Jain K, Singh J, Chauhan LKS, Murthy RC, Gupta SK (2004) Modulation of flyash-induced genotoxicity in Vicia faba by vermicomposting. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 59:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant material with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci 109:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Junior HM, Da-Silva J, Arenzon A, Portela CS, De-Sa-Ferreira IC, Henriques JAP (2007) Evaluation of genotoxicity and toxicity of water and sediment samples from a Brazilian stream influenced by tanneries industries. Chemosphere 67:1211–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaur A, Singh J, Vig AP, Dhaliwal SS, Rup PJ (2010) Cocomposting with and without Eisenia fetida for conversion of toxic paper mill sludge into soil conditioner. Bioresour Technol 101:8192–8198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaushik P, Garg VK (2004) Dynamics of biological and chemical parameters during vermicomposting of solid textile mill sludge mixed with cow dung and agricultural residues. Bioresour Technol 94:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaviraj B, Sharma S (2003) Municipal solid waste management through vermicomposting employing exotic and local species of earthworms. Bioresour Technol 90:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaymak F, Goc-Rasgele P (2009) Genotoxic effect of raxil on root tips and anthers of Allium cepa L. Caryologia 62:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Khwairakpam M, Bhargava R (2009) Vermitechnology for sewage sludge recycling. J Hazard Mater 161:948–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumar R, Verma D, Singh BL, Umesh K, Shweta (2010) Composting of sugar-cane waste by- products through treatment with microorganisms and subsequent vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol 101:670–6711Google Scholar
  44. Kumar DS, Kumar PS, Rajendran NM, Kumar VU, Anbuganapathi G (2014) Evaluation of vermicompost maturity using scanning electron microscopy and paper chromatography analysis. J Agric Food Chem 62:2738–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lasaridi K, Protopapa I, Kotsou M, Pilidis G, Manios T, Kyriacou A (2003) Quality assessment of composts in the green market: the need for standards and quality assurance. J Environ Manage 80:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Domínguez J (2008) Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere 72:1013–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee KE (1985) Earthworm: their ecology and relationship with soil and land use. Academic, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  48. Leme DM, Marin-Morales MA (2009) Allium cepa test in environmental monitoring: a review on its applications. Mutat Res 682:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ma TH (1999) The international program on plant bioassays and the report of the follow-up study after the hands-on workshop in China. Mutat Res 426:103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Muthukumaravel K, Amsath A, Sukumaran M (2008) Vermicomposting of vegetable wastes using cow dung. E J Chem 5:810–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 71:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon and organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–1010Google Scholar
  53. Neuhauser EF, Hartenstein R, Kaplan DL (1980) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida in relation to population density and food rationing. OIKOS 35:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Odeigah PGC, Nurudeen O, Amund OO (1997) Genotoxicity of oil field wastewater in Nigeria. Hereditas 126:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oosterveld A, Beldman G, Schols H, Voragen A (2000) Characterization of arabinose and ferulic acid rich pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses from sugar beet pulp. Carbohydr Res 328:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plaza C, Nogales R, Senesi N, Benitez E, Polo A (2007) Organic matter humification by vermicomposting of cattle manure alone and mixed with two phase olive pomace. Bioresour Technol 9:5085–5089Google Scholar
  57. Prakash M, Karmegam N (2010) Vermistabilization of pressmud using Perionyx ceylanensis Mich. Bioresour Technol 101:8464–8468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Radic S, Stipanicev D, Vujcic MM, Sirac S, Pevalek-Kozlina B (2010) The evaluation of surface and wastewater genotoxicity using the Allium cepa test. Sci Total Environ 408:1228–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rank J (2003) The method of Allium anaphase-telophase chromosome aberration assay. Ekologija 1:38–42Google Scholar
  60. Rank J, Nielsen MH (1994) Evaluation of the Allium anaphase-telophase test in relation to genotoxicity screening of industrial wastewater. Mutat Res 312:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rank J, Nielsen MH (1998) Genotoxicity testing of waste water sludge using the Allium cepa anaphase-telophase chromosome aberration assay. Mutat Res 418:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rathinamala J, Jayashree S, Lakshmanaperumalsamy P (2008) Potential utilization of domestic wastes as a suitable experimental diet to enhance the biomass of Eudrilus eugeniae in various seasons. Eco Env Cons 14(1):43–50Google Scholar
  63. Ravindran B, Dinesh SL, John Kennedy L, Sekaran G (2008) Vermicomposting of solid waste generated from leather industries using epigeic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 151:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reinecke AJ, Reinecke SA (1997) The influence of lead and manganese on spermatozoa of Eisenia foetida (Oligochaeta). Soil Biol Biochem 29:737–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Samka-kincl V, Stegnar P, Lovka M, Toman MJ (1996) The evaluation of waste, surface and ground water quality using the Allium test procedure. Mutat Res 368:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sangwan P, Kaushik CP, Garg VK (2010) Vermicomposting of sugar industry waste (pressmud) mixed with cow dung employing an epigeic earthworm Eisenia foetida. Waste Mgmt Res 28:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Singh D, Suthar S (2012) Vermicomposting of herbal pharmaceutical industry solid wastes. Ecol Eng 39:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Singh J, Kaur A, Vig AP, Rup PJ (2010) Role of Eisenia fetida in rapid recycling of nutrients from bio sludge of beverage industry. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:430–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Singh RP, Singh P, Araujo ASF, Ibrahim MH, Sulaiman O (2011) Management of urban solid wastes, vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resour Conserv Recy 55:719–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Singh J, Kaur A, Vig AP (2014) Bioremediation of distillery sludge into soil-enriching material through vermicomposting with the help of Eisenia fetida. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:1403–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Srivastava R, Kumar D, Gupta SK (2005) Bioremediation of municipal sludge by vermitechnology and toxicity assessment by Allium cepa. Bioresour Technol 96:1867–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Subramanian S, Sivarajan M, Saravanapriya S (2010) Chemical changes during vermicomposting of sago industry solid wastes. J Hazard Mater 179:318–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sun R, Hughes S (1999) Fractional isolation and physico-chemical characterization of hemicelluloses and cellulose from sugar beet pulp. Carbohydr Poly 36:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Suthar S (2006) Potential utilization of Guar gum industrial waste in vermicompost production. Bioresour Technol 97:2474–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suthar S (2008) Bioconversion of post-harvest residues and cattle shed manure into value added products using earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae. Ecol Eng 32:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Suthar S (2009) Growth and fecundity of earthworm, Perionyx excavates and Perionyx sansibaricus in cattle waste solids. Environmentalist 29:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Suthar S (2012) Earthworm production in cattle dung vermicomposting system under different stocking density loads. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:748–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tognetti C, Mazzarino MJ, Laos F (2007) Cocomposting biosolids and municipal organic waste: effect of process management on stabilization and quality. Biol Fert Soils 43:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tripathi G, Bhardwaj P (2004) Comparative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting efficiency of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and Lampito mauritii (Kinberg). Bioresour Technol 92:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Viel M, Sayag D, Andre L (1987) Optimization of agricultural industrial waste management through in-vessel composting. In: de Bertoldi M (ed) Compost: Production, Quality and Use. Elsevier Essex, pp. 230-237Google Scholar
  81. Vig AP, Singh J, Wani SH, Dhaliwal SS (2011) Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresour Technol 102:7941–7945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Villar MC, Beloso MC, Acea MJ, Cabaneiro A, González-Prieto SJ, Díaz-Raviña M, Carballas T (1993) Physical and chemical characterization of four composted urban refuses. Bioresour Technol 45:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yadav A, Garg VK (2011) Recycling of organic wastes by employing Eisenia fetida. Bioresour Technol 102:2874–2880CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sartaj Ahmad Bhat
    • 1
  • Jaswinder Singh
    • 2
  • Adarsh Pal Vig
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Botanical and Environmental SciencesGuru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyKhalsa CollegeAmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations