Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relationships between bacterial energetic metabolism, mercury methylation potential, and hgcA/hgcB gene expression in Desulfovibrio dechloroacetivorans BerOc1

  • 1670 Accesses

  • 22 Citations

Abstract

The proteins encoded by the hgcA and hgcB genes are currently the only ones known to be involved in the mercury methylation by anaerobic microorganisms. However, no studies have been published to determine the relationships between their expression level and the net/gross methylmercury production. This study aimed to decipher the effect of growth conditions on methylmercury production and the relationships between hgcA and hgcB expression levels and net methylation. Desulfovibrio dechloroacetivorans strain BerOc1 was grown under sulfidogenic conditions with different carbon sources and electron donors as well as under fumarate respiration. A good correlation was found between the biomass production and the methylmercury production when the strain was grown under sulfate-reducing conditions. Methylmercury production was much higher under fumarate respiration when no sulfide was produced. During exponential growth, hgcA and hgcB gene expression levels were only slightly higher in the presence of inorganic mercury, and it was difficult to conclude whether there was a significant induction of hgcA and hgcB genes by inorganic mercury. Besides, no relationships between hgcA and hgcB expression levels and net mercury methylation could be observed when the strain was grown either under sulfate reduction or fumarate respiration, indicating that environmental factors had more influence than expression levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Bae HS, Dierberg FE, Ogram A (2014) Syntrophs dominate sequences associated with the mercury methylation-related gene hgcA in the water conservation areas of the Florida Everglades. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:6517–6526

  2. Barkay T, Wagner-Döbler I (2005) Microbial transformations of mercury: potentials, challenges, and achievements in controlling mercury toxicity in the environment. Adv Appl Microbiol 57:1–52

  3. Benoit JM, Gilmour CC, Mason RP (2001) The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3). Environ Sci Technol 35:127–132

  4. Biswas A, Brooks SC, Miller CL, Mosher JJ, Yin XL, Drake MM (2011) Bacterial growth phase influences methylmercury production by the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. Sci Total Environ 409:3943–3948

  5. Bordenave S, Goñi-Urriza M, Vilette C, Blanchard S, Caumette P, Duran R (2008) Diversity of ring-hydroxylating dioxygenases in pristine and oil contaminated microbial mats at genomic and transcriptomic levels. Environ Microbiol 10:3201–3211

  6. Borges V, Ferreira R, Nunes A, Nogueira P, Borrego MJ, Gomes JP (2010) Normalization strategies for real-time expression data in Chlamydia trachomatis. J Microbiol Methods 82:256–264

  7. Boudou A, Ribeyre F (1997) Mercury in food webs: accumulation and transfer mechanisms. Metal Ions Biol Syst 34:289–319

  8. Braaten HFV, de Wit HA, Fjeld E, Rognerud S, Lydersen E, Larssen T (2014) Environmental factors influencing mercury speciation in Subarctic and Boreal lakes. Sci Total Environ 476–477:336–345

  9. Bridou R, Monperrus M, Rodriguez Gonzalez P, Guyoneaud R, Amouroux D (2011) Simultaneous determination of mercury methylation and demethylation capacities of various sulfate-reducing bacteria using species-specific isotopic tracers. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:337–344

  10. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wttwer CT (2009) The MIQE Guidelines - Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622

  11. Compeau GC, Bartha R (1985) Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:498–502

  12. Gilmour CC, Elias DA, Kucken AM, Brown SD, Palumbo AV, Schadt CW, Wall JD (2011) Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3938–3951

  13. Gilmour CC, Podar M, Bullock AL, Graham AM, Brown S, Somenahally AC, Johs A, Hurt R, Bailey KL, Elias D (2013) Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ Sci Technol 47:11810–11820

  14. Graham AM, Aiken GR, Gilmour CC (2013) Effect of dissolved organic matter source and character on microbial Hg methylation in Hg-S-DOM solutions. Environ Sci Technol 47:5746–5754

  15. Ivask A, Hakkila K, Virta M (2001) Detection of organomercurials with sensor bacteria. Anal Chem 73:5168–5171

  16. Ivask A, Rolova T, Kahru A (2009) A suite of recombinant luminescent bacterial strains for the quantification of bioavailable heavy metals and toxicity testing. BMC Biotechnol 9:41

  17. Jay JA, Murray KJ, Gilmour CC, Mason RP, Morel FM, Roberts AL, Hemond HF (2002) Mercury methylation by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 in the presence of polysulfides. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5741–5745

  18. Jonsson S, Skyllberg U, Nilsson MB, Lundberg E, Andersson A, Björn E (2014) Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota. Nat Commun 5:4624

  19. Kerin EJ, Gilmour CC, Roden E, Suzuki MT, Coates JD, Mason RP (2006) Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7919–7921

  20. King JK, Kostka JE, Frischer ME, Saunders FM (2000) Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2430–2437

  21. Liu YR, Yu RQ, Zheng YM, He JZ (2014) Analysis of the microbial community structure by monitoring an Hg methylation gene (hgcA) in paddy soils along an Hg gradient. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:2874–2879

  22. Moberly JG, Miller CL, Brown SD, Biswas A, Brandt CC, Palumbo AV, Elias DA (2012) Role of morphological growth state and gene expression in Desulfovibrio africanus strain Walvis Bay mercury methylation. Environ Sci Technol 46:4926–4932

  23. Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA Jr, Smith SD, Tomanicek SJ, Qian Y, Brown SD, Brandt CC, Palumbo AV, Smith JC, Wall JD, Elias DA, Liang L (2013) The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 339:1332–1335

  24. Perrot V, Bridou R, Pedrero Z, Guyoneaud R, Monperrus M, Amouroux D (2015) Identical Hg isotope mass dependent fractionation signature during methylation by sulfate-reducing bacteria in sulfate and sulfate-free environment. Environ Sci Technol 49:1365–1373

  25. Pham ALT, Morris A, Zhang T, Ticknor J, Levard C, Hsu-Kim H (2014) Precipitation of nanoscale mercuric sulfides in the presence of natural organic matter: structural properties, aggregation, and biotransformation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 133:204–215

  26. Poulain AJ, Barkay T (2013) Cracking the mercury methylation code. Sciences 339:1280–1281

  27. Ranchou-Peyruse A, Moppert X, Hourcade E, Hernandez G, Caumette P, Guyoneaud R (2004) Characterization of brackish anaerobic bacteria involved in hydrocarbon degradation: A combination of molecular and culture-based approaches. Ophelia 58:255–262

  28. Ranchou-Peyruse M, Monperrus M, Bridou R, Duran R, Amouroux D, Salvado JC, Guyoneaud R (2009) Overview of mercury methylation capacities among anaerobic bacteria including representatives of the sulphate-reducers: implications for environmental studies. Geomicrobiol J 26:1–8

  29. Rigaud S, Di Giorgio C, Radakovitch O, Garnier JM, De Meo M (2012) Genotoxicity of sediment extracts of the Berre lagoon (France). Chemosphere 88:937–944

  30. Ritz M, Garenaux A, Berge M, Federighi M (2009) Determination of rpoA as the most suitable internal control to study stress response in C. jejuni by RT-qPCR and application to oxidative stress. J Microbiol Methods 76:196–200

  31. Rodriguez-Gonzalez P, Monperrus M, Alonso JIG, Amouroux D, Donard OFX (2007) Comparison of different numerical approaches for multiple spiking species-specific isotope dilution analysis exemplified by the determination of butyltin species in sediments. J Anal At Spectrom 22:1373–1382

  32. Rodriguez-Gonzalez P, Epov VN, Bridou R, Tessier E, Guyoneaud R, Monperrus M, Amouroux D (2009) Species-specific stable isotope fractionation of mercury during Hg(II) methylation by an anaerobic bacteria (Desulfobulbus propionicus) under dark conditions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9183–9188

  33. Schaefer JK, Morel FMM (2009) High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Nat Geosci 2:123–126

  34. Schaefer JK, Rocks SS, Zheng W, Liang L, Gu B, Morel FMM (2011) Active transport, substrate specificity, and methylation of Hg(II) in anaerobic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:8714–8719

  35. Schaefer JK, Kronberg RM, Morel FMM, Skyllberg U (2014) Detection of a key Hg methylation gene, hgcA, in wetland soils. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:441–447

  36. Sim MS, Ono S, Donovan K, Templer SP, Bosak T (2011) Effect of electron donors on the fractionation of sulfur isotopes by a marine Desulfovibrio sp. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 75:4244–4259

  37. Truong HY, Chen YW, Belzile N (2013) Effect of sulfide, selenite and mercuric mercury on the growth and methylation capacity of the sulfate reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Sci Total Environ 449:373–384

  38. U.N. Environment Programme DTI/1636/GE (2013) Mercury, Time to act. http://www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/Mercury_TimeToAct.pdf

  39. Widdel F, Bak F (1992) Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH (eds) The prokaryotes, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 3352–3378

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the CNRS-INSU EC2CO (Biomer Project). Authors acknowledge Angela Ivask for kindly providing the E. coli MC1061 biosensor.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors have been informed about this publication and have given their consent. This research did not involve Human Participants and/or Animals.

Author information

Correspondence to Marisol Goñi-Urriza.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Table 1

(DOC 26 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goñi-Urriza, M., Corsellis, Y., Lanceleur, L. et al. Relationships between bacterial energetic metabolism, mercury methylation potential, and hgcA/hgcB gene expression in Desulfovibrio dechloroacetivorans BerOc1. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 13764–13771 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4273-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mercury methylation
  • hgcA gene
  • hgcB gene
  • Expression levels
  • Growth conditions
  • Sulfate-reducing bacteria