Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 951–961 | Cite as

Sorption of halogenated phenols and pharmaceuticals to biochar: affecting factors and mechanisms

  • Seok-Young OhEmail author
  • Yong-Deuk Seo
Selected Papers from the 2nd Contaminated Land, Ecological Assessment and Remediation (CLEAR 2014) Conference: Environmental Pollution and Remediation

Abstract

The feasibility of using biochar as a sorbent to remove nine halogenated phenols (2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4-dibromophenol, 2,4-difluorophenol, 2-chlorophenol, 4-chlorophenol, 2-bromophenol, 4-bromophenol, 2-fluorophenol, and 4-fluorophenol) and two pharmaceuticals (triclosan and ibuprofen) from water was examined through a series of batch experiments. Types of biochar, synthesized using various biomasses including fallen leaves, rice straw, corn stalk, used coffee grounds, and biosolids, were evaluated. Compared to granular activated carbon (GAC), most of the biochar samples did not effectively remove halogenated phenols or pharmaceuticals from water. The increase in pH and deprotonation of phenols in biochar systems may be responsible for its ineffectiveness at this task. When pH was maintained at 4 or 7, the sorption capacity of biochar was markedly increased. Considering maximum sorption capacity and properties of sorbents and sorbates, it appears that the sorption capacity of biochar for halogenated phenols is related to the surface area and carbon content of the biochar and the hydrophobicity of halogenated phenols. In the cases of triclosan and ibuprofen, the sorptive capacities of GAC, graphite, and biochars were also significantly affected by pH, according to the point of zero charge (PZC) of sorbents and deprotonation of the pharmaceuticals. Pyrolysis temperature did not affect the sorption capacity of halogenated phenols or pharmaceuticals. Based on the experimental observations, some biochars are good candidates for removal of halogenated phenols, triclosan, and ibuprofen from water and soil.

Keywords

Black carbon Biochar Sorption Halogenated phenols Triclosan Ibuprofen 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2013007767).

Supplementary material

11356_2015_4201_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1470 kb)

References

  1. Ahmad M, Lee SS, Rajapaksha AU, Vithanage M, Zhang M, Cho JS, Lee SE, Ok YS (2013) Trichloroethylene adsorption by pine needle biochars produced at various pyrolysis temperatures. Bioresour Technol 143:615–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behera SK, Oh SY, Park HS (2010) Sorption of triclosan onto activated carbon, kaolinite and montmorillonite: effects of pH, ionic strength, and humic acid. J Hazard Mater 179:684–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behera SK, Oh SY, Park HS (2012) Sorptive removal of ibuprofen from water using selected soil minerals and activated carbon. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borchard N, Prost K, Kautz T, Moeller A, Siemens J (2011) Sorption of copper (II) and sulphate to different biochars before and after composting with farmyard manure. Eur J Soil Sci 63:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao X, Ma L, Gao B, Harris W (2009) Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environ Sci Technol 43:3285–3291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochar of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42:5137–5143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun Y, Sheng G, Chiu CT, Xing B (2004) Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol 38:4649–4655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faria P, Órfão J, Pereira M (2004) Adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes on activated carbons with different surface chemistries. Water Res 38:2043–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamdaoui O, Naffrechoux E (2007) Modeling of adsorption isotherms of phenol and chlorophenols onto granular activated carbon. Part 1. Two-parameters models and equations allowing determination of thermodynamic parameters. J Hazard Mater 147:381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansch C, Leo A, Hoekman D (1995) Exploring QSAR: volume 2: hydrophobic, electronic, and steric constants (Hydrophobic, Electronic & Steric Constants). American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Hesse PR (1971) A textbook of soil chemical analysis. John Murry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Jindarom C, Meeyoo V, Kitiyanan B, Rirksomboon T, Rangsunvigit P (2007) Surface characterization and dye adsoptive capacities of char obtained from pyrolysis/gasification of sewage sludge. Chem Eng J 133:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasozi GN, Zimmerman AR, Nkedi-Kizza P, Gao B (2010) Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol 44:6189–6195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuramochi H, Maeda K, Kawamoto K (2004) Water solubility and partitioning behavior of brominated phenols. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1386–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lattao C, Cao X, Mao J, Schmidt-Rohr K, Pignatello JJ (2014) Influence of molecular structure and adsorbent properties on sorption of organic compounds to a temperature series of wood char. Environ Sci Technol 48:4790–4798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for the environmental management, science and technology. Earthscan, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Pignatello JJ, Wang Y, Xing B (2013) New insight into adsorption mechanism of ionizable compounds on carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 47:8334–8341Google Scholar
  19. Lima IM, Boateng AA, Klasson KT (2009) Pyrolysis of broiler manure: char and product gas characterization. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:1292–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu QS, Zheng T, Wang P, Jiang JP, Li N (2010) Adsorption isotherm, kinetic and mechanism studies of some substituted phenols on activated carbon fibers. Chem Eng J 157:348–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loganathan VA, Feng Y, Sheng GD, Clement TP (2009) Crop-residue-derived char influences sorption, desorption, and bioavailability of atrazine in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:967–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu H, Zhang W, Yang Y, Huang X, Wang S, Qiu R (2012) Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Res 46:854–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Machida M, Mochimaru T, Tatsumoto H (2006) Lead(II) adsorption onto the graphene layer of carbonaceous materials in aqueous solution. Carbon 44:2681–2688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mackay D, Shin WY, Ma KC, Lee SC (2006) Handbook of physical-chemical properties and environmental fate of organic chemicals, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  25. Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, Goodale C (2010) Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward migration leaching and soil respiration. Glob Chang Biol 16:1366–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr, Bricka M, Smith F, Yancey B, Mohammad J, Steele PH, Alexandre-Franco MF, Gómez-Serrano V, Gong H (2007) Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. J Colloid Interface Sci 310:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mui ELK, Cheung WH, Valix M, McKay G (2010) Dye adsorption onto char from bamboo. J Hazard Mater 177:1001–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ni J, Pignatello JJ, Xing B (2011) Adsorption of aromatic carboxylate ions to black carbon (biochar) is accompanied by proton exchange with water. Environ Sci Technol 45:9240–9248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oh SY, Seo YD (2014) Sorptive removal of nitro explosives and metals using biochar. J Environ Qual 43:1663–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oh SY, Yoon MK (2013) Biochar for treating acid mine drainage. Environ Eng Sci 30:589–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oh SY, Son JG, Chiu PC (2013) Biochar-mediated reductive transformation of nitro herbicides and explosives. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pattanayak J, Mondal K, Mathew S, Lalvani SB (2000) A parametric evaluation of the removal of As(V) and As(III) by carbon-based adsorbent. Carbon 38:589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peng F, He PW, Luo Y, Lu X, Liang Y, Fu J (2012) Adsorption of phosphate by biomass char deriving from fast pyrolysis of biomass waste. Clean—Soil Air Water 40:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pignatello JJ, Kwon S, Lu Y (2006) Effect of natural organic substance and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): attenuation of surface activity by humic and fulvic acids. Environ Sci Technol 40:7757–7763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qiu Y, Xiao X, Cheng H, Zhou Z, Sheng GD (2009) Influence of environmental factors on pesticide sorption by black carbon: pH and model dissolved organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 43:4973–4978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rio S, Faur-Brasquet C, Le Coq L, Le Cloirec P (2005) Structure characterization and adsorption properties of pyrolyzed sewage sludge. Environ Sci Technol 39:4249–4257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rump HH, Krist H (1988) Laboratory manual for the examination of water, wastewater and soil. VCH, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Sander M, Pignatello JJ (2005) Characterization of charcoal adsorption sites for aromatic compounds: insights drawn from single-solute and bi-solute competitive experiments. Environ Sci Technol 39:1606–1615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seredych M, Badosz TJ (2006) Removal of copper on composite sewage sludge/industrial sludge-based adsorbents: the role of surface chemistry. J Colloid Interface Sci 302:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sohi S, Loez-Capel E, Krull E, Bol R (2009) Biochar’s role in soil and climate change: a review of research needs. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 05/09, SCIROGoogle Scholar
  41. Sparks DL (2002) Environmental soil chemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  42. Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manage 1:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stringer R, Johnston P (2001) Chlorine and the environment: an overview of the chlorine industry. Kluwer Academic Pub, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Klasson KT, Chang S, Wartelle LH, Rodgers JE (2010) Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem 58:5538–5544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uchimiya M, Klasson KT, Wartelle LH, Lima IM (2011) Influence of soil properties on heavy metal sequestration by biochar amendment: 1. Copper sorption isotherm and the release of cations. Chemosphere 82:1431–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang JP, Chen YZ, Feng HM, Zhang SJ, Yu HQ (2007) Removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol from aqueous solution by static-air-activated carbon fibers. J Colloid Interface Sci 313:80–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang S, Ma Q, Zhu ZH (2009) Characteristics of unburned carbons and their application for humic acid removal from water. Fuel Process Technol 90:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang Y, Sheng G (2003) Enhanced pesticide sorption by soils containing particulate matter from crop residue burns. Environ Sci Technol 37:3635–3639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang Y, Chun Y, Sheng G, Huang M (2004) pH-dependence of pesticide adsorption by wheat-residue-derived black carbon. Langmuir 20:6736–6741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang K, Wu W, Jing Q, Zhu L (2008) Aqueous adsorption of aniline, phenol, and their substitutes by muiti-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ Sci Technol 42:7931–7936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yuan JH, Xu RK, Zhang H (2011) The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 102:3488–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhou Z, Shi D, Qiu Y, Sheng D (2010) Sorptive domains of pine chars as probed by benzene and nitrobenzene. Environ Pollut 158:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu D, Pignatello JJ (2005) Characterization of aromatic compound sorptive interactions with black carbon (charcoal) assisted by graphite as a model. Environ Sci Technol 39:2033–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of UlsanUlsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations