Emission characteristics of VOCs emitted from consumer and commercial products and their ozone formation potential
- 503 Downloads
The characteristics of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from several consumer and commercial products (body wash, dishwashing detergent, air freshener, windshield washer fluid, lubricant, hair spray, and insecticide) were studied and compared. The spray products were found to emit the highest amount of VOCs (~96 wt%). In contrast, the body wash products showed the lowest VOC contents (~1.6 wt%). In the spray products, 21.6–96.4 % of the VOCs were propane, iso-butane, and n-butane, which are the components of liquefied petroleum gas. Monoterpene (C10H16) was the dominant component of the VOCs in the non-spray products (e.g., body wash, 53–88 %). In particular, methanol was present with the highest amount of VOCs in windshield washer fluid products. In terms of the number of carbon, the windshield washer fluids, lubricants, insecticides, and hair sprays comprised >95 % of the VOCs in the range C2–C5. The VOCs in the range C6–C10 were predominantly found in the body wash products. The dishwashing detergents and air fresheners contained diverse VOCs from C2 to C11. Besides comprising hazardous VOCs, VOCs from consumer products were also ozone precursors. The ozone formation potential of the consumer and commercial spray products was estimated to be higher than those of liquid and gel materials. In particular, the hair sprays showed the highest ozone formation potential.
KeywordsVOCs Spray Ozone formation potential Consumer product Commercial product Monoterpene
This study was supported by the Korea Ministry of Environment by “Eco-Innovation project (411-113-013)”.
- California Environmental Protection Agency-Cal. EPA (2005) CARB 310—determination of volatile organic compounds in consumer products and reactive organic compounds in aerosol coating productsGoogle Scholar
- Carter WPL (2013) Estimation of ozone reactivities for volatile organic compound speciation profiles in the Speciate 4.2 Database. Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, USAGoogle Scholar
- European Collaborative Action (ECA) (1997) Report No. 19. Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) in indoor air quality investigationsGoogle Scholar
- ISO 16000-6 (2002) Indoor air—part 6: determination of volatile organic compounds in indoor and chamber air by active sampling on TENAX TA sorbent, thermal desorption and gas chromatography using MSD/FIDGoogle Scholar
- ISO 16000-9 (2004) Indoor air—part 9: determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds—emission test chamber methodGoogle Scholar
- Latella A, Stani G, Cobelli L, Duane M, Junninen H, Astorga C, Larsen BR (2005) Semicontinuous GC analysis and receptor modeling for source apportionment of ozone precursor hydrocarbons in Bresso. Milan, J Chromatogr A 1071:29–39Google Scholar
- Pohanish RP (2012) Sittig’s handbook of toxic and hazardous chemicals and carcinogens (sixth edition), Elsevier Inc., MA 02451, USAGoogle Scholar
- Szulejko JE, Kim YH, Kim KH (2013) Method to predict gas chromatographic response factors for the trace-level analysis of volatile organic compounds based on the effective carbon number concept. J Sep Sci 36:3356–3365Google Scholar
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Method TO-17. Determination volatile organic compounds in ambient air using active sampling onto sorbent tubesGoogle Scholar
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) SPECIATE 4.0Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (2010) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutantsGoogle Scholar