Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 6696–6712 | Cite as

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with total suspended particles and surface soils in Kunming, China: distribution, possible sources, and cancer risks

  • Xiaoxia Yang
  • Dong Ren
  • Wenwen Sun
  • Xiaoman Li
  • Bin Huang
  • Rong Chen
  • Chan Lin
  • Xuejun PanEmail author
Research Article


The concentrations, distribution, possible sources, and cancer risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in total suspended particles (TSPs) and surface soils collected from the same sampling spots were compared in Kunming, China. The total PAH concentrations were 9.35–75.01 ng/m3 and 101.64–693.30 ng/g dry weight (d.w.), respectively, in TSPs and surface soils. Fluoranthene (FLA), pyrene (PYR), chrysene (CHR), and phenanthrene (PHE) were the abundant compounds in TSP samples, and phenanthrene (PHE), fluorene (FLO), fluoranthene (FLA), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), and benzo[g,h,i]perylene (BghiP) were the abundant compounds in surface soil samples. The spatial distribution of PAHs in TSPs is closely related to the surrounding environment, which varied significantly as a result of variations in source emission and changes in meteorology. However, the spatial distribution of PAHs in surface soils is supposed to correlate with a city’s urbanization history, and high levels of PAHs were always observed in industry district, or central or old district of city. Based on the diagnostic ratios and principal component analysis (PCA), vehicle emissions (especially diesel-powered vehicles) and coal and wood combustion were the main sources of PAHs in TSPs, and the combustion of wood and coal, and spills of unburnt petroleum were the main sources of PAHs in the surface soils. The benzo[a]pyrene equivalent concentration (BaPeq) for the TSPs and surface soil samples were 0.16–2.57 ng/m3 and 11.44–116.03 ng/g d.w., respectively. The incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) exposed to particulate PAHs ranged from 10−4 to 10−3 indicating high potential of carcinogenic risk, and the ILCR exposed to soil PAHs was from 10−7 to 10−6 indicating virtual safety. These presented results showed that particle-bound PAHs had higher potential carcinogenic ability for human than soil PAHs. And, the values of cancer risk for children were always higher than for adults, which demonstrated that children were sensitive to carcinogenic effects of PAHs.


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Total suspended particles Surface soils Source apportionment Potential risk 



This project was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21267012), Application Fundamental Key Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2013FA011), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2013 M531987), Application Fundamental Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (Grant No. 2012FB124), and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KF2013-04).


  1. Agarwal T (2009) Concentration level, pattern and toxic potential of PAHs in traffic soil of Delhi, India. J Hazard Mater 171:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal T, Khillare PS, Shridhar V, Ray S (2009) Pattern, sources and toxic potential of PAHs in the agricultural soils of Delhi, India. J Hazard Mater 163:1033–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aislabie J, Balks M, Astori N, Stevenson G, Symons R (1999) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fuel-oil contaminated soils, Antarctica. Chemosphere 39:2201–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bae SY, Yi SM, Kim YP (2002) Temporal and spatial variations of the particle size distribution of PAHs and their dry deposition fluxes in Korea. Atmos Environ 36:5491–5500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boström CE, Gerde P, Hanberg A, Jernström B, Johansson C, Kyrklund T (2002) Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Persp 110(Suppl 3):451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourotte C, Forti MC, Taniguchi S, Bícego MC, Lotufo PA (2005) A wintertime study of PAHs in fine and coarse aerosols in São Paulo city, Brazil. Atmos Environ 39:3799–3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozlaker A, Muezzinoglu A, Odabasi M (2008) Atmospheric concentrations, dry deposition and air–soil exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an industrial region in Turkey. J Hazard Mater 153:1093–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callén MS, De La Cruz MT, López JM, Navarro MV, Mastral AM (2009) Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of the PM10 in Zaragoza (Spain). Chemosphere 76:1120–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cecinato A, Ciccioli P, Brancaleoni E, Zagari M (1998) PAH and N-PAH in the urban atmosphere of Rome and Milan. Ann Chim 88:369–380Google Scholar
  10. Cetin B, Yatkin S, Bayram A, Odabasi M (2007) Ambient concentrations and source apportionment of PCBs and trace elements around an industrial area in Izmir, Turkey. Chemosphere 69:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang KF, Fang GC, Chen JC, Wu YS (2006) Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Asia: a review from 1999 to 2004. Environ Pollut 142:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen B, Xuan X, Zhu L, Wang J, Gao Y, Yang K (2004) Distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface waters, sediments and soils of Hangzhou City, China. Water Res 38:3558–3568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi SD, Ghim YS, Lee JY, Kim JY, Kim YP (2012) Factors affecting the level and pattern of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at Gosan, Korea during a dust period. J Hazard Mater 227:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cousins IT, Beck AK, Jones KC (1999) A review of the processes involved in the exchange of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC) across the air-soil interface. Sci Total Environ 228:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daly GL, Lei YD, Castillo LE, Muir DCG, Wania F (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Costa Rican air and soil: a tropical/temperate comparison. Atmos Environ 41:7339–7350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De La Torre-Roche RJ, Lee WY, Campos-Díaz SI (2009) Soil-borne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in El Paso, Texas: analysis of a potential problem in the United States/Mexico border region. J Hazard Mater 163:946–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong TTT, Lee BK (2009) Characteristics, toxicity, and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in road dust of Ulsan, Korea. Chemosphere 74:1245–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esen F, Tasdemir Y, Vardar N (2008) Atmospheric concentrations of PAHs, their possible sources and gas-to-particle partitioning at a residential site of Bursa, Turkey. Atmos Res 88:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang GC, Chang CN, Wu YS, Fu PP, Yang IL, Chen MH (2004) Characterization, identification of ambient air and road dust polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in central Taiwan, Taichung. Sci Total Environ 327:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman DJ, Cattell FC (1990) Woodburning as a source of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 24:1581–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao B, Yu JZ, Li SX, Ding X, He QF, Wang XM (2011) Roadside and rooftop measurements of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 in urban Guangzhou: evaluation of vehicular and regional combustion source contributions. Atmos Environ 45:7184–7191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halsall CJ, Coleman PJ, Davis BJ, Burnett V, Waterhouse KS, Harding-Jones P (1994) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in UK urban air. Environ Sci Technol 28:2380–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harner T, Bidleman TF (1998) Measurement of octanol-air partition coefficients for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated naphthalenes. J Chem Eng Data 43:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison RM, Smith DJT, Luhana L (1996) Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK. Environ Sci Technol 30:825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hippelein M, McLachlan MS (1998) Soil/air partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds. 1. method development and influence of physical-chemical properties. Environ Sci Technol 32:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiang YF, Wang XT, Wang F, Jia Y, Wu MH, Sheng GY, Fu JM (2009) Levels, composition profiles and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soil of Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 75:1112–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiao WT, Lu YL, Li J, Han JY, Wang TY, Luo W, Shi YJ, Wang G (2009) Identification of sources of elevated concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an industrial area in Tianjin, China. Environ Monit Assess 158:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kakareka SV, Kukharchyk TI, Khomich VS (2005) Study of PAH emission from the solid fuels combustion in residential furnaces. Environ Pollut 133:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khalili NR, Scheff PA, Holsen TM (1995) PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and gasoline engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions. Atmos Environ 29:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E, Brown RJC (2013) A review of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their human health effects. Environ Int 60:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krugly E, Martuzevicius D, Sidaraviciute R, Ciuzas D, Prasauskas T, Kauneliene V, Stasiulaitiene I, Kliucininkas L (2014) Characterization of particulate and vapor phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor and outdoor air of primary schools. Atmos Environ 82:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kulkarni P, Venkataraman C (2000) Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Mumbai, India. Atmos Environ 34:2785–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemieux PM, Lutes CC, Santoianni DA (2004) Emissions of organic air toxics from open burning: a comprehensive review. Prog Energy Combust 30:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li C, Kang S, Chen P, Zhang Q, Fang GC (2012) Characterizations of particle-bound trace metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) within Tibetan tents of south Tibetan Plateau, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1620–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liao CM, Chiang KC (2006) Probabilistic risk assessment for personal exposure to carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Taiwanese temples. Chemosphere 63:1610–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin C, Liu JL, Wang RM, Wang Y, Huang B, Pan XJ (2013) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils of Kunming, China: concentrations, distribution, sources, and potential risk. Soil Sediment Contam 22:753–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu S, Xia X, Yang L, Shen M, Liu R (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of different land uses in Beijing, China: distribution, sources and their correlation with the city’s urbanization history. J Hazard Mater 177:1085–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma WL, Li YF, Qi H, Sun DZ, Liu LY, Wang DG (2010) Seasonal variations of sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to a northeastern urban city, China. Chemosphere 79:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma WL, Sun DZ, Shen WG, Yang M, Qi H, Liu LY (2011) Atmospheric concentrations, sources and gas-particle partitioning of PAHs in Beijing after the 29th Olympic Games. Environ Pollut 159:1794–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menzie CA, Potocki BB, Santodonato J (1992) Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 26:1278–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Motelay-Massei A, Harner T, Shoeib M, Diamond M, Stern G, Rosenberg B (2005) Using passive air samplers to assess urban–rural trends for persistent organic pollutants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 2. Seasonal trends for PAHs, PCBs, and organochlorine pesticides. Environ Sci Technol 39:5763–5673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nam JJ, Thomas GO, Jaward FM, Steinnes E, Gustafsson O, Jones KC (2008) PAHs in background soils from Western Europe: influence of atmospheric deposition and soil organic matter. Chemosphere 70:1596–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nisbet IC, LaGoy PK (1992) Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regul Toxicol Pharm 16:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okuda T, Okamoto K, Tanaka S, Shen Z, Han Y, Huo Z (2010) Measurement and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the aerosol in Xi’an, China, by using automated column chromatography and applying positive matrix factorization (PMF). Sci Total Environ 408:1909–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Panther BC, Hooper MA, Tapper NJ (1999) A comparison of air particulate matter and associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in some tropical and temperate urban environments. Atmos Environ 33:4087–4099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng C, Chen WP, Liao XL, Wang ME, Ouyang ZY, Jiao WT, Bai Y (2011) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of Beijing: status, sources, distribution and potential risk. Environ Pollut 159:802–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rangaswamy M, Govindaraj S, Selvaraj D (2011) Fine particulate phase PAHs in ambient atmosphere of Chennai metropolitan city, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:764–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rubio-Clemente A, Torres-Palma RA, Peñuela GA (2014) Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous environment by chemical treatments: a review. Sci Total Environ 478:201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. SFT (1999) Guidelines on risk assessment of contaminated sites. SFT report 99.06. Norwegian Pollution Control AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  50. Simcik MF, Franz TP, Zhang H, Eisenreich SJ (1998) Gas-particle partitioning of PCBs and PAHs in the Chicago urban and adjacent coastal atmosphere: states of equilibrium. Environ Sci Technol 32:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sofuoglu A, Cetin E, Bozacioglu SS, Sener GD, Odabasi M (2004) Short-term variation in ambient concentrations and gas/particle partitioning of organochlorine pesticides in Izmir, Turkey. Atmos Environ 38:4483–4493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume 1: human health evaluation manual (Part A). Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1-89/002Google Scholar
  53. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1991a) Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: “standard default exposure factors”. OSWER Directive 9285:6–03Google Scholar
  54. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1991b) Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Volume 1: human health evaluation manual (Part B, Development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals). OSWER, [9285.7-01B. EPA/540/R-92/003]Google Scholar
  55. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1996) EPA Method Collections.
  56. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2002) Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. OSWER 9355:4–24Google Scholar
  57. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2007) EPA Method Collections.
  58. United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2011a) Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. EPA/600/R-090/052 FGoogle Scholar
  59. Vaeck LV, Cauwenberghe KV (1978) Cascade impactor measurements of the size distribution of the major classes of organic pollutants in atmospheric particulate matter. Atmos Environ 12:2229–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. VanRooij JG, Bodelier-Bade MM, Jongeneelen FJ (1993) Estimation of individual dermal and respiratory uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 12 coke oven workers. Br J Ind Med 50:623–632Google Scholar
  61. Wang W, Simonich S, Giri B, Chang Y, Zhang Y, Jia Y, Tao S, Wang R, Wang B, Li W, Cao J, Lu X (2011) Atmospheric concentrations and air-soil gas exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in remote, rural village and urban areas of Beijing-Tianjin region, North China. Sci Total Environ 409:2942–2950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang C, Wang X, Gong P, Yao T (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soil across the Tibetan Plateau: spatial distribution, source and air–soil exchange. Environ Pollut 184:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilcke W (2007) Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma 141:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang Y, Guo P, Zhang Q, Li D, Zhao L, Mu D (2010) Seasonal variation, sources and gas/particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Guangzhou, China. Sci Total Environ 408:2492–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Vingarzan R, Mitchell RH, Goyette D, Sylvestre S (2002) PAHs in the Fraser River basin: a critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Org Geochem 33:489–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang Y, Tao S (2008) Seasonal variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emissions in China. Environ Pollut 156:657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang HB, Luo YM, Wong MH, Zhao QG, Zhang GL (2006) Distributions and concentrations of PAHs in Hong Kong soils. Environ Pollut 141:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhao J, Zhang F, Chen J, Xu Y (2010) Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and gas/particle partitioning in a coastal city, Xiamen, southeast China. J Environ Sci 22:1014–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhao SM, Wang B, Wang DW, Li XM, Huang B, Hu P, Zhang LW, Pan XJ (2014) Distributions, sources and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments from Dianchi Lake, China. Int J Environ Res 8:317–328Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoxia Yang
    • 1
  • Dong Ren
    • 1
  • Wenwen Sun
    • 1
  • Xiaoman Li
    • 1
  • Bin Huang
    • 1
  • Rong Chen
    • 1
  • Chan Lin
    • 1
  • Xuejun Pan
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental Science and EngineeringKunming University of Science and TechnologyKunmingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations