Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 2788–2799 | Cite as

Factors affecting the adsorptive removal of bisphenol A in landfill leachate by high silica Y-type zeolite

  • Xiaoqiang Chen
  • Taku Fujiwara
  • Shuji Fukahori
  • Tomonori Ishigaki
Research Article

Abstract

Although bisphenol A (BPA), a representative endocrine-disrupting compound, has been detected frequently in landfill leachate, effective technologies for BPA removal from landfill leachates are limited. We used high silica Y-type zeolite (HSZ-385) for the selective adsorption of BPA from landfill leachate, and factors affecting this adsorption are discussed. Higher removal efficiencies at pH 5.0–9.0 imply that neutral BPA is adsorbed more easily onto HSZ-385 than monomeric or divalent BPA anions. An increase in ionic strength and sodium acetate concentration did not affect BPA adsorption significantly, while the removal efficiency decreased slightly when more than 50 mgC/L of humic acid was added. HSZ-385 was applied to synthetic leachates that simulate the composition of landfill leachate at various degradation stages. In young acidic leachates that contain sodium acetate, the use of HSZ-385 for the adsorptive removal of BPA appears to be more effective than in old alkaline leachates, which contain large amounts of humic acid. In addition, 82 % BPA removal was achieved from young raw leachates using HSZ-385, which demonstrates that selective BPA removal from actual landfill leachate has been achieved.

Keywords

Bisphenol A High silica Y-type zeolite Adsorption Humic acid Landfill leachate Affecting factor 

Supplementary material

11356_2014_3522_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 53 kb)

References

  1. Asada T, Oikawa K, Kawata K et al (2004) Study of removal effect of bisphenol A and β-estradiol by porous carbon. J Heal Sci 50:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asakura H, Matsuto T, Tanaka N (2004) Behavior of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in leachate from MSW landfill sites in Japan. Waste Manag 24:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basile T, Petrella A, Mario P et al (2011) Review of endocrine-disrupting-compound removal technologies in water and wastewater treatment plants: an EU perspective. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:8389–8401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baun A, Ledin A, Reitzel LA et al (2004) Xenobiotic organic compounds in leachates from ten Danish MSW landfills—chemical analysis and toxicity tests. Water Res 38:3845–3858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bautista-Toledo I, Ferro-García MA, Rivera-Utrilla J et al (2005) Bisphenol A removal from water by activated carbon. Effects of carbon characteristics and solution chemistry. Environ Sci Technol 39:6246–6250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braschi I, Blasioli S, Gigli L et al (2010) Removal of sulfonamide antibiotics from water: evidence of adsorption into an organophilic zeolite Y by its structural modifications. J Hazard Mater 178:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang CY, Tsai WT, Ing CH, Chang CF (2003) Adsorption of polyethylene glycol (PEG) from aqueous solution onto hydrophobic zeolite. J Colloid Interf Sci 260:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang H-S, Choo K-H, Lee B, Choi S-J (2009) The methods of identification, analysis, and removal of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in water. J Hazard Mater 172:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong Y, Wu D, Chen X, Lin Y (2010) Adsorption of bisphenol A from water by surfactant-modified zeolite. J Colloid Interf Sci 348:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eggen T, Moeder M, Arukwe A (2010) Municipal landfill leachates: a significant source for new and emerging pollutants. Sci Total Environ 408:5147–5157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2009) An overview of landfill leachate treatment via activated carbon adsorption process. J Hazard Mater 171:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fromme H, Thomas K, Thomas O et al (2002) Occurrence of phthalates and bisphenol A and F in the environment. Water Res 36:1429–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukahori S, Fujiwara T (2014) Modeling of sulfonamide antibiotic removal by TiO2/high-silica zeolite HSZ-385 composite. J Hazard Mater 272:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukahori S, Fujiwara T, Funamizu N et al (2013) Adsorptive removal of sulfonamide antibiotics in livestock urine using the high-silica zeolite HSZ-385. Water Sci Technol 67:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fukahori S, Fujiwara T, Ito R, Funamizu N (2011) pH-dependent adsorption of sulfa drugs on high silica zeolite: modeling and kinetic study. Desalination 275:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fukahori S, Ichiura H, Kitaoka T, Tanaka H (2003a) Photocatalytic decomposition of bisphenol A in water using composite TiO2-zeolite sheets prepared by a papermaking technique. Environ Sci Technol 37:1048–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukahori S, Ichiura H, Kitaoka T, Tanaka H (2003b) Capturing of bisphenol A photodecomposition intermediates by composite TiO2–zeolite sheets. Appl Catal B Environ 46:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Höhne C, Püttmann W (2008) Occurrence and temporal variations of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A, 4-tert-octylphenol, and tech. 4-nonylphenol in two German wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 15:405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ito M, Fukahori S, Fujiwara T (2014) Adsorptive removal and photocatalytic decomposition of sulfamethazine in secondary effluent using TiO2-zeolite composites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:834–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ji L, Liu F, Xu Z et al (2009) Zeolite-templated microporous carbon as a superior adsorbent for removal of monoaromatic compounds from aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol 43:7870–7876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson AC, Sumpter JP (2001) Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works. Environ Sci Technol 35:4697–4703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joseph L, Zaib Q, Khan IA et al (2011) Removal of bisphenol A and 17α-ethinyl estradiol from landfill leachate using single-walled carbon nanotubes. Water Res 45:4056–4068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP et al (2002) Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 32:297–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu G, Ma J, Li X, Qin Q (2009a) Adsorption of bisphenol A from aqueous solution onto activated carbons with different modification treatments. J Hazard Mater 164:1275–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Z-H, Kanjo Y, Mizutani S (2009b) Removal mechanisms for endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in wastewater treatment-physical means, biodegradation, and chemical advanced oxidation: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:731–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matos J, Laine J, Herrmann J-M (1998) Synergy effect in the photocatalytic degradation of phenol on a suspended mixture of titania and activated carbon. Appl Catal B Environ 18:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakanishi A, Tamai M, Kawasaki N et al (2002) Adsorption characteristics of bisphenol A onto carbonaceous materials produced from wood chips as organic waste. J Colloid Interface Sci 252:393–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nam S-H, Seo Y-M, Kim M-G (2010) Bisphenol A migration from polycarbonate baby bottle with repeated use. Chemosphere 79:949–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ohko Y, Ando I, Niwa C et al (2001) Degradation of bisphenol A in water by TiO2 photocatalyst. Environ Sci Technol 35:2365–2368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Öman CB, Junestedt C (2008) Chemical characterization of landfill leachates—400 parameters and compounds. Waste Manag 28:1876–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pan B, Sun K, Xing B (2010a) Adsorption kinetics of 17α-ethinyl estradiol and bisphenol A on carbon nanomaterials. I. Several concerns regarding pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models. J Soils Sediments 10:838–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pan B, Xing B, Sun K (2010b) Adsorption kinetics of 17α-ethinyl estradiol and bisphenol A on carbon nanomaterials. II. Concentration-dependence. J Soils Sediments 10:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Racz L, Goel RK (2010) Fate and removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater. J Environ Monit 12:58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S et al (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater 150:468–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sakamoto H, Fukui H, Souta I, Takahashi M et al (2006) Results of continuous monitoring of bisphenol A and 4-nonylphenol concentrations in leachate from final disposal landfills. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 17:259–270 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  36. Sakamoto H, Fukui H, Souta I, Kaneko H (2004) Studies on bisphenol A and its origins in leachates from solid waste landfills. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 15:511–520 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  37. Schwarzbauer J, Heim S, Brinker S, Littke R (2002) Occurrence and alteration of organic contaminants in seepage and leakage water from a waste deposit landfill. Water Res 36:2275–2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shu H-T, Li D, Scala AA, Ma YH (1997) Adsorption of small organic pollutants from aqueous streams by aluminosilicate-based microporous materials. Sep Purif Technol 11:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai W-T, Hsu H-C, Su T-Y et al (2006) Adsorption characteristics of bisphenol-A in aqueous solutions onto hydrophobic zeolite. J Colloid Interf Sci 299:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Urase T, Miyashita K (2003) Factors affecting the concentration of bisphenol A in leachates from solid waste disposal sites and its fate in treatment processes. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 5:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urase T, Takemura J, Okumura H et al (2007) Micropollutants in leachate from Nonthaburi Solid Waste Disposal Site in Thailand. J Japan Soc Water Environ 30:617–620 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu S-H, Dong B, Huang Y (2010) Adsorption of bisphenol A by polysulphone membrane. Desalination 253:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu J, Wang L, Zhu Y (2012) Decontamination of bisphenol A from aqueous solution by graphene adsorption. Langmuir 28:8418–8425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamamoto T, Yasuhara A, Shiraishi H, Nakasugi O (2001) Bisphenol A in hazardous waste landfill leachates. Chemosphere 42:415–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yap P-S, Cheah Y-L, Srinivasan M, Lim T-T (2012) Bimodal N-doped P25-TiO2/AC composite: preparation, characterization, physical stability, and synergistic adsorptive-solar photocatalytic removal of sulfamethazine. Appl Catal A Gen 427–428:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yap P-S, Lim T-T (2012) Solar regeneration of powdered activated carbon impregnated with visible-light responsive photocatalyst: factors affecting performances and predictive model. Water Res 46:3054–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yasuhara A, Shiraishi H, Nishikawa M et al (1997) Determination of organic components in leachates from hazardous waste disposal sites in Japan by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 774:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yasuhara A, Shiraishi H, Nishikawa M et al (1999) Organic components in leachates from hazardous waste disposal sites. Waste Manag Res 17:186–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoqiang Chen
    • 1
  • Taku Fujiwara
    • 1
  • Shuji Fukahori
    • 2
  • Tomonori Ishigaki
    • 3
  1. 1.Research and Education Faculty, Natural Sciences Cluster, Agriculture UnitKochi UniversityNankokuJapan
  2. 2.New Paper Industry Program Center, Faculty of AgricultureEhime UniversityShikokuchuoJapan
  3. 3.Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management ResearchNational Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations