Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 988–995 | Cite as

Soil genotoxicity assessment—results of an interlaboratory study on the Vicia micronucleus assay in the context of ISO standardization

  • Sylvie Cotelle
  • Adrien Dhyèvre
  • Serge Muller
  • Pascale Chenon
  • Nicolas Manier
  • Pascal Pandard
  • Abdelwahad Echairi
  • Jérôme Silvestre
  • Maritxu Guiresse
  • Eric Pinelli
  • Lucia Giorgetti
  • Meri Barbafieri
  • Valéria C. Silva
  • Fernanda Engel
  • Claudemir M. Radetski
Research Article

Abstract

The Vicia micronucleus assay was standardized in an international protocol, ISO 29200, “Assessment of genotoxic effects on higher plants—Vicia faba micronucleus test,” for soil or soil materials (e.g., compost, sludge, sediment, waste, and fertilizing materials). The aim of this interlaboratory study on the Vicia micronucleus assay was to investigate the robustness of this in vivo assay in terms of its applicability in different countries where each participant were asked to use their own seeds and reference soil, in agreement with the ISO 29200 standard. The ISO 29200 standard protocol was adopted for this study, and seven laboratories from three countries (France, Italy, and Brazil) participated in the study. Negative and positive controls were correctly evaluated by 100 % of the participants. In the solid-phase test, the micronucleus frequency (number of micronuclei/1,000 cells) varied from 0.0 to 1.8 for the negative control (i.e., Hoagland’s solution) and from 5.8 to 85.7 for the positive control (i.e., maleic hydrazide), while these values varied from 0.0 to 1.7 for the negative control and from 14.3 to 97.7 for the positive control in the case of liquid-phase test. The variability in the data obtained does not adversely affect the robustness of the protocol assessed, on the condition that the methodology described in the standard ISO 29200 is strictly respected. Thus, the Vicia micronucleus test (ISO 29200) is appropriate for complementing prokaryotic or in vitro tests cited in legislation related to risk assessment of genotoxicity potential.

Keywords

Vicia faba Genotoxicity Micronucleus assay Interlaboratory study Contaminated soil ISO 29200 

References

  1. Ames BN, Lee FD, Durston WE (1973) An improved bacterial test system for the detection and classification of mutagens and carcinogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:782–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbafieri M, Giorgetti L, Giansoldati V (2012) Metal bioavailability and phytotoxicity study on Vicia faba L. grown on natural and spiked contaminated soils. 9th International Symposium on Environmental Geochemistry, Aveiro (Portugal), 15th– 21th July 2012. Abstract book pag 66Google Scholar
  3. Béraud E, Cotelle S, Leroy P, Férard JF (2007) Genotoxic effects and induction of phytochelatins in the presence of cadmium in Vicia faba roots. Mutat Res 633:112–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cotelle S, Masfaraud JF, Férard JF (1999) Assessment of the genotoxicity of two contaminated soils with the Allium/Vicia-micronucleus and the Tradescantia-micronucleus assays. Mutat Res 426:167–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cotelle S, Testolin RC, Foltête AS, Bossardi-Rissardi G, Silveira RA, Radetski CM (2012) Genotoxicity potential of a new natural formicide. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:628–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duan C, Hu B, Guo T, Luo M, Xu X, Chang X, Wen C, Meng L, Yang L, Wang H (2000) Changes of reliability and efficiency of micronucleus bioassay in Vicia faba after exposure to metal contamination for several generations. Environ Exp Bot 44:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foltête AS, Dhyèvre A, Férard JF, Cotelle S (2011a) Improvement of Vicia-micronucleus test for assessment of soil quality: a proposal for international standardization. Chemosphere 85:1624–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foltête AS, Masfaraud JF, Bigorgne E, Nahmani J, Chaurand P, Botta C, Labille J, Rose J, Férard JF, Cotelle S (2011b) Environmental impact of sunscreen nanomaterials: ecotoxicity and genotoxicity of altered TiO2 nanocomposites on Vicia faba. Environ Pollut 159:2515–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foltête AS, Masfaraud JF, Férard JF, Cotelle S (2012) Is there a relationship between early genotoxicity and life-history traits in Vicia faba exposed to cadmium-spiked soils? Mutat Res 747:159–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fusconi A, Repetto O, Bona E, Massa N, Gallo C, Dumas-Gaudot E, Berta G (2006) Effects of cadmium on meristem activity and nucleus ploidy in roots of Pisum sativum L. cv. Frisson seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 58:253–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giorgetti L, Talouizte H, Merzouki M, Caltavuturo L, Geri C, Frassinetti S (2011) Genotoxicity evaluation of effluents from textile industries of the region Fez-Boulmane, Morocco: a case study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:2275–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giorgetti L, Giansoldati V, Barbafieri M (2012) Genotoxicity study on Vicia faba L. grown on natural and spiked contaminated soils. 6th SETAC World Congress 2012 SETAC Europe 22nd Annual Meeting, Berlin, 20–24 May 2012. Abstract book TU 203 p 331Google Scholar
  13. Grant WF (1994) The present status of higher plant bioassays for the detection of environmental mutagens. Mutat Res 310:175–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoshina MM (2002) Evaluation of a possible contamination of the waters of the Claro River—Municipality of Rio Claro, part of the Corumbataí River basin, with the mutagenicity tests using Allium cepa. Monograph (Bachelor’s and Teaching degrees)—State University of São Paulo, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  15. International Standardization Organization (ISO) (2007) Soil quality—leaching procedures for subsequent chemical and ecotoxicological testing of soil and soil materials—part 2: batch test using a liquid to solid ratio of 10 l/kg of dry matter. ISO TS 21268-2, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. International Standardization Organization (ISO) (2013) Soil quality—assessment of genotoxic effects on higher plants—Vicia faba micronucleus test. ISO 29200, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu D, Zhai L, Jiang W, Wang W (1995) Effects of Mg2+, Co2+, and Hg2+ on the nucleus and nucleolus in root tip cells of Allium cepa. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 55:779–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma TH, Xu Z, Xu C, McConnell H, Rabago EV, Arreola GA, Zhang H (1995) The improved Allium/Vicia root tip micronucleus assay for clastogenicity of environmental pollutants. Mutat Res 334:185–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maluszynska J, Juchimiuk J (2005) Plant genotoxicity: a molecular cytogenetic approach in plant bioassays. Plant Genotoxicity Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 56:177–84Google Scholar
  20. Marcato-Romain CE, Guiresse M, Cecchi M, Cotelle S, Pinelli E (2009) New direct contact approach to evaluate soil genotoxicity using the Vicia faba micronucleus test. Chemosphere 77:345–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Minouflet M, Ayrault S, Badot PM, Cotelle S, Férard JF (2005) Assessment of the genotoxicity of 137Cs radiation using Vicia-micronucleus, Tradescantia-micronucleus and Tradescantia-stamen-hair mutation bioassays. J Environ Radioacy 81:143–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monarca S, Rizzoni M, Gustavino B, Zani C, Alberti A, Feretti D, Zerbini I (2003) Genotoxicity of surface water treated with different disinfectants using in situ plant tests. Environ Mol Mutag 41:353–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Commission OSPAR (2002) Survey on genotoxicity test methods for the evaluation of waste water within whole effluent assessment, convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR). UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Radetski CM, Ferrari B, Cotelle S, Masfaraud JF, Férard JF (2004) Evaluation of the genotoxic, mutagenic and oxidant stress potentials of municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash leachates. Sci Total Environ 333:209–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Römbke J, Jänsch S, Junker T, Pohl B, Scheffczyk A, Schallnaß HJ (2007) The effect of tributyltin-oxide on earthworms, springtails and plants in artificial and natural soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:525–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva VC, Almeida SM, Resgalla C Jr, Masfaraud JF, Cotelle S, Radetski CM (2013) Arsenate (As V) in water: quantitative sensitivity relationships among biomarker, ecotoxicity and genotoxicity endpoints. Ecotox Environ Safe 92:174–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175:184–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ünyayar S, Celik A, Cekic FO, Gozel A (2006) Cadmium-induced genotoxicity, cytotoxicity and lipid peroxidation in Allium sativum and Vicia faba. Mutagenesis 21:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. White PA, Claxton LD (2004) Mutagens in contaminated soil: a review. Mutat Res 567:227–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wurgler FE, Kramers PGN (1992) Environmental-effects of genotoxins (ecogenotoxicology). Mutagenesis 7:321–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvie Cotelle
    • 1
  • Adrien Dhyèvre
    • 1
  • Serge Muller
    • 1
  • Pascale Chenon
    • 2
  • Nicolas Manier
    • 3
  • Pascal Pandard
    • 3
  • Abdelwahad Echairi
    • 4
  • Jérôme Silvestre
    • 5
    • 6
  • Maritxu Guiresse
    • 5
    • 6
  • Eric Pinelli
    • 5
    • 6
  • Lucia Giorgetti
    • 7
  • Meri Barbafieri
    • 8
  • Valéria C. Silva
    • 9
  • Fernanda Engel
    • 9
  • Claudemir M. Radetski
    • 9
  1. 1.Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Environnements ContinentauxUniversité de Lorraine (LIEC), CNRS UMR 7360MetzFrance
  2. 2.RITTMO Agro-EnvironnementColmarFrance
  3. 3.INERIS, Parc technologique AlataBP2 Verneuil-en-HalatteFrance
  4. 4.WELIENCE Agro-EnvironnementRD 31, BretenièreFrance
  5. 5.Université de Toulouse; INP, UPSEcoLab (Laboratoire d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement ENSATCastanet TolosanFrance
  6. 6.CNRS EcoLabCastanet TolosanFrance
  7. 7.National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Biology and Agricultural Biotechnology (IBBA)Research Unit of PisaPisaItaly
  8. 8.National Research Council (CNR), Institute of Ecosystem Study (ISE)Research Unit of PisaPisaItaly
  9. 9.UNIVALI-Universidade do Vale do ItajaíLaboratório de Remediação AmbientalItajaíBrazil

Personalised recommendations