Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 701–710 | Cite as

Phytoremediation of Pb, Zn, Fe, and Mg with 25 wetland plant species from a paper mill contaminated site in North East India

Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In order to assess the potential of wetland plants to remediate metals from a paper mill effluent contaminated wetland site in Northeast India, 25 abundant plant species belonging to 15 different families, soil, and water samples from the sites were tested for Pb, Zn, Mg, and Fe by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The results showed that metal accumulation by wetland plants differed among species and tissues. Plants thrived in high Pb, Zn, Mg, and Fe which indicated their tolerance. According to the criteria used for selecting plants for phytoremediation such as high metal tolerance, short life cycle, wide distribution, large shoot biomass and translocation factor (TF) >1; five species each were Mg and Fe accumulators, nine species were Pb accumulators and, eight species were Zn accumulators and the rest were excluders. Alternanthera sessilis was the only plant species that had TF > 1 for all the four metals. The study indicated great promise for phytoremediation, as these accumulators could be used in future for practical phytoremediation approaches and reduction of the risk from harmful metals to human health.

Keywords

Phytoremediation Metal Wetland Tolerance Accumulation Paper mill 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bai J, Xiao R, Cui B, Zhang K, Wang Q, Liu X, Gao H, Huang L (2011) Assessment of heavy metal pollution in wetland soils from the young and old reclaimed regions in the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Environ Pollut 159:817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker AJM (1981) Accumulators and excluders—strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. J Plant Nutr 3:643–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartakova I, Kummerova M, Mandl M, Pospisil M (2001) Phytotoxicity of iron in relation to its solubility conditions and the effect of ionic strength. Plant Soil 235:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker M, Asch F (2005) Iron toxicity in rice-conditions and management concepts. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:558–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckett PHT, Davis RD (1977) Upper critical levels of toxic elements in plants. New Phytol 79:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatterjee S, Chetia M, Singh L, Chattopadhyay B, Datta S, Mukhopadhyay SK (2011) A study on the phytoaccumulation of waste elements in wetland plants of a Ramsar site in India. Environ Monit Assess 178:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng H, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2004) Accumulation of lead, zinc, copper and cadmium by 12 wetland plant species thriving in metal-contaminated sites in China. Environ Pollut 132:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (1995) Standard methods of the examination of water and wastewater, Nineteenthth edn. APHA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Gabbrielli R, Pandolfini T (1984) Effect of Mg and Ca on the response to nickel toxicity in a serpentine endemic and nickel-accumulating species. Physiol Plant 62:540–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabbrielli R, Gori P, Sealab A (1995) Ni toxicity on carnation (Dyanthus cariophyllus L. cv. Corrida) cell cultures: selection of Ni tolerant lines and effects of Ca and Mg. Plant Sci 104:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garbisu C, Alkorta I (2001) Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ip CCM, Li X, Zhang G, Wai OWH, Li Y (2007) Trace metal distribution in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary and the surrounding coastal area, South China. Environ Pollut 147:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isaac RA, Kerber JD (1971) Atomic absorption and flame photometry: Techniques and uses in soil and plant and water analysis. In: Walsh LM (ed) Instrumental methods for analysis of soils and plant tissue. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, p 125Google Scholar
  14. Istvan P, Benton J (1997) Trace elements. Lucie, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H (1984) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Q, Wu Z, Chu B, Zhang N, Cai S, Fang J (2007) Heavy metals in coastal wetland sediments of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Environ Pollut 149:158–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu JN, Zhou QX, Sun T, Ma LQ, Wang S (2008) Growth responses of three ornamental plants to Cd and Cd–Pb stress and their metal accumulation characteristics. J Hazard Mater 151:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo C, Shen Z, Li X (2005) Enhanced phytoextraction of Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd with EDTA and EDDS. Chemosphere 59:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mander Ü, Mitsch WJ (2009) Pollution control by wetlands. Ecol Eng 35:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Notten MJM, Oosthoek AJP, Rozema J, Aerts R (2005) Heavy metal concentrations in a soil–plant–snail food chain along a terrestrial soil pollution gradient. Environ Pollut 138:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otte ML (2001) What is stress to a wetland plant? Environ Exp Bot 46:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pilon-Smits EAH, Freeman JL (2006) Environmental cleanup using plants: biotechnological advances and ecological considerations. Front Ecol Environ 4:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Qian JH, Zayed A, Zhu YL, Yu M, Terry N (1999) Phytoremediation of trace elements by wetland plants: III. Uptake and accumulation of ten trace elements by twelve plant species. J Environ Qual 28:1448–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qureshi MI, D’Amici GM, Fagioni M, Rinalducci S, Zolla L (2010) Iron stabilizes thylakoid protein–pigment complexes in Indian mustard during Cd-phytoremediation as revealed by BN-SDS-PAGE and ESI-MS/MS. J Plant Physiol 167:761–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rai PK (2008) Heavy Metal Pollution in Aquatic Ecosystems and its Phytoremediation using Wetland Plants: An ecosustainable approach. Int J Phytoremediat 10:133–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Robertson AI (1985) The poisoning of roots of Zea mays by nickel ions and the protection afforded by magnesium and calcium. New Phytol 100:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Nevel L, Mertens J, Oorts K, Verheyen K (2007) Phytoextraction of metals from soils: how far from practice? Environ Pollut 150:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vangronsveld J, Herzig R, Weyens N, Boulet J, Adriaensen K, Ruttens A, Thewys T, Vassilev A, Meers E, Nehnevajova E, Van der Lelie D, Mench M (2009) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils and groundwater: lessons from the field. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:765–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weis JS, Weis P (2004) Metal uptake, transport and release by wetland plants: implications for phytoremediation and restoration. Environ Int 30:685–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Welsh JH, Smith RK (1961) Laboratory exercises in invertebrate physiology. Burgess, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  31. Wheeler DM, Power IL, Edmeades DC (1993) Effect of various metal ions on growth of two wheat lines known to differ in aluminium tolerance. Plant Soil 156:489–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Z, Rengel Z, Meney K (2010) Cadmium accumulation and translocation in four emergent wetland species. Water Air Soil Pollut 212:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aquatic Toxicology and Remediation Laboratory, Department of Life Science and Bio InformaticsAssam UniversitySilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations