Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 22, pp 12651–12661 | Cite as

Scanning electron microscopic investigations of root structural modifications arising from growth in crude oil-contaminated sand

Research Article

Abstract

The choice of plant for phytoremediation success requires knowledge of how plants respond to contaminant exposure, especially their roots which are instrumental in supporting rhizosphere activity. In this study, we investigated the responses of plants with different architectures represented by beetroot (Beta vulgaris), a eudicot with a central taproot and many narrower lateral roots, and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), a monocot possessing a mass of threadlike fibrous roots to grow in crude oil-treated sand. In this paper, scanning electron microscopy was used to investigate modifications to plant root structure caused by growth in crude oil-contaminated sand. Root structural disorders were evident and included enhanced thickening in the endodermis, increased width of the root cortical zone and smaller diameter of xylem vessels. Inhibition in the rate of root elongation correlated with the increase in cell wall thickening and was dramatically pronounced in beetroot compared to the roots of treated fescue. The latter possessed significantly fewer (p < 0.001) and significantly shorter (p < 0.001) root hairs compared to control plants. Possibly, root hairs that absorb the hydrophobic contaminants may prevent contaminant absorption into the main root and concomitant axile root thickening by being sloughed off from roots. Tall fescue exhibited greater root morphological adaptability to growth in crude oil-treated sand than beetroot and, thus, a potential for long-term phytoremediation.

Keywords

Beetroot Crude oil contamination Root growth Root structural modifications Scanning electron microscopy Stress Tall fescue 

References

  1. Agarwal UP (2006) Raman imaging to investigate ultrastructure and composition of plant cell walls: distribution of lignin and cellulose in black spruce wood (Picea mariana). Planta 224:1141–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkio M, Tabuchi TM, Wang X, Colón-Carmona A (2005) Stress responses to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Arabidopsis include growth inhibition and hypersensitive response-like symptoms. J Exp Bot 56:2983–2994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcel’o J, V’azquez MD, Poschenrieder C (1988) Cadmium-Induced structural and ultrastructural changes in the vascular system of bush bean stems. Bot Acta 101:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz BR, Rhode JM, Cruzan MB (2007) Aerenchyma development and elevated alcohol dehydrogenase activity as alternative responses to hypoxic soils in the Piriqueta caroliniana complex. Am J Bot 94:542–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blancaflor EB, Masson PH (2003) Update on tropisms. Plant gravitropism. Unraveling the ups and downs of a complex process. Plant Physiol 133:1677–1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boot RGA, Mensink M (1990) Size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses from contrasting habitats as affected by nitrogen supply. Plant Soil 129:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, Koutstaal B (2000) Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt R, Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C, Broll G (2006) Potential of vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash) for phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in Venezuela. Int J Phytorem 8:273–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins C, Martin I, Fryer M (2006) Evaluation of models for predicting plant uptake of chemicals from soil. (Science Report- SC050021/SR). Environment Agency, Bristol. http://www.environmentagency.gov.uk/static/documents/Research/sc050021_2029764.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2009
  10. Cosgrove DJ (1993) Tansley Review No. 46. Wall extensibility: its nature, measurement and relationship to plant cell growth. New Phytol 124:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currier HB, Peoples SA (1954) Phytotoxicity of hydrocarbons. Hilgardia 23:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Enstone DE, Peterson CA, Ma F (2003) Root endodermis and exodermis: structure, function, and responses to the environment. J Plant Growth Regul 21:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher JS, Hedge RS (1995) Release of phenols by perennial plant roots and their importance in bioremediation. Chemosphere 31:3009–3016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE (2003) Phosphorus (P) uptake and growth of a root hairless barley mutant (bald root barley, brb) and wild type in low- and high-P soils. Plant Cell Environ 26:1759–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao Y, Zhu L (2004) Plant uptake, accumulation and translocation of phenanthrene and pyrene in soils. Chemosphere 55:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerhardt KE, Huang X-D, Glick BR, Greenberg BM (2009) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci 176:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey PJ, Campanella BF, Castro PML, Harms H, Lichtfouse E, Schaffner AR, Smrcek S, Werck-Reichhart D (2002) Phytoremediation of Polyaromatic hydrocarbons, anilines and phenols. Review articles: phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut R 9:29–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang BR, Taylor HM, McMichael BL (1991) Effects of temperature on the development of metaxylem in primary wheat roots and its hydraulic consequence. Ann Bot 67:163–166Google Scholar
  19. Johnson DL, Maguire KL, Anderson DR, McGrath SP (2004) Enhanced dissipation of chrysene in planted soil: the impact of a rhizobial inoculum. Soil Biol Biochem 36:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liste HH, Alexander M (2000a) Accumulation of phenanthrene and pyrene in rhizosphere soils. Chemosphere 40:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liste HH, Alexander M (2000b) Plant promoted pyrene degradation in soil. Chemosphere 40:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacAdam JW, Sharp RE, Nelson CJ (1992a) Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Plant Physiol 99:872–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacAdam JW, Nelson CJ, Sharp RE (1992b) Peroxidase activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue. Plant Physiol 99:879–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2005a) Phytoremediation in the tropics-influence of heavy crude oil on root morphological characteristics of graminoids. Environ Pollut 138:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merkl N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C (2005b) Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Poll 165:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newman LA, Reynolds CM (2004) Phytodegradation of organic compounds. Curr Opin Biotech 15:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Phillips LA, Greer CW, Germida JJ (2006) Culture-based and culture-independent assessment of the impact of mixed and single plant treatments on rhizosphere microbial communities in hydrocarbon contaminated flare-pit soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2823–2833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rentz JA, Chapman B, Alvarez PJ, Schnoor JL (2003) Stimulation of hybrid poplar growth in petroleum-contaminated soils through oxygen addition and soil nutrient amendments. Int J Phytorem 5:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rentz JA, Alvarez PJJ, Schnoor JL (2005) Benzo (a) pyrene co-metabolism in the presence of plant root extracts and exudates: implications for phytoremediation. Environ Pollut 136:477–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers L, Campbell MM (2004) Tansley review: the genetic control of lignin deposition during plant growth and development. New Phytol 164:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scippa G, Trupiano D, Rocco M, Di Iorio A, Chiatante D (2008) Unravelling the response of poplar (Populus nigra) roots to mechanical stress imposed by bending. Plant Biosyst 142:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Segal E, Kushnir T, Mualem Y, Shani U (2008) Water uptake and hydraulics of the root hair rhizosphere. Vadose Zone J 7:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siciliano SD, Germida JJ, Banks K, Greer CW (2003) Changes in microbial composition and function during a polyaromatic hydrocarbon phytoremediation field trial. Appl Environ Microb 69:483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker TS, Bais HP, Halligan KM, Stermitz FR, Vivanco JM (2003) Metabolic profiling of root exudates of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Agr Food Chem 51:2548–2554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wild SR, Jones KC (1992) Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons uptake by carrots grown in sludge-amended soil. J Environ Qual 21:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wild E, Dent J, Thomas GO, Jones KC (2005) Direct observation of organic contaminant uptake, storage and metabolism within plant roots. Environ Sci Technol 39:3695–3702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu JG, Johnson RL (1995) Root growth, microbial activity and phosphate activity in oil-contaminated, remediated and uncontaminated soils planted to barley and field pea. Plant Soil 173:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anuluxshy Balasubramaniyam
    • 1
  • Patricia J. Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ScienceUniversity of Greenwich at MedwayChatham MaritimeUK

Personalised recommendations