Copper distribution in surface and subsurface soil horizons
- 234 Downloads
The horizons of four natural soils were treated with Cu2+ in an acid medium to study the retention capacity of Cu. The possible mineralogical changes arising because of the treatment were also studied. The soil properties and characteristics with the greatest influence on the metal retention and its distribution among the different soil fractions were determined. Crystalline phases of each horizon were determined by X-ray diffraction (XDR). The morphology, structural distribution and particle chemical composition of soil samples were investigated using field emission scanning electron microscopy. Cu distribution in the different geochemical phases of the soil was studied using a sequential extraction. The treatment led to an increase in the amorphous phases and the formation of new crystalline phases, such as rouaite (Cu2(NO3)(OH)3) and nitratine (NaNO3). Cu was also found superficially sorbed on amorphous hydroxy compounds of Fe that interact with albite, muscovite and gibbsite, and also on spherical and curved particles of aluminium clays. The largest amount of Cu retained was in an exchangeable form, and the smallest amount associated with the crystalline Fe oxides and residual fraction. In the surface horizons, the predominant Cu retention process is complexation in organomineral associations, while in the subsurface horizons it is adsorption.
KeywordsCopper FE-SEM Mineral alteration Sequential extraction Soil XRD
This study was supported by the Xunta de Galicia (project EM2013/018). We also thank the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science due to the Ramón y Cajal contract awarded to F.A. Vega. D. Arenas Lago was also awarded with a pre-doctoral fellowship FPI-MICINN.
- Andrade L, Alonso Vega F, Marcet P, Fernández Covelo E (2005) Heavy metal contents of soils from semiarid Pampa, Buenos Aires Province (Argentina). In: Faz Cano A et al. (ed) Sustainable use and management of soils-arid and semiarid regions. Soil contamination and remediation. Advances in Geoecology. Germany: A Cooperatting Series in the International Union of Soil Science, pp 477-492Google Scholar
- Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 545–567Google Scholar
- Fabrizio de Iorio A (2010) Sorption capacity of Cu and Zn in natraquols of depressed Pampa (Argentina). Relationship with geochemical phases (in Spanish). Ph.D. Thesis, University of VigoGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources. In: IUSS (ed) ISRIC, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Guitián F, Carballas T (1976) Techniques of soil analysis (in Spanish). Pico Sacro, Santiago de CompostelaGoogle Scholar
- ICDD. International Center for Diffraction Data (2014) http://www.icdd.com. Accessed 2014
- Kabata-Pendias A (2001) Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
- Németh T, Sipos P, Balázs R, Szalai Z, Mészáros E, Di Gléria M (2010) Adsorption of copper on the illuviation and accumulation horizons of a Luvisol. Carpath J Earth Environ 5:19–24Google Scholar
- Sherdrick BH, McKeague JA (1975) A comparison of extractable Fe and Al data using methods followed in the U.S.A. and Canada. Can J Chem 55:77–78Google Scholar
- Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (1972) Soil survey laboratory methods and procedures for collecting soil samples. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1 (revised). Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Zhou D, Chen H, Hao X, Wang Y (2002) Fractionation of heavy metals in soils as affected by soil types and metal load quantity. Pedosphere 12:309–319Google Scholar