Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 19, pp 11189–11197 | Cite as

Synthesis of BiVO4/TiO2 composites and evaluation of their photocatalytic activity under indoor illumination

  • Giulia Longo
  • Fernando Fresno
  • Silvia Gross
  • Urška Lavrenčič Štangar
Photocatalysis: new highlights from JEP 2013


BiVO4/TiO2 composites with different weight ratios have been prepared by coprecipitation-based reactions followed by either thermal or hydrothermal treatment with the aim of evaluating the TiO2 photosensitization by BiVO4. The obtained materials present in all cases the desired monoclinic phase of BiVO4 and anatase phase of TiO2. Visible light absorption increased with increasing amount of bismuth vanadate. XPS results reveal the surface enrichment of Ti with respect to the bulk composition in samples characterised by a higher content of BiVO4. The photocatalytic activity of the prepared materials was tested for the degradation of isopropanol in the gas phase under indoor illumination conditions. Although none of the composites was able to improve the activity of TiO2, the low BiVO4 containing samples appear as more suitable for further synthesis tuning.


Photocatalysis Titania Bismuth vanadate Photosensitization Coupled photocatalysts Composite photocatalysts 



The Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry (Ministero degli Affari Esteri, MAE, Italy) and the National Research Council (CNR, Rome, Italy) are gratefully acknowledged for the financial support of this work in the framework of a “Progetto Grande Rilevanza Italia-Slovenia 2013”. G.L. thanks the Erasmus-Socrates project of the European Union and the University of Padova for funding mobility to Slovenia. The University of Nova Gorica gratefully acknowledges EC for financial support from the SUNGREEN project (FP7-REGPOT-2011-1).


  1. Briggs D, Seah MP (1990) Practical surface analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Carp O, Huisman CL, Reller A (2004) Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Prog Solid State Chem 32:33–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coronado JM, Fresno F, Hernández-Alonso MD, Portela R (eds) (2013) Design of advanced photocatalytic materials for energy and environmental applications. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng H, Hossenlopp JM (2005) Combined x-ray diffraction and diffuse reflectance analysis of nanocrystalline mixed Sn(II) and Sn(IV) oxide powders. J Phys Chem B 109:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fresno F, Tudela D, Coronado JM, Soria J (2009) Synthesis of Ti1-xSnxO2 nanosized photocatalysts in reverse microemulsions. Catal Today 43:230–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fresno F, Portela R, Suárez S, Coronado JM (2014) Photocatalytic materials: recent achievements and near future trends. J Mater Chem A 2:2863–2884Google Scholar
  7. Grätzel M (2003) Dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 4:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hernández-Alonso MD, Fresno F, Suárez S, Coronado JM (2009) Development of alternative photocatalysts to TiO2: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Environ Sci 2:1231–1257Google Scholar
  9. Herrmann JM (2010) Photocatalysis fundamentals revisited to avoid several misconceptions. Appl Catal B Environ 99:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Y, Li D, Zheng Y, Chen W, He Y, Shao Y, Fu X, Xiao G (2011) BiVO4/TiO2 nanocrystalline structure: a wide spectrum responsive photocatalyst towards the highly efficient decomposition of gaseous benzene. Appl Catal B Environ 104:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang CM, Pan GT, Peng PY, Yang TCK (2010) In situ DRIFT study of photocatalytic degradation of gaseous isopropanol over BiVO4 under indoor illumination. J Mol Catal A Chem 327:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang H, Dai H, Meng X, Ji K, Zhang L, Deng J (2011) Porous olive-like BiVO4: alcohol-hydrothermal preparation and excellent visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance for the degradation of phenol. Appl Catal B Environ 105:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kocabaş-Ataklı ZO, Yürüm Y (2013) Synthesis and characterization of anatase nanoadsorbent and application in removal of lead, copper and arsenic from water. Chem Eng J 225:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kubacka A, Fernández-García M, Colón G (2012) Advanced nanoarchitectures for solar photocatalytic applications. Chem Rev 112:1555–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kudo A, Omori K, Kato H (1999) A novel aqueous process for preparation of crystal form-controlled and highly crystalline BiVO4 powder from layered vanadates at room temperature and its photocatalytic and photophysical properties. J Am Chem Soc 121:11459–11467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Min Y, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhang Y (2011) Synthesis of novel visible light responding vanadate/TiO2 heterostructured photocatalysts for application of organic pollutants. Chem Eng J 175:76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyauchi M, Nakajima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K (2002) Photoinduced hydrophilic conversion of WO3/TiO2 layered thin films. Chem Mater 14:4714–4720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pei D, Luan J (2012) Development of visible light-responsive sensitized photocatalysts. Int J Photoenergy. doi: 10.1155/2012/26283.
  19. Pelaez M, Nolan NT, Pillai SC, Seery MK, Falaras P, Kontos AG, Dunlop PSM, Hamilton JWJ, Byrne JA, O’Shea K, Entezari MH, Dionysiou DD (2012) A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl Catal B Environ 125:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robert D (2007) Photosensitization of TiO2 by MxOy and MxSy nanoparticles for heterogeneous photocatalysis applications. Catal Today 122:20–26Google Scholar
  21. Serpone N, Borgarello E, Grätzel M (1984) Visible light induced generation of hydrogen from H2S in mixed semiconductor dispersions; improved efficiency through inter-particle electron transfer. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 6:342–344Google Scholar
  22. Shirley DA (1972) High resolution X-ray photoemission spectrum of the valence bands of gold. Phys Rev B 5:4709–4714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soria J, Sanz J, Sobrados I, Coronado JM, Maira AJ, Hernández-Alonso MD, Fresno F (2007) FTIR and NMR study of the adsorbed water on nanocrystalline anatase. J Phys Chem C 111:10590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tasbihi M, Kete M, Raichur AM, Novak Tušar N, Lavrenčič Štangar U (2012) Photocatalytic degradation of gaseous toluene by using immobilized titania/silica on aluminum sheets. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:3735–3742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wahnón P, Conesa JC, Palacios P, Lucena R, Aguilera I, Seminovsky Y, Fresno F (2011) V-doped SnS2: a new intermediate band material for a better use of the solar spectrum. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:20401–20407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walsh A, Yan Y, Huda MN, Al-Jassim MM, Wei SH (2009) Band edge electronic structure of BiVO4: elucidating the role of the Bi s and V d orbitals. Chem Mater 21:547–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Youngblood WJ, Seung-Hyun AL, Maeda K, Mallouk TE (2009) Visible light water splitting using dye-sensitized oxide semiconductors. Accounts Chem Res 42:1966–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang L, Chen D, Jiao X (2006) Monoclinic structured BiVO4 nanosheets: hydrothermal preparation, formation mechanism, and coloristic and photocatalytic properties. J Phys Chem B 110:2668–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Longo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fernando Fresno
    • 1
  • Silvia Gross
    • 2
  • Urška Lavrenčič Štangar
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Environmental ResearchUniversity of Nova GoricaNova GoricaSlovenia
  2. 2.IENI-CNR, Dipartimento di Scienze ChimicheUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations