Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 19, pp 11142–11154 | Cite as

Radiation modeling of a photo-reactor using a backward ray-tracing method: an insight into indoor photocatalytic oxidation

Photocatalysis: new highlights from JEP 2013

Abstract

This article aims to understand the radiation behavior within a photo-reactor, following the ISO 22197-1:2007 standard. The RADIANCE lighting simulation tool, based on the backward ray-tracing modeling method, is employed for a numerical computation of the radiation field. The reflection of the glass cover in the photo-reactor and the test sample influence the amount of irradiance received by the test-sample surface in the photo-reactor setup. The reflection of a white sample limits the irradiance reduction by the glass cover to 1.4 %, but darker samples can lead to an overestimation up to 9.8 % when used in the same setup. This overestimation could introduce considerable error into the interpretation of experiments. Furthermore, this method demonstrates that the kinetics for indoor photocatalytic pollutant degradation can be refined through radiation modeling of the reactor setup. In addition, RADIANCE may aid in future modeling of the more complex indoor environment where radiation affects significantly photocatalytic activity.

Keywords

Ray tracing Photocatalytic oxidation Kinetic model Reactor Indoor environment Radiation RADIANCE 

Nomenclature

Variable (Latin)

Description (standard unit)

C

Correction parameter (–)

E

Irradiance (watts per square meter)

k

Rate constant, reaction rate related (per second or per second per pascal or cubic meters per second per mole)

K

Rate constant, sorption related (cubic meters per mole or lumens per watt)

L

Radiance (watts per square meter per steradian)

r

Reaction rate per surface catalyst (moles per square meter per second)

S

Specular component (–)

x

Distance in the x direction or general variable (meters or –)

y

Distance in the y direction or general variable (meters or –)

α

Rate constant, irradiance related (moles per watt per second)

β

Rate constant (moles per square meter per second)

λ

Wavelength (meters)

σ

Reflection coefficient (–)

τ

Transmission coefficient (–)

ϕ

Total radiance flux (watts)

ψ

Viewing angle (degrees)

θ

Viewing angle (degrees)

Ω

Solid angle (steradians)

Subscripts

Description

c

Corrected

catalyst

A property of the catalyst

glass

A property of the glass

l

Light source

n

Value obtained through n simulation runs

m

Value obtained through measurement

X

At grid point X

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to the following sponsors of the building materials research group at TU Eindhoven: Rijkswaterstaat Grote Projecten en Onderhoud, Graniet-Import Benelux, Kijlstra Betonmortel, Struyk Verwo, Attero, Enci, Provincie Overijssel, Rijkswaterstaat Zee en Delta - District Noord, Van Gansewinkel Minerals, BTE, Alvon Bouwsystemen, V.d. Bosch Beton, Selor, Twee “R” Recycling, GMB, Schenk Concrete Consultancy, Geochem Research, Icopal, BN International, APP All Remove, Consensor, Eltomation, Knauf Gips, Hess AAC Systems, Kronos, and Joma (in chronological order of joining).

References

  1. Aman MM, Jasmon GB, Mokhlis H, Bakar AHA (2013) Analysis of the performance of domestic lighting lamps. Energy Policy 52:482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apian-Bennewitz P (2011) 10th Radiance Workshop, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available at: http://www.radiance-online.org/radiance-workshop10/presentations/day1/PAB1_FittingPlasticMetal.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2012
  3. Balling BL (2009) A comparative study of the bidirectional reflectance distribution function of several surfaces as a mid-wave infrared diffuse reflectance standard, MSEE thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Google Scholar
  4. Bass M, Van Stryland E, Williams D, Wolfe W (1996) Handbook of optics. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang WK, Sun DS, Chan H, Huang PT, Wu WS, Lin CH, Tseng YH, Cheng YH, Tseng CC, Chang HH (2012) Visible light-responsive core-shell structured In2O3@CaIn2O4 photocatalyst with superior bactericidal properties and biocompatibility. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 8:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debono O, Thevenet F, Gravejat P, Hequet V, Raillard C, Le Coq L, Locoge N (2013) Gas phase photocatalytic oxidation of decane at ppb levels: removal kinetics, reaction intermediates and carbon mass balance. J Photochem Photobiol A-Chem 258:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Destaillats H, Sleiman M, Sullivan DP, Jacquiod C, Sablayrolles J, Molins L (2012) Key parameters influencing the performance of photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) air purification under realistic indoor conditions. Appl Catal B-Environ 128:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong F, Lee SC, Wu Z, Huang Y, Fu M, Ho WK, Zou S, Wang B (2011) Rose-like monodisperse bismuth subcarbonate hierarchical hollow microspheres: One-pot template-free fabrication and excellent visible light photocatalytic activity and photochemical stability for NO removal in indoor air. J Hazard Mater 195:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffman MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Photocatalysis over semiconductors. Chem Rev 95:69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Organization for Standardization (2007) ISO 22197-1 Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics)—test method for air-purification performance of semiconducting photocatalytic materials—part 1: removal of nitric oxideGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs A (2012) Radiance Tutorial. Available at: http://www.jaloxa.eu/resources/radiance/documentation/docs/radiance_tutorial.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2012
  12. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, Behar JV, Hern SC, Engelmann WH (2001) The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolarik J, Toftum J (2012) The impact of a photocatalytic paint on indoor air pollutants: sensory assessments. Build Environ 57:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larson GW, Shakespeare RA (2004) Rendering with radiance: the art and science of lighting visualization (revised edition). BookSurge LLC, Charleston, SCGoogle Scholar
  15. Lasek J, Yu YH, Wu JCS (2013) Removal of NOx by photocatalytic processes. J Photochem Photobiol C-Photochem Rev 14:29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li G, Zhang D, Yu JC, Leung MK (2010) An efficient bismuth tungstate visible-light-driven photocatalyst for breaking down nitric oxide. Environ Sci Technol 44:4276–4281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathers C, Stevens G, Mascarenhas M (2009) Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  18. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2007) Applied statistics and probability for engineers (with CD). John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  19. Ng EY-Y, Poh LK, Wei W, Nagakura T (2001) Advanced lighting simulation in architectural design in the tropics. Autom Constr 10:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nie L, Yu J, Li X, Cheng B, Liu G, Jaroniec M (2013) Enhanced performance of NaOH-modified Pt/TiO2 toward room temperature selective oxidation of formaldehyde. Environ Sci Technol 47:2777–2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Passalia C, Alfano OM, Brandi RJ (2012) A methodology for modeling photocatalytic reactors for indoor pollution control using previously estimated kinetic parameters. J Hazard Mater 211–212:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reinhart CF, Andersen M (2006) Development and validation of a radiance model for a translucent panel. Energy Build 38:890–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ruppertsberg AI, Bloj M (2006) Rendering complex scenes for psychophysics using RADIANCE: how accurate can you get? JOSA A 23:759–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saelens D, Parys W, Roofthooft J, de la Torre AT (2013) Assessment of approaches for modeling louver shading devices in building energy simulation programs. Energy Build 60:286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salvado-Estivill I, Brucato A, Li Puma G (2007a) Two-dimensional modeling of a flat-plate photocatalytic reactor for oxidation of indoor air pollutants. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:7489–7496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Salvado-Estivill I, Hargreaves DM, Li Puma G (2007b) Evaluation of the intrinsic photocatalytic oxidation kinetics of indoor air pollutantso. Environ Sci Technol 41:2028–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen S, Burton M, Jobson B, Haselbach L (2012) Pervious concrete with titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst compound for a greener urban road environment. Const Build Mat 35:874–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slomp MPB, Oliveira MM, Patricio DI (2006) A gentle introduction to precomputed radiance transfer. RITA 13:131–160Google Scholar
  29. Smith KR (2002) Indoor air pollution in developing countries: recommendations for research. Indoor Air 12:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. US Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Volatile Organic Compounds. Available: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/voc.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
  31. US Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Residential Air Cleaners. Available: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/residair.html#Photocatalytic_Oxidation_Cleaners. Accessed 17 June 2012
  32. Ward G (1994) The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. In SIGGRAPH (pp. 459–472). Orlando: ACM SIGGRAPHGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang H, Wu Z, Liu Y (2009) Effect of filler types and calcination temperature on the microstructure and the nitric oxide photocatalytic activity of composite titanium dioxide films. J Hazard Mater 164:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weschler CJ (2009) Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmos Environ 43:153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Health Organisation (2011) Indoor air pollution and health. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
  36. Yu QL (2012) Design of environmentally friendly calcium sulfate-based building materials, PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  37. Yu QL, Brouwers HJH (2009) Indoor air purification using heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation. Part I: experimental study. Appl Catal B-Environ 92:454–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yu QL, Ballari MM, Brouwers HJH (2010) Indoor air purification using heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation. Part II: kinetic study. Appl Catal B-Environ 99:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu J, Wang S, Low J, Xiao W (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic performance of direct Z-scheme g-C3N4G–TiO2 photocatalysts for the decomposition of formaldehyde in air. PCCP 15:16883–16890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zazueta ALL, Destaillats H, Li Puma G (2013) Radiation field modeling and optimization of a compact and modular multi-plate photocatalytic reactor (MPPR) for air/water purification by Monte Carlo method. Chem Eng J 217:475–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang JJ, Smith KR (2003) Indoor air pollution: a global health concern. Br Med Bull 68:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Z, Wu H, Yuan Y, Fang Y, Jin L (2012) Development of a novel capillary array photocatalytic reactor and application for degradation of azo dye. Chem Eng J 184:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhong L, Haghighat F, Lee CS (2013) Ultraviolet photocatalytic oxidation for indoor environment applications: experimental validation of the model. Build Environ 62:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of the Built EnvironmentEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations