Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 2988–3004 | Cite as

Influence of salinity and temperature on the activity of biosurfactants by polychaete-associated isolates

  • Carmen Rizzo
  • Luigi Michaud
  • Christoph Syldatk
  • Rudolf Hausmann
  • Emilio De Domenico
  • Angelina Lo Giudice
Research Article

Abstract

Influence of different parameters on biosurfactant (BS) activity was carried out on strains that were isolated from the polychaetes Megalomma claparedei, Sabella spallanzanii and Branchiomma luctuosum and additional 30 strains that were previously identified as potential BS producers from crude oil enrichments of the same polychaete specimens. The selection of BS-producing strains from polychaete natural samples was carried out by using standard screening tests. The BS activity by each isolate was evaluated for the effect of salinity and temperature on emulsion production and surface tension reduction, during incubation in mineral medium supplemented with tetradecane or diesel oil. All isolates showed a similar time course of BS activity, and the latter was more influenced by salinity rather than temperature. Some of the BS producers belonged to genera that have not (i.e. Citricoccus, Cellulophaga, Tenacibaculum and Maribacter) or have poorly been (Psychrobacter, Vibrio, and Pseudoalteromonas) reported as able to produce BSs. This is remarkable as some of them have previously been detected in hydrocarbon-enriched samples. Results confirm that filter-feeding polychaetes are an efficient source for the isolation of BS producers.

Keywords

Biosurfactants Filter-feeding organisms Salinity Temperature Megalomma claparedei Sabella spallanzanii Branchiomma luctuosum 

Supplementary material

11356_2013_2259_MOESM1_ESM.doc (68 kb)
Table S1(DOC 68 kb)

References

  1. Abu-Ruwaida AS, Banat IM, Haditirto S, Salem A, Kadri M (1991) Isolation of biosurfactant-producing bacteria product characterization, and evaluation. Acta Biotechnol 4:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Maden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anandaraj B, Thivakaran P (2010) Isolation and production of biosurfactant-producing organism from oil spilled soil. Biosci Technol 1:120–126Google Scholar
  4. Atlas RM (1981) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective. Microbiol Rev 45:180–209Google Scholar
  5. Banat IM (1995) Characteristics of biosurfactants and their use in pollution removal-state of art. Acta Biotechnol 15:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banat IM, Samarah N, Murad M, Horne R, Benerjee S (1991) Biosurfactant production and use in oil tank clean-up. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 7:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodour AA, Guerrero-Barajas C, Jiorle BV, Malcomson ME, Paull AK, Somogyi A, Trinh LN, Bates RB, Maier RM (2004) Structure and characterization of flavolipids, a novel class of biosurfactants produced by Flavobacterium sp. strain MTN11. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho SH, Ma CW, Oh KH (2011) Optimized production of biosurfactant by the indigenous bacterium, Pseudoalteromonas sp. HK-3 originating from oil-spilled areas. Korean Soc Biotech Bioeng J 26:57–61Google Scholar
  9. Christova N, Tuleva B, Lalchev Z (2004) Rhamnolipid biosurfactants produced by Renibacterium salmoninarum 27BN during growth on n-hexadecane. Z Naturforsch C 59:70–74Google Scholar
  10. Cooper DG, Paddock DA (1983) Torulopsis petrophilum and surface activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:1426–1429Google Scholar
  11. Dastgheib SMM, Amoozegar MA, Elahi E, Asad S, Banat IM (2008) Bioemulsifier production by a halothermophilic Bacillus strain with potential applications in microbially enhanced oil recovery. Biotechnol Lett 30:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyksterhouse SE, Gray JP, Herwig RP, Lara JC, Staley JT (1995) Cycloclasticus pugetii gen. nov., sp. nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from marine sediments. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellaiah P, Prabhakar T, Sreekanth M, Taleb AT, Raju PB, Saisha V (2002) Production of glycolipids containing biosurfactant by Pseudomonas species. Indian J Exp Biol 40:1083–1086Google Scholar
  14. Gandhimathi R, Kiran SG, Hema TA, Selvin J, Raviji TR, Shanmughapriya S (2009) Production and characterization of lipopeptide biosurfactant by a sponge-associated marine actinomycetes Nocardiopsis alba MSA10. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:825–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guerra-Santos LH, Kappeli O, Fiechter A (1984) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactant production in continuous culture with glucose as carbon source. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:301–305Google Scholar
  16. Gutierrez T, Singleton DR, Berry D, Yang T, Aitken MD, Teske A (2013) Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria enriched by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill identified by cultivation and DNA-SIP. ISME J. doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.98 Google Scholar
  17. Haddad IAN, Wang J, Mu B (2009) Identification of a biosurfactant producing strain: Bacillus subtilis HOB2. Protein Pept Lett 16:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hedlund BP, Staley JT (2001) Vibrio cyclotrophicus sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-degrading marine bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:61–66Google Scholar
  19. Holmström C, Kjelleberg S (1999) Marine Pseudoalteromonas species are associated with higher organisms and produce biologically active extracellular agents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hörmann B, Müller MM, Syldatk C, Hausmann R (2010) Rhamnolipid production by Burkholderia plantarii DSM 9509T. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 112:674–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karanth NGK, Deo PG, Veenanadig NK (1999) Microbial production of biosurfactants and their importance. Curr Sci 77:116–126Google Scholar
  22. Khopade A, Biao R, Liu X, Mahadik K, Zhang L, Kokare C (2012a) Production and stability studies of the biosurfactant isolated from marine Nocardiopsis sp. B4. Desalination 285:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khopade A, Ren B, Liu XY, Mahadik K, Zhang L, Kokare C (2012b) Production and characterization of biosurfactant from marine Streptomyces species B3. J Colloid Interface Sci 367:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiran SG, Anto T, Selvin J, Sabarathnam B, Lipton AP (2010) Optimization and characterization of a new lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by marine Brevibacterium aureum MSA13 in solid state culture. Bioresour Technol 101:2389–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (1993) MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis. Pennsylvania State University, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee LH, Kim JH (1993) Distribution of substrate carbon in sophorose lipid production by Torulopsis bombicola. Biotechnol Lett 15:263–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Licciano M, Stabili L, Giangrande A (2005) Clearance rates of Sabella spallanzanii and Branchiomma luctuosum (Annelida: Polychaeta) on a pure culture of Vibrio alginolyticus. Water Res 39:4375–4384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Licciano M, Stabili L, Giangrande A, Cavallo RA (2007) Bacterial accumulation by Branchiomma luctuosum (Annelida: Polychaeta): a tool for biomonitoring marine systems and restoring polluted waters. Mar Environ Res 63:291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lo Giudice A, Casella P, Caruso C, Mangano S, Bruni V, De Domenico M, Michaud L (2010) Occurrence and characterization of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria from surface seawater along the Victoria Land coast (Antarctica). Polar Biol 33:929–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lotfabad TB, Shourian M, Roostaazad R, Najafabadi AR, Adelzadeh MR, Noghabi KA (2009) An efficient biosurfactant-producing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa MR01, isolated from oil excavation areas in south of Iran. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 69:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margaritis A, Zajic JE, Gerson DF (1979) Production and surface active properties of microbial surfactants. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1151–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mulligan CN, Gibbs BF (1989) Correlation of nitrogen metabolism with biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:3016–3019Google Scholar
  33. Mulligan CN, Cooper DG, Neufeld RJ (1984) Selection of microbes producing biosurfactants in media without hydrocarbons. J Ferment Technol 62:311–314Google Scholar
  34. Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płaza GA, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Cameotra SS (2011) Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci 12:633–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perepelov AV, Shashkov AS, Tomshich SV, Komandrovab NA, Nedashkovskayab OI (2007) A pseudoaminic acid-containing O-specific polysaccharide from a marine bacterium Cellulophaga fucicola. Carbohydr Res 342:1378–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Radwan S, Sorkhoh N (1993) Lipids of n-alkane-utilizing microorganisms and their application potential. Adv Appl Microbiol 39:29–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ristau E, Wagner F (1983) Formation of novel anionic trehalose-tetraesters from Rhodococcus erythropolis under growth limiting conditions. Biotechnol Lett 5:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rizzo C, Michaud L, Hörmann B, Gerçe B, Syldatk C, Hausmann R, De Domenico E, Lo Giudice A (2013) Bacteria associated with Sabellids (Polychaeta: Annelida) as a novel source of surface active compounds. Mar Pollut Bull 70:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenberg E, Ron EZ (1999) High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saccà A, Guglielmo L, Bruni V (2008) Vertical and temporal microbial community patterns in a meromictic coastal lake influenced by the Straits of Messina upwelling system. Hydrobiologia 600:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
  42. Salehizadeh H, Mohammadizad S (2009) Microbial enhanced oil recovery using biosurfactant produced by Alcaligenes faecalis. Iran J Biotechnol 7:216–223Google Scholar
  43. Salihu A, Abdulkadir I, Almustapha MN (2009) An investigation for potential development on biosurfactants. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev 3:111–117Google Scholar
  44. Satpute SK, Bhawsar BD, Dhakephalkar PK, Chopade BA (2008) Assessment of different screening methods for selecting biosurfactant producing marine bacteria. Indian J Mar Sci 37:243–250Google Scholar
  45. Satpute SK, Banat IM, Dhakephalkar PK, Banpurkar AG, Chopade BA (2010) Biosurfactants, bioemulsifiers and exopolysaccharides from marine microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv 28:436–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schenk T, Schuphan I, Schmidt B (1995) High-performance liquid-chromatographic determination of the rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Chromatogr A 693:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siegmund I, Wagner F (1991) New method for detecting rhamnolipids excreted by Pseudomonas species during growth on mineral agar. Biotechnol Technol 5:265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sriram MI, Kalishwaralal K, Deepak V, Gracerosepat R, Srisakthi K, Gurunathan S (2011) Biofilm inhibition and antimicrobial action of lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by heavy metal tolerant strain Bacillus cereus NK1. Colloids Surf B 85:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stuwer O, Hommel R, Haferburg D, Kieber HP (1987) Production of crystalline surface-active glycolipids by a strain of Torulopsis apicola. J Biotechnol 6:259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Syldatk C, Lang S, Wagner F (1985) Chemical and physical characterization of four interfacial-active rhamnolipids from Pseudomonas sp. DSM 2874 grown on n-alkanes. Z Naturforsch 40C:51–60Google Scholar
  51. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tomshich SV, Komandrova NA, Widmalm G, Nedashkovskaya OI, Shashkov AS, Perepelov AV (2007) Structure of acidic O-specific polysaccharide from the marine bacterium Cellulophaga baltica. Russ J Bioorg Chem 33:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tuleva B, Christova N, Jordanov B, Nikolova-Damyanova B, Petrov P (2005) Naphthalene degradation and biosurfactant activity by Bacillus cereus 28BN. Z Naturforsch C 60:577–582Google Scholar
  54. Tulloch AP, Spencer JFT, Gorin PAJ (1962) The fermentation of long-chain compounds by Torulopsis magnoliae. Structures of the hydroxyl fatty acids obtained by fermentation of fatty acids and hydrocarbons. Can J Chem 40:1326–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walter V, Syldatk C, Hausmann R (2010) Screening concepts for the isolation of biosurfactant producing microorganisms. Biosurfactants 672:1–13Google Scholar
  56. Youssef N, Duncan K, Nagle D (2004) Comparison of methods to detect biosurfactant production by diverse microorganisms. J Microbiol Meth 56:339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Rizzo
    • 1
  • Luigi Michaud
    • 1
  • Christoph Syldatk
    • 2
  • Rudolf Hausmann
    • 3
  • Emilio De Domenico
    • 1
  • Angelina Lo Giudice
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Process Engineering in Life Sciences, Section II: Technical BiologyKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Section Bioprocess EngineeringUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany
  4. 4.Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences (DISBA)Università di MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations