Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 2943–2954 | Cite as

Speciation and distribution of copper in a mining soil using multiple synchrotron-based bulk and microscopic techniques

  • Jianjun Yang
  • Jin Liu
  • James J. Dynes
  • Derek Peak
  • Tom Regier
  • Jian Wang
  • Shenhai Zhu
  • Jiyan Shi
  • John S. Tse
Research Article

Abstract

Molecular-level understanding of soil Cu speciation and distribution assists in management of Cu contamination in mining sites. In this study, one soil sample, collected from a mining site contaminated since 1950s, was characterized complementarily by multiple synchrotron-based bulk and spatially resolved techniques for the speciation and distribution of Cu as well as other related elements (Fe, Ca, Mn, K, Al, and Si). Bulk X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy revealed that soil Cu was predominantly associated with Fe oxides instead of soil organic matter. This agreed with the closest association of Cu to Fe by microscopic X-ray fluorescence (U-XRF) and scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) nanoanalysis, along with the non-occurrence of photoreduction of soil Cu(II) by quick Cu L3,2-edge XANES spectroscopy (Q-XANES) which often occurs when Cu organic complexes are present. Furthermore, bulk-EXAFS and STXM-coupled Fe L3,2-edge nano-XANES analysis revealed soil Cu adsorbed primarily to Fe(III) oxides by inner-sphere complexation. Additionally, Cu K-edge μ-XANES, L3,2-edge bulk-XANES, and successive Q-XANES results identified the presence of Cu2S rather than radiation-damage artifacts dominant in certain microsites of the mining soil. This study demonstrates the great benefits in use of multiple combined synchrotron-based techniques for comprehensive understanding of Cu speciation in heterogeneous soil matrix, which facilitates our prediction of Cu reactivity and environmental fate in the mining site.

Keywords

Copper XANES EXAFS XRF STXM Mining soil Molecular speciation Radiation damage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Yuying Huang and Xiaohan Yu at the SSRF and Dr. Yidong Zhao at the BSRF for their kind help during these synchrotron experiments. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21207114, 11179025); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M511375); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (R5110031); and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0455). Cu L3,2-edge XANES and STXM measurements were performed at the SGM and Spectromicroscopy beamlines in CLS which was supported by NSERC, NRC, CIHR, the Province of Saskatchewan, WEDC, and the University of Saskatchewan.

Supplementary material

11356_2013_2214_MOESM1_ESM.doc (7 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 6.98 mb)

References

  1. Alcacio TE, Hesterberg D, Chou JW et al (2001) Molecular scale characteristics of Cu(II) bonding in goethite-humate complexes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:1355–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boudesocque S, Guillon E, Aplincourt M et al (2007) Sorption of Cu(II) onto vineyard soils: macroscopic and spectroscopic investigations. J Colloid Interface Sci 307:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boularbah A, Schwartz C, Bitton G et al (2006) Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 1. Use of a biotest to assess metal toxicity of tailings and soils. Chemosphere 63:802–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown GE, Catalano JG, Templeton AS et al (2005) Environmental interfaces, heavy metals, microbes, and plants: applications of XAFS spectroscopy and related synchrotron radiation methods to environmental science. Phys Scr T115:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen X, Shi J, Chen Y et al (2006) Tolerance and biosorption of copper and zinc by Pseudomonas putida CZ1 isolated from metal-polluted soil. Can J Microbiol 52:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croue JP, Benedetti MF, Violleau D et al (2003) Characterization and copper binding of humic and nonhumic organic matter isolated from the South Platte River: evidence for the presence of nitrogenous binding site. Environ Sci Technol 37:328–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dynes JJ, Tyliszczak T, Araki T et al (2006) Speciation and quantitative mapping of metal species in microbial biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy. Environ Sci Technol 40:1556–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elguindi J, Hao XL, Lin YB et al (2011) Advantages and challenges of increased antimicrobial copper use and copper mining. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Favas PJC, Pratas J, Gomes MEP et al (2011) Selective chemical extraction of heavy metals in tailings and soils contaminated by mining activity: environmental implications. J Geochem Explor 111:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fittschen UEA, Falkenberg G (2011) Trends in environmental science using microscopic X-ray fluorescence. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 66:567–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flogeac K, Guillon E, Aplincourt M (2004) Surface complexation of copper(II) on soil particles: EPR and XAFS studies. Environ Sci Technol 38:3098–3103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frenkel AI, Korshin GV, Ankudinov AL (2000) XANES study of Cu2+ binding sites in aquatic humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 34:2138–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grioni M, Goedkoop JB, Schoorl R et al (1989) Studies of copper valence states with Cu L3 X-ray-absorption spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 39:1541–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo GY, Yuan T, Wang WH et al (2011) Bioavailability, mobility, and toxicity of Cu in soils around the Dexing Cu mine in China. Environ Geochem Health 33:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hesterberg D, Duff MC, Dixon JB et al (2011) X-ray microspectroscopy and chemical reactions in soil microsites. J Environ Qual 40:667–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hitchcock AP, Dynes JJ, Lawrence JR et al (2009) Soft X-ray spectromicroscopy of nickel sorption in a natural river biofilm. Geobiol 7:432–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobson AR, Dousset S, Andreux F et al (2007) Electron microprobe and synchrotron X-ray fluorescence mapping of the heterogeneous distribution of copper in high-copper vineyard soils. Environ Sci Technol 41:6343–6349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karlsson T, Persson P, Skyllberg U (2006) Complexation of copper(II) in organic soils and in dissolved organic matter—EXAFS evidence for chelate ring structures. Environ Sci Technol 40:2623–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumpiene J, Mench M, Bes CM et al (2011) Assessment of aided phytostabilization of copper-contaminated soil by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and chemical extractions. Environ Pollut 159:1536–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence JR, Dynes JJ, Korber DR et al (2012) Monitoring the fate of copper nanoparticles in river biofilms using scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM). Chem Geol 239:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu SH, Wang HP (2004) In situ speciation studies of copper-humic substances in a contaminated soil during electrokinetic remediation. J Environ Qual 33:1280–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu RK (1999) Analytical methods of soil and agricultural chemistry. China Agricultural Science and Technology, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  23. Manceau A, Matynia A (2010) The nature of Cu bonding to natural organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:2556–2580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manceau A, Marcus MA, Tamura N (2002) Quantitative speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments by synchrotron X-ray techniques. Rev Mineral Geochem 49:341–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manceau A, Tamura N, Celestre RS et al (2003) Molecular-scale speciation of Zn and Ni in soil ferromanganese nodules from loess soils of the Mississippi Basin. Environ Sci Technol 37:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morton JD, Semrau JD, Hayes KF (2001) An X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of the structure and reversibility of copper adsorbed to montmorillonite clay. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:2709–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parkman RH, Charnock JM, Bryan ND et al (1999) Reactions of copper and cadmium ions in aqueous solution with goethite, lepidocrocite, mackinawite, and pyrite. Am Mineral 84:407–419Google Scholar
  28. Peacock CL, Sherman DM (2005) Copper(II) sorption onto goethite, hematite, and lepidocrocite: a surface complexation model based on ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:5141–5142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravel B, Newville M (2005) ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat 12:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Regier T, Krochak J, Sham TK et al (2007) Performance and capabilities of the Canadian Dragon: the SGM beamline at the Canadian Light Source. Nucl Instrum Meth A 582:93–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schofield PF, Henderson CMB, Cressey G et al (1995) 2p X-ray absorption spectroscopy in the earth sciences. J Synchrotron Radiat 2:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi JY, Wu B, Yuan XF et al (2008) An X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation of speciation and biotransformation of copper in Elsholtzia splendens. Plant Soil 302:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shimizu K, Maeshima H, Yoshida H et al (2001) Ligand field effect on the chemical shift in XANES spectra of Cu(II) compounds. Phys Chem Chem Phys 3:862–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solomon EI, Hedman B, Hodgson KO et al (2005) Ligand K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy: covalency of ligand-metal bonds. Coord Chem Rev 249:97–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strawn DG, Baker LL (2008) Speciation of Cu in a contaminated agricultural soil measured by XAFS, μ-XAFS, and μ-XRF. Environ Sci Technol 42:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strawn DG, Baker LL (2009) Molecular characterization of copper in soils using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Environ Pollut 157:2813–2821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Todd EC, Sherman DM (2003) Surface oxidation of chalcocite (Cu2S) under aqueous (pH = 2–11) and ambient atmospheric conditions: mineralogy from Cu L-and O K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Am Mineral 88:1652–1656Google Scholar
  38. USDA (1988) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Krieger, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  39. Vega FA, Covelo EF, Andrade M (2006) Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals in mine soils: influence of mine soil characteristics. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wan J, Tyliszczak T, Tokunaga TK (2007) Organic carbon distribution, speciation, and elemental correlations within soil micro aggregates: applications of STXM and NEXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:5439–5449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang JJ, Regier T, Dynes JJ et al (2011) Soft X-ray induced photoreduction of organic Cu(II) compounds probed by X-ray absorption near-edge (XANES) spectroscopy. Anal Chem 83:7856–7862CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianjun Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jin Liu
    • 1
  • James J. Dynes
    • 3
  • Derek Peak
    • 4
  • Tom Regier
    • 3
  • Jian Wang
    • 3
  • Shenhai Zhu
    • 1
  • Jiyan Shi
    • 1
  • John S. Tse
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Engineering PhysicsUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  3. 3.Canadian Light Source Inc.University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Soil ScienceUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations