Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

  • Contaminated Land, Ecological Assessment and Remediation Conference Series (CLEAR 2012) : Environmental Pollution and Risk Assessments
  • Published:

Observations of mercury wet deposition in Mexico

  • 1684 Accesses

  • 9 Citations


We provide a longer-term record of Hg wet deposition at two tropical latitude monitoring sites in Mexico, selected to provide regionally representative data. Weekly wet deposition samples were collected over 2 years, from September 2003 to November 2005. Based on this data set, we discuss the magnitude and seasonal variation of Hg in wet deposition and compare the results to other measurement sites and to several model estimates. With precipitation-weighted mean (PWM) concentrations of 8.2 and 7.9 ng L−1, respectively, during the sampling period from Sep 30 2003 to Oct 11 2005, and median weekly concentrations of 9.4 ± 1 ng L−1 for both sites, the wet Hg concentrations and deposition at HD01 were much lower than those observed at the US Gulf Coast MDN sites while the wet Hg deposition at OA02 was much lower than most MDN sites, but somewhat similar to US MDN sites along the Pacific Coast. Based on the limited available data, we conclude that the approximately 30 % higher average precipitation at HD01 and roughly equal PWM concentrations lead to the higher deposition at HD01 versus OA02. We believe that these observations may offer scientists and modelers additional understanding of the depositional fluxes in the lower latitudes of North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6


  1. Acosta y Asociados (2001) Inventory of sites in Mexico with elevated concentrations of mercury. Final report. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Project no.

  2. Bigelow DS, Dossett SR, Bowersox VC (2001) Instruction manual: NADP/NTN site selection and installation. Champaign, IL: NADP Program Office, ISWS, NADP Manual 2000-01. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/archive/siteinst2000.pdf. Last accessed 30 December 2012

  3. Bullock R, Atkinson D, Braverman K, Civerolo K, Dastoor A, Davignon D, Vijayaraghavan K (2008). The North American Mercury Model Intercomparison Study (NAMMIS): study description and model-to-model comparisons. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 113, D17310:1–17

  4. De la Rosa DA, Volke-Sepúlveda T, Solórzano G, Green C, Tordon R, Beauchamp S (2004) Survey of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in Mexico. Atmos Environ 38(29):4839–4846

  5. Fostier AH, Forti MC, Guimaraes JRD, Melfi AJ, Boulet R, Espirito Santo CM, Krug FJ (2000) Mercury fluxes in a natural forested Amazonian catchment (Serra do Navio, Amapa State, Brazil). Sci Total Environ 260(1):201–211

  6. Fu XW, Feng X, Dong ZQ, Yin RS, Wang JX, Yang ZR, Zhang H (2009) Atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) concentrations and wet and dry deposition of mercury at a high-altitude mountain peak in south China. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 9:23465–23504

  7. Fu XW, Feng X, Shang LH, Wang SF, Zhang H (2012) Two years of measurements of atmospheric total gaseous mercury (TGM) at a remote site in Mt. Changbai area, Northeastern China. Atmos Chem Phys 12:4215–4226

  8. Gay DA, Schmeltz D, Prestbo E, Olson M, Sharac T, Tordon R (2013) The Atmospheric Mercury Network: examination of a long-term atmospheric mercury record across North America. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 13:10521–10546

  9. Gichuki SW, Mason RP (2013) Mercury and metals in South African precipitation. Atmos Environ. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.009

  10. Hansen AM (2012) Lake sediment cores as indicators of historical metal (loid) accumulation—a case study in Mexico. Appl Geochem 27(9):1745–1752

  11. Hylander LD (2001) Global mercury pollution and its expected decrease after a mercury trade ban. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:265–272

  12. IMTA (Mexican Institute of Water Technology) (1999) Eric II. Quick climatological information reference (In Spanish), v. 2.0. Jiutepec, Mor, Mexico

  13. INEGI (Mexican National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Data Processing) (1995) Census of population and housing 1995. In: INEGI, Information by state (in Spanish) http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/iter/entidad_indicador.aspx?ev=2. Last accessed 20 June 2013

  14. INEGI (Mexican National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Data Processing) (2003) Soil use and vegetation. In: INEGI, Information by state, 1991–1996 (in Spanish). http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/inf_e1m.aspx. Last accessed 20 June 2013

  15. INE (National Institute of Ecology) (2008) National inventory of mercury releases in Mexico. National Institute of Ecology. Final Report of Contract INE/ADE-016/2008. Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, Mexico City, 213 p

  16. Martínez-Trinidad S, Hernández-Silva G, Ramírez-Islas ME, Martínez-Reyes J, Solorio-Munguía G, Solís-Valdez S, García-Martínez R (2013) Total mercury in terrestrial systems (air-soil-plant-water) at the mining region of San Joaquín, Querétaro, Mexico. Geofís Int 52(1):43–58

  17. Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF, Vandal GM (1992) The sources and composition of mercury in Pacific Ocean rain. J Atmos Chem 14(1–4):489–500

  18. Mason RP, Choi AL, Fitzgerald WF, Hammerschmidt CR, Lamborg CR, Soerensen AL, Sunderland EM (2012) Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ Res 119:101–117

  19. NADP (National Atmospheric Deposition Program) (2005) Monitoring mercury deposition. A key tool to understanding the link between emissions and effects. IEM 2005–03 and NADP Brochure 2005–01. Revised 07–11. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/brochures/mdn.pdf. Last accessed 30 December 2012

  20. NADP (National Atmospheric Deposition Program) (2011) NADP site selection and installation manual. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/manuals/NADP_Site_Selection_and_Installation_Manual.pdf. Last accessed 26 June 2013

  21. NADP (National Atmospheric Deposition Program) (2012a) Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) laboratory methods. National Atmospheric Deposition Program. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/MDN/MDNlab.aspx. Last accessed 30 December 2012

  22. NADP (National Atmospheric Deposition Program) (2012b) Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) data retrieval options. National Atmospheric Deposition Program. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/sites/mdnmap.asp. Last accessed 3 July 2013

  23. Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Sundseth K, Munthe J, Kindbom K, Wilson S, Steenhuisen F, Maxson P (2010) Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos Environ 44:2487–2499

  24. Prestbo EM, Gay DA (2009) Wet deposition of mercury in the US and Canada, 1996–2005: results and analysis of the NADP mercury deposition network (MDN). Atmos Environ 43(27):4223–4233

  25. Rutter AP, Snyder DC, Stone EA, Schauer JJ, González-Abraham R, Molina LT, Márquez C, Cárdenas B, de Foy B (2009) In situ measurements of speciated atmospheric mercury and the identification of source regions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Atmos Chem Phys 9:207–220

  26. Schmeltz D, Evers DC, Driscoll CT, Artz R, Cohen M, Gay D, Wiener JG (2011) MercNet: a national monitoring network to assess responses to changing mercury emissions in the United States. Ecotoxicology 20:1713–1725

  27. Schroeder WH, Munthe J (1998) Atmospheric mercury—an overview. Atmos Environ 32:809–822

  28. Seigneur C, Karamchandani P, Lohman K, Vijayaraghavan K, Shia RL (2001) Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 106(D21):27795–27809

  29. Selin NE (2009) Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34(956):43–63

  30. Selin NE, Jacob DJ (2008) Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ 42(21):5193–5204

  31. Smith-Downey NV, Sunderland EM, Jacob DJ (2010) Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: Insights from a new global model. J Geophys Res: Biogeosciences (2005–2012) 115, G03008, doi:10.1029/2009JG001124. Last accessed 01 July 2013

  32. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Method 1631, revision E: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/metals/mercury/upload/2007_07_10_methods_method_mercury_1631.pdf. Last accessed 30 June 2013

  33. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2002) Glacial ice cores reveal a record of natural and anthropogenic atmospheric mercury deposition for the last 270 years. USGS Fact Sheet FS-051-02, June 2002, http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/FS-051-02/pdf/fs-051-02.pdf. Last accessed 30 December 2012.

  34. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (2013) Mercury in the nation's streams-levels, trends, and implications. USGS Circular, in review as of May 2013

  35. Wang J, Newman M, Xu X, Liang L (2013) Higher and more variable methylmercury biomagnification factors for floodplain than the contiguous river (South River, Virginia, USA). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 92:191–198

Download references


This research was supported by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) through its Sound Management of Chemicals initiative under Action 3 - Mercury Implementation Task Force during the 2003-2005 Operational Plan. The authors would like to acknowledge the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) for providing sampling instruments and Frontier Geosciences (now Eurofins-Frontier Global Sciences) for the chemical analysis of total Hg. Also, thanks to Vic Shantora, Luke Trip, Eric Prestbo, José Carlos Tenorio, Rick Artz, Bob Brunette, Don MacKay, Víctor Gutiérrez Avedoy, Rocío Alatorre, José Castro, Gustavo Solórzano, Martha Ramírez, Alejandra López, Ulises López, Manfred van Afferden, and Axel Falcón for their guidance and assistance in this project.

Author information

Correspondence to Anne M. Hansen.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Gerhard Lammel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, A.M., Gay, D.A. Observations of mercury wet deposition in Mexico. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 8316–8325 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2012-3

Download citation


  • MDN
  • Hidalgo
  • Oaxaca
  • Tropical regions
  • Low-latitude geographical areas