Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 7320–7333 | Cite as

Evaluation of the groundwater quality feasibility zones for irrigational purposes through GIS in Omalur Taluk, Salem District, South India

  • D. KarunanidhiEmail author
  • G. Vennila
  • M. Suresh
  • S. K. Subramanian
Research Article

Abstract

The present work is employed in Omalur Taluk (study area 538.10 km2), Salem District, Tamil Nadu, India. Eighty-nine groundwater samples were collected during pre-monsoon (May) 2011 and were analyzed for major cations and anions. The irrigational parameters like; EC, Kelley’s ratio, sodium absorption ratio (SAR) values, Mg2+ hazards, HCO3 and residual sodium carbonate (RSC) have been worked out to know the suitability of the groundwater for irrigational purpose. Wilcox diagram indicates that out of 89 samples, 39 samples belong to good permissible category and Doneen diagram revealed that 98.88 % of the groundwater samples fall in Class I. The plotting of SAR values in USSL diagram indicates that all the samples have low SAR value. Out of 89 samples, 44 samples were in C3-S1 field. This implies that no alkali hazard is anticipated to the crops. In 44 locations (49.44 %), samples fall within C3-S1 category. This category is suitable for irrigation purpose. However, the concentration of bicarbonate was in significant amount showing 82 % of sites under “increasing problem” and the 4 % sites under “Severe Problem” zones. Finally, the above-said results are taken into a Geographic Information System (GIS) platform. To understand the spatial distribution of unsuitable zones, ArcGIS was employed. The present work reveals that groundwater in the Omalur Taluk is of good quality and is suitable for all uses including interbrain water transfer in the region.

Keywords

Sodium absorption ratio (SAR) Doneen’s diagram Geographic Information System (GIS) Irrigational purpose Omalur Taluk 

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1966) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. Public health association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Baker Thomas R, Case Steven B (2000) Let GIS be your guide. The Science Teacher 67, no. 7: 24–26. http://kangis.org/learning/publications/science_teacher/print/tst 0010_24. pdf
  3. Christiansen JE, Olsen EC, Willardson LS (1977) Irrigation water quality evaluation. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 103(IR2):155–169Google Scholar
  4. Doneen LD (1961) Notes on water quality in Agriculture. Published as a water science and Engineering Paper 4001, Department of Water Sciences and Engineering. University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  5. Doneen LD (1964) Notes on Water Quality in Agriculture, Water Science and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  6. Durbude D. G., and Vararrajan, N. (2007) Monitoring and mapping of groundwater quality. Journal of Applied Hydrology, v.xx, No. 1&2, pp.22–30.Google Scholar
  7. Eaton EM (1950) Significance of carbonate in irrigation water. Soil Sci 69:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frape SK, Fritz P, Mcnutt RH (1984) Water rock interaction and chemistry of groundwaters from the Canadian Shield. Geochem Cosmochim Acta 48:1617–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garrels RM, Christ CL (1965) Solutions, minerals and equilibria. Harper and Row, New York, 450pGoogle Scholar
  10. Hem JD (1985) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water. US Geol. Surv. Water Supply pp.254, 263, USGS, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Herczeg AL, Torgersen T, Chivas AR, Habermehl MA (1991) Geochemistry of groundwater from the Great Artesian Basin. Australia Jour Hydrology 126:225–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelley WP, Brown SM, Leibig GI Jr (1940) Chemical effects of Saline Irrigation water on soils. Soil Sci 49:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kimblin RT (1995) The chemistry and origin of groundwater in Triassic sandstone and Quaternary deposits, Northwest England and some U.K. comparisons. Jour Hydrology 172:293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Longley Paul A (2000) The academic success of GIS in geography: problems and prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2 no. 1: pp.37–42Google Scholar
  15. Mandel S, Shiftan ZL (1981) Ground water resources investigation and development. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Michael AM (1990) Irrigation: theory and practice. Vikas, New Delhi, 801pGoogle Scholar
  17. Openshaw SA (1991) view on the crisis in geography, or using GIS to put humpty-dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning, A 23, no. 5: pp.621-628Google Scholar
  18. Pandian K, Sankar K (2007) Hydrogeochemistry and groundwater quality in the Vaippar river basin. Tamil Nadu Jour of GSI 69:970–982Google Scholar
  19. Pawar NJ (1993) Geochemistry of carbonate precipitation from the groundwaters in basaltic aquifers. An equilibrium thermodynamic approach, Jour Geol Soc India 41:119–131Google Scholar
  20. Ragunath HM (1987) Groundwater. Wiley, New Delhi, p 353Google Scholar
  21. Raju KCB (1998) Importance of recharging depleted aquifers. State of the art of artificial recharge in India Jour Geol Soc India 51:429–454Google Scholar
  22. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA handbook 60:160Google Scholar
  23. Saleh A, AL-RUwaih F, Shehata M (1999) Hydrogeochemical processes operating within the main aquifers of Kuwait. J Arid Env 42:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saraf AK, Gupta RP, Jain RK, Srivastava NK (1994) GIS based processing and interpretation of ground water quality data, Proceedings of Regional workshop on Environmental Aspects of Ground water Development, Oct. 17–19, Kurukshetra, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Som SK, Bhattacharya AK (1992) Groundwater geochemistry of recent weathering at Panchpatmali bauxite bearing plateau. Koraput district, Orissa Jour Geol Soc India 40:453–461Google Scholar
  26. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1970) Aquatic chemistry. Wiley, New York, 1022pGoogle Scholar
  27. Sui Daniel, and Richard Morrill. (2004) Computers and geography: From automated geography to digital earth. In Geography and Technology, edited by Stanley, D., Brunn Susan, L., Cutter, and J.W. Harrington, JR. Dordrecht, NL: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  28. Swaine S, Schneider PJ (1971) The chemistry of surface water in prairie ponds. Am Chem Soc Adv Chem Ser 106:99–104Google Scholar
  29. Todd DK (1980) Groundwater hydrology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogel AI (1968) A text book of quantitative inorganic analysis including elementary analysis. 3rd edn, elbs/Iongman. Livingstone, Churchill, p 121Google Scholar
  31. Wicks CM, Herman JS (1994) The effect of a confining unit on the geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Upper Floridan aquifer system. Jour Hydrology 153:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilcox L.V (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. US Department of Agriculture, Arc 969, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Karunanidhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Vennila
    • 2
  • M. Suresh
    • 3
  • S. K. Subramanian
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringJayam College of Engineering and TechnologyDharmapuriIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringK S Rangasamy College of Technology (Autonomous)TiruchungodeIndia
  3. 3.Department of GeologyPeriyar UniversitySalemIndia
  4. 4.Hydrogeology Group, National Remote Sensing Center (NRSC)Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Department of Space, Government of IndiaHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations