Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 5975–5982 | Cite as

Vermiremediation of dyeing sludge from textile mill with the help of exotic earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny

  • Sartaj Ahmad Bhat
  • Jaswinder SinghEmail author
  • Adarsh Pal VigEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

The aim of present study was for the vermiremediation of dyeing sludge from textile mill into nutrient-rich vermicompost using earthworm Eisenia fetida. The dyeing sludge was mixed with cattle dung in different ratios, i.e., 0:100 (D0), 25:75 (D25), 50:50 (D50), 75:25 (D75), and 100:0 (D100) with earthworms, and 0:100 (S0), 25:75 (S25), 50:50 (S50), 75:25 (S75), and 100:0 (S100) without earthworms. Minimum mortality and maximum population build-up were observed in a 25:75 mixture. Nitrogen, phosphorus, sodium, and pH increased from the initial to the final products with earthworms, while electrical conductivity, C/N ratio, organic carbon, and potassium declined in all the feed mixtures. Vermicomposting with E. fetida was better for composting to change this sludge into nutrient-rich manure.

Keywords

Vermicomposting Eisenia fetida Dyeing sludge Earthworm Textile mill 

References

  1. Alexander M (1983) Introduction to soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New Delhi, p 467Google Scholar
  2. Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger J (2000) Influence ofearthworm processed pig manure on the growth and yield of green house tomatoes. Bioresour Technol 75:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balan DSL, Monteiro RTR (2001) Decolorization of textile indigo dye by lignolytic Fungi. J Biotechnol 89:141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Pearson Education, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen total. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Am. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wilcosin, pp 575–624Google Scholar
  6. Datar MT, Rao MN, Reddy S (1997) Vermicomposting—a technological option for solid waste management. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 24:89–93Google Scholar
  7. Deolalikar AV, Mitra A, Bhattacharyee S, Chakraborty S (2005) Effect of vermicomposting process on metal content of paper mill solidwaste. J Environ Sci Eng 47:81–84Google Scholar
  8. Dominguez J, Edwards CA (2004) Vermicomposting organic wastes: a review. In: Hanna SHS, Mikhail WZA (eds). Soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st century. S. H. Shakir Hanna, Cairo, pp 369–395Google Scholar
  9. Flack FM, Hartenstein R (1984) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida on microorganisms and cellulose. Soil Biol Biochem 16:491–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gajalakshmi S, Ramasamy EV, Abbasi SA (2005) Composting–vermicomposting of leaf litter ensuing from the trees of mango (Mangifera indica). Bioresour Technol 96:1057–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hait S, Tare V (2011) Vermistabilization of primary sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 102:2812–2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hand P, Hayes WA, Frankland JC, Satchell JE (1988) The vermicomposting of cow slurry. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPS Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 49–43Google Scholar
  13. Harris RC, Knox K, Walker N (1990) Strategies for the development of sustainable Landfill design. In: IWM Proceeding, pp 26–29Google Scholar
  14. Hartenstein R (1981) Production of earthworms as a potentially economic source of protein. Biotechnol Bioeng 23:1797–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant material with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci 109:214–220Google Scholar
  16. Kaviraj B, Sharma S (2003) Municipal solid waste management through vermicomposting employing exotic and local species of earthworms. Bioresour Technol 90:169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khwairakpam M, Bhargava R (2009) Vermitechnology for sewage sludge recycling. J Hazard Mater 16:948–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Logsdson G (1994) Worldwide progress in vermicomposting. Biocycle 35:63–65Google Scholar
  19. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2000) Effects of stocking density and feeding rate on vermicomposting of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 71:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ndegwa PM, Thompson SA (2001) Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment of bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresour Technol 76:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon and organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (ed) Method of soil analysis. Am. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, Wilcosin, pp 539–579Google Scholar
  22. Neuhauser EF, Hartenstein R, Kaplan DL (1980) Growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida in relation to population density and food rationing. Oikos 35:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orozco FH, Cegarra J, Trujillo LM, Roig A (1996) Vermicomposting of coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisenia foetida: effects on C and N contents and the availability of nutrients. Biol Fertil Soils 22:162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raymond CL, Martein JJH, Neuhauser EF (1988) Stabilization of liquid municipal sludge using earthworms. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPS Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 95–110Google Scholar
  25. Rynk RM, Kamp VD, Willson GG, Singley ME, Richard TL, Kolega JJ, Gouin FR, Laliberty JL, Kay D, Murphy DH, Hoitink AJ, Brinton WF (1992). In: R. Rynk (ed) On-farm composting handbook, NRAES-54 Natural Resource, Agriculture and Engineering Service, pp 186Google Scholar
  26. Sabina JR (1978) The nutritive value of earthworm meals. In: Hartenstein R (ed) Utilization of soil organisms in sludge management. State University of New York, Syracuse, pp 122–130Google Scholar
  27. Satchell JE, Martin K (1984) Phosphate activity in earthworm faeces. Soil Biol Biochem 16:191–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh D, Suthar S (2012) Vermicomposting of herbal pharmaceutical industry solid wastes. Ecol Eng 39:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh J, Kaur A, Vig AP, Rup PJ (2010) Role of Eisenia fetida in rapid recycling of nutrients from bio sludge of beverage industry. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:430–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suthar S (2006) Potential utilization of guar gum industrial waste in vermicompost production. Bioresour Technol 97:2474–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suthar S, Singh S, Dhawan S (2008) Earthworm as bioindicators of metals (Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu, Pb and Cd) in soils: is metal bioaccumulation affected by their ecological categories. Ecol Eng 32:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tognetti C, Mazzarino MJ, Laos F (2007) Improving the quality of municipal organic waste compost. Bioresour Technol 98:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tripathi G, Bhardwaj P (2004) Comparative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting efficiency of Eisenia foetida (Savigny) and Lampitomauritii (Kinberg). Bioresour Technol 92:275–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Viel M, Sayag D, Andre L (1987) Optimization of agricultural industrial waste Management through in-vessel composting. In: de Bertoldi M (ed) Compost: production, quality and use. Elsevier, Essex, pp 230–237Google Scholar
  35. Vig AP, Singh J, Wani SH, Dhaliwa SS (2011) Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresour Technol 102:7941–7945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yadav A, Garg VK (2011) Vermicomposting—an effective tool for the management of invasive weed Parthenium hysterophorus. Bioresour Technol 102:5891–5895CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botanical and Environmental SciencesGuru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyKhalsa College AmritsarPunjabIndia

Personalised recommendations