Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 7768–7776 | Cite as

Development and application of biotechnologies in the metal mining industry

  • D. Barrie Johnson
Mining and the Environment - Understanding Processes, Assessing Impacts and Developing Remediation


Metal mining faces a number of significant economic and environmental challenges in the twenty-first century for which established and emerging biotechnologies may, at least in part, provide the answers. Bioprocessing of mineral ores and concentrates is already used in variously engineered formats to extract base (e.g., copper, cobalt, and nickel) and precious (gold and silver) metals in mines throughout the world, though it remains a niche technology. However, current projections of an increasing future need to use low-grade primary metal ores, to reprocess mine wastes, and to develop in situ leaching technologies to extract metals from deep-buried ore bodies, all of which are economically more amenable to bioprocessing than conventional approaches (e.g., pyrometallurgy), would suggest that biomining will become more extensively utilized in the future. Recent research has also shown that bioleaching could be used to process a far wider range of metal ores (e.g., oxidized ores) than has previously been the case. Biotechnologies are also being developed to control mine-related pollution, including securing mine wastes (rocks and tailings) by using “ecological engineering” approaches, and also to remediate and recover metals from waste waters, such as acid mine drainage. This article reviews the current status of biotechnologies within the mining sector and considers how these may be developed and applied in future years.


Acidophiles Biomining Biotechnology Metals Mining Pollution Recycling Reprocessing Sulfidogenesis 



The author wishes to acknowledge the insights provide by numerous colleagues in the biohydrometallurgical community and to current and past members of the Bangor Acidophile Research Team. He also wishes to acknowledge financial support from the European Union in the “BioMinE” (FP6 contract NMP1-CT-500329-1) and ProMine (FP7 contract NMP-2008-LARGE-2: #228559) projects.


  1. Batterham R (2011) In situ leaching—how far in the future. In: Qui G, Jiang T, Qin W, Liu X, Yang Y, Wang H (eds) Biohydrometallurgy: biotech key to unlock mineral resources value. Central South University Press, Changsha, pp 21–22Google Scholar
  2. Berezowsky RMGS, Collins MJ, Kerfoot DGE, Torres N (1991) The commercial status of pressure leaching technology. J Min Met Mater Soc 43:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonstra J, van Lier R, Janssen G, Dijkman H, Buisman CJN (1999) Biohydrometallurgy and the environment toward the mining of the 21st century. In: Amils R, Ballester RA (eds) Biological treatment of acid mine drainage. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 559–567, Process Metallurgy 9BGoogle Scholar
  4. Bratty M, Lawrence RW, Kratochvil D, Marchant PB (2006) Applications of biological H2S production from elemental sulfur in the treatment of heavy metal pollution including acid rock drainage. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium of Acid Rock Drainage (ICARD). St. Louis, MO, pp. 271–281Google Scholar
  5. Brierley CL (2008a) How will biomining be applied in future. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 18:1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brierley JA (2008b) A perspective on developments in biohydrometallurgy. Hydrometall 94:2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colmer AR, Temple KL, Hinkle ME (1950) An iron-oxidizing bacterium from the acid drainage of some butiminous coal mines. J Bacteriol 59:317–328Google Scholar
  8. Cui J, Zhang L (2008) Metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste: a review. J Hazard Mater 158:228–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dold B (2010) Basic concepts in environmental geochemistry of sulfidic mine-waste management. In: Sunil Kumar E (ed) Waste management. InTech, Rijeka Croatia, pp 173–198Google Scholar
  10. du Plessis CA, Slabbert W, Hallberg KB, Johnson DB (2011) Ferredox: a biohydrometallurgical processing concept for limonitic nickel laterites. Hydrometall 109:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hallberg KB, Grail BM, du Plessis C, Johnson DB (2011) Reductive dissolution of ferric iron minerals: a new approach for bioprocessing nickel laterites. Min Eng 24:620–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey TJ, Bath M (2007) The GeoBiotics GEOCOATR technology—progress and challenges. In: Rawlings DE, Johnson DB (eds) Biomining. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedrich S, Johnson DB (2012) A modular continuous flow reactor system for the selective bio-oxidation and precipitation of iron in mine-impacted waters. Bioresource Technol 106:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedrich S, Schlömann M, Johnson DB (2011) The iron-oxidizing Proteobacteria. Microbiol 157:1551–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinzel E, Janneck E, Glombitza F, Schlömann M, Seifert J (2009) Population dynamics of iron-oxidizing communities in pilot plants for the treatment of acid mine waters. Environ Sci Technol 43:6138–6144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Janneck E, Arnold I, Koch T, Meyer J, Burghardt D, Ehinger S (2010) Microbial synthesis of schwertmannite from lignite mine water and its utilization for removal of arsenic from mine waters and for production of iron pigments. In: Wolkersdorfer C, Freund A (eds) International mine water association symposium—mine water and innovative thinking. CBU Press Sydney, Nova Scotia, pp 131–134Google Scholar
  17. Johnson DB (2010) The biogeochemistry of biomining. In: Barton L, Mandl M, Loy A (eds) Geomicrobiology: molecular and environmental perspective. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 401–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson DB (2012) Reductive dissolution of minerals and selective recovery of metals using acidophilic iron- and sulfate-reducing acidophiles. Hydrometall 127–128:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson DB, Hallberg KH (2002) Pitfalls of passive mine drainage. Re/Views Environ Biotechnol 1:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2005) Acid mine drainage: remediation options. Sci Tot Environ 338:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson DB, Kanao T, Hedrich S (2012) Redox transformations of iron at extremely low pH: fundamental and applied aspects. Front Microbiol 3:96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalin M, Cairns J, McCready RGL (1991) Ecological engineering methods for acid mine drainage treatment of coal wastes. Resour Conserv Recy 5:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morin D, D Hugues P (2007) Bioleaching of a cobalt-containing pyrite in stirred reactors: a case study from laboratory scale to industrial applications. In: Rawlings DE, Johnson DB (eds) Biomining. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB (2011) Safeguarding reactive mine tailings by ecological engineering: the significance of microbial communities and interactions. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:8201–8208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB (2012) Selective removal of transition metals from acidic mine waters by novel consortia of acidophilic sulfidogenic bacteria. Microb Biotechnol 5:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ňancucheo I, Hedrich S, Johnson DB (2012) New (micro-) biological strategies that enable the selective recovery and recycling of metals from acid mine drainage and mine process waters. Miner Mag 76:2683–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson GJ, Brierley JA, Brierley CL (2003) Bioleaching review part B: progress in bioleaching: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rawlings DE (2002) Heavy metal mining using microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rawlings DE, Johnson DB (2007) The microbiology of biomining: development and optimization of mineral-oxidizing microbial consortia. Microbiol 153:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Riekkola-Vanhanen M (2010) Talvivaara Sotkamo mine—bioleaching of a polymetallic nickel ore in subarctic climate. Nova Biotechnol 10:7–14Google Scholar
  31. Rohwerder T, Gehrke T, Kinzler K, Sand W (2003) Bioleaching review part A: progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of bacterial metal sulfide oxidation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanchez Espaňa J, Pamo EL, Pastor ES, Andres JR, Rubi JAM (2005) The natural attenuation of two acidic effluents in Tharsis and La Zarza-Perrunal mines (Iberian Pyrite Belt, Huelva, Spain). Environ Geol 49:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swanson DA, Barbour SL, Wilson GW (1997) Dry-site versus wet-site cover design. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, Volume IV. Vancouver, BC, Canada, p. 1595–1610Google Scholar
  34. Wang D, Qui G, Liu X (2011) The progress of biohydrometallurgy in China. In: Qui G, Jiang T, Qin W, Liu X, Yang Y, Wang H (eds) Biohydrometallurgy: biotech key to unlock mineral resources value. Central South University Press, Changsha, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  35. Watling HR (2006) The bioleaching of sulfide minerals with emphasis on copper sulfides—a review. Hydrometall 84:81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Natural SciencesBangor UniversityBangorUK

Personalised recommendations