Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 8919–8926 | Cite as

Grain yield and arsenic uptake of upland rice inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in As-spiked soils

  • Fuyong Wu
  • Junli Hu
  • Shengchun Wu
  • Ming Hung Wong
Bioavailability - the underlying basis for Risk Based Land Management

Abstract

A pot trial was conducted to investigate the effects of three arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi species, including Glomus geosporum BGC HUN02C, G. versiforme BGC GD01B, and G. mosseae BGC GD01A, on grain yield and arsenic (As) uptake of upland rice (Zhonghan 221) in As-spiked soils. Moderate levels of AM colonization (24.1–63.1 %) were recorded in the roots of upland rice, and up to 70 mg kg−1 As in soils did not seem to inhibit mycorrhizal colonization. Positive mycorrhizal growth effects in grain, husk, straw, and root of the upland rice, especially under high level (70 mg kg−1) of As in soils, were apparent. Although the effects varied among species of AM fungi, inoculation of AM fungi apparently enhanced grain yield of upland rice without increasing grain As concentrations in As-spiked soils, indicating that AM fungi could alleviate adverse effects on the upland rice caused by As in soils. The present results also show that mycorrhizal inoculation significantly (p < 0.05) decreased As concentrations in husk, straw, and root in soils added with 70 mg kg−1 As. The present results suggest that AM fungi are able to mitigate the adverse effects with enhancing rice production when growing in As-contaminated soils.

Keywords

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Rice Arsenic contamination Agro-products safety 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The present project was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (HKBU-203011), the Special Equipment Grant of RGC (SEG HKBU09), and the Mini-AoE (Area of excellence) of Hong Kong Baptist University (RC/AOE/08-09/01).

References

  1. Abedin MJ, Feldmann J, Meharg A (2002) Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice plants. Plant Physiol 128:1120–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adomako EE, Solaiman ARM, Williams PN, Deacon C, Rahman GKMM, Meharg AA (2009) Enhanced transfer of arsenic to grain for Bangladesh grown rice compared to US and EU. Environ Int 35:476–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed FRS, Killham K, Alexander I (2006) Influences of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on growth and nutrition of lentil irrigated with arsenic contaminated water. Plant Soil 283:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asher CJ, Reay PF (1979) Arsenic uptake by barley seedlings. Aust J Plant Physiol 6:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai JF, Lin XG, Yin R, Zhang HY, Wang JH, Chen XM, Luo YM (2008) The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on As and P uptake by maize (Zea mays L.) from As contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol 38:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catarecha P, Segura MD, Franco-Zorrilla JM, Garcia-Ponce B, Lanza M, Solano R, Paz-Ares J, Leyva A (2007) A mutant of the Arabidopsis phosphate transporter PHT1; 1 displays enhanced arsenic accumulation. Plant Cell 19:1123–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen BD, Xiao XY, Zhu YG, Smith FA, Xie ZM, Smith SE (2007) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae gives contradictory effects on phosphorus and arsenic acquisition by Medicago sativa Linn. Sci Total Environ 379:226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques to measure vesicular–arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guimil S, Chang HS, Zhu T, Sesma A, Osbourn A, Roux C, Ionnidis V, Oakeley EJ, Docquier M, Descombes P, Briggs SP, Paszkowski U (2005) Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. P Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8066–8070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hajiboland R, Afiasgharzad N, Barzeghar R (2009) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on uptake of Zn and P by two contrasting rice genotypes. Plant Soil Environ 55:93–100Google Scholar
  11. Hata S, Kobae Y, Banba M (2010) Interactions between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Int Rev Cel Mol Bio 281:1–48Google Scholar
  12. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1938) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exp Stat Circ 347:1–39Google Scholar
  13. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2004) Some drinking-water disinfectants and contaminants, including arsenic. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. Kobae Y, Hata S (2010) Dynamics of periarbuscular membranes visualized with a fluorescent phosphate transporter in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 51:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IRRI (1997) Rice almanac. IRRI, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H, Ye ZH, Chan WF, Chen XW, Wu FY, Wu SC, Wong MH (2011) Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve grain yield, As uptake and tolerance of rice grown under aerobic conditions? Environ Pollut 159:2537–2545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li RY, Stroud JL, Ma JF, McGrath SP, Zhao FJ (2009) Mitigation of arsenic accumulation in rice with water management and silicon fertilization. Environ Sci Tech 43:3778–3783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meliker JR, Franzblau A, Slotnick MJ, Nriagu JO (2006) Major contributors to inorganic arsenic intake in southeastern Michigan. Int J Hyg Envir Heal 209:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, Wisconsin, pp 1–1142Google Scholar
  20. Paszkowski U, Kroken S, Roux C, Briggs SP (2002) Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13324–13329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing and staining parasitic and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 55:158–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Poynton CY, Huang JWW, Blaylock MJ, Kochian LV, Elless MP (2004) Mechanisms of arsenic hyperaccumulation in Pteris species: root as influx and translocation. Planta 219:1080–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith SE, Smith FA (2011) Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith SE, Smith FA, Jakobsen I (2004) Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptake. New Phytol 162:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Somenahally AC, Hollister EB, Yan WG, Gentry TJ, Loeppert RH (2011) Water management impacts on arsenic speciation and iron-reducing bacteria in contrasting rice-rhizosphere compartments. Environ Sci Tech 45:8328–8335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsuji JS, Yost LJ, Barraj LM, Scrafford CG, Mink PJ (2007) Use of background inorganic arsenic exposures to provide perspective on risk assessment results. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 48:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams PN, Villada A, Deacon C, Raab A, Figuerola J, Green AJ, Feldmann J, Meharg AA (2007) Greatly enhanced arsenic shoot assimilation in rice leads to elevated grain levels compared to wheat and barley. Environ Sci Tech 41:6854–6859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu FY, Ye ZH, Wong MH (2009) Intraspecific differences of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in their impacts on arsenic accumulation by Pteris vittata L. Chemosphere 76:1258–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu PL, Christie P, Liu Y, Zhang JL, Li XL (2008a) The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae can enhance arsenic tolerance in Medicago truncatula by increasing plant phosphorus status and restricting arsenate uptake. Environ Pollut 156:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu XY, McGrath SP, Meharg AA, Zhao FJ (2008b) Growing rice aerobically markedly decreases arsenic accumulation. Environ Sci Tech 42:5574–5579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang XH, Zhu YG, Chen BD, Lin AJ, Smith SE, Smith FA (2005) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to resistance of upland rice to combined metal contamination of soil. J Plant Nutr 28:2065–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fuyong Wu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Junli Hu
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Shengchun Wu
    • 2
    • 4
  • Ming Hung Wong
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Municipal EngineeringHenan University of Urban ConstructionPingdingshanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Croucher Institute for Environmental Sciences, and Department of BiologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the EnvironmentHong Kong Baptist University & Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of SciencesNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations