Impact of chronic exposure to low doses of chlorpyrifos on the intestinal microbiota in the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME®) and in the rat
- 1.9k Downloads
The impact of the insecticide chlorpyrifos (CPF) on the mammalian digestive system has been poorly described. The present study aimed at evaluating the effect of chronic, low-dose exposure to CPF on the composition of the gut microbiota in a Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem: the SHIME® and in rats. The SHIME® comprises six reactor vessels (stomach to colon). The colonic segments were inoculated with feces from healthy humans. Then, the simulator was exposed to a daily dose of 1 mg of CPF for 30 days. The changes over time in the populations of bacteria were examined at different time points: prior to pesticide exposure (as a control) and after exposure. In parallel, pregnant rats were gavaged daily with 1 mg/kg of CPF (or vehicle) until the pups were weaned. Next, the rats were gavaged with same dose of CPF until 60 days of age (adulthood). Then, samples of different parts of the digestive tract were collected under sterile conditions for microbiological assessment. Chronic, low-dose exposure to CPF in the SHIME® and in the rat was found to induce dysbiosis in the microbial community with, in particular, proliferation of subpopulations of some strains and a decrease in the numbers of others bacteria. In compliance with European guidelines, the use of the SHIME® in vitro tool would help to (1) elucidate the final health effect of toxic agents and (2) minimize (though not fully replace) animal testing. Indeed, certain parameters would still have to be studied further in vivo.
KeywordsChlorpyrifos Pesticide Gut microbiota Balanced microbiota Simulator of human intestinal microbial ecosystem Rats
The authors thank Professor Willy Verstraete for his assistance with technology transfer from Belgium to France, Dr David Fraser for improving the manuscript’s English language, and most particularly, the French Ministry of Research and the Picardy Regional Council for providing financial support for this project.
- Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation de l’environnement et du travail (2011) Résultats de l’étude nationale de surveillance des expositions alimentaires aux substances chimiques. Etude l’Alimentation Totale 2:2006–2010Google Scholar
- De Boever P, Deplancke B, Verstraete W (2000) Fermentation by gut microbiota cultured in a simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem is improved by supplementing a soygerm powder. J Nutr 130:2599–2606Google Scholar
- European Union (2005) Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council on maximum residue levels (MRLs) of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Off J Eur UnionGoogle Scholar
- Frick, J.S., Autenrieth, I.B., 2012. The gut microflora and its variety of roles in health and disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_217
- Kitagawa K, Nishigori A, Murata N, Nishimoto K, Takada H (1966) Radiotelemetry of the pH of the gastrointestinal tract by glass electrode. Gastroenterology 51:368–372Google Scholar
- Lennette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ, HJ S (1985) Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, p 1149, Vol. 4Google Scholar
- Mach T (2006) Clinical usefulness of probiotics in inflammatory bowel diseases. J Physiol Pharmacol 57(Suppl 9):23–33Google Scholar
- Rashid M, Weintraub A, Nord CE (2011) Comparative effects of the immediate and the extended release formulations of ciprofloxacin on normal human intestinal microflora. J Chemother 23:145–149Google Scholar
- Rosenberg A, Alexander M (1979) Microbial cleavage of various organophosphorus insecticides. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:886–891Google Scholar
- Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Marzorati M, Possemiers S, Verstraete W, Gerard P, Rabot S, Bruneau A, El Aidy S, Derrien M, Zoetendal E, Kleerebezem M, Smidt H, Van de Wiele T (2010) Microbial community development in a dynamic gut model is reproducible, colon region specific, and selective for Bacteroidetes and Clostridium cluster IX. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5237–5246CrossRefGoogle Scholar