Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 3430–3439 | Cite as

Isolation and characterization of a Rhodococcus strain with phenol-degrading ability and its potential use for tannery effluent biotreatment

  • Cintia E. Paisio
  • Melina A. Talano
  • Paola S. González
  • Víctor D. Busto
  • Julián Rodríguez Talou
  • Elizabeth AgostiniEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Introduction

Wastewater derived from leather production may contain phenols, which are highly toxic, and their degradation could be possible through bioremediation technologies.

Materials, methods and results

In the present work, microbial degradation of phenol was studied using a tolerant bacterial strain, named CS1, isolated from tannery sediments. This strain was able to survive in the presence of phenol at concentrations of up to 1,000 mg/L. On the basis of morphological and biochemical properties, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis, the isolated strain was identified as Rhodococcus sp. Phenol removal was evaluated at a lab-scale in Erlenmeyer flasks and at a bioreactor scale in a stirred tank reactor. Rhodococcus sp. CS1 was able to completely remove phenol in a range of 200 to 1,000 mg/L in mineral medium at 30 ± 2 °C and pH 7 as optimal conditions. In the stirred tank bioreactor, we studied the effect of some parameters, such as agitation (200–600 rpm) and aeration (1–3 vvm), on growth and phenol removal efficiency. Faster phenol biodegradation was obtained in the bioreactor than in Erlenmeyer flasks, and maximum phenol removal was achieved at 400 rpm and 1 vvm in only 12 h. Furthermore, Rhodococcus sp. CS1 strain was able to grow and completely degrade phenols from tannery effluents after 9 h of incubation.

Conclusion

Based on these results, Rhodococcus sp. CS1 could be an appropriate microorganism for bioremediation of tannery effluents or other phenol-containing wastewaters.

Keywords

Phenol removal Bioremediation Phenol tolerance Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase Tannery effluents Bioreactor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

P.S.G, M.T., and E.A. are members of the research career from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) (Argentina). C.E.P. has a fellowship from CONICET-MinCyT Córdoba. We wish to thank PPI (SECyT-UNRC), CONICET, MinCyT Córdoba, and PICT (FONCyT) for the financial support.

References

  1. Agarry SE, Solomon BO, Audu TOK (2010) Optimization of process variables for the batch degradation of phenol by Pseudomonas fluorescence using response surface methodology. Int J Chem Technol 1–13Google Scholar
  2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25:3389–402. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (1998) Toxicological profile for phenol. U. S Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A, Ghoshal AK (2011) Phenol degradation performance by isolated Bacillus cereus immobilized in alginate. Int Biodet Biodeg 65:1052–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty S, Bhattacharya T, Patel TN, Tiwari KK (2010) Biodegradation of phenol by native microorganisms isolated from coke processing wastewater. J Environ Biol 31:293–296Google Scholar
  7. Chandra R, Bharagava RN, Kapley A, Purohit HJ (2011) Bacterial diversity, organic pollutants and their metabolites in two aeration lagoons of common effluent treatment plant (CETP) during the degradation and detoxification of tannery wastewater. Biores Technol 102:2333–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cokgor EU, Karahan O, Orhon D (2008) The effect of mixing pharmaceutical and tannery wastewaters on the biodegradation characteristics of the effluents. J Hazard Mat 156:292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM (2009). The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 37: D141–D145. http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/classifier/classifier.jsp CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagley S (1971) Catabolism of aromatic compounds by microorganisms. Adv Microbiol Physiol 6:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enfors SO, Jahhic M, Rozkov A, Xu B, Hecker M (2001) Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol 85:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahy A, McGenity TJ, Timmis KN, Ball AS (2006) Heterogeneous aerobic benzene-degrading communities in oxygen-depleted groundwaters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gargouri B, Karray F, Mhiri N, Aloui F, Sayadi S (2011) Application of a continuously stirred tank bioreactor (CSTR) for bioremediation of hydrocarbon-rich industrial wastewater effluents. J Hazard Mat 189:427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez R, Gentina JC, Acevedo F (2003) Optimization of the solids suspension conditions in a continuous stirred tank reactor for the biooxidation of refractory gold concentrates. Electronic J Biotechnol 6:1–8Google Scholar
  15. Harayama S, Renik M (1989) Bacterial aromatic ring cleavage enzymes are classified into two different gene families. J Biol Chem 264:15328–15333Google Scholar
  16. Hidalgo A, Jaureguibeitia A, Begoña Prieto M, Rodríguez-Fernández C, Serra JL, Llama MJ (2002) Biological treatment of phenolic industrial wastewaters by Rhodococcus erythropolis UPV-1. Enz Microbial Tech 31:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodaifa G, Martinez ME, Orpez R, Sánchez F (2010). Influence of hydrodynamic stress in the growth of Scenedesmus obliquus using a culture medium based on olive-mill wastewater. Chem. Eng. and processing: process intensification 49:1161–1168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khleifat KM (2006) Biodegradation of phenol by Ewingella americana: effect of carbon starvation and some growth conditions. Process Biochem 41:2010–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khwaja AR, Singh R, Tandon SN (2001) Monitoring of Ganga water and sediments vis-à-vis tannery pollution at Kanpur (India): a case study. Environ Monit Assess 68:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kibret M, Somitsch W, Robra KH (2000) Characterization of a phenol degrading mixed population by enzyme assay. Water Res 34:1127–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leigh MB, Prouzová P, Macková M, Macek T, Nagle DP, Fletcher JS (2006) Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-degrading bacteria associated with trees in a PCB-contaminated site. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2331–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Margesin R, Fonteyne P, Redl B (2005) Low-temperature biodegradation of high amounts of phenol by Rhodococcus spp. and basidiomycetous yeasts. Orig Res Microbiol 156:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Law from Argentina N° 24.051, Decree 831/93. Reglamentation of hazardous wastes, http://www.cecopal.org/derecho/DNacional/DN-831-93.htm
  24. Paisio CE, Agostini E, González PS, Bertuzzi ML (2009) Lethal and teratogenic effects of phenol on Bufo arenarum embryos. J Hazard Mater 167:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pradhan N, Ingle AO (2007) Mineralization of phenol by a Serratia plymuthica strain GC isolated from sludge sample. Int Biodet Biodegrad 60:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qiao M, Wang C, Huang S, Wang D, Wang Z (2006) Composition, sources, and potential toxicological significance of PAHs in the surface sediments of the Meiliang Bay, Taihu Lake, China. Environ Int 32:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reda AB, Ashraf TAH (2010) Optimization of bacterial biodegradation of toluene and phenol under different nutritional and environmental conditions. J Appl Sci Res 6:1086–1095Google Scholar
  28. Reemtsma T, Jekel M (1997) Dissolved organics in tannery wastewaters and their alteration by a combined anaerobic and aerobic treatment. Water Res 31:1035–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rehfuss M, Urban J (2005) Rhodococcus phenolicus sp. nov., a novel bioprocessor isolated actinomycete with the ability to degrade chlorobenzene, dichlorobenzene and phenol as sole carbon sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah S, Thakur IS (2002) Enrichment and characterization of microbial community of tannery effluent for the degradation of pentachlorophenol. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Srivastava S, Ahmadb AH, Thakurc IS (2007) Removal of chromium and pentachlorophenol from tannery effluents. Biores Technol 98:1128–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun JQ, Xu L, Tang YQ, Chen FM, Liu WQ, Wu XL (2011) Degradation of pyridine by one Rhodococcus strain in the presence of chromium (VI) or phenol. J Hazard Mater 191:62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tadesse I, Green FB, Puhakka JA (2004) Seasonal and diurnal variations of temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen in advanced integrated wastewater pond system treating tannery effluent. Water Res 38:645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599Google Scholar
  35. US EPA (1979) Phenol ambient water quality criteria. Office of planning and standards. Environ. Protect. Agency, Washington, pp 296–786Google Scholar
  36. Vidali M (2001) Bioremediation. An overview. Pure Appl Chem 73:1163–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Warhurst AM, Fewson CA (1994) Biotransformations catalyzed by the genus Rhodococcus. Crit Rev Biotechnol 14:29–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright H, Nicell JA (1999) Characterization of soybean peroxidase for wastewater treatment. Biores Technol 70:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cintia E. Paisio
    • 1
  • Melina A. Talano
    • 1
  • Paola S. González
    • 1
  • Víctor D. Busto
    • 2
  • Julián Rodríguez Talou
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Agostini
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Biología Molecular, FCEFQyNUniversidad Nacional de Río CuartoRío Cuarto (Córdoba)Argentina
  2. 2.Microbiología Industrial y Biotecnología, Facultad de Farmacia y BioquímicaUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations