Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1629–1639 | Cite as

Exposure to heavy metals in blood and risk perception of the population living in the vicinity of municipal waste incinerators in Korea

  • Chung Soo Lee
  • Young Wook Lim
  • Ho Hyun Kim
  • Ji Yeon Yang
  • Dong Chun ShinEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

The purpose of this study was to monitor and present the heavy metal concentrations in the blood of residents of areas near municipal waste incinerators (MWIs), who are more prone to environmental pollution. We also sought to compare and analyze the residents’ perception of environmental pollution as one of the factors affecting heavy metal concentrations in the blood using a survey about the perceived damage caused by the facilities. Since heavy metal levels in the blood can be affected not only by local environmental pollution but also by personal and occupational factors, heavy metal levels in the blood need to be verified and consistently monitored.

Methods

Residents who live within 300 m of MWIs in Seoul are acknowledged to be under indirect influence according to the Waste Disposal Act. A survey was given to 841 residents living within 300 m of a MWI from 2006 to 2009. The concentrations of heavy metals (lead, cadmium, and mercury) in the blood were measured in the 841 surveyed residents and in 105 residents in reference areas. Additionally, the perception of the damage caused by municipal waste incinerators was investigated using scores from 1 to 5 on a Likert scale.

Results

The measurements of the heavy metal concentrations in the blood showed that the mean concentrations of lead, cadmium, and mercury were 43.1, 1.7, and 1.3 ug/L, respectively. The blood levels of lead and cadmium were slightly higher in the group of the subjects who had resided the longest near the municipal waste incinerators. When compared with the domestic investigation by the Ministry of Environment, the concentrations of lead and cadmium were a little higher, while that of mercury was a little lower. Overall, there was no significant difference in the distribution of heavy metal levels in the blood among age groups. Additionally, the investigation of the perceived damage from municipal waste incinerators showed that the subjects

Keywords

Exposure Heavy metals Risk perception Municipal waste incinerators 

References

  1. Agramunt MC, Domingo A, Domingo JL, Corbella J (2003) Monitoring internal exposure to metals and organic substances in workers at a hazardous waste incinerator after 3 years of operation. Toxicol Lett 146(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allsopp M, Constner P, Johnston P (2001) Incineration and human health. State of knowledge of the impacts of waste incinerators on human health. Environ Sci Pollu Res Int 8(2):141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker F (1990) Risk communication about environmental hazards. J Public Health Policy 11(3):341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickerstaff K (2004) Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int 30(6):827–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casteleyn L, Van Tongelena B, Reisa MF, Polchera A, Joasa R (2007) Human biomonitoring: towards more integrated approaches in Europe. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210(3–4):199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2005) Third national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. NCEH publication no. 05–0570Google Scholar
  7. Clevrly DH, Morrison RM, Riddle BL, Kellam RG (1989) Regulatory analysis of pollutant emissions. Including polychlorinated dibenzo-ρ-dioxins (CODs) and dibenzofurans (CDFs), from the stacks of municipal waste combustors. Chemosphere 18(1–6):1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cordier S, Lehébel A, Amar E, Anzivino-Viricel L, Hours M, Monfort C, Chevrier C, Chiron M, Robert-Gnansia E (2010) Maternal residence near municipal waste incinerators and the risk of urinary tract birth defects. Occup Eviron Med 67(7):493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. EI-Zein A, Nasrallah R, Nuwayhid I, Kai L, Makhoul J (2006) Why do neighbors have different environmental priorities? Analysis of environmental risk perception in a Beirut neighborhood. Risk Anal 26(2):423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Environment Ministry of Korea (2004) The situation of production and management of sludgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Environment Ministry of Korea (2008) The national investigation into the current status of hazardous substances in the human bodyGoogle Scholar
  12. Fátima Reis M, Smpaio C, Ana Brantes P, Aniceto MMelim, Cardoso L, Gabriel C, Filipa Simão J, Miguel P (2007) Human exposure to heavy metal in the vicinity of Portuguese solid waste incinerators—part 1: biomonitoring of Pb, Cd and Hg in blood of the general population. Int J Hyg Environ Health 210(3–4):439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friberg L, Mottet NK (1989) Accumulation of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in the brain. Biol Trace Elem Res 21:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golding D, Krimsky S, Plough A (1992) Evaluating risk communication: narrative vs. technical presentation about radon. Risk Anal 12(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg MR (2009) NIMBY, CLAMP, and the location of new nuclear-related facilities: US national and 11 site-specific surveys. Risk Anal 29(9):1242–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haddam N, Samira S, Dumont X, Taleb A, Lison D, Haufroid V, Bernard A (2011) Confounders in the assessment of the renal effects associated with low-level urinary cadmium: an analysis in industrial workers. Environ Health 10(1):37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermand D, Karsenty S, Py Y, Guillet L, Chauvin B, Simeone A, Muñoz Sastre MT, Mullet E (2003) Risk target: an interactive context factor in risk perception. Risk Anal 23(4):821–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higashikawa K, Zhang ZW, Shimbo S, Moon CS, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Matsuda-Inoguchi N, Ikeda M (2000) Correlation between concentration in urine and in blood of cadmium and lead among women in Asia. Sci Total Environ 246(2–3):97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ikeda M, Shimbo S, Watanabe T, Ohashi F, Fukui Y, Sakuragi S, Moriguchi J (2011) Estimation of dietary Pb and Cd intake from Pb and Cd in blood or urine. Biol Trace Elem Res 139(3):269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan MI, Ahmad I, Mahdi AA, Akhtar MJ, Islam N, Ashquin M, Venkatesh T (2010) Elevated blood lead levels and cytogenetic markers in buccal epithelial cells of painters in India: genotoxicity in painters exposed to lead containing paints. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 17(7):1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim S, Cho YM, Choi SH, Kim HJ, Choi J (2011) The effect of exposure factors on the concentration of heavy metals in residents near abandoned metal mines. J Prev Med Public Health 44(1):41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kröger G, Pietsch J, Ufermann K (1999) Environmental accounting on a communal level: a tool to support environmental management and decision-making by communal executives. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 6(3):170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lima ML, Barnett J, Vala J (2005) Risk perception and technological development at a societal level. Risk Anal 25(5):1229–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Llobet JM, Falcó G, Casas C, Teixidó A, Domingo JL (2003) Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead in common foods and estimated daily intake by children, adolescents, adults, and seniors of Catalonia, Spain. J Agric Food Chem 51(3):838–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lo KSL, Chen YH (1990) Extracting heavy metals from municipal and industrial sludges. Sci Total Environ 90:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michael W, Slimak TD (2006) Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Anal 26(6):1689–1705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Min SK, Kim KI, Lee CI, Jung YC, Suh SY, Kim DK (2002) Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF. Qual Life Res 11(6):593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miranda ML, Edwards S, Maxson PJ (2011) Mercury levels in an urban pregnant population in Durham County, North Carolina. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(3):698–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Okuda I, Thomson VE (2007) Regionalization of municipal solid waste management in Japan: balancing the proximity principle with economic efficiency. Eviron Manage 40(1):12–19Google Scholar
  30. Park JM, Lee SB, Kim JP, Kim MJ, Kwon OS, Jung DI (2009) Behavior of PAHs from sewage sludge incinerators in Korea. Waste Manag 29(2):690–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pekárek V, Karban J, Fiserová E, Bures M, Pacáková V, Vecerníková E (2003) Dehalogenation potential of municipal waste incineration fly ash. I. General principles. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 10(1):39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poręba R, Gać P, Poręba M, Antonowicz-Juchniewicz J, Andrzejak R (2011) Relation between occupational exposure to lead, cadmium, arsenic and concentration of cystatin C. Toxicology 283(2–3):88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rucandio MI, Petit-Domínguez MD, Fidalgo-Hijano C, García-Giménez R (2011) Biomonitoring of chemical elements in an urban environment using arboreal and bush plant species. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 18(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shen G, Cao L, Lu Y, Hong J (2005) Influence of phenanthrene on cadmium toxicity to soil enzymes and microbial growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 12(5):259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Skerfving S, Bencko V, Vahter M, Schütz A, Gerhardsson L (1999) Environmental health in the Baltic region-toxic metals. Scand J Work Enviro Health 25(3):40–64Google Scholar
  36. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of interna-tional filed trial. A Report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 13(2):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sokolowska J, Tyszka T (1995) Perception and acceptance of technological and environmental risk: why are poor countries less concerned? Risk Anal 15(6):733–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stasinakis AS, Thomaidis NS, Giannes AS, Lekkas TD (2003) Effect of arsenic and mercury speciation on inhibition of respiration rate in activated sludge systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 10(3):177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong S, von Schirnding YE, Prapamontol T (2000) Environmental lead exposure: a public health problem of global dimensions. Bull World Health Organ 78(9):1068–1077Google Scholar
  41. Witten K, Parkes M, Ramasubramanian L (2000) Participatory environmental health research in Aotearoa/New Zealand: constraints and opportunities. Health Educ Behav 27(3):371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organization (1997) WHOQOL: measuring quality of life, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu M, Fitzgerald EF, Gelberg KH (2011) Exposure sources and reasons for testing among women with low blood lead levels. Int J Environ Health Res 21(4):286–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zint MT (2001) Advancing environmental risk education. Risk Anal 21(3):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung Soo Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Young Wook Lim
    • 1
  • Ho Hyun Kim
    • 1
  • Ji Yeon Yang
    • 1
  • Dong Chun Shin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute for Environmental ResearchYonsei University, College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Preventive MedicineYonsei University, College of MedicineSeodeamun-guRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations