Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 169–176 | Cite as

Degradation of o-toluidine by fluidized-bed Fenton process: statistical and kinetic study

  • Jin Anotai
  • Pumis Thuptimdang
  • Chia-Chi Su
  • Ming-Chun Lu
Research Article

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

The optimal conditions of o-toluidine degradation by fluidized-bed Fenton process were determined using Box–Behnken designs (BBD). The BBD can be used to find the optimal conditions in multivariable systems. The optimal conditions obtained by the design were further applied in the kinetic analysis of o-toluidine oxidation in fluidized-bed Fenton process.

Materials and methods

The 1.35-L fluidized-bed reactor used in all experiments was a cylindrical vessel with an inlet, outlet, and recirculation pump. The o-toluidine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results and discussion

Analytical results indicated that pH, Fe2+, and H2O2 were significant factors in o-toluidine and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, but loading carrier was not. The pH significantly affected not only o-toluidine degradation, but also total iron removal. The predicted conditions for optimal removal of 1 mM of o-toluidine using 100 g of carriers were pH 3 ± 0.5, 1 mM of Fe2+, and 17 mM of H2O2. Removal of o-toluidine and COD in the actual experiment was higher than predicted, whereas removal of total iron was slightly lower. The kinetic study showed that the initial rate and rate constant (k) of o-toluidine degradation in the fluidized-bed Fenton process correlated Fe2+ concentration. In the Fe2+/H2O2 stage, high concentration of H2O2 produced a scavenging effect.

Conclusions

The predicted removal efficiencies of o-toluidine and COD were 90.2% and 41.4%, respectively. Moreover, the removals of o-toluidine and COD in the actual experiment were 99.8% and 61.8%, respectively.

Keywords

Advanced oxidation process Fluidized-bed Fenton o-Toluidine Box–Behnken design Kinetics Degradation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of Taiwan (grant no. NSC 96-2628-E-041-001-MY3) and National Research University Project of Thailand’s Office of the Higher Education Commission for financially supporting this research.

References

  1. Ahmad AL, Derek CJC, Zulkali MMD (2008) Optimization of thaumatin extraction by aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) using response surface methodology (RSM). Sep Purif Technol 62:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anotai J, Sakulkittimasak P, Boonrattanakij N, Lu MC (2009) Kinetics of nitrobenzene oxidation and iron crystallization in fluidized-bed Fenton process. J Hazard Mater 165:874–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Badawy MI, Ghaly MY, Gad-Allah TA (2006) Advanced oxidation processes for the removal of organophosphorus pesticides from wastewater. Desalination 194:166–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeningo M (1994) Carcinogenicity and metabolism of azodyes especially derived from Benzidine. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Box GEP, Behnken EW (1960) Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2:455–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for experiments. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou S, Huang C, Huang YH (2001) Heterogeneous and homogeneous catalytic oxidation by supported γ-FeOOH in a fluidized-bed reactor: kinetic approach. Environ Sci Technol 35:1247–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chou S, Liao CC, Perng SH, Chang SH (2004) Factors influencing the preparation of supported iron oxide in fluidized-bed crystallization. Chemosphere 54:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen H, Sehested K, Corfitzen H (1982) Reaction of hydroxyl radicals with hydrogen peroxide at ambient and elevated temperatures. J Phys Chem 86:1588–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutta K, Bhattacharjee S, Chaudhuri B, Mukhopadhyay S (2002) Chemical oxidation of CI reactive red 2 using Fenton-like reactions. J Environ Monit 4:754–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanna K, Kone T, Ruby C (2010) Fenton-like oxidation and mineralization of phenol using synthetic Fe(II)-Fe(III) green rusts. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hmani E, Elaoud SC, Samet Y, Abdelhédi R (2009) Electrochemical degradation of waters containing o-toluidine on PbO2 and BDD anodes. J Hazard Mater 170:928–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsueh CL, Huang YH, Wang CC, Chen CY (2006) Photoassisted Fenton degradation of nonbiodegradable azo-dye (Reactive Black 5) over a novel supported iron oxide catalyst at neutral pH. J Mol Catal A: Chem 245:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang N, Lee DS, Yoon J (2002) Kinetic modeling of Fenton oxidation of phenol and monochlorophenols. Chemosphere 47:915–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khataee AR, Zarei M, Moradkhannejhad L (2010) Application of response surface methodology for optimization of azo dye removal by oxalate catalyzed photoelectro-Fenton process using carbon nanotube-PTFE cathode. Desalination 258:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuo WG (1992) Decolorizing dye waste-water with Fenton reagent. Water Res 26:881–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu MC, Chen JN, Chang CP (1999) Oxidation of dichlorvos with hydrogen peroxide using ferrous ion as catalyst. J Hazard Mater B65:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malik PK, Saha SK (2003) Oxidation of direct dyes with hydrogen peroxide using ferrous ion as catalyst. Sep Purif Technol 31:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Neyens E, Baeyens J (2003) A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J Hazard Mater B98:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang S (2008) A comparative study of Fenton and Fenton-like reaction kinetics in decolourisation of wastewater. Dye Pigment 76:714–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin Anotai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pumis Thuptimdang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chia-Chi Su
    • 4
  • Ming-Chun Lu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiBangkokThailand
  2. 2.National Center of Excellence for Environmental and Hazardous Waste Management (NCE-EHWM)Chulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.International Postgraduate Programs in Environmental Management, Graduate SchoolChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Resources ManagementChia-Nan University of Pharmacy and SciencesTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations