Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 1457–1470 | Cite as

Survey of patterns, levels, and trends of perfluorinated compounds in aquatic organisms and bird eggs from representative German ecosystems

  • Heinz RüdelEmail author
  • Josef Müller
  • Heinrich Jürling
  • Martina Bartel-Steinbach
  • Jan Koschorreck
Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Samples from the German Environmental Specimen Bank (ESB) covering particularly the years 1994–1996, 2000–2002, and 2006–2009 were analyzed for perfluorinated compounds (PFC; mainly C4–C13 carboxylic and sulfonic acids) to gain an overview on current PFC levels and patterns in marine, limnetic, and terrestrial biota; to assess their concentrations in different trophic levels; and to investigate whether risk management measures for PFC are successful.

Methods

Specimens, either standardized annual pooled samples (blue mussels, eelpout liver, bream liver, pigeon eggs) or individual single samples (cormorant eggs, rook eggs), were collected for the German ESB program from representative sampling sites according to documented guidelines. After appropriate extraction, PFC were quantified under ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation by HPLC/MS-MS with isotopically labeled internal standards. Limits of quantification (LOQs) were 0.2–0.5 ng/g. Data are reported on a wet weight basis.

Results and discussion

In most samples the predominant PFC was perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). However, in marine mussels from North and Baltic Seas, PFOS levels were mostly below the LOQ, but low residues of PFOS amide were found which declined in recent years. Livers of eelpout showed maximum concentrations of 15–25 ng/g PFOS in the period 2000–2002 and low amounts of perfluoropentanoate in all years. Beside PFOS (median 48 ng/g) several PFC could be determined in cormorant eggs sampled in 2009 from a Baltic Sea site. For a freshwater ecosystem, current PFC burdens for cormorant eggs were even higher (median 400 ng/g PFOS). Livers of bream from rivers showed concentrations of 130–260 ng/g PFOS, but for bream from a reference lake levels were only about 6 ng/g. In contrast to cormorants, eggs of rook and feral pigeon from terrestrial ecosystems displayed only low PFC burdens (up to 6 ng/g PFOS).

Conclusions

Generally, PFC levels were lower in marine than in freshwater biota. PFC burdens were higher in biota from the ESB-North Sea sites than in Baltic Sea organisms. Levels of PFC were quite high especially in top predators of both limnetic and marine ecosystems. Only low PFC levels were detected in eggs of terrestrial birds. A decrease of PFOS levels from maximum values around the year 2000 observed at least in North Sea biota may be a result of a production cease and shifts in marketing pattern.

Keywords

Blue mussels Bream Cormorant Eelpout Environmental specimen bank PFOS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of all past and present partners of the Umweltprobenbank program to the routine operations of the specimen bank since these are the basis of all retrospective investigations. The continuous funding of the program by the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11356_2011_501_MOESM1_ESM.doc (448 kb)
ESM (DOC 448 kb)

References

  1. Ahrens L, Siebert U, Ebinghaus R (2009) Temporal trends of polyfluoroalkyl compounds in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from the German Bight, 1999–2008. Chemosphere 76:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrens L, Herzke D, Huber S, Bustnes JO, Bangjord G, Ebinghaus R (2011) Temporal trends and pattern of polyfluoroalkyl compounds in tawny owl (Strix aluco) eggs from Norway, 1986–2009. Environ Sci Technol. doi: 10.1021/es103473v
  3. Andersen ME, Butenhoff JL, Chang S-C, Farrar DG, Kennedy GL Jr, Lau C, Olsen GW, Seed J, Wallace KB (2008) Review: perfluoroalkyl acids and related chemistries—toxicokinetics and modes of action. Toxicol Sci 102:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker AM, Gerstmann S, Frank H (2010) Perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate in two fish species collected from the Roter Main River, Bayreuth, Germany. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bignert A (2007) PIA statistical application developed for use by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (www.amap.no). Accessed 22 Feb 2001
  6. Bignert A, Danielsson S, Nyberg E, Asplund L, Eriksson U, Berger U, Haglund P (2009) Comments concerning the national Swedish contaminant monitoring programme in marine biota 2009. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Department of Contaminant Research, Stockholm, Sweden, 14.08.2009 http://www.nrm.se/download/18.6321786f122df65955f80002587/Marina+programmet+2009.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2011
  7. BMU (2008) Federal Ministry for the Environment, nature conservation and nuclear safety: German Environmental Specimen Bank—concept. Federal Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin, Germany, 2008 http://www.umweltprobenbank.de/upb_static/fck/download/concept_oct_2008_en.pdf. Accessed on 22 Feb 2011
  8. Bossi R, Riget FF, Dietz R, Sonne C, Fauser P, Dam M, Vorkamp K (2005) Preliminary screening of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and other fluorochemicals in fish, birds and marine mammals from Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Environ Pollut 136:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bossi R, Strand J, Sortkjaer O, Larsen MM (2008) Perfluoroalkyl compounds in Danish wastewater treatment plants and aquatic environments. Environ Int 34:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butt CM, Berger U, Bossi R, Tomy GT (2010) Levels and trends of poly- and perfluorinated compounds in the arctic environment. Sci Total Environ 408:2936–2965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conder JM, Hoke RA, de Wolf W, Russell MH, Buck RC (2008) Are PFCAs bioaccumulative? A critical review and comparison with regulatory criteria and persistent lipophilic compounds. Environ Sci Technol 42:995–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunha I, Hoff P, van de Vijver K, Guilhermino L, Esmans E, de Coen W (2005) Baseline study of perfluorooctane sulfonate occurrence in mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, from north-central Portuguese estuaries. Mar Pollut Bull 50:1128–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DIN 32645 (1998) Chemical analysis—decision limit, detection limit and determination limit under repeatability conditions—terms, methods, evaluation. German Standard, Beuth Verlag, Berlin (in German language)Google Scholar
  14. European Union (2006) Directive 2006/122/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 amending for the 30th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (perfluorooctane sulfonates). Official Journal of the European Union, L 372/32 EN December 27, 2006Google Scholar
  15. German Federal Environment Agency (2009) Do without per- and polyfluorinated chemicals and prevent their discharge into the environment. Federal Environment Agency, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3818.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2011
  16. Giesy JP, Kannan K (2001) Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife. Environ Sci Technol 35:1339–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herzke D, Nygård T, Berger U, Huber S, Røv N (2009) Perfluorinated and other persistent halogenated organic compounds in European shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) and common eider (Somateria mollissima) from Norway: a suburban to remote pollutant gradient. Sci Total Environ 408:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoff PT, Van de Vijver K, Van Dongen W, Esmans EL, Blust R, De Coen WM (2003) Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in bib (Trisopterus luscus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) from the Western Scheldt and the Belgian North Sea: distribution and biochemical effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:608–614Google Scholar
  19. Hoff PT, Van Campenhout K, Van de Vijver K, Covaci A, Bervoets L, Moens L, Huyskens G, Goemans G, Belpaire C, Blust R, De Coen W (2005) Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and organohalogen pollutants in liver of three freshwater fish species in Flanders (Belgium): relationships with biochemical and organismal effects. Environ Pollut 137:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmström KE, Järnberg U, Bignert A (2005) Temporal trends of PFOS and PFOA in guillemot eggs from the Baltic Sea, 1968–2003. Environ Sci Technol 39:80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmström KE, Johansson A-K, Bignert A, Lindberg P, Berger U (2010) Temporal trends of perfluorinated surfactants in Swedish peregrine falcon eggs (Falco peregrinus), 1974–2007. Environ Sci Technol 44:4083–4088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Houde M, Martin JW, Letcher RJ, Solomon KR, Muir DC (2006) Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: a review. Environ Sci Technol 40:3463–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones PD, Hu W, de Coen W, Newstedt JL, Giesy JP (2003) Binding of perfluorinated fatty acids to serum proteins. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2639–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kannan K, Franson JC, Bowerman WW, Hansen KJ, Jones PD, Giesy JP (2001) Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish-eating water birds including bald eagles and albatrosses. Environ Sci Technol 35:3065–3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kannan K, Corsolini S, Falandysz J, Oehme G, Focardi S, Giesy JP (2002) Perfluorooctanesulfonate and related fluorinated hydrocarbons in marine mammals, fishes, and birds from coasts of the Baltic and the Mediterranean seas. Environ Sci Technol 36:3210–3216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kannan K, Tao L, Sinclair E, Pastva SD, Jude DJ, Giesy JP (2005) Perfluorinated compounds in aquatic organisms at various trophic levels in a Great Lakes food chain. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein R, Bartel M, Neitzke M, Nentwich K, Paulus M, Quack M, Wagner G (2003) Umweltprobenbank: guideline for sampling and sample treatment—bream (Abramis brama). University of Trier, Institute for Biogeography, TrierGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein R, Bartel M, Paulus M, Quack M, Tarricone K, Teubner D, Wagner G (2007) Umweltprobenbank: guideline for sampling and sample treatment—eelpout (Zoarces viviparus). University of Trier, Institute for Biogeography, TrierGoogle Scholar
  29. Müller J, Jürling H (2008) Retrospective monitoring of perfluorinated compounds in eggs of sea gulls and pigeons, and in deer liver samples. Report of Fraunhofer IME for German Federal Environment Agency, Dessau-Rosslau (in German language with English abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Nicholson M D, Fryer R, Larsen J R (1998) Temporal trend monitoring: robust method for analysing contaminant trend monitoring data. Techniques in marine environmental sciences, No. 20. ICES, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  31. Paul AG, Jones KC, Sweetman AJ (2009) A first global production, emission, and environmental inventory for perfluorooctane sulfonate. Environ Sci Technol 43:386–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paulus M, Klein R, Wagner G, Müller P (1996) Biomonitoring and environmental specimen banking. Environ Sci Pollut Res 3:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulus M, Bartel M, Klein R, Neitzke M, Nentwich K, Quack M, Wagner G (2003a) Umweltprobenbank: guideline for sampling and sample treatment—feral pigeon (Columba livia f. domestica). University of Trier, Institute for Biogeography, TrierGoogle Scholar
  34. Paulus M, Bartel M, Klein R, Neitzke M, Nentwich K, Quack M, Wagner G (2003b) Umweltprobenbank: guideline for sampling and sample treatment: herring gull (Larus argentatus). University of Trier, Institute for Biogeography, TrierGoogle Scholar
  35. Rüdel H, Lepper P, Steinhanses J, Schröter-Kermani C (2003) Retrospective monitoring of organotin compounds in marine biota from 1985 to 1999: results from the German environmental specimen bank. Environ Sci Technol 37:1731–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rüdel H, Böhmer W, Schröter-Kermani C (2006) Retrospective monitoring of synthetic musk compounds in aquatic biota from German rivers and coastal areas. J Environ Monit 8:812–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rüdel H, Müller J, Jürling H, Schröter-Kermani C (2010) Retrospective monitoring of perfluorinated compounds in archived herring gull eggs. In: Isobe T, Nomiyama K, Subramanian A, Tanabe S (eds) Interdisciplinary studies on environmental chemistry—environmental specimen bank: exploring possibility of setting-up ESBs in developing countries. TERRAPUB, Tokyo, pp 81–86. ISBN 978-4-88704-153-0Google Scholar
  38. Salmi T, Määttä A, Anttila P, Ruoho-Airola T, Amnell T (2002) Detecting trends of annual values of atmospheric pollutants by the Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimates—the EXCEL template application MAKESENS. Report code FMI-AQ-31. Finnish Meteorological Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  39. So MK, Taniyasu S, Lam PK, Zheng GJ, Giesy JP, Yamashita N (2006) Alkaline digestion and solid phase extraction method for perfluorinated compounds in mussels and oysters from South China and Japan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tomy GT, Pleskach K, Ferguson SH, Hare J, Stern G, MacInnis G, Marvin CH, Loseto L (2009) Trophodynamics of some PFC and BFRs in a western Canadian arctic marine food web. Environ Sci Technol 43:4076–4081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Umweltbundesamt (1996) Umweltprobenbank des Bundes—Verfahrensrichtlinien. Erich Schmidt Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. UNEP (2009) Report of the Conference of the parties of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants on the work of its fourth meeting, Geneva, 4–8 May 2009. Document UNEP/POPS/COP.4/38. http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/Repository/COP4/UNEP-POPS-COP.4-38.English.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2011
  43. Van den Heuvel JP, Kuslikis BI, Peterson RE (1992) Covalent binding of perfluorinated fatty acids to proteins in the plasma, liver and testes of rats. Chem Biol Interact 82:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verreault J, Berger U, Gabrielsen GW (2007) Trends of perfluorinated alkyl substances in herring gull eggs from two coastal colonies in northern Norway 1983–2003. Environ Sci Technol 41:6671–6677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagner G, Bartel M, Klein R, Paulus M, Quack M, Tarricone K, Teubner D (2007) Umweltprobenbank: guideline for sampling and sample treatment—blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). University of Trier, Institute for Biogeography, TrierGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenzel A, Böhmer W, Müller J, Rüdel H, Schröter-Kermani C (2004) Retrospective monitoring of alkylphenols and alkylphenol monoethoxylates in aquatic biota from 1985 to 2001: results from the German environmental specimen bank. Environ Sci Technol 38:1654–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoshikane M, Takazawa Y, Tanaka A, Komori S, Kobayashi M, Kanda Y, Jahan N, Shibata Y (2006) Concentration of perfluorochemicals in bivalves in Japan by alkaline digestion method. Organohalog Compd 68:2063–2066Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinz Rüdel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Josef Müller
    • 1
  • Heinrich Jürling
    • 1
  • Martina Bartel-Steinbach
    • 2
  • Jan Koschorreck
    • 3
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (Fraunhofer IME)SchmallenbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of BiogeographyUniversity of TrierTrierGermany
  3. 3.Federal Environment AgencyDessau-RosslauGermany

Personalised recommendations