Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 152–162 | Cite as

Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) as new Stockholm Convention POPs—a global perspective on the management of Lindane and its waste isomers

  • John Vijgen
  • P. C. Abhilash
  • Yi Fan Li
  • Rup Lal
  • Martin Forter
  • Joao Torres
  • Nandita Singh
  • Mohammad Yunus
  • Chongguo Tian
  • Andreas Schäffer
  • Roland Weber
Review Article

Abstract

Purpose

Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) isomers (α-, β- and γ- (Lindane)) were recently included as new persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the Stockholm Convention, and therefore, the legacy of HCH and Lindane production became a contemporary topic of global relevance. This article wants to briefly summarise the outcomes of the Stockholm Convention process and make an estimation of the amount of HCH waste generated and dumped in the former Lindane/HCH-producing countries.

Results

In a preliminary assessment, the countries and the respective amount of HCH residues stored and deposited from Lindane production are estimated. Between 4 and 7 million tonnes of wastes of toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative residues (largely consisting of alpha- (approx. 80%) and beta-HCH) are estimated to have been produced and discarded around the globe during 60 years of Lindane production. For approximately 1.9 million tonnes, information is available regarding deposition. Countries are: Austria, Brazil, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Macedonia, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, The Netherlands, UK, USA, and former USSR. The paper highlights the environmental relevance of deposited HCH wastes and the related POPs’ contaminated sites and provides suggestions for further steps to address the challenge of the legacy of HCH/Lindane production.

Conclusion

It can be expected that most locations where HCH waste was discarded/stockpiled are not secured and that critical environmental impacts are resulting from leaching and volatilisation. As parties to the Stockholm Convention are legally required to take action to stop further POPs pollution, identification and evaluation of such sites are necessary.

Keywords

HCH Lindane Stockholm Convention POPs Contaminated site PCDD/PCDF 

References

  1. Abhilash PC, Singh N (2009a) Seasonal variation of HCH isomers in open soil and plant-rhizospheric soil system of a contaminated environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 16:727–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhilash PC, Singh N (2009b) Withania somnifera Dunal-mediated dissipation of Lindane from simulated soil: implications for rhizoremediation of contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 10:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ACAT and PANNA (2008) Alaska Community Action on Toxics (ACAT) and Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA). Annex F Submission for Lindane to the POPs Reviewing CommitteeGoogle Scholar
  4. Africa Stockpiles Programme (2009) http://www.africastockpiles.org/pressroom.html
  5. Amadori E (1993) The production and use of HCH, HCH and halogenated pesticides—state of the art for risk assessment and technology development, IWU – Tagungsberichte, 1993 Magdeburg, (See http://www.ihpa.info/library.htm 1st & 2nd Forum)
  6. ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (1998). Toxicological profile for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-hexachlorocyclohexane. Draft for public comment (update). U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  7. ATSDR (2005) Toxicological profile for hexachlorocyclohexanes. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Public Health Service. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. August, 2005. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp43.html
  8. Bao Z, Wang K, Kang J, Zhao L (1994) Analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in pyrolysis residue of HCH. Environ Chem 13:409–414 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Bidleman TF, Cotham WE, Addison RF, Zinck ME (1992) Organic contaminants in the Northwest Atlantic atmosphere at Sable Island, Nova Scotia, 1988–89. Chemosphere 24:1389–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bodenstein G (1972) Disposal of wastes from Lindane manufacture. In: E. Uhlmann, Verlag K (eds) Lindane monograph of an insecticide. Schillinger, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, pp 23–77Google Scholar
  11. Braga AMCB, Krauss T, dos Santos CRR, de Souza PM (2002) PCDD/F-contamination in a hexachlorocyclohexane waste site in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Chemosphere 46:1329–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breivik K, Pacyna JM, Munch J (1999) Use of α-, β-, γ- hexachlorocyclohexane in Europe, 1970–1996. Sci Total Environ 239:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breivik K, Sweetman A, Pacynaa JM, Jones K (2002) Towards a global historical emission inventory for selected PCB congeners—a mass balance approach 1. Global production and consumption. Sci Tot Environ 290:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CAPE (Community Action for Pesticide Elimination) (2005) Lindane’s dirty secret: Indian facilities dump toxic waste May 2005 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/27574041/LINDANES-DIRTY-SECRET (Accessed 05/2010)
  15. De Voogt P, Brinkman UAT (1989) Production, Properties and Usage. In: R.D. Kimbrough und A.A. Jensen (Hrsg.): Halogenated Biphenyls, Terphenyls, Naphthalenes, Dibenzodioxins and Related Products. Elsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiedler H (2001) Global and local disposition of PCB. In: Robertson LW, Hansen LG (eds) PCBs—recent advances in the environmental toxicology and health effects. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, pp 11–15Google Scholar
  17. Forter M (1995) Umweltnutzung durch die chemische Industrie am Fall Beispiel der HCH-Fabrik Ugine- Kuhlmann, Hüningen (France), Lizentiatsarbeit, 1995, Universität Basel, SchweizGoogle Scholar
  18. Fróes-Asmus CIR, Alonzo HGA, Palácios M, Silva AP, Filhote MIF, Buosi B, Câmara VM (2008) Assessment of human health risk from organochlorine pesticide residues in Cidade dos Meninos, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Cad. Saúde Publica Rio Janeiro 24(4):755–766Google Scholar
  19. Goates BM (2006) An effective non-chemical treatment for head lice. Pediatrics 118(5):1962–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauzenberger I (2004) Reports on substances scheduled for re-assessments under the UNECE POPs Protocol, Technical Review Report on Lindane, Austria http://www.unece.org/env/lrtap/TaskForce/popsxg/2004/Dossier_Lindane.pdf (Accessed 07.08.2010)
  21. Heukelbach J, Feldmeier H (2006) Scabies. Lancet 367:1767–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. India Pesticide Limited (2009) Dye intermediates http://www.indiapesticideslimited.com/dye.html (Accessed 01.05.2010)
  23. IPEN International POPs Elimination Network (2005) Lindane. Answers to common questions http://www.ipen.org/ipenweb/documents/work%20documents/lindane%20answers_english.pdf (Accessed 05.09.2010)
  24. IPEN International POPs Elimination Network (2009) Lindane: pharmaceutical and agricultural alternatives. http://www.akaction.org/REPORTS/Alternatives%20to%20Lindane%20Report%204-29-09.pdf (Accessed 01.05.2010)
  25. International HCH and Pesticides Forum (2001) 6th Int. HCH and Pesticides Forum meeting, 20–22 March 2001, Forum Book, 31–32 CIEL., Verlag K.Schillinger, Freiburg im Breisgau. http://www.ihpa.info/docs/library/libraryPPI.php
  26. International HCH and Pesticide Association (2009) Abstracts submitted to the International HCH and Pesticide Forums: http://www.ihpa.info/resources/library/
  27. Jit S, Dadhwal M, Kumari H, Jindal S, Kaur J, Lata P, Niharika N, Lal D, Garg N, Kumar Gupta S, Sharma P, Bala K, Singh A, Vijgen J, Weber R, Lal R (2010) Evaluation of hexachlorocyclohexane contamination from the last Lindane production plant operating in India. Env Sci Pollut Res (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Jürgens H-J, Roth R (1989) Case study and proposed decontamination steps of the soil and groundwater beneath a closed herbicide plant in Germany. Chemosphere 18:1163–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krum W (1982) Lindan- ja, HCH –nein, Lindan-Workshop, Hannover, Germany 1982; K. Schillinger, C.I.E.L.-Redaktion (Freiburg i. Br/Germany)Google Scholar
  30. Li Y-F (1999) Global technical hexachlorocyclohexane usage and its contamination consequences in the environment: from 1948 to 1997. Sci Total Environ 232(3):121–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Y-F, Cai DJ, Shan ZJ, Zhu ZL (2001) Gridded Usage Inventories of Technical Hexachlorocyclohexane and Lindane for China with 1/6° Latitude by 1/4° Longitude Resolution. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 41, 261–266Google Scholar
  32. Li Y-F, Trevorscholtz M, Van Heyst BJ (2003) Global gridded emission inventories of beta-hexachlorocyclohexane. Environ Sci Technol 37:3493–3498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y-F, MacDonald R (2005) Sources and pathways of selected organochlorine pesticides to the Arctic and the effect of pathway divergence on HCH trends in biota: a review. Sci Total Environ 342:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Otto W, Schönberger H, Burger D, Weber R (2006) Case study on remediation of a German city contaminated by a chloralkali plant and PCP production. Organohalogen Compd. 68, 880–885Google Scholar
  35. Pearlman D (2005) Cetaphil cleanser cures head lice. Pediatrics 116(6):1612–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peking University (2005) College of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China, Report on China—Joint project to promote the reduction of Lindane emissions in China (Phase 1), November 2005Google Scholar
  37. Ren N (2006) China—Canada joint project on reduction of Lindane usage in China and its impact globally and on North America. April 2006Google Scholar
  38. Rippen G (ed) (1996) Handbuch Umweltchemikalien (laufend aktualisierte Ausgabe). Ecomed, Landsberg am LechGoogle Scholar
  39. Romania (2008) Annual report 2008 to EU Commission on POPs (English), 16 June 2009Google Scholar
  40. Sievers S, Friesel P (1989) Soil contamination patterns of chlorinated organic compounds: looking for the source. Chemosphere 19:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stockholm Convention (2001) Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants; http://chm.pops.int/. http://chm.pops.int/Convention/tabid/54/language/en-US/Default.aspx#convtext
  42. Torres JPM, Fróes-Asmus CIR, Weber R, Vijgen JMH (2010) HCH/DDT contamination around former organochlorine productions in Brazil and preliminary human risk assessment. Organohalogen compounds 72 http://www.xcdtech.com/dioxin2010/pdf/1304.pdf
  43. Treger YA (2004) Data on production of HCH in the former USSR. FSUE Research Institute “Sintez”, Moscow, 12 October 2004Google Scholar
  44. Ulman E (1972) Lindane, monograph of an insecticide. Verlag K Schillinger, Friebur im BreisgauGoogle Scholar
  45. UNEP (2005a) Consideration of chemicals proposed for inclusion in Annexes A, B and C of the Convention: Lindane. Lindane proposal. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.1/8. 24 August 2005Google Scholar
  46. UNEP (2005b) Decision POPRC-1/6: Lindane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.1/10. November 2005Google Scholar
  47. UNEP (2006a) Consideration of chemicals newly proposed for inclusion in Annexes A, B or C of the Convention: Alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.2/15. 7. August 2006; The POP Reviewing Committee texts can be downloaded at the following website http://chm.pops.int/Convention/POPsReviewCommittee/Chemicals/tabid/781/language/en-US/Default.aspx
  48. UNEP (2006b) Consideration of chemicals newly proposed for inclusion in Annexes A, B or C of the Convention: Beta-hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.2/16. 7. August 200612 Google Scholar
  49. UNEP (2006c) Decision POPRC-2/9: Alpha hexachlorocyclohexane. November 200612 Google Scholar
  50. UNEP (2006d) Decision POPRC-2/10: Beta hexachlorocyclohexane. November 200612 Google Scholar
  51. UNEP (2006e) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its second meeting Risk profile on Lindane UNEP/POPS/POPRC.2/17/Add.4. 21. November 200612 Google Scholar
  52. UNEP (2007a) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its third meeting. Risk management evaluation on Lindane. 4. December 200712 Google Scholar
  53. UNEP (2007b) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its third meeting. Risk profile on beta hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.3/20/Add.9. 04. December 200712 Google Scholar
  54. UNEP (2008a) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its third meeting. Risk profile on alpha hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.3/20/Add.8. 18. January 200812 Google Scholar
  55. UNEP (2008b) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its third meeting. Risk management evaluation for alpha hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.4/15/Add.3. 30. October 200812 Google Scholar
  56. UNEP (2008c) Report of the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee on the work of its third meeting. Risk management evaluation for beta hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/POPRC.4/15/Add.4. 30. October 200812 Google Scholar
  57. UNEP (2009a) Report of the Conference of the Parties of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants on the work of its fourth meeting. UNEP/POPS/COP.4/38. 8 May 2009; http://chm.pops.int/Programmes/NewPOPs/DecisionsRecommendations/tabid/671/language/en-US/Default.aspx
  58. UNEP (2009b) SC-4/10: Listing of alpha hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/COP.4/SC-4/10. May 200913 Google Scholar
  59. UNEP (2009c) SC-4/11: Listing of beta hexachlorocyclohexane. UNEP/POPS/COP.4/SC-4/11. May 200913 Google Scholar
  60. UNEP (2009d) SC-4/15: Listing of Lindane. UNEP/POPS/COP.4/SC-4/15. May 200913 Google Scholar
  61. Universität Bayreuth, Tritschler & Partner GmbH (1995) Dioxin-Bilanz für Hamburg, p. 21, http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/112354/data/dioxinbilanz.pdf
  62. US EPA (2003) Five-year review fact sheet, Geigy Chemical Corp. Site, Aberdeen, Moore County, North Carolina, Oct. 2003Google Scholar
  63. Varbelow G, Weber R (2009) Remediation and securing activities at a former 2,4,5-T and HCH production site in Germany. Presentation at the 10th International HCH and Pesticide Forum, 07–10 September 2009, Brno, Czech Republic http://www.hchforum.com/10th/presentations/pdf/06-01_Varbelow_Weber.pdf
  64. Vijgen J (2006a) The legacy of lindane HCH isomer production. Main report. IHPA, Holte, January 2006 http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Agriculture/Agreports/obsolete_pesticides/lindane_production.pdf
  65. Vijgen J (2006b) The legacy of Lindane HCH isomer production. Annexes. IHPA, Holte, January 2006 http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Agriculture/Agreports/obsolete_pesticides/lindane_annexes.pdf (Accessed 01.05.2010)
  66. Vijgen J, Li YF, Martin F, Lal R, Weber R (2006) The legacy of Lindane and technical HCH production. Organohal Compd 68:899–904Google Scholar
  67. Walker K, Vallero DA, Lewis RG (1999) Factors influencing the distribution of Lindane and other hexachlorocyclohexanes in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 33:4373–4378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ware GW (1999) An introduction to insecticides, 3rd edn. Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  69. Watson A, Forter M, Lal R, Jopkova M, Torres J, Li Y, Weber R, Vijgen J (2009) Global mapping of former HCH production sites and their waste dumps. Presentation at the 10th International HCH and Pesticide Forum, 07–10 September 2009, Brno, Czech Republic http://www.hchforum.com/10th/presentations/pdf/01-06_Weber%20et%20al.pdf
  70. Weber R, Behnisch PA, Brouwer A, van Bavel B, Lindstroem G, Zennegg M, Schilling B, Paepke O (2006) Contemporary relevance of dioxin and dioxin-like compound contaminations in residues from recycling of HCH waste. Organohalogen Comp 68:905–910Google Scholar
  71. Weber R (2007) Relevance of PCDD/PCDF Formation for the Evaluation of POPs Destruction Technologies - Review on Current Status and Assessment Gaps. Chemosphere 67:109–117Google Scholar
  72. Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M, Johnston P, Forter M, Hollert H, Heinisch H, Holoubek I, Lloyd-Smith M, Masunaga S, Moccarelli P, Santillo D, Seike N, Symons R, Torres JPM, Verta M, Varbelow G, Vijgen J, Watson A, Costner P, Woelz J, Wycisk P, Zennegg M (2008a) Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges. Env Sci Pollut Res 15:363–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber R, Tysklind M, Gaus C (2008b) Dioxin—contemporary and future challenges of historical legacies (editorial). Env Sci Pollut Res 15:96–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WHO (1991) Environmental program on chemical safety. Environmental health criteria.124, Lindane, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc124.htm
  75. Weber R, Watson A, Forter M, Oliaei F (2010) POPs in landfills—persistent organic pollutants and landfills—a review of past experiences and future challenges. Waste Management & Research (in press)Google Scholar
  76. Willet KL, Utrich EM, Hites RA (1998) Differential toxicity and environmental facts of hexachlorocyclohexane isomers. Environ Sci Technol 32:2197–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wycisk P, Stollberg R, Neumann C, Gossel W, Weber R, Weiss H (2010) Methodology for exposure route assessment of HCH groundwater pollution from multi-source contaminated mega sites—a case study. Env Sci Pollut Res (submitted).Google Scholar
  78. Zheng M, Liu P, Bad Z, Xu X (1999) Aspects of formation and degradation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans. Chinese Science Bulletin 44:1249–1257, http://www.springerlink.com/content/l342q683084l1n96/fulltext.pdf (Accessed 04.2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Vijgen
    • 1
  • P. C. Abhilash
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yi Fan Li
    • 1
    • 3
    • 8
  • Rup Lal
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martin Forter
    • 5
  • Joao Torres
    • 1
    • 6
  • Nandita Singh
    • 2
  • Mohammad Yunus
    • 7
  • Chongguo Tian
    • 8
  • Andreas Schäffer
    • 9
  • Roland Weber
    • 1
    • 10
  1. 1.International HCH and Pesticides Association (IHPA)HolteDenmark
  2. 2.National Botanical Research InstituteLucknowIndia
  3. 3.Environment Canada, Science and Technology BranchTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of ZoologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  5. 5.BaselSwitzerland
  6. 6.Instituto de Biofisica, Rio de Janeiro Federal UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  7. 7.School for Environmental SciencesBabasaheb Bhimarao Ambedkar University (A Central University)LucknowIndia
  8. 8.International Joint Research Center for Persistent Toxic Substances (IJRC-PTS), State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  9. 9.Institute for Environmental Biology Group VRWTA Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  10. 10.POPs Environmental ConsultingGöppingenGermany

Personalised recommendations