Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 471–478 | Cite as

Bioremediation and reclamation of soil contaminated with petroleum oil hydrocarbons by exogenously seeded bacterial consortium: a pilot-scale study

Research Article

Abstract

Purpose

Spillage of petroleum hydrocarbons causes significant environmental pollution. Bioremediation is an effective process to remediate petroleum oil contaminant from the ecosystem. The aim of the present study was to reclaim a petroleum oil-contaminated soil which was unsuitable for the cultivation of crop plants by using petroleum oil hydrocarbon-degrading microbial consortium.

Materials and methods

Bacterial consortium consisting of Bacillus subtilis DM-04 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa M and NM strains were seeded to 20% (v/w) petroleum oil-contaminated soil, and bioremediation experiment was carried out for 180 days under laboratory condition. The kinetics of hydrocarbon degradation was analyzed using biochemical and gas chromatographic (GC) techniques. The ecotoxicity of the elutriates obtained from petroleum oil-contaminated soil before and post-treatment with microbial consortium was tested on germination and growth of Bengal gram (Cicer aretinum) and green gram (Phaseolus mungo) seeds.

Results

Bacterial consortium showed a significant reduction in total petroleum hydrocarbon level in contaminated soil (76% degradation) as compared to the control soil (3.6% degradation) 180 days post-inoculation. The GC analysis confirmed that bacterial consortium was more effective in degrading the alkane fraction compared to aromatic fraction of crude petroleum oil hydrocarbons in soil. The nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen compounds fraction was least degraded. The reclaimed soil supported the germination and growth of crop plants (C. aretinum and P. mungo). In contrast, seeds could not be germinated in petroleum oil-contaminated soil.

Conclusions

The present study reinforces the application of bacterial consortium rather than individual bacterium for the effective bioremediation and reclamation of soil contaminated with petroleum oil.

Keywords

Bioremediation Crop plants Petroleum oil hydrocarbon degradation Soil reclamation Bacillus subtilis Pseudomonas aeruginosa 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Dr. F. A. Danta, Department of English and Foreign Languages, for editing the manuscript, and Prof. M. K. Chaudhuri, Vice-chancellor, T. U., for his constant encouragement to pursue this work. N.K.B. is the recipient of Institutional Research Associateship. This work was partly supported from the grant received under UGC-SAP to A.K.M.

References

  1. Das K, Mukherjee AK (2005) Characterization of biochemical properties and biological activities of biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa mucoid and non-mucoid strains. J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:192–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007a) Crude petroleum-oil biodegradation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from petroleum oil contaminated soil from North-East India. Bioresour Technol 98:1339–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Das K, Mukherjee AK (2007b) Comparison of lipopeptide biosurfactants production by Bacillus subtilis strains in submerged and solid state fermentation systems using a cheap carbon source: some industrial applications of biosurfactants. Process Biochem 42:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyreborg S, Arvin E, Broholm K (1989) Effects of creosote compounds on the aerobic bio-degradation of benzene. Biodegradation 7:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghazali FM, Rahman RNZA, Salleh AB, Basri M (2004) Biodegradation ofhydrocarbons in soil by microbial consortium. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 54:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hornick SB, Fisher RH, Paolini PA (1983) Petroleum wastes. In: Parr JF, Marsh PB, Kla JM (eds) Land treatment of hazardous wastes. Noyes Data Corp., Park Ridge, pp 321–337Google Scholar
  7. Jean JS, Wang Lee MK, Chattopadhyay SM, Maity JP (2008) Effects of inorganic nutrient levels on the biodegradation of benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) by Pseudomonas spp. in a laboratory porous media sand aquifer model. Bioresour Technol 99:7807–7815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson SJ, Woolhouse KJ, Prommer H, Barry DA, Christofi N (2003) Contribution of anaerobic microbial activity to natural attenuation of benzene in groundwater. Eng Geol 70:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim SJ, Choi DH, Sim DS, Oh YS (2005) Evaluation of bioremediation effectiveness on crude oil-contaminated sand. Chemosphere 59:845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kjeldahl J (1883) A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. J Anal Chem 22:366Google Scholar
  11. Leahy JG, Tracy KD, Eley MH (2003) Degradation of mixtures of aromatic and chloroaliphatic hydrocarbons by aromatic hydrocarbon degrading bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1458:1–6Google Scholar
  12. Mattingly GEG (1970) Total phosphorus contents of soils by perchloric acid digestion and sodium carbonate fusion. J Agric Sci 74:79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mukherjee AK, Das K (2005) Correlation between diverse cyclic lipopeptides production and regulation of growth and substrate utilization by Bacillus subtilis strains in a particular habitat. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Obayori OS, Adebusoye SA, Adewale AO, Oyetibo GO, Oluyemi OO, Amokun RA, Iiori MO (2009) Differential degradation of crude oil (Bonny light) by four Pseudomonas strains. J Environ Sci (China) 21:243–248Google Scholar
  15. Okoh AI, Trejo-Hernandez MR (2006) Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon polluted systems: exploiting the bioremediation strategies. African J Biotechnol 5:2520–2525Google Scholar
  16. Petukhov VN, Fomchenkov VM, Chugunov VA, Kholodenko VP (2000) Plant biotests for soil and water contaminated with oil and oil products. Appl Biochem Microbiol 36:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahman KSM, Rahman TJ, Kourkoutas Y, Petsas I, Marchant R, Banat IM (2003) Enhanced bioremediation of n-alkane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with rhamnolipid and micronutrients. Bioresour Technol 90:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vezquez S, Nogales B, Ruberto L, Hernandez E, Christic-Oleza J, Lo balbo A, Bosch R, Lalucat J, Mac Cormack W (2009) Bacterial community dynamics during bioremediation of diesel oil-contaminated Antarctic soil. Microb Ecol 57:598–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang X, Wang Y, Dai X, Wang L, Han S (2002) Response-surface analysis for the inhibition toxicity of benzene derivatives to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 69(2):278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang l, Qiao N, San F, Shao Z (2008) Isolation, gene detection and solvent tolerance of benzene, toluene and xylene degrading bacteria from near shore surface water and Pacific Ocean sediment. Etremophiles 12:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiesel I, Wuebker SM, Rehm HJ (1993) Degradation of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons by an immobilized mixed bacterial culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:110–116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations