Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 1448–1459 | Cite as

The demography of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations occurring in roadside habitats in Southern Manitoba, Canada: implications for novel trait confinement

  • Muthukumar V. BagavathiannanEmail author
  • Robert H. Gulden
  • Graham S. Begg
  • Rene C. Van Acker
Research Article



Feral populations of cultivated crops can act as reservoirs for novel genetically engineered (GE) traits and aid in trait movement at the landscape level. However, little information is available on the potential of cultivated crops to become feral. In this study, we investigated the ferality of alfalfa populations (non-GE version) occurring in roadside habitats. Knowledge on the nature of roadside alfalfa populations would be useful for designing efficient trait confinement protocols and coexistence strategies in alfalfa.


We investigated roadside alfalfa populations from 2006 to 2009 in three rural municipalities (Hanover, MacDonald, and Springfield) in Southern Manitoba, Canada. We studied the demography of these populations including seedbank, seedling recruitment, and fecundity and examined the impact of road verge mowing on key life stages of these populations. We also compared the growth and reproductive attributes of roadside and cultivated alfalfa populations.


Alfalfa is reproductively successful in roadside habitats and capable of establishing self-perpetuating populations. A substantial portion of the alfalfa seeds we extracted from seedbank samples were viable but not germinable, suggesting some degree of seedbank persistence in roadside habitats. In the roadside habitat, alfalfa seedlings recruited successfully, however, seedling mortality was high when seedlings were in close proximity to well-established alfalfa plants. Mowing dramatically reduced the reproductive success of roadside alfalfa. Generally, the growth and reproduction of roadside alfalfa was comparable to cultivated alfalfa except for total fecundity.


Considering the long lifespan (>10 years) of alfalfa and the levels of fecundity, seedbank, and seedling survival we observed, long-term persistence of roadside alfalfa populations seems reasonable. In the context of novel trait confinement, our results suggest that feral alfalfa populations required to be managed if there is a desire/need to confine novel traits in alfalfa.


Coexistence Demography Ferality Gene flow GE alfalfa Trait confinement 



The authors are grateful for funding from the Agri-Food Research and Development Initiative (ARDI) of the governments of Manitoba and Canada, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), the Scottish government (work package 1.7 Sustainable Crop Systems), and a University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship and Manitoba Graduate Scholarship for M. Bagavathiannan.


  1. Abhilasha D, Joshi J (2009) Enhanced fitness due to higher fecundity, increased defence against a specialist and tolerance towards a generalist herbivore in an invasive annual plant. J Plant Ecol 2:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arriola PE, Ellstrand NC (1996) Crop to weed gene flow in the genus Sorghum (Poaceae): spontaneous interspecific hybridization between Johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense, and crop sorghum, S. bicolor. Am J Bot 83:1153–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagavathiannan MV, Van Acker RC (2008) Crop ferality: implications for novel trait confinement. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagavathiannan MV, Van Acker RC (2009) The biology and ecology of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) and its implications for novel trait confinement in North America. Cri Rev Pl Sci 28:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass DA, Crossman ND, Lawrie SL, Lethbridge MR (2006) The importance of population growth, seed dispersal and habitat suitability in determining plant invasiveness. Euphytica 148:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berdahl JD, Wilton AC, Frank AB (1989) Survival and agronomic performance of 25 alfalfa cultivars and strains interseeded into rangeland. J Range Manage 42:312–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton JL, Goplen BP, Baenziger H (1972) World distribution and historical developments. In: Hanson CH (ed) Alfalfa Science and Technology. American Society of Agronomy Inc. Publishers, Madison, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  8. Bossuyt B, Honnay O (2006) Interactions between plant life span, seed dispersal capacity and fecundity determine metapopulation viability in a dynamics landscape. Lands Ecol 21:1195–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspersen JP, Saprunoff M (2005) Seedling recruitment in a northern temperate forest: the relative importance of supply and establishment limitation. Can J For Res 35:978–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) (2005) Decision document DD2005-53: determination of the safety of Monsanto Canada Inc.’s Roundup Ready alfalfa (Medicago sativa, L.) events J101 and J163. Accessed 8 Aug 2009
  11. Chamblee DS, Lovvorn RL (1953) The effects of rate and method of seeding on the yield and botanical composition of alfalfa-orchardgrass and alfalfa-tall fescue. Agron J 45:192–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Claessen D, Gilligan CA, Lutman PJW, van den Bosch F (2005) Which traits promote persistence of feral GM crops? Part 1: implications of environmental stochasticity. OIKOS 110:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawley MJ, Brown SL (1995) Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway. Proc Royal Soc Lond Series B-Biol Sci 259:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham SM, Volenec JJ (1998) Plant survival and root and bud composition of alfalfa populations selected for contrasting fall dormancy. Crop Sci 38:962–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drenovsky RE, Martin CE, Falasco MR, James JJ (2008) Variation in resource acquisition and utilization traits between native and invasive perennial forbs. Am J Bot 95:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubbs AL (1971) Competition between grass and legume species on dryland. Agron J 63:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellstrand NC (2006) Genetic engineering and pollen flow. Agricultural Biotechnology in California Series. Publication 8182:1–4Google Scholar
  19. Evans MEK, Ferriere R, Kane JJ, Venable DL (2007) Bet hedging via seed banking in desert evening primoses (Oenothera, Onagraceae): demographic evidence from natural populations. Am Nat 169:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fick GW, Holt DA, Lugg DG (1988) Environmental physiology and crop growth. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR Jr (eds) Alfalfa and Alfalfa improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 163–194Google Scholar
  21. Bass LN, Gunn CR, Hesterman OB, Roos EE (1988) Seed physiology, seedling performance and seed sprouting. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR Jr (eds) Alfalfa and Alfalfa improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 961–984Google Scholar
  22. Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature 446:1079–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garcia MB, Pico XF, Ehrlen J (2008) Life span correlates with population dynamics in perennial herbaceous plants. Am J Bot 95:258–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garnier A, Lecomte J (2006) Using a spatial and stage-structured invasion model to assess the spread of feral populations of transgenic oilseed rape. Ecol Model 194:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gepts P (2002) A comparison between crop domestication, classical plant breeding, and genetic engineering. Crop Sci 42:1780–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray AJ, Raybould AF (1998) Reducing transgene escape routes. Nature 392:653–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gressel J (2005) Crop ferality and volunteerism. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall RL (1974) Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. I. Concepts and extension of the de Wit analysis to examine effects. Aus J Agric Res 25:739–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Honnay O, Bossuyt B (2005) Prolonged clonal growth: escape route or route to extinction? Oikos 108:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horton JL, Hart SC (1998) Hydraulic lift: a potentially important ecosystem process. Trends Ecol Evol 13:232–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) (1999) Biochemical test for viability. Seed Sci Tech 27:201–244Google Scholar
  32. Jenczewski E, Prosperi JM, Ronfort J (1999) Evidence for gene flow between wild and cultivated Medicago sativa (Leguminosae) based on allozyme markers and quantitative traits. Am J Bot 86:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jennings JA, Nelson CJ (1991) Reseeding old alfalfa stands. In: Proceedings of the 1991 American Forage and Grassland Council Conference, Columbia, MO, USA, pp 162–165Google Scholar
  34. Jennings JA, Nelson CJ (2002) Zone of autotoxic influence around established alfalfa plants. Agron J 94:1104–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalisz S (1991) Experimental determination of seed-bank age structure in the winter annual Collinsia verna. Ecology 72:575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kendrick D, Pester T, Horak M, Rogan G, Nickson T (2005) Biogeographic survey of feral alfalfa populations in the U.S. during 2001 and 2002 as a component of ecological risk assessment of Roundup Ready® Alfalfa. In: Proceedings of North Central Weed Science Society Meeting, UT, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. Kery M, Matthies D, Spillmann HH (2000) Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. J Ecol 88:17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kilcher MR, Heinrichs DH (1965) Persistence of alfalfa in mixture with grasses in a semiarid region. Can J Plant Sci 46:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knispel AL, McLachlan SM, Van Acker RC, Friesen LF (2008) Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Sci 56:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wofinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS, CaryGoogle Scholar
  41. Littell RC, Henry PR, Ammerman CB (1998) Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J Anim Sci 76:1216–1231Google Scholar
  42. Lund RE (1975) Tables for an approximate test for outliers in linear models. Technometrics 17:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall CB, Avila-Sakar G, Reekie EG (2008) Effects of nutrient and CO2 availability on tolerance to herbivory in Brassica rapa. Plant Ecol 196:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manitoba Agriculture Food and Rural Initiatives (MAFRI) (2009) Lygus bugs on seed alfalfa. Accessed 02 Sep 2009
  45. Manitoba Community Profiles (MCP) (2009) Municipal community Profiles. Accessed 6 Oct 2008
  46. Manitoba Management Plus Program (MMPP) (2009) Variety and yield data. Accessed 19 June 2009
  47. McCordick SA, Hillger DE, Leep RH, Kells JJ (2008) Forage quality of glyphosate-resistant alfalfa as influenced by establishment systems. Weed Tech 22:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGraw RI, Stamps WT, Houx JH, Linit MJ (2008) Yield, maturation, and forage quality of alfalfa in a black walnut alley-cropping practice. Agroforest Syst 74:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nightingale J, Baker JD (1995) Improving germination of evening primrose seed. J Her Spi Med Pl 3:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearse CK (1965) Range study tour in the Soviet Union. J Range Manage 18:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pedersen MW, Nye WP (1962) Alfalfa seed production studies. Part II. Additional factors associated with seed yields. Utah Agric Exp Stn Bull 436:9–22Google Scholar
  52. Rice EL (1984) Allelopathy, 2nd edn. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  53. Rincker CM (1983) Germination of forage crop seed after 20 years of sub-freezing storage. Crop Sci 23:229–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ronce O, Olivieri I (1997) Evolution of reproductive effort in a metapopulation with local extinctions and ecological succession. Am Nat 150:220–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rumbaugh MD (1982) Reseeding by eight alfalfa populations in a semiarid pasture. J Range Manage 35:84–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rumbaugh MD, Pedersen MW (1979) Survival of alfalfa in five semiarid range seedings. J Range Manage 32:48–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. SAS Institute (2003) SAS 9.1 for windows. SAS, CaryGoogle Scholar
  58. Saxton A (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. In: Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International, Nashville, TN. pp.1243–1246Google Scholar
  59. Soroka JJ (1991) Insect pests of legume and grass crops in western Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Publication no.1435, pp 39Google Scholar
  60. Strickler K (1999) Impact of flower standing crop and pollinator movement on alfalfa seed yield. Environ Entomol 28:1067–1076Google Scholar
  61. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) (2005) Availability determination of non-regulated status for alfalfa genetically engineered for tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, USA. Accessed 24 Oct 2008
  62. Van Acker RC (2007) The potential for the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in Canada. In: Gulden RH, Swanton CJ (eds) The first decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, vol 4. Canadian Weed Science Society, Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Québec, pp 153–162Google Scholar
  63. van Klinken RD, Lukitsch B, Cook C (2008) Interaction between dormancy-release mechanism, environment and seed bank strategy for a widely distributed perennial legume, Parkinsonia aculeata (Caesalpinaceae). Ann Bot 102:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson RG, Burgener PA (2009) Evaluation of glyphosate-tolerant and conventional alfalfa weed control systems during the first year of establishment. Weed Tech 23:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilton AC, Townsend CE, Lorenz RJ, Rogler GA (1978) Longevity of alfalfa seed. Crop Sci 18:1091–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) Biotechnology and ecoogy—the ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290:2088–2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xavier PF, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Megnes ES, Fabiola LB (2003) Recruitment rates exhibit high elasticity and high temporal variation in populations of a short-lived perennial herb. Oikos 103:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yoshimura Y, Beckie HJ, Matsuo K (2006) Transgenic oilseed rape along transportation routers and port of Vancouver in western Canada. Environ Biosaf Res 5:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert H. Gulden
    • 1
  • Graham S. Begg
    • 2
  • Rene C. Van Acker
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI)DundeeUK
  3. 3.Department of Plant AgricultureUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations