Advertisement

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 497–504 | Cite as

A universal method to assess the potential of phosphorus loss from soil to aquatic ecosystems

  • Rosemarie PöthigEmail author
  • Horst Behrendt
  • Dieter Opitz
  • Gerhard Furrer
AREA 7.1 • RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICALS • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Phosphorus loss from terrestrial to the aquatic ecosystems contributes to eutrophication of surface waters. To maintain the world's vital freshwater ecosystems, the reduction of eutrophication is crucial. This needs the prevention of overfertilization of agricultural soils with phosphorus. However, the methods of risk assessment for the P loss potential from soils lack uniformity and are difficult for routine analysis. Therefore, the efficient detection of areas with a high risk of P loss requires a simple and universal soil test method that is cost effective and applicable in both industrialized and developing countries.

Materials and methods

Soils from areas which varied highly in land use and soil type were investigated regarding the degree of P saturation (DPS) as well as the equilibrium P concentration (EPC0) and water-soluble P (WSP) as indicators for the potential of P loss. The parameters DPS and EPC0 were determined from P sorption isotherms.

Results

Our investigation of more than 400 soil samples revealed coherent relationships between DPS and EPC0 as well as WSP. The complex parameter DPS, characterizing the actual P status of soil, is accessible from a simple standard measurement of WSP based on the equation \( {\text{DPS}}\left( \% \right) = \frac{1}{{1 + 1.25 \times {\text{WS}}{{\text{P}}^{ - 0.75}}}} \times 100 \).

Discussion

The parameter WSP in this equation is a function of remaining phosphorous sorption capacity/total accumulated phosphorous (SP/TP). This quotient is independent of soil type due to the mutual compensation of the factors SP and TP. Thus, the relationship between DPS and WSP is also independent of soil type.

Conclusions

The degree of P saturation, which reflects the actual state of P fertilization of soil, can be calculated from the easily accessible parameter WSP. Due to the independence from soil type and land use, the relation is valid for all soils. Values of WSP, which exceed 5 mg P/kg soil, signalize a P saturation between 70% and 80% and thus a high risk of P loss from soil.

Recommendations and perspectives

These results reveal a new approach of risk assessment for P loss from soils to surface and ground waters. The consequent application of this method may globally help to save the vital resources of our terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Keywords

Equilibrium P concentration Eutrophication P loss Risk assessment Soil P saturation Water-soluble P 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is based on several research projects that were supported by the Senate department of urban development of Berlin and the German Research Association (DFG). We gratefully thank Marlies Leu, Hanna Winkler, Barbara Finck, and Rüdiger Biskupek for their assistance in laboratory and field and Helena Lademann (deceased) and René Schwartz for their qualified contribution to soil type characterization. We thank Ed Tipping, William H. Casey, Christian Ludwig, Oscar F. Schoumans, and C. Annette Johnson for critical comments.

References

  1. Allen BL, Mallarino AP, Klatt JG, Baker JL, Camara M (2006) Soil and surface runoff phosphorus relationships for five typical USA midwest soils. J Environ Qual 35:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauchemin S, Simard RR (2000) Phosphorus status of intensively cropped soils of the St. Lawrence Lowlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:659–670Google Scholar
  3. Beck MA, Zelazny LW, Daniels WL, Mullins GL (2004) Using the Mehlich-1 Extract to estimate soil phosphorus saturation for environmental risk assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1762–1771Google Scholar
  4. Behrendt H, Boekhold A (1993) Phosphorus saturation in soils and groundwaters. Land Degrad Rehabil 4:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behrendt H, Lademann H, Pagenkopf WG, Pöthig R (1996) Vulnerable areas of phosphorus leaching—detection by GIS-analysis and measurements of phosphorus sorption capacity. Water Sci Technol 33:175–181Google Scholar
  6. Berry JK, Delgado JA, Khosla R, Pierce FJ (2003) Precision conservation for environmental sustainability. J Soil Water Conserv 58:332–339Google Scholar
  7. Bolinder MA, Simard RR, Beauchemin S, MacDonald KB (2000) Indicator of risk of water contamination by P for soil landscape of Canada polygons. Can J Soil Sci 80:153–163Google Scholar
  8. Börling K, Otabbong E, Barberis E (2004) Soil variables for predicting potential phosphorus release in Swedish noncalcareous soils. J environ Qual 33:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bridgham SD, Johnston CA, Schubauer-Berigan JP, Weishampel P (2001) Phosphorus sorption dynamics in soils and coupling with surface and pore water in riverine wetlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR (2005) Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:1002–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casson JP, Bennett DR, Nolan SC, Olson BM, Ontkean BR (2006) Degree of phosphorus saturation thresholds in manure-amended soils of Alberta. J Environ Qual 35:2212–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis RL, Zhang H, Schroder JL, Wang JJ, Payton ME, Zazulak A (2005) Soil characteristics and phosphorus level effect on phosphorus loss in runoff. J Environ Qual 34:1640–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filippelli GM (2008) The global phosphorus cycle: past, present, and future. Elements 4:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes S, Reynolds B, Bell SA, Gardner C (2000) Simple phosphorus saturation index to estimate risk of dissolved P in runoff from arable soils. Soil Use Manage 16:206–210Google Scholar
  15. Khiari L, Parent LE, Pellerini A, Alimi ARA, Tremblay C, Simard RR, Fortin J (2000) An agri-environmental phosphorus saturation index for acid coarse-textured soils. J Environ Qual 29:1561–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Little JL, Nolan SC, Casson JP, Olson BM (2007) Relationships between soil and runoff phosphorus in small Alberta watersheds. J Environ Qual 36:1289–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maguire RO, Sims JT (2002) Measuring agronomic and environmental soil phosphorus saturation and predicting phosphorus leaching with Mehlich 3. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:2033–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mehlich A (1953) Determination of P, Ca, K, Na, and NH4. North Carolina Department of Agric, RaleighGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehlich A (1978) A new extractant for soil test evaluation of phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, calcium, sodium, manganese and zinc. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 9:477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy J, Rilay JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nair VD, Portier KM, Graetz DA, Walker ML (2004) An environmental threshold for degree of phosphorus saturation in sandy soils. J Environ Qual 33:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nash D, Hannah M, Barlow K, Robertson F, Mathers N, Butler C, Horton J (2007) A comparison of some surface soil phosphorus tests that could be used to assess P export potential. Australian J Soil Res 45:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olsen R, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Circular No 939Google Scholar
  26. Pautler MC, Sims JT (2000) Relationship between soil test phosphorus, soluble phosphorus and phosphorus saturation in Delaware soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:765–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penn CJ, Mullins GL, Zelazny LW, Sharpley AN (2006) Estimating dissolved phosphorus concentrations in runoff from three physiographic regions of Virginia. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1967–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pöthig R, Behrendt H, Lademann H (2000) Accumulation, sorption ability and mobility of phosphorus in recultivated mining waste soils of the brown coal mining in the Lower Lusatian Region. Arch Nat Lands 39:41–57Google Scholar
  29. Reddy KR, O'Connor GA, Gale PM (1998) Phosphorus sorption capacities of wetland soils and stream sediments impacted by dairy effluent. J Environ Qual 27:438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharpley AN, Daniel TC, Edwards DR (1993) Phosphorus movement in the landscape. J Prod Agric 6:492–500Google Scholar
  31. Simard RR, Cluis D, Gangbazo G, Beauchemin S (1995) Phosphorus status of forest and agricultural soils from a watershed of high animal density. J Environ Qual 24:1010–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sims JT, Edwards AC, Schoumans OF, Simard RR (2000) Integrating soil phosphorus testing into environmentally based agricultural management practices. J Environ Qual 29:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith RA, Alexander RB, Schwarz GE (2003) Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States. Environ Sci Technol 37:3039–3047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D'Antonio C, Dobson A, Howart R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Troitino F, Gil-Sotres F, Leiros MC, Trasar-Cepeda C, Seoane S (2008) Effect of land use on some soil properties related to the risk of loss of soil phosphorus. Land Degradation Development 19:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ulen B (2006) A simplified risk assessment for losses of dissolved reactive phosphorus through drainage pipes from agricultural soils. Acta Agric Scand (B) 56:307–314Google Scholar
  38. Van der Molen DT, Breeuwsma A, Boers PCM (1998) Agricultural nutrient losses to surface water in the Netherlands: impact, strategies and perspectives. J Environ Qual 27:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhou M, Li Y (2001) Phosphorus sorption characteristics of calcareous soils and limestone from the southern everglades and adjacent farmlands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:1404–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosemarie Pöthig
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Horst Behrendt
    • 1
  • Dieter Opitz
    • 1
  • Gerhard Furrer
    • 3
  1. 1.Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland FisheriesBerlinGermany
  2. 2.ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental SciencesZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.ETH Zürich, Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant DynamicsZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations