Targeting aquatic microcontaminants for monitoring: exposure categorization and application to the Swiss situation
- 592 Downloads
Background, aim, and scope
Aquatic microcontaminants (MCs) comprise diverse chemical classes, such as pesticides, biocides, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and industrial chemicals. For water pollution control and the evaluation of water protection measures, it is crucial to screen for MCs. However, the selection and prioritization of which MCs to screen for is rather difficult and complex. Existing methods usually are strongly limited because of a lack of screening regulations or unavailability of required data.
Method and models
Here, we present a simple exposure-based methodology that provides a systematic overview of a broad range of MCs according to their potential to occur in the water phase of surface waters. The method requires input of publicly available data only. Missing data are estimated with quantitative structure–property relationships. The presented substance categorization methodology is based on the chemicals’ distribution behavior between different environmental media, degradation data, and input dynamics.
Seven different exposure categories are distinguished based on different compound properties and input dynamics. Ranking the defined exposure categories based on a chemical’s potential to occur in the water phase of surface waters, exposure categories I and II contain chemicals with a very high potential, categories III and IV contain chemicals with a high potential, and categories V and VI contain chemicals with a moderate to low potential. Chemicals in category VII are not evaluated because of a lack of data. We illustrate and evaluate the methodology on the example of MCs in Swiss surface waters. Furthermore, a categorized list containing potentially water-relevant chemicals is provided.
Chemicals of categories I and III continuously enter surface waters and are thus likely to show relatively steady concentrations. Therefore, they are best suited for water monitoring programs requiring a relatively low sampling effort. Chemicals in categories II and IV have complex input dynamics. They are consequently more difficult to monitor. However, they should be considered if an overall picture is needed that includes contaminants from diffuse sources.
The presented methodology supports compound selection for (a) water quality guidance, (b) monitoring programs, and (c) further research on the chemical’s ecotoxicology. The results from the developed categorization procedure are supported by data on consumption and observed concentrations in Swiss surface waters. The presented methodology is a tool to preselect potential hazardous substances based on exposure-based criteria for policy guidance and monitoring programs and a first important step for a detailed risk assessment for potential microcontaminants.
KeywordsBiocides Micropollutants Chemical risk assessment Emerging pollutants Pesticides Pharmaceuticals Priority substances Prioritization Surface water
We acknowledge the FOEN for funding of the project and providing the Swiss micropollutants monitoring database and Damian Helbling of Eawag for reviewing and commenting on this paper.
- AWEL (2008) Monitoring of micropollutants. Reports. http://www.gewaesserqualitaet.zh.ch
- Blüm W, McArdell CS et al (2005) Organische Spurenstoffe im Grundwasser des Limmattales: Ergebnisse der Untersuchungskampagne 2004. Baudirektion Kanton Zürich, AWEL, ZürichGoogle Scholar
- Brauch H, Fleig M et al (2006) Vorkommen und Bewertung von Arzneimittelrückständen in Rhein und Main. TZW-Schriftenreihe Band 29Google Scholar
- Carlsson C, Johansson AK et al (2006) Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part I: environmental risk assessments of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients. Sci Total Environ 364(1–3):67–87Google Scholar
- CIPEL (2008 ) Der Genfersee und sein Einzugsgebiet in einigen Daten. http://www.cipel.org/sp/article75.html
- Daughton CG (2004) PPCPs in the environment: future research beginning with the end always in mind. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 463–495Google Scholar
- Edder P, Ortelli D et al (2007) Metals and organic micropollutants in geneva lake waters. Rapp. Comm. int. prot. eaux Léman contre pollut., Campagne 2006, 59–81Google Scholar
- European-Commission (2006) Commission proposal COM (2006) 397 final: proposed priority substances directive. L397.Google Scholar
- European-Parliament (2004) Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European parliament and of the council on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EECGoogle Scholar
- FOEN (2008a) Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN): Project Micropoll. Database with Swiss monitoring data, FOEN, ZurichGoogle Scholar
- FOEN (2008) Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN): Hydrological foundations and data, http://www.hydrodaten.admin.ch
- IKSR (2006) Rheinüberwachungsstation Weil am Rhein, Jahresbericht. Im Auftrag vom Umweltministerium Baden-Württemberg und dem Schweizerischen Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU)Google Scholar
- IMS (2005) IMS Health GmbH. Hergiswil, Switzerland; http://www.ihaims.ch, last visit to website: 14.08.2006, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Mackay D (2001) Multimedia environmental models, the fugacity approach. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM et al (2003) Environmental organic chemistry. Wiley Interscience, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- SGCI (2006) Pflanzenschutzmittelstatistik Schweiz. SCGI Chemie Pharma Schweiz, ZurichGoogle Scholar
- Stamm C, Siber R et al (2006) Monitoring von Pestizidbelastungen in Schweizer Oberflächengewässern. gwa 8/2006Google Scholar
- Stoob K, Singer H et al (2005) Fully automated online solid phase extraction coupled directly to liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry—quantification of sulfonamide antibiotics, neutral and acidic pesticides at low concentrations in surface waters. J Chromatogr A 1097(1–2):138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- U.S.EPA (2007) Estimation program interface; EPI Suite v3.20Google Scholar
- Wilkinson H, Sturdy L et al (2007) Prioritising chemicals for standard derivation under Annex VIII of the Water Framework Directive. Science report—SC040038/SRGoogle Scholar