Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 400–409 | Cite as

Straining phenomena in bacteria transport through natural porous media

AREA 5.3 • BIOREMEDIATION • RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope

Transport of bacteria through natural porous media is an issue of increasing concern arising in several very important environmental processes. These include the percolation of bacteria from fecal waste to drinking water reservoirs, thus leading to a risk for human health, or the bioremediation of contaminated soils in which the bacteria are expected to travel long distances underground in order to reach contaminated areas and degrade chemicals originating from accidental spills. An understanding of bacterial retention and transport mechanisms in porous media would be of great help in the development of models able to predict the distance covered by bacterial suspensions in these situations.

Materials and methods

Experiments were carried out preparing columns filled of soil and sand, introducing bacteria culture (Escherichia coli, Pseudomona putida, and Listeria innocua) solutions by the top of the column. Breakthrough curves were obtained to see the transport of the bacteria in the column.

Results

The transport of different bacteria in the two soils aimed at establishing the relative importance of straining in different conditions. This has enabled us to obtain certain parameters, such as the sticking coefficients derived from the filtration theory or bacterial recoveries after multi-step elution, which aid our understanding of how bacteria are retained by mechanisms different to those usually included in the physico-chemical filtration theory.

Discussion

Several indicators may be used to determine the degree of relevance of straining as a mechanism acting during bacterial transport through porous media. Usually, in natural media, neither straining nor physico-chemical filtration is the sole mechanism contributing to bacterial retention. The retention of bacteria by straining mechanisms can be assessed by means of elution profiles under varying conditions. The inversion of flow in our experiments gave rise to secondary elution peaks, probably originating from bacteria retained in narrow pores

Conclusions

According to experimental observations, straining was shown to contribute highly to bacterial retention in all the soils tested, in particular in the soils with a broader grain size distribution and more irregular shape. In both media, an increase in ionic strength did not lead to significant differences in bacterial retention, possibly due to the lack of relevance of ionic repulsion as a barrier to physico-chemical attachment of particles

Recommendation and perspectives

The study of bacteria transport in natural soil is an important step in the development of decontamination processes. The importance of the straining in the transport process has been revealed in the work carried out in this paper.

Keywords

Bacterial straining Escherichia coli Filtration Listeria innocua Pseudomona putida Soil column 

References

  1. Black CA (1965) Methods of soil analysis, Part I, Agronomy, No. 9. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolster CH, Mills AL, Hornberger GM, Herman JS (2001) Effect of surface coatings, grain size, and ionic strength on the maximum attainable coverage of bacteria on sand surfaces. J Contam Hydrol 50(3–4):287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford SA, Simunek J, Bettahar M, van Genuchten MTh, Yates SR (2003) Modeling colloid attachment, straining, and exclusion in saturated porous media. Environ Sci Technol 37(10):2242–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fontes DE, Mills AL, Hornberger GM, Herman JS (1991) Physical and chemical factors influencing transport of microorganisms through porous media. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2473–2481Google Scholar
  5. Foppen JWA (2002) Impact of high strength wastewater infiltration on groundwater quality and drinking water supply: the case of Sana'a. Yemen J Hydrol 263:198–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guimaraes VF, Cruz IV, Hagler AN, Mendonca-Hagler LC, van Elsas JD (1997) Transport of a genetically modified Pseudomonas Fluorescens and its parent strain through undisturbed tropical soil cores. Appl Soil Ecol 7:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herzig JP, Leclerc DM, LeGoff P (1970) Flow of suspensions through porous media: application to deep filtration. Ind Eng Chem 62:8–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson WP, Logan BE (1996) Enhance transport of bacteria in porous media by sediment-phase and aqueous-phase natural organic matter. Water Res 30:923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li Q, Logan BE (1999) Enhancing bacterial transport for bioaugmentation of aquifers using low ionic strength solutions and surfactants. Water Resour Res 33(4):1090–1100Google Scholar
  10. McCarthy JF, McKay LD, Bruner DD (2002) Influence of ionic strength and cation charge on transport of colloidal particles in fracturated shale saprolite. Environ Sci Technol 36(17):3735–3743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Powelson DK, Mills A (2001) Transport of Escherichia coli in sand columns with constant and changing water contents. J Environ Qual 30:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Radojevic M, Bashkin VN (1999) Practical environmental analysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajagopalan R, Tien C (1976) Trajectory analysis of deep-bed filtration with the sphere-in-a-cell porous media model. AIChE J 22(3):523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rijnaarts HH, Norde W, Bouwer EJ, Lyklema J, Zehnder AJ (1996) Bacterial deposition in porous media: effects of cell coating, substratum hydrophobicity, and electrolyte concentration. Environ Sci Technol 30(10):2877–2883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers B, Logan BE (2000) Bacterial transport in NAPL-contaminated porous media. J Environ Eng 126(7):657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ryan JN, Elimelech M (1996) Colloid mobilization and transport in groundwater. Colloids Surf A 107:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sakthivadivel R (1969) Clogging of a granular porous medium by sediment. Rep. HEL15-7, Hydraul. Eng. Lab., . University of Califorinia, Berkeley, p 106Google Scholar
  18. Scholl MA, Harvey RW (1992) Laboratory investigations on the role of sediment surface and groundwater chemistry in transport of bacteria through a contaminated sandy aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 26:1410–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scholl MA, Mills AL, Herman JS, Hornberger GM (1990) The influence of mineralogy and solution chemistry on the attachment of bacteria to representative aquifer materials. J Contam Hydrol 6:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharma PK, McInerney MJ (1994) Effect of grain size on bacterial penetration, reproduction and metabolic activity in porous glass bead chambers. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1481–1486Google Scholar
  21. Shellenberger K, Logan BE (2002) Effect of molecular scale roughness of glass beads on colloidal and bacterial deposition. Environ Sci Technol 36:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tufenjki N, Elimelech M (2004) Deviation from the classical colloid filtration theory in the presence of repulsive DLVO interactions. Langmuir 20:10818–10828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tufenkji N, Millar GF, Ryan JN, Harvey RW, Elimelech M (2004) Transport of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in porous media: role of straining and physicochemical filtration. Environ Sci Technol 38:5932–5938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker SL, Redman JA, Elimelech M (2004) Role of cell surface lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion and transport. Langmuir 20:7736–7746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yao KM, Habibian MT, Melia CR O (1971) Water and wastewater filtration: concepts and applications. Environ Sci Technol 5:1105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations