Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 329–338

Chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage in human populations exposed to the processing of electronics waste

  • Qiang Liu
  • Jia Cao
  • Ke Qiu Li
  • Xu Hong Miao
  • Guang Li
  • Fei Yue Fan
  • Yong Cheng Zhao


Background, aim, and scope

It has been known that the pollutants of electronic wastes (E-wastes) can lead to severe pollution to the environment. It has been reported that about 50% to 80% of E-wastes from developed countries are exported to Asia and Africa. It has become a major global environmental problem to deal with ‘E-wastes’. E-waste recycling has remained primitive in Jinghai, China. This not only produces enormous environmental pollution but also can bring about toxic or genotoxic effects on the human body, threatening the health of both current residents and future generations living in the local environment. The concentration of lead in the blood of children in the E-waste polluted area in China is higher than that of the control area. But little is known about the cytogenetic effect to human beings caused by the pollution of E-wastes. In the present study, experiments have been performed to investigate the genetics of permanent residents of three villages with numerous E-waste disposal sites and to analyze the harmful effects of exposure to E-wastes.

Materials and methods

In total, 171 villagers (exposed group) were randomly selected from permanent residents of three villages located in Jinghai County of Tianjin, China, where there has been massive disposal of E-wastes. Thirty villagers were selected from the neighboring towns without E-waste disposal sites to serve as controls. Chromosomal aberrations and cytokinesis blocking micronucleus were performed to detect the cytogenetic effect, dic + r (dicentric and ring chromosome), monomer, fragments (acentric fragments, minute chromosomes, and acentric rings), translocation, satellite, quadriradial, total aberrations, and micronuclear rate were scored for each subject. DNA damage was detected using comet assay; the DNA percentage in the comet tail (TDNA%), tail moment (TM), and Olive tail moment (OTM) were recorded to describe DNA damage to lymphocytes.


The total chromosome aberration rates (5.50%) and micronuclear rates (16.99%) of the exposure group were significantly higher than in the control group (P = 0.000). The percentage of DNA in the comet tail, tail moment, and Olive tail moment detected by comet assay showed that there was a significant difference in DNA damage in the exposure group (P = 0.000). The chromosome aberration, micronucleus rate, and DNA damage observed in women were significantly higher than those in men. Chromosome aberration and micronuclear rates of both smokers and non-smokers in the exposure group are obviously higher than that in the control group (P = 0.000).


The use of outdated (and unsafe) ways to deal with E-wastes can lead to exposure to a variety of substances harmful to human health. The components of pollution may enter the human body through the air, drinking water, and food chain to damage human genetic material, resulting in genomic instability. The rates of chromosomal aberration, micronucleus formation, and the degree of DNA damage in women in the group exposed to electronic waste were significantly higher than in men. The reason for this may be concerned with the traditional lifestyle of the local residents or the difference of sensitivity to the exposure to E-wastes or any others. Further investigations are needed to provide evidence to demonstrate this.


Here, we report the obviously cytogenetic toxicity to the exposure population by the E-waste pollution for the first time. E-waste pollution may be a potential agent of genetic mutation, and may induce cytogenetic damage within the general population exposed to the pollution. These findings need to be considered, and steps should be taken to protect the current population and future generations from the effects of pollution with E-wastes.

Recommendations and perspectives

The above results remind us that the impact of E-waste recycling on environmental quality of Jinghai should be evaluated soon. Moreover, it is urgent for the government to prohibit E-waste import and its processing by outdated ways. The future studies such as pollutant details of drinking water, air, and soil in the area as well as epidemiological investigations on the harmful effect to children must be performed eagerly. All the data available do provide a compelling case for immediate action in both countries to address workplace health and safety and waste management.


Chromosome aberration Comet assay Cytogenetics DNA damage Electronic waste Environment pollution Micronucleus analysis Single cell gel electrophoresis 


  1. BAN (The Basel Action Network) (2002) Exporting harm: the high-tech trashing of Asia. Available: http://www.ban.org/E-waste/technotrashfinalcomp.pdf (accessed 23 December 2007)
  2. Banath JP, Fushiki M, Olive PL (1998) Rejoining of DNA single and double-strand breaks in human white blood cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 73:649–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betti C, Davini T, Giannessi L, Loprieno N, Barale R (1994) Microgel electrophoresis assay (comet test) and SCE analysis in human lymphocytes from 100 normal subjects. Mutat Res 307:323–333Google Scholar
  4. Betti C, Davini T, Giannessi L, Loprieno N, Barale R (1995) Comparative studies by comet test and SCE analysis in human lymphocytes from 200 healthy subjects. Mutat Res 343:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brigden K, Labunska I, Santillo D, Allsopp M (2005) Recycling of electronic wastes in China & India: workplace & environmental contamination. Available: http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/china/en/press/reports/recycling-of-electronic-wastes.pdf (accessed 22 December 2007)
  6. Chatterjee R (2007) E-waste recycling spews dioxins into the air. Environ Sci Technol 41:5577Google Scholar
  7. Colleu-Durel S, Guitton N, Nourgalieva K, Legue F, Lévêque J, Danic B, Chenal C (2004) Alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay): a simple technique to show genomic instability in sporadic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Countryman PI, Heddle JA (1976) The production of micronuclei from chromosome aberrations in irradiated cultures of human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 41:321–331Google Scholar
  9. Dahl R (2002) Who pays for e-junk? Environ Health Perspect 110:A196–A199Google Scholar
  10. DeMarini DM (2004) Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review. Mutat Res 567:447–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenech M (1998) Important variables that influence base-line micronucleus frequency in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes—a biomarker for DNA damage in human populations. Mutat Res 404:155–165Google Scholar
  12. Fenech M (2000) The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 455:81–95Google Scholar
  13. Fenech M (2002a) Biomarkers of genetic damage for cancer epidemiology. Toxicology 181–182:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fenech M (2002b) Chromosomal biomarkers of genomic instability relevant to cancer. Drug Discov Today 7:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fenech M, Chang WP, Kirsch-Volders M, Holland N, Bonassi S, Zeiger E (2003) HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. Mutat Res 534:65–75Google Scholar
  16. Guttenbach M, Schmid M (1994) Exclusion of specific human chromosomes into micronuclei by 5-azacytidine treatment of lymphocyte cultures. Exp Cell Res 211:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halluite J, Linton JD, Yeomans JS, Yoogalingam R (2005) The challenge of hazardous waste management in a sustainable environment: insights from electronic recovery laws. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 12:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huo X, Peng L, Xu X, Zheng L, Qiu B, Qi Z, Zhang B, Han D, Piao Z (2007) Elevated blood lead levels of children in Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling town in China. Environ Health Perspect 115:1113–1117Google Scholar
  19. IAEA (2001) Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment, A Manual. Technical reports series No 405, NC: International Atomic Energy AgencyGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang YC, Townsend TG (2003) Leaching of lead from computer printed wire boards and cathode ray tubes by municipal solid waste landfill leachates. Environ Sci Technol 37:4778–4784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konca K, Lankoff A, Banasik A, Lisowska H, Kuszewski T, Góźdź S, Koza Z, Wojcik A (2003) A cross-platform public domain PC image-analysis program for the comet assay. Mutat Res 534:15–20Google Scholar
  22. Leung AO, Luksemburg WJ, Wong AS, Wong MH (2007) Spatial distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in soil and combusted residue at Guiyu, an electronic waste recycling site in southeast China. Environ Sci Technol 41:2730–2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maluf SW (2004) Monitoring DNA damage following radiation exposure using cytokinesis-block micronucleus method and alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis. Clinica Chimica Acta 347:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Media China (2007) National E-Waste Disposal Center Planned In Tianjin. Available: http://en.mediach.com/HTML/20072/Detail30161307_1.html (accessed 23 December 2007)
  25. Moller P (2006) The alkaline comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 98:336–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen HM, Tu BM, Watanabe M, Kunisue T, Monirith I, Tanabe S, Sakai S, Subramanian A, Sasikumar K, Pham HV, Bui CT, Tana TS, Prudente MS (2003) Open dumping site in Asian developing countries: a potential source of polychlorinated dibenz-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environ Sci Technol 37:1493–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramesh Babu B, Parande AK, Ahmed Basha C (2007) Electrical and electronic waste: a global environmental problem. Waste Manage Res 25:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramsey MJ, Moore DH 2nd, Briner JF, Lee DA, Olsen L, Senft JR, Tucker JD (1995) The effects of age and lifestyle factors on the accumulation of cytogenetic damage as measured by chromosome painting. Mutat Res 338:95–106Google Scholar
  29. Rojas E, Lopez MC, Valverde M (1999) Single cell gel electrophoresis assay: methodology and applications. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 722:225–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Savage JRK (1993) Update on target theory as applied to chromosomal aberrations. Env Mol Mutagen 22:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt CW (2002) e-Junk explosion. Environ Health Perspect 110:A188–A194Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt CW (2006) Unfair trade: e-waste in Africa. Environ Health Perspect 114:A232–A235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh R, Kaur B, Kalina I, Popov TA, Georgieva T, Garte S, Binkova B, Sram RJ, Taioli E, Farmer PB (2007) Effects of environmental air pollution on endogenous oxidative DNA damage in humans. Mutat Res 620:71–82Google Scholar
  34. SVTC (Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition) (2001) Poison PCs and Toxic TVs. http://svtc.igc.org/cleancc/pubs/ppcttv2004.pdf (accessed 23 December 2007)
  35. Tawn EJ, Whitehouse CA (2001) Frequencies of chromosome aberrations in a control population determined by G banding. Mutat Res 490:171–177Google Scholar
  36. Thiebault C, Carriere M, Milgram S, Simon A, Avoscan L, Gouget B (2007) Uranium induces apoptosis and is genotoxic to normal rat kidney (NRK-52E) proximal cells. Toxicol Sci 98:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, Miyamae Y, Rojas E, Ryu JC, Sasaki YF (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang JP, Guo XK (2006) Impact of electronic wastes recycling on environmental quality. Biomed Environ Sci 19:137–142Google Scholar
  39. Wong CS, Wu SC, Duzgoren-Aydin NS, Aydin A, Wong MH (2007a) Trace metal contamination of sediments in an e-waste processing village in China. Environ Pollut 145:434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wong MH, Wu SC, Deng WJ, Yu XZ, Luo Q, Leung AO, Wong CS, Luksemburg WJ, Wong AS (2007b) Export of toxic chemicals—a review of the case of uncontrolled electronic-waste recycling. Environ Pollut 149:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu XZ, Gao Y, Wu SC, Zhang HB, Cheung KC, Wong MH (2006) Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils at Guiyu area of China, affected by recycling of electronic waste using primitive technologies. Chemosphere 65:1500–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiang Liu
    • 1
  • Jia Cao
    • 1
  • Ke Qiu Li
    • 2
  • Xu Hong Miao
    • 2
  • Guang Li
    • 2
  • Fei Yue Fan
    • 1
  • Yong Cheng Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeTianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear MedicineTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of BiologyTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations